Dear ALL,
After discussion with the so-far only presenter, we decided to cancel
the LWIG online session that was planned on this Friday. We will
bring the discussion to the mailing list.
We encourage everybody to continue working on any existing or new
drafts, regardless of the online session ar
Hi Everyone,
Please drop us a note if you need to present at the upcoming lwig
meeting, which will take place at:
Friday, November 20, 2020 UTC+7
14:30-15:30 Friday Session II
All the best,
Mohit & Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.
Zhen Cao has requested publication of
draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-09 as Informational on behalf of
the LWIG working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-net
Dear Authors of draft-ietrf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks,
Can each of the author/co-author confirm if any and all appropriate
IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of
BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed for the most update version.
This is needed as part of
Hi Folks,
The agenda of LWIG @ IETF 106 has been published.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-lwig/
Let us know if you have any questions.
Cheers,
Mohit & Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Hello Heinrich,
Thanks for your review and comments. See my comments&questions to
confirm inline.
> I don't know why IETF would publish this document when they have rfc 6973.
This draft has much content not stated in RFC6973 (which is a general
recommendation) , e.g., overhead analysis /delay/ha
Dear Presenters,
Thank you very much for giving talks at the upcoming LWIG session on Friday.
Could you help send us slides of your talk if you have not done yet,
by Thursday evening. I plan to upload the consolidated slides then.
Cheers,
Mohit &Zhen
Ref to LWIG Agenda:
--
2. Car
Hi Everyone,
Thank you for attending and discussion.
Thank you Rahul Jadhav for taking the minutes which has been uploaded here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-lwig-00
Feel free to report any issues within one week. Thanks.
BR,
Co-chairs
__
Hi Everyone, please check the initial version of the agenda:
0. Carlos: TCP Usage Guidance in the Internet of Things (IoT) (15min)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks
1. Rahul: Neighbor Management Policy for 6LoWPAN (10 min)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft
Hi Carsten,
Thanks for the draft. This is quite related to LWIG, and could you
present this draft at IETF 101 lwig session? Would a 10-15 min slot
suffice?
Thanks and regards,
Zhen
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I finally wrote up the last paragraph of Section 2.5.2
Hi Tim,
Thank you again for reviewing this document, and a very happy new year
of 2018 :)
Could you help review the update according to Mohit's update and see
if you have further concerns? so that as shepherd I can see if I can
move it further.
Many thanks and regards,
Zhen
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017
Hi Christian,
Thank you again for reviewing this document, and a very happy new year
of 2018 :)
Could you help review the update according to authors' update and see
if you have further concerns? so that as shepherd I can see if I can
move it further.
BR,
Zhen
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 12:27 AM,
Hi Everyone,
Minutes of lwig session at IETF100 uploaded here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-lwig/
Let me know if you have any concern.
Thank Jaime a lot for taking the minutes, and crafting this ASCII art
of LWIG :)
Many thanks,
Mohit & Zhen
__
Hi Folks,
To repeat, the lwig session will start from 11am this morning.
I came across some last night and realize that no all are aware of the
agenda update online.
See you soon.
Thanks,
Zhen
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please be aware that the Lwi
Hi All,
Please be aware that the Lwig session on Wednesday will start from
11am till noon, and the printed agenda does not indicate that.
The online agenda always has the ground truth.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/agenda.html (You may have
already received the email from the IETF Agen
Thank you Olaf, a lot!
Could you prepare a short talk on the coming IETF meeting for existing
changes and future needs. I will also try to seek coap implementers to
help review.
Cheers,
Zhen
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Olaf Bergmann wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we have just submitted a new versi
Dear All,
Lwig is supposed to meet at IETF100 for one hour.
Could you please let us know if you need to present any thing on this meeting?
Please include the following information: Title/Presenter/time/
goal. Report from relevant opensource or hackathon events will be
welcome.
Cheers,
Mohit&Z
en him away from IETF
> activities and he is no longer able to continue as lwig chair. I would like
> to thank him for his substantial contributions to lwig WG right from its
> formation, and to wish him the very best in his future endeavors.
>
> After consultation with Zhen Cao, I h
Thank you so much, Charlies, for the review, and the valuable comments
for us to improve the draft.
We will come up with wording proposals shortly.
Many thanks,
Zhen
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Charles Perkins
wrote:
> Reviewer: Charles Perkins
> Review result: On the Right Track
>
> [Ple
Hi Bernie, Thank you so much for the review, and the valuable comments
for us to improve the draft.
We will come up with wording proposals shortly.
Many thanks,
Zhen
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Bernie Volz wrote:
> Reviewer: Bernie Volz
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am an assigned
retariat wrote:
>>
>> The LWIG WG has placed draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy in state
>> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Zhen Cao)
>>
>> The document is available at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy/
>>
>>
t;
> On 08/11/2017 10:34 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>>
>> The LWIG WG has placed draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks in
>> state
>> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Zhen Cao)
>>
>> The document is available at
>> https://datatracker.ietf
Hi Authors of draft-lwig-coap,
Thank you for the draft. I have a question related to CoAP-over-DTLS.
Section 5.4 of the draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-coap-04#section-5.4) has
some discussion over the problem, it however does not help with the
case below.
Say, the client and
>>>>
>>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 6, 2017, at 12:18, Mohit Sethi
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> The authors of the document be
document
and send your comments to the mailing list. Thank you in advance.
The WGLC will end in ONE week till August 7th, 2017.
Thank the authors for their hard work again.
Best regards,
Zhen
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This email starts the
Hello Everyone,
Thank you very much for participating the lwig session at IETF99,
on-site or remotely. We have had a heated discussion over four topics
on the agenda efficiently.
Please check the minutes posted at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-lwig/00/
Let me know if there is any
Hi All,
Please take a look at the slides for tomorrow's presentation, linked below.
Thank all the presenters for their hard work.
1 - Minimal ESP
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-lwig-1-minimal-esp-00.pdf
2 - TCP Over Constrained Net
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slide
Dear Rahul and co-authors,
Many thanks for the hard work in contributing this draft to the lwig
wg. (I am copying roll and 6lo since some discussion will be quite
relevant)
As I go through the document, I found essentially there are three
types of different policies discussed:
a. Trivial neighbor
Dear All,
To make the f2f meeting more efficient, could you kindly help review
the drafts that will be discussed:
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks-03.txt
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jadhav-lwig-nbr-mgmt-policy-00.txt
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-
Hi Everyone,
Please check the agenda for the coming LWIG session next week.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/lwig/
In the meantime, I will issue several adoption call for the relevant drafts.
Please bring your questions/comments to the authors/presenters for the
f2f meeting.
BR,
Z
Dear All,
Lwig is supposed to meet at 18:10-19:10 Thursday Afternoon session
III of the Prague meeting.
Could you please let me know if you need to present any thing on this meeting?
Please include the following information: Title/Presenter/F2F meeting
goal. Report from relevant opensource or
Hi Everyone,
Meeting minutes have been posted here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-98-lwig/
Please let me know if there is anything not appropriate.
Thank you, @Mohit, for taking them.
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
h
Dear All,
Monday 17:10-18:10
Zurich D
1. Agenda bashing 5 min
2. TCP over Constrained NodesCarles Gomez Montenegro
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gomez-lwig-tcp-constrained-node-networks
15 min
Goal: discussion and call for adoption.
3. Neighbor Management Policy and Implementation Cons
;
> > The draft provides useful information to implementors about different
> > challenges related to security aspects especially towards using low-end
> > hardware. The deployment model described with the experiences will prove
> > helpful to implementors. Will be helpful to t
Hi All,
Please drop us a message if you would like a slot in the Lwig session of
the coming IETF98 meeting.
The LWIG session details as below:
1710-1810 Afternoon Session III
Zurich DINT *** lwigLight-Weight Implementation Guidance WG
Best regards,
Co-chairs
Hello everyone,
This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-02)
Could you help review the document and send your comments to the
mailing list. Thank you in advance.
The WGLC will end in two weeks from now.
BR,
Zhen
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Sure. We started that discussion a few IETFs ago and have a bis draft out at
> draft-bormann-lwig-7228bis.
>
> (I’m not sure that I will be in Chicago, but I could join from remote.)
>
> One thing that needs to be added before even discuss
Hi Hannes,
Definitely an interesting topic. We had some brief discussion at
IETF96, and now we need some concrete items to kickoff.
Anyway, I will add a slot on the next meeting.
Best regards,
Zhen
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ari Keränen
Date: Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: IoT Directorate
To: wgcha...@ietf.org
Cc: Ted Lemon
Dear WG chairs,
The IoT directorate is now chartered; see notification below. If your group
is working on topics related to IoT, i
Hi Folks,
Slides have been uploaded. We will have some good talks with cool content.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/materials.html/#lwig
Collaborative notes taking is highly encouraged:
http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-97-lwig
Remote participation via:
http://www.meetech
Hi Carles,
Thanks for the update.
One nits for the Lwip section, now Lwip supports both winscale and Sack.
Zhen
On Monday, October 31, 2016, Carles Gomez Montenegro
wrote:
> Dear LWIG and TCPM WGs,
>
> Please find below pointers to our update of the TCP over Constrained-Node
> Networks I-D.
>
Dear All,
If you plan to present relevant topics at the coming IETF Seoul meeting,
please let me know in advance. This could be an existing draft or a pending
document.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: NomCom Chair 2016
Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:37 AM
Subject: NomCom 2016-2017: Call for Nominations
To: Working Group Chairs
Please forward on to your Working Groups -
The 2016-17 Nominating Committee (Nomcom) is seeking nominations from
now
Hello Mohit and co-authors,
The call has concluded. The mailing list voice is quite supportive. I see
support from many participants.
Please re-submit the document in a wg-format. Thank you for the work.
Many thanks,
Zhen
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> Deal All,
>
Hello Folks,
You may check the minutes below:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-lwig
Thank Rahul for minutes taking, and Renzo Navas for Jabber scribe.
Cheers,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l
As an individual (co-chair hat off), I read the draft and find a lot
useful information, that why I'd like to support the adoption.
Thanks for the work.
Cheers,
Zhen
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> Deal All,
>
> At Lwig Berlin IETF96 session, the poll for t
Deal All,
At Lwig Berlin IETF96 session, the poll for the adoption of
draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-01 is pretty positive. ( around 20
people voiced the support and there was no objection ).
This message starts a TWO week call for adoption of this draft (in
case people will be on vocations after
Dear Presenters,
Please send your slides to me by Thursday night. Enjoy your IETF week of
course.
Thanks,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Hi All,
The current agenda goes as below. There may be some changes of 4&5.
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/agenda/agenda-96-lwig
12:20-13:20 Friday Afternoon session I
Room: Schoeneberg
1. Agenda bashing 5 min
2. TCP over Constrained NodesCarles Gomez Montenegro
https://tools.ietf.o
ft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>
>>
>> Title : CoAP Latency Evaluation
>> Authors : Fei Zheng
>> Baicheng Fu
>> Zhen Cao
>> Filename
from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
Title : CoAP Latency Evaluation
Authors : Fei Zheng
Baicheng Fu
Zhen Cao
Filename: draft-zheng-core-coap-lantency-evaluation-00.txt
Pages
Hi Mohit ,
Nice draft with a lot of reference data
one quick question: do you have any data around AES/tinyAES, and DTLS
memory footprint?
Many thanks,
Zhen
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Mohit Sethi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have uploaded the next version of our draft documenting the
> impl
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Carles Gomez Montenegro
wrote:
>>
>>> A TCP window size of one segment follows the same rationale as the
>>> default setting for NSTART in [RFC7252], leading to equivalent
>>> operation when CoAP is used over TCP.
>>
>> IMHO, it does not matter because if the appl
Hi Carles,
Nice draft. I always want to know the complains of TCP problems over
Constrained link and device. In the very beginning of Lwig, the
IETF79 bof, David Bormann gave an excellent talk about similar issues
( i try to search the IETF proceedings for the talk but failed coz
they do not hold
https://github.com/openthread/openthread
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Hi Folks,
We discussed the draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient in Prague meeting
,and the consensus was to proceed to WGLC.
This is another round of confirming the consensus on the mailing list.
This email starts the WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-04.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ie
.
>7 Summary.
This section is very useful in understanding this document.
I do not see a summary of Section. 5, which is an important technique
part of this document.
Best regards
Zhen
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We discussed the draf
Dear All,
Please check the minutes of Lwig session at IETF93. If you have any
comments, please let us know before next Wednesday (August 12).
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-lwig
Thank Matthias again for help taking minutes.
Many thanks,
Zhen
__
Greetings, all
This time in Prague, Lwig will experience an experimental round table
discussion, focusing on how to proceed.
For working group document, we mainly discuss the plan to proceed and boost
discussion and solicit reviews, so that we can move appropriately.
For other topics, we will ha
Dear all,
If you need a slot to present and discuss your draft, please do let us know
in advance. Thanks a lot.
For the following working group drafts that have not requested WGLC, please
also let us know your plan. (please also let us know even if you have no
ideas in mind )
draft-ietf-lwig-co
Chair hat-off.
I support this adoption.
Thanks for the work.
-Zhen
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Robert Cragie
wrote:
> Dear LWIG WG,
>
> As discussed at IETF 91, this is a Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-lwig-cellular. The WGLC starts today (Jan 27 2015) and ends Feb
> 09 2015.
>
Aloha Everyone,
Please check the agenda for Hawaii.
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lwig/agenda
For WG-drafts, we expect your plan for next step.
For non-WG drafts, we expect comments and discussions.
Any bash, please let us know.
Best regards
Co-chairs
__
Dear All,
Please check the agenda draft version here:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-lwig
*WG Items and waiting for actions *
draft-ietf-lwig-coap
draft-ietf-lwig-cellular
draft-ietf-lwig-energy-efficient-01
*Presentation to collect opinions: *
1. draft-fu-lwig-iot-us
Hello Hannes,
Thanks for the message. I am going to join this discussion.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> here is the webex information for our conference call tomorrow.
> We am looking forward to an interesting discussion.
>
Hi Hannes,
Thank you for this interesting draft. I think energy aspect is also
valuable to look into.
One question, what the relationship with the Tero's ikev2 draft? Ikev2 has
certificate based authentication, what's the implication from your draft.
Best regards,
Zhen
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Synchronization Layer: an Implementation Method
for Energy Efficient Sensor Stack
Author(s) : Zhen Cao
Filename: draft-cao-lwig-syn-layer-00.txt
Pages
Hi All,
This is a new submission for Lwig. Please take a look and send comments if
any.
Thanks and regards,
Zhen
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:27 AM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-kovatsch-lwig-class1-coap-00.txt
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
A New Interne
Dear Authors
I read the draft and found it very interesting and useful for me to
understand how to build energy efficient cellular M2M devices, not
only CoAP devices.
Although the draft is entitled with “CoAP devices”, its provided
recommendations are generally workable for any M2M devices that
p
Hi All,
The Lwig session of IETF84 is on Thursday, August 2, 17:30-18:30
If you would like to present something on the meeting, please send a
message to the co-chairs, including the name of the draft/topic, time
needed.
See you in Vancouver.
--
Best regards,
Zhen
__
Hi All,
For your information:
lwig Session 1 (1:00:00)
Thursday, Afternoon Session III 1730-1830
Room Name: Regency D
--
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
rom Mobile
>
> On 28.05.2012, at 07:46, Zhen Cao wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 09:58, Marc Lampo wrote:
>>>
>>>> an object registering itself
>>>
>>> Most current activity i
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On May 23, 2012, at 09:58, Marc Lampo wrote:
>
>> an object registering itself
>
> Most current activity in this space is around Zach/Srdjan's resource
> directory draft.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shelby-core-resource-directory
Hello All,
The one-week call for adoption is closed, during which we have heard
support for the action.
Congratulations, authors, and please submit a working group document
to replace the individual one. Thank you.
Best regards,
Zhen
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Zhen Cao wrote:
> He
Hello All,
Based on the IETF83 Paris meeting, we see consensus of adopting the
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bormann-lwig-guidance-01.txt as the
working group document.
This email is to confirm the consensus of adoption. Please feedback in
one week from now, i.e., before May 2, 2012.
--
Best re
Hi All,
Please check the minutes of the working group below.
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/minutes/minutes-83-lwig.txt
--
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
Hi All,
I have uploaded the version 02 of the agenda, per
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/agenda/agenda-83-lwig.txt
Presenters:
Appreciate if you could send us the slides by tomorrow (Wedn) 6 PM
-Paris time.
--
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing
Should definitely be of interest to implementers here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeroen Hoebeke
Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:19 PM
Subject: [core] draft-ietf-core-coap-09: Separate response in a lossy context
To: core WG
Dear working group,
During the plug test event, we n
Hi All,
The Lwig session of IETF83 is on Thursday, March 29, 1520-1720
Afternoon Session II.
If you would like to present something in the meeting, please send a
message to Robert or me. Thank you in advance.
--
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing li
Hi All,
The Lwig session of IETF83 is on Thursday, March 29, 1520-1720
Afternoon Session II.
If you would like to present something in the meeting, please send a
message to Robert or me. Thank you in advance.
--
Best regards,
Zhen
___
Lwip mailing li
Forward a discussion from Contiki-developer list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tobias Petry
Date: Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:53 PM
Subject: [Contiki-developers] Reducing code footprint of ipv6+rpl?
To: Contiki developer mailing list
Hi,
according to msp430-size the ipv6+rpl udp ex
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Zach Shelby
Date: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Subject: [core] Fwd: Invitation Internet of Things CoAP Plugtest,
24-25th March 2012 in Paris, France
To: "c...@ietf.org WG"
ETSI is co-locating a CoAP interop event with the next IETF. It will
be
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
wrote:
> Hi Brinda,
>
> thanks for the response. I certainly understand the need to manage networks
> and devices.
>
> I was curious where the resource constraints come from that motivate the
> requirements for lightweight implementations. For ex
Hi Brinda,
Thank you for the information. See my reply inline.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Brinda M. C wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of a project on building a network monitoring and management based
> on SNMP for 6LoWPAN/RPL WSNs, we have developed a light-weight SNMPv1 agent
> which, acco
83 matches
Mail list logo
