Re: [lwip-users] Which mbedTLS branch LWIP is supporting—only LTS or development too?

As far as I know Simon, he wrote this answer on his mobile phone with autocorrection turned on :-) :-) -> [...] we'd happily accept _patches_ to build against newer versions [...] On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:17 AM Simon Goldschmidt via lwip-users < lwip-users@nongnu.org> wrote: > > > Am 8. April

Re: [lwip-users] SNMPv3 ready for production?

SNMPv3 is working fine, you can use it in products On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:20 PM Jan Dospěl via lwip-users < lwip-users@nongnu.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I have ported SNMPv1+v2c from IwIP to embedded stack at WiFi SoC CC3220. > Its works like a charm. But now I considering add support for

Re: [lwip-users] Sample code for the mainloop NO_SYS case is broken

The code in NO_SYS docs is pseudo-code, you need to implement pbuf queues by yourself. Usually an OS already supports some kind of queue. So packet QUEUES are not supported, pbufs only support CHAINS (=one single ethernet packet splitted into multiple pbufs).

Re: [lwip-users] Core locked checking when using the SNMP netconn implementation

ld explain it does not work. > > Regards, > Harrold > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:07 PM Dirk Ziegelmeier > wrote: > >> The last two options will both work. Read the lwip threading hints in the >> docs! >> >> Harrold Spier schrieb am Do., 12. März 2

Re: [lwip-users] Core locked checking when using the SNMP netconn implementation

ack() function. >- Call snmp_coldstart_trap() after calling LOCK_TCPIP_CORE() and before >UNLOCK_TCPIP_CORE(). > > Best regards, > Harrold > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:48 AM Dirk Ziegelmeier > wrote: > >> you found a bug :-) >> >> Try this, and

Re: [lwip-users] Core locked checking when using the SNMP netconn implementation

rn sizeof(u32_t); case 4: /* sysContact */ var = syscontact; var_len = (const s16_t *)syscontact_len; break; case 5: /* sysName */ var = sysname; var_len = (const s16_t *)sysname_len; Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.zieg

Re: [lwip-users] Core locked checking when using the SNMP netconn implementation

The netconn thread receives SNMP packets and processes them in the SNMP stack, nothing else. It never calls snmp_set_device_enterprise_oid(). Put a breakpoint in calls snmp_set_device_enterprise_oid() and check the call stack. I guess it's your application that makes this call from the wrong

Re: [lwip-users] autoip_remove_struct()

no Ciao Dirk On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:41 AM Amena El Homsi wrote: > Thanks.. Is there a new lwip version that fixes this bug? > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:33 AM Dirk Ziegelmeier > wrote: > >> thats a bug, a correct function would be >> >> /** >>

Re: [lwip-users] autoip_remove_struct()

thats a bug, a correct function would be /** * @ingroup autoip * Remove a struct autoip previously set to the netif using autoip_set_struct() * * @param netif the netif for which to set the struct autoip */ void autoip_remove_struct(struct netif *netif) { LWIP_ASSERT_CORE_LOCKED();

Re: [lwip-users] Bug in invalidate_cpu_cache() usage

It's in the zero-copy example. Of course your DMA buffers need to be cacheline-aligned, that's why the example uses custom pbufs, there should also not be any data/variables between the DMA buffers. And your invalidate() function needs to match addresses to cache lines. But all this is out of

Re: [lwip-users] SNMP for lwip 1.4.1

Not really, but there are examples in the contrib directory Ciao Dirk On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:03 PM Trampas Stern wrote: > I did get the lwip 2.1.2 version compiled and ported with httpd running. > Is there a quick start guide for SNMP? > > I am new to SNMP, and have started reading up so

Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

; authentication failure? > As I don't know about SNMP protocol, I am not sure if thats ok or > something is wrong.. > Hope you can clarify me. > > Mario Luzeiro > > > From: lwip-users on > behalf of Dirk Ziegelmeier > Sent: 24 Sept

Re: [lwip-users] Status of snmp v3

it is technically complete, it only needs proper implementation of the functions in http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/contrib/examples/snmp/snmp_v3/snmpv3_dummy.c which is the glueing code to your application. And of course it needs mbedtls in your project, or a reimplentation of

Re: [lwip-users] Raw Ethernet II frames for PTP

What do you need an IP stack for when you want to process raw ethernet frames??? Dirk On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:25 PM Nathan Immerman via lwip-users < lwip-users@nongnu.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am implementing a software Precision Time Protocol (PTP) implementation > which requires reading

Re: [lwip-users] Why doesn't udp_recv callback contain the received netif?

Correct! See also: https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/multithreading.html Ciao Dirk On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 11:12 AM wayne.ur...@tridentrfid.com < wayne.ur...@tridentrfid.com> wrote: > Wow, cool. > > Question: how is this thread safe - because the callback happens inside the > TCP thread and

Re: [lwip-users] Why doesn't udp_recv callback contain the received netif?

Simply call ip_current_netif() to get it Ciao Dirk On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 5:11 AM Wayne Uroda wrote: > Hi, > > Please forgive me if this is a stupid question. > > I am writing a DHCP server and using udp_recv functionality to handle > incoming broadcast messages on a udp pcb. > I have

Re: [lwip-users] Does lwip have snmp socket implementation?

No, but the netconn implementation is basically a socket implementation. The Socket implementation of lwIP is a wrapper around the netconn API. You can (and should) change the thread priority of the SNMP thread to be lower then the priority of the lwIP main thread. Dirk On Fri, May 10, 2019 at

Re: [lwip-users] How receive UDP broadcast with LwIP ?

Can you at least check/debug to be sure your MAC delivers the desired packet to lwIP? e.g. by dumping the first few bytes of all received packets and looking for your desired broadcast? If that is not the case, consult your MAC manual about broadcast reception / MAC filters. Dirk

Re: [lwip-users] How receive UDP broadcast with LwIP ?

Did you configure your MAC to receive multicasts/boradcasts? lwIP cannot do this! Ciao Dirk On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:39 PM Pekub wrote: > Hello, > > I have this problem. I need to receive UDP Broadcast, but The "callback" > function is never called. > > I use LwIP 2.0.3. > > /*- Default

Re: [lwip-users] Netconn API for UDP and Raw API for TCP

You are violating threading rules in the thread using the RAW API. See: https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/pitfalls.html https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/multithreading.html HTH Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] Settibg/Getting IPv6 address

https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/group__netif__ip6.html HTH Dirk On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:03 PM saad saeed wrote: > Dear All, > > I am new to lwIP. I want to know that, how can I get the assigned IPv6 > address and how can I assign the IPv6 address. Are there any examples for > this. > >

Re: [lwip-users] Changed IP address during runtime but TCP PCB stuck time wait state

Ich you listen to an ANY IP address, then rebinding the netconn should not be necessary. Otherwise, check SO_REUSE. Dirk On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 4:40 AM uaz wrote: > Hi All, > > I am doing a webserver that allows users to change device ip address during > runtime (no power reset required). >

Re: [lwip-users] Custom placement of memory pool

Yes, in exactly the same way - just figure out the name of the PBUF pool (see linker map file) and add an external with appropriate GCC attribute to cc.h Dirk On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:14 PM uaz wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Thanks for the heads up. I lost focus because I was drowning in the macros. >

Re: [lwip-users] Custom placement of memory pool

To relocate a pool, see: https://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_1_x/group__mempool.html#ga5b1fb3ce7942432d87cc948b1c5ed6cb "To relocate a pool, declare it as extern in cc.h. Example for GCC: extern u8_t __attribute__((section(".onchip_mem"))) memp_memory_my_private_pool_base[];" HTH Dirk

Re: [lwip-users] Lwip http server example raw api

The examples have moved here: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip/lwip-contrib.git/tree/examples/httpd Dirk On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:45 AM Keith Rubow wrote: > Is there no longer an http server example using the raw api for lwip > 2.x? I only see one in the contrib-1.4.1, but not in any

Re: [lwip-users] SNMP v3

Yes, it is functional (git head or 2.1 beta). Be aware the user needs to implement a lot of things for it (user/password management). The MIB compiler is not affected by the SNMP version. Dirk On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:37 PM Andy Pont wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to make sense of the

Re: [lwip-users] Can't compile unix unit tests using Cmake

No, I having problems with that on Kubuntu 18.4, too. I'll disable the offending compiler flags to avoid problems in 2.1 release. Dirk On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 9:55 AM Joan Lledó wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to compile the unix unit tests in debian stable and ubuntu > 18.04 and in both cases I

Re: [lwip-users] Request for ALTCP example etc.

Maybe a look at httpd_inits() may help you for now lwip\src\apps\http\httpd.c ​ Ciao Dirk On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:37 AM Richard Man wrote: > Hi Simon or others, I am attempting to build 2.1.0 RC1 with ALTCP, > specifically with the mbedTLS 2.12.0. Looks like I need to map the function >

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.1 cleanup - remove UNIX test apps

ggestion for cmake (will need to install cmake). > If it is simple and reliable maybe it is a godo improvement. > > Thanks > Yigal > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Dirk Ziegelmeier > wrote: > >> Hi Yigal, >> >> I removed it because you

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.1 cleanup - remove UNIX test apps

Hi Yigal, I removed it because you can generate easily a Makefile-based build (and many others) using cmake. - cd into example_app dir - mkdir build - cd build - cmake .. -G "MinGW Makefiles" - make ​The msvc_netif_init contains no platform specific code. I just forgot to rename it. Just pushed

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.1 cleanup - remove UNIX test apps

Hi Sergio, you "*started long ago* using 'minimal' for development and teaching" - does that mean you still use it today? Do you want me to keep it? The TAP (not TUN) interface will remain, since the example_app uses it. Do you need the TUN interface? If I got you right, lib, simhost, simnode

Re: [lwip-users] [lwip-devel] lwIP 2.1 cleanup - remove UNIX test apps

all these netifs be deleted, too? Does anyone out there use them? Ciao Dirk On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:39 AM Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Dirk Ziegelmeier wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > in order to clean up for lwIP 2.1, I'd like to remove the UNIX port test > applications

[lwip-users] lwIP 2.1 cleanup - remove UNIX test apps

Hello all, in order to clean up for lwIP 2.1, I'd like to remove the UNIX port test applications - lib - minimal - unixsim The only remaining test/debug app would be the new "example_app" that shares most of the code with the windows port. We would then have only one common app shared between

Re: [lwip-users] Defining a function call via a macro in lwipopts.h

See LWIP_HOOK_FILENAME ​ http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__lwip__opts__hooks.html#ga11ac9d637cb6afc0a32e8da7f51d0c0d Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

[lwip-users] Transition to CMake?

Hello all, those who watch the lwIP commits have noticed I started working on a CMake based build system. My question is: Is there an interest in the old Makefile-based system? I'm currently tempted to throw it away :-) I'd just keep the Filelists.mk files for people with Makefile build systems.

Re: [lwip-users] DOXYGEN usage

So, then what is your question? There is even a batch file to generate the docs in the directory I sent you. Did you try it??? Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:57 PM, cookies_do <amina.bra...@softhouse.se>

Re: [lwip-users] DOXYGEN usage

??? Did you ever look at the code on lwIPs homepage? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/doc/doxygen Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:31 PM, cookies_do <amina.bra...@softhouse.se> wrote: > Hello!

Re: [lwip-users] Initialization problem upgrading from 1.4.1 to 2.0.3

try to add #include "lwip/ip_addr.h" and read http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/upgrading.html especially "Changed netif "up" flag handling to be an administrative flag [...]" -> don't forget to call netif_set_up() Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelme

Re: [lwip-users] Set DNS servers IPs manually

DNS_MAX_SERVERS must be greater than LWIP_DHCP_MAX_DNS_SERVERS and http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__dns.html HTH Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:49 AM, cookies_do <amina.bra...@softhouse.se> wrote: &

Re: [lwip-users] How to solve netif is not up issue

Read http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/upgrading.html Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] Double VLAN tagging

yes, it discards them Ciao Dirk On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Amena El Homsi <amena.elho...@gmail.com> wrote: > So the LwIP discards such frames, right? > > Thanks > Amena > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Dirk Ziegelmeier <d...@ziegelmeier.net> > wro

Re: [lwip-users] Double VLAN tagging

No, lwIP doesn't support it. But it should be easy to add in src/netif/ethernet.c. Ciao Dirk On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Amena El Homsi wrote: > Hello, > > In the eth_type enum, I didn't see the ETHTYPE 0x88a8 referring to the > TPID of service-provider outer

Re: [lwip-users] mDNS

This is not an lwIP issue, but a configuration issue of your ethernet driver. Contact Xilinx for support on that driver. Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] mDNS

Did you configure your netif to receive broadcasts? Do you call mdns_resp_netif_settings_changed() when your link state / IP changes? This will trigger a broadcast. http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__mdns.html Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing

Re: [lwip-users] SNMP MIB CREATE

That's simply because the number in the first tree node after the MIB OID is ignored. The macro practically reads "SNMP_CREATE_TREE_NODE(, private_nodes);" - but again, only for the FIRST tree node after a MIB node! ​To avoid confusion, that "don't care number" should be the

Re: [lwip-users] Problem running lwip on cortex M7 with D cache enabled

> We still have a task open to work on fully supporting zero copy tx/rx. > To clarify: 2.0.3 supports zero-copy RX: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__pbuf.html Section "Detailed Description" but NOT TX! Maybe RX is "good enough" for you. ​Dirk ​

Re: [lwip-users] 2 Devices

you need both calls (bind, sockopt), your code should work like this, I think. If not, please debug and tell us why :-) Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] netconn send broadcast

Yes, that's correct. Be aware this is not thread-safe, you should not change that option during runtime. You should do it before binding the PCB. Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] Lwip tcp-stack reliability issue when using non-reliable network?

Sorry for the DisableInterrupts() / EnableInterrupts() confusion, I forgot you are running on Android in a process. Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Dirk Ziegelmeier <d...@ziegelmeier.net> wrote:

Re: [lwip-users] Externally allocated memory pool for pbufs

RX is OK, updated example: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__pbuf.html Moving PBUFs: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__mempool.html#ga5b1fb3ce7942432d87cc948b1c5ed6cb Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] Lwip tcp-stack reliability issue when using non-reliable network?

Try implementing it as DisableInterrupts() / EnableInterrupts() Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] 2 Devices

Try SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option Ciao Dirk On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > At 15:20 07.11.2017, you wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I am doing similar thing. I think I will use one thread to collect data > from multiple devices and feed them to corresponding

Re: [lwip-users] lwipopts: TX_SINGLE_PBUF

Simon tried to explain you this: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/include/lwip/opt.h#n1593 Dirk On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:57 PM, David Gauchard wrote: > On ven., oct. 20, 2017 at 09:32:14 -0300, Sergio R. Caprile wrote: > > I can comment on the ESP8266

Re: [lwip-users] Memory Pool relocation

​ extern u8_t attribute((section(".onchip_mem"))) memp_memory_PBUF_POOL_base[]; The documentation is wrong. I'll fix it. Ciao Dirk Hi > > > I eventually got round to testing this – but I am not sure the docs are > correct. Here is the note in the docs: > > > > extern u8_t

Re: [lwip-users] FW: Problem by sending of UDP broadcast frame

http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/upgrading.html (2.0.0) ++ Application changes: * Changed netif "up" flag handling to be an administrative flag (as opposed to the previous meaning of "ip4-address-valid", a netif will now not be used for transmission if not up) -> even a DHCP netif

Re: [lwip-users] Problem by sending of UDP broadcast frame

set a default netif using netif_set_default() Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] ip_addr_copy alignment issue

Packed structs imply two things: No padding inside the struct AND the struct's location may be unaligned in memory. So when this u32 access fails at runtime your compiler did not generate correct code for your platform. When copying an u32 to/from a packed struct, something like memcpy needs to be

Re: [lwip-users] 2 packets received in tcp and passed as only 1 with doubled size

Are you aware TCP is a STREAM protocol, NOT a PACKET based protocol like UDP? The behavior sounds perfectly fine. Dirk On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:24 PM, gussabina wrote: > Hello: > > I'm using lwIP 1.4.1 with FreeRTOS 7.30 running on Atmel ATSAM4E, with an > application

Re: [lwip-users] Correct way to use SNTP safely

Read: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/index.html and http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/pitfalls.html Check the "Modules" section, the APIs are separated in "Callback-style" (tcpipthread only) and "Sequential-style" (to be used from other threads) Ciao Dirk On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:51 AM,

Re: [lwip-users] udp_send / udp_recv thread safefy

No, its not OK to call raw API functions from another thread. See http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/pitfalls.html Dirk On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Ricardo Martins wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing some work with LWIP 2.0.2 using the raw API to send and receive > UDP

Re: [lwip-users] IPv6 multicast support by Socket API?

"We have task #14394 (Improve socket options) for this" does not mean that somebody is or will be working on it - it is just there so the issue is not forgotten. Have you been able to test my patch? Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list

Re: [lwip-users] IPv6 multicast support by Socket API?

Andrey, can you try my patch and tell me if it works? If not, please try to debug it, I was not able to test it at home. TODO: Correctly unregister at socket close, try to fix code duplication with IGMP. Ciao Dirk diff --git a/src/api/sockets.c b/src/api/sockets.c index a50faf5..21f6481 100644

Re: [lwip-users] how to set the link up

Seriously, Max, if I send you a link to the lwIP docs, the I can at least expect you ​ READ AND try HARD to UNDERSTAND the docs.​ You really can answer that question by yourself.​ Read the page that I sent you, and several other pages in the docs, there are many questions answered in there

Re: [lwip-users] seting up ip address after initialization

http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__netifapi__netif.html ​HTH Dirk On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:16 PM, massimiliano cialdi < massimiliano.cia...@powersoft.it> wrote: > I have to set the ip address after initialization. > > I guess I have to pass 0.0.0.0 as ip address, netmask and gw to call

Re: [lwip-users] Example of changes needed to switch from 1.4.1 to 2.0.1

TiVaWare = TI Vapor Ware? ;-) Am 23.05.2017 10:27 nachm. schrieb "goldsi...@gmx.de" : > Wow, this is so horrible! I really don't know why people come up with this > idea of including C files in other C files. > > Funny enough, it seems to work on the lwIP sources without

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 2.0.2 + freertos + ARM7

The two APIs can coexist. regarding your code: Sorry, this code is so horribly wrong :-( I am sorry for being rude - you also need a LOT of education in C code. And, if your compiler compiles this, the warning settings are way too relaxed or you really should read and fix all compiler warnings.

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 2.0.2 + freertos + ARM7

Use socket API and you can use threads without problems. Possible alternative: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__tcp__raw.html#gafba47015098ed7ce523dcf7bdf70f7e5 Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 2.0.2 + freertos + ARM7

an I ensure that I am in the tcpip thread? > > > > > > *Von:* lwip-users [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+motz=smart-e-tech.de@nongnu. > org] *Im Auftrag von *Dirk Ziegelmeier > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017 19:04 > *An:* Mailing list for lwIP users > *Betreff:* Re: [l

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 2.0.2 + freertos + ARM7

Sounds like you are calling lwIP functions from another thread than the lwIP thread, in your case the CAN thread. See http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/pitfalls.html Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] DHCP fails ?

> After checking/debugging I found that if I add a call to function > netif_set_link_down(netif); just before I check for link and > > netif_set_link_up(netif); … DHCP task will work fine > > > ​Sounds correct - from the UPGRADING document (

Re: [lwip-users] SNTP example?

Look AG lwip contrib repository, Unix port, simhost.c. There is an example in there. Dirk On Apr 29, 2017 23:17, "Mike Rosing" wrote: Hello, I have ported 2.0.2 to the TI C6748 and finally got DHCP to get an address. The next thing I'd like to do is use sntp. What

Re: [lwip-users] Connect two machines running LWIP applications via WLAN

I sent this link because of the first answer: It is not possible to bridge between wireless (client a.k.a. station mode) and wired interfaces according to this thread on linux-ath5k-devel

Re: [lwip-users] Connect two machines running LWIP applications via WLAN

http://serverfault.com/questions/152363/bridging-wlan0-to-eth0 Ciao Dirk > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] Question regarding mdns responder

from mdns.c: * Things left to implement: * - * * - Probing/conflict resolution [...] Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 -> 2.0.1: problem with dhcp

no, you just need to enable the interface during system startup by calling netif_set_up(). NO_SYS example: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/group__lwip__nosys.html Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:35 AM, <marku

Re: [lwip-users] lwip 1.4.1 -> 2.0.1: problem with dhcp

Maybe this is missing: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_x/upgrading.html * Changed netif "up" flag handling to be an administrative flag (as opposed to the previous meaning of "ip4-address-valid", a netif will now not be used for transmission if not up) -> even a DHCP netif has to be set

Re: [lwip-users] Upgrading from 1.4.x to 2.0.2

I'd recommend to use the Filelists.mk if you use make as a build system, then you don't have to worry about added/removed files in the future. Ciao Dirk Also, note that 2.0.0 has added/removed/moved files, so you need to adjust your build process/project. > > Simon > > >

Re: [lwip-users] Lwip with router

Did you check this? http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/upgrading.html Especially the netif_set_up() part? Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] sporadic PCB corruption

That call stack does not mean the corruption happens in this call stack. For debugging, can you simply call memp_free on the tcp PCB from your application thread? If the sanity check already hits you there, then it is most probably your application's problem. If you are on a platform with HW

Re: [lwip-users] lwip_sendto hanging with lwip 2.0

Calling sys_timeout() results in send_actual_pkt being called back from TCPIP thread. You must not call sequencial style functions from TCPIP thread. http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/group__sequential__api.html says: "More overhead, but can be called from any thread except TCPIP thread."​ Dirk

Re: [lwip-users] Assertions when using DHCP when using LWIP 2.0

And read this: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/pitfalls.html Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] Using in a single thread with NO_SYS = 1

Yes, but read and apply these: http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/pitfalls.html http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/group__lwip__nosys.html Pay especially attention to your netif driver, it must not call netif->input() from IRQ context! See example code on the page of the second link above. Also

Re: [lwip-users] MEMP_POOL_256 undeclared when enabling custom pools

Can you please post more detail of the error message? e.g. which file is being compiled. ​I use custom mempool in my application, and ​I don't see this error message. Ciao Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] TFTP init

The unix simhost has a working example in contrib http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip/lwip-contrib.git/tree/ports/unix/unixsim/simhost.c Dirk On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Nicholas Richard wrote: > > Hello, > > I’m looking to get the TFTP server up and

Re: [lwip-users] FreeRTOs port

http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/lwIP-ports-for-RTEMS-POSIX-based-RTOS-and-FreeRTOS-TMS570-a-LPC17-40xx-drivers-td27134.html Ciao Dirk On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Nirav Desai wrote: > Hello All, > > Please find attached a patch which has FreeRTOS port for LWIP. > > Many

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP : Get rid of warnings when LWIP_NOASSERT is on

? Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:00 AM, adityapr <adity...@marvell.com> wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Since we are already at this issue, there are a couple of warnings that I > would also like to report. > I

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP : Get rid of warnings when LWIP_NOASSERT is on

Thank you for reporting. I found three more places in IPv6 code to fix. Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Nirav Desai <nir...@marvell.com> wrote: > ​Hello, > > I use LWIP in professional capacity.

Re: [lwip-users] UDP bind error due to address and port reuse

n stops sending after sending few times, i.e., the > packets are > not reaching the destination. The error message says "Error on udp_send: -1 > pack dropped, no space" . Why does this happen? > > Regards, > Surya > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:49:25 +0100, Dirk

Re: [lwip-users] UDP bind error due to address and port reuse

on't understand is how it works, i.e., how the port parameter in the > function is > the port sending the reply. Could you plz. explain. Thank You. > > Regards, > Surya > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:43:59 +0100, Dirk Ziegelmeier wrote > > Use one UDP PCB, bind it to IPADDR_

Re: [lwip-users] UDP bind error due to address and port reuse

Why don't you simply try out to program the 5 lines of code that I recommended you? Then you would already know whether it works or (if it does not work) provide a better description what the problem is. ​D​ irk ___ lwip-users mailing list

Re: [lwip-users] UDP bind error due to address and port reuse

Use one UDP PCB, bind it to IPADDR_ANY and port x. Use udp_sendto() to send to any IP/port combination. http://www.nongnu.org/lwip/2_0_0/group__udp__raw.html You get the src address/port of any request in your receive callback: void my_udp_recv_fn (void *arg, struct udp_pcb

Re: [lwip-users] Upgrading lwip 1.4.1 to 2.0.0 pbuf (or other) issue?

The "udp_send: No route to 192.168.101.10" sounds like there is an explicit netif_set_up() is missing. Also check whether netif_set_link_up()/netif_set_link_down() is called somewhere. Dirk ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org

Re: [lwip-users] Issue in err.c for lwIP 2.0.0

No, the solution is in errno.h: Choose one of: - #define LWIP_PROVIDE_ERRNO 1 - #define LWIP_ERRNO_INCLUDE "path/my_header_file_containing_errno.h" HTH Dirk On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello All, > > When integrating FreeRTOS with lwIP 2.0.0

Re: [lwip-users] Issue in arch.h for lwIP 2.0.0

Since it was already included in several lwIP .c/.h files, I simply decided to move it to a central place: arch.h. So my change should not break anything or make lwIP less portable as it was before. Dirk On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Freddie

Re: [lwip-users] Issue in arch.h for lwIP 2.0.0

I added it, thanks for reporting! ​ http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/commit/?id=182d7c138a5b845c74b7d364ee07af6105d8e786 Dirk On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello All, > > I am using the ARM Compiler from Code Composer Studio and while

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP_VERSION in lwIP 2.0.0

LWIP_VERSION_RC has changed from 2 (RC2) to 255 (RELEASE) So your macro should be OK. Is there something else that may be wrong? Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 3:19 PM, bernard <bernard.xi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [lwip-users] LLDP Implementation for 1.4.1

way more work than just sending LLDP frames. So IMHO, your LLDP implementation is not that useful - or am I wrong with my assumption about LLDP reception? Are there use cases where sending LLDP frames is enough? Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net O

Re: [lwip-users] LLDP Implementation for 1.4.1

Just post it as a patch at savannah, we'll see what to do then. Hope this is OK for you. Dirk On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello All > > The LLDP base implementation for lwIP 1.4.1 is ready and will be released > on or before Oct 28, 2016. I

Re: [lwip-users] Switching to dual stack LwIP

there are no plans at the momet. Please file a task for it. Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * d...@ziegelmeier.net * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Aditya Prakash <aditya.prakash...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > > I guess dual-stack

Re: [lwip-users] Switching to dual stack LwIP

I guess dual-stack is not well tested with socket API :-( I did most of the dual-stack stuff, but since I don't use IPv6 and socket API at work, I have no real-life tests for it. Dirk On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Aditya Prakash < aditya.prakash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am able to

  1   2   >