>
> --
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> __
arting the
> container,
> killed the host X and it didn't continue working afterwards i.e. it was
> stopped.
> The host OS is centos as well.
> Would there be a official centos/rhel template bundled with lxc? If not,
> which
> one is most preferred one?
> --
r setting up IPSec tunnels with XAUTH to
communicate with Cisco ASA concentrators, and I'm the author of similar
code in Openswan for doing the same there only using the Openswan and
kernel level IPsec infrastructure.
>
> Robert Adams
I may experiment with this further as you now have
tp://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/
ear feedback on my
latest proposal.
> The autodev hook does exactly the same thing but is
> automated per-container during container startup. Good find though :)
Yes, we want to be able to do this at container startup. Ultimately,
this should provide some semblance of udev capabil
t are much less
likely than configuration collisions that allow conflicts over proc,
sysfs, or devtmpfs.
Possible - yes. Likely - no. As likely - no.
> Dustin Oprea
>
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 4
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 23:10 +0200, Tamas Papp wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 08:37 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Oh? I thought it did, but you had to have the rpm and yum packages
> > installed (you won't with the new one). I thought I had tested that out
> > on one of my
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 12:14 -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:52:15 +0700
> "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:38 +0700, Fajar A. N
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 19:53 +0200, Tamas Papp wrote:
> On 09/30/2013 06:23 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > The Oracle Linux template worked well on Fedora. Will it work on other
> > distros like Arch, Alt, or Suse which doesn't have a (compatible)
> > version of
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 12:14 -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 09:52:15 +0700
> "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:38 +0700, Fajar A. N
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 10:38 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 19:43 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > Would there be a official centos/rhel template bundled with
>
lerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Regards,
> >Failed to download 'fedora base'
> >failed to install fedora
> >lxc-create: container creation template for f1 failed
> >
> >lxc-create: Error creating container f1
> Looks like unpacking didn't go right?
That looks like the first one I sent out. I
dd maintenance issues. A superior solution might be
> a file transfer transport that automatically does checksum (like
> torrent but that opens up potential issues since some ISPs block
> torrent indiscriminitately).
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
the default Key Ring or something more is
> required. If this approach is feasable, then this needs to be added
> early to the template script, but maybe a better method is for the
> User to be prompted for an interactive answer to confirm key
> installation.
Actually, this should now
Tony:
On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 00:20 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > All - Especially Tony Su,
>
> > Couple of people where I work thought you couldn't do what I was trying
> > to do, that it was &
s being
> used and openSUSE does require User verification (unless the "silent"
> switch is invoked which now that I'm thinking about it could be the
> answer to my specific situation but may not address other distros).
> H... so, maybe I have something to experimen
On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 15:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> All - Especially Tony Su,
> Couple of people where I work thought you couldn't do what I was trying
> to do, that it was "impossible". Oh well. Looks like they were
> wrong. :-P It may not be "
2013-09-09 at 07:28 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:58 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 20:33:16 -0400
> > "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> > > With all due respect...
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2013
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 17:23 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Monday, September 09, 2013 07:28:43 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > In the git-stage current Fedora template, the entire problem is embodied
> > in the "download_fedora" function starting around line 201
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 08:58 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 20:33:16 -0400
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> > With all due respect...
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 16:08 -0700, Tony Su wrote:
> > > After putting some thought in
esponsibility for
my files and you for yours. When I pass my pieces along, I hope I've
commented things enough for someone else to take up the flame or flame
me if I failed.
If you can truly come up with a distro agnostic way of doing this
without requiring significant new support from the (arb
enSUSE YAST LXC container applet. but then when I invoked
> lxc-create from a console, but the "help" verifies it supports few options
> and not these. But, as I described if the template requires parameters,
> it's also possible to simply provide them in the script instead
Any input will be extremely useful.
>
> Robert Pendell
> shi...@elite-systems.org
> A perfect world is one of chaos.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC
though the template describes passing that
> parameter from the command line, it's not supported by lxc-create on
> openSUSE.
It certainly works on Ubuntu and Fedora. You'll have to provide a few
more details there since I don't know any reason why it shouldn't h
/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Arjan Widlak
>
> Bezoek onze site op:
> http://www.unitedknowledge.nl
>
> De rijkshuisstijl, ook voor tablet en iPhone:
> http://www.rijkshuisstijl.unitedknowledge.nl/
>
> United Knowledge, in
nter like I am.
> bretton
>
>
> Just one of those thoughts :)
>
Interesting thoughts but you have other options. What you are referring
to is merely the default.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678
an unsupported version of Fedora using an unsupported version of LXC.
First step... Get up to date. I don't have your problem at all.
But... I'm running F17 on my test host (which is near EOL already) and
F18 on my production engines with an LXC 0.9.0 upgrade. I don't have
your pr
rwarding enabled in the host.
>
I'll test some of this out on another host of mine with NAT networking.
> Joe
Regards,
Mike
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:54 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:54 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 08:51 -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> > Yes, it is lxc-0.8 from the repos. I did notice that ubuntu shipped
> > with lxc-0.9.
> > You're right, f19 failed du
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 10:02 -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:05:49 -0400
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 16:11 -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > >
> > > N
pm builds and the
0.9.0 package is not obsoleting the Fedora 0.8.0 lxc-doc package.
> Joe
Regards,
Mike
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 16:11 -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
> > All,
>
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 18:22 +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2013/7/8 Michael H. Warfield :
> > 2) The lxc-fedora template (even in 0.9.0) is busted, as I feared it
> > would be, for Fedora 19 because the Fedora 19 release file is a -2
> > release and it's only looking for
---------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> ___
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
uot;read-only" remounts of mounted file
systems in the host. We've been plagued by that problem on and off
again for some time and never really nailed it. I think the latest
fixes for dealing with systemd based systems is ultimately incompatible
with some of the host workarounds (bind m
to go check that out. :-)=)
> Rob
> ------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 08:48 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 08:45 +, Purcareata Bogdan-B43198 wrote:
> ...
> > I use to do something similar a lot under the old linux-vservers project
> > (now d
t deploy it in a
production environment until it had proven itself in a realistic test
environment first.
> Thank you,
> Bogdan P.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:26 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > Crap... Bumped the keyboard and this one got away from me prematurely.
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > On
ll be "private" (fe:...)
and the dummy0 interface will have something lower, you should be good
to go.
> Thanks,
> Hans
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
Crap... Bumped the keyboard and this one got away from me prematurely.
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:17 +, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
> > >yes and it does this. The point is that lxcbr0 is not tied to any
> > >physic
ingle system of record for all IT processes
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
> ___
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
>
--
Michael H.
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 09:30 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 07:40 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > > Now my question, could not lxc (at boot) setup a fixed MAC addr for the
> > > > host por
by brctl, based on some discussions I saw.
Certainly shouldn't be a problem in a server hosting environment where
the host MAC is used for the bridge MAC and unlikely to ever be removed
from the bridge.
AFAICT... This should be fixed in the current releases and no longer a
problem.
-
> How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
> 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
> 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
> 3. A sin
ave packman?
Anyone with an Arch container prebuilt template they could share?
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in
on do you use?
> >
> >
> > tamas
> --
> Kalyanasundaram
> http://blogs.eskratch.com/
> https://github.com/kalyanceg/
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittse
xecStop=/usr/bin/lxc-stop -n $2
> RemainAfterExit=yes
>
> [Install]
> WantedBy=multi-user.target
> EOF
>
> ;;
> disable)
> rm $UNITFILE
> ;;
> *)
> usage
> ;;
> esac
>
> -
> --
> Regards
> Shridhar
Regards,
Mike
--
Mic
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 12:22 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 12:10 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:09 -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote:
> >> Interesting. I didn't realize how spoiled I am and how easy I have it with
> >> lxc o
r the Raspberry
Pi just renamed their distribution to Pidor (shades of Kubuntu, Edubuntu
and the other remixes of Ubuntu). That's going to break the lxc-fedora
template on the Raspberry Pi (yet again - pounding head on desk). Right
now, AFAICT, the ARM support for Ubuntu is only for ARM7 and
to the
list and the bad addresses get automagically unsubscribed. So, that
idea of changing the Reply-To gets my endorsement. I would just wait a
short while for anyone else to chime in with an opinion and then make it
so.
+1
> Cheers,
> tamas
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 02:06 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 11:44 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
> > On 05/23/2013 11:13 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >> Last I knew, it was Daniel who created the list and most likely "owns"
> >> it. It was c
been on the
list for like forever. It's been mentioned before. It's a mailman list
so we just need someone with owner privs and the password.
> Thanks,
> tamas
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (67
r
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
> ___ Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 09:26 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 04:06:30 PM Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > > I ran into the same lxc-console issue and managed to solve it by
> >
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 09:58:26 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> > > Then I have started the container using below command and tried to
> > > con
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 00:02 +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Saturday, May 18, 2013 09:58:26 AM Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> > > Then I have started the container using below command and tried to
> > > con
using LXC- containers :)
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:02 +0530, Ajith Adapa wrote:
> > Sorry for the confusion.
>
> > In case of issue 3, I felt host kernel
plus other stuff) have now
been accepted and applied by Serge, so that's done. Maybe I can look
deeper into this morass now.
Regards,
Mike
> Regards,
> Ajith
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
&
Rom drive? Looks like it
recovered.
> 3. Last but not least after sometime my host kernel crashed as a result
> need to restart the VPC.
I don't understand what you are saying here. You're saying your kernel
crashed but I don't understand the "as a result of..."
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:31 +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2013/5/14 Michael H. Warfield :
> > What I would recommend as steps on Fedora 17...
> >
> > Download lxc-0.9.0 here:
> >
> > http://lxc.sourceforge.net/download/lxc/lxc-0.9.0.tar.gz
> >
> > Yo
ist):
lxc.autodev = 1
You should now be able to start the container:
"lxc-start -n Fedora17"
I still need to submit the patches for the Fedora template for the
autodev support and the ARM / Raspberry Pi support. They'll eventually
get in there. :-P
> Regards,
> Ajith
7;s probably overkill in your case.
Regards,
Mike
> On Apr 22, 2013, at 10:48 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 21:59 +0200, Robin Monjo wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> Using the default config, containers will have their IP
ys to have the dnsmasq table synced with the /etc/hosts file
> (container's host side) ?
Again... Why? Use the DNS cache in dnsmasq. You have no need to refer
to /etc/hosts at all.
> Kind regards
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/
rt) container and it works with the
proper permissions in the /dev directory for both autodev settings. But
that's under 0.9.0, so that would be my first check.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-093
ed
> -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied
>
> Im using opensuse 12.3 on the host and guest.
> The gues is a fresh lxc container.
>
>
> mfg AO
> --
> You can contact me by using XING:
> https://www.xing.com/profile/Andreas_Otto6
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (
te out on a Raspberry Pi ARM. I've already got
proposed patches in for comments from others and we'll be incorporating
the fixes into the sources before long. Sorry if it proved to be a dead
end for you because of the architecture incompatibilities.
Regards,
Mike
> On 04/03/2013 11:10
Hey John,
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 09:07 +0100, John wrote:
> On 03/04/13 23:15, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 23:03 +0100, John wrote:
> >> On 02/04/13 23:59, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:02 +0100, John wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 23:03 +0100, John wrote:
> On 02/04/13 23:59, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:02 +0100, John wrote:
> >> If my understanding is correctl, to stop systemd trying to launch udev
> >> and generally make a mess of everything insi
ost talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
> Employer Resources Portal
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
> ___
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourc
to run a fedora14 container on ARM (raspberry pi)
> architecture ?
> If so can anyone point me in the right direction ?
I may see if I can pull this off on one of my F17 ARM Remix RPIs after
rebuilding lxc with the latest sources. I think you can forget about
F14 (IMHO) though.
>
; $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
> ___________
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/
f
upgrading to RHEL 6 / CentOS 6 than even attempting this.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the bes
nd much more. Keep your skills current
> with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
> MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912
> ___ Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourcef
u are in runlevel 3 and you have services configured to start,
which are not starting, then you should probably look
in /var/log/messages to see if you're getting errors.
> Thanks.
> ShiB.
> while ( ! ( succeed = try() ) );
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-
on but
this problem could require some input from the devs, especially if it
means something needs to be changed. There was a recent one asking
about what was and appropriate kernel level and that got no responses
here but some good comments from Serge over on the -devel list. Not
every message
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:35 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 08:10 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > There has been very little discussion i
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 08:10 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > There has been very little discussion in the main project over how to
> > manage autobooting containers (or maybe I've missed it). Maybe it's
> > time we h
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 19:51 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 12/08/2012 06:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > It's possible to drop a full configuration file there into /etc/lxc/auto and
> > not have it exist in /var/lib/lxc and then "-f " would work
> >
in the same cluster, if all that information is in the
container config, it follows along. If you bury it in a common config,
you then have to edit those configuration files on both the servers (the
throwing and the catching) in order to properly complete the migration.
I don't like that idea
lxc-start 1354793173.812 DEBUGlxc_conf - umounted
> '/lxc_putold/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct'
> lxc-start 1354793173.812 DEBUGlxc_conf - umounted
> '/lxc_putold/sys/fs/cgroup/memory'
> lxc-start 1354793173.812 DEBUGlxc_conf - umounted
> '/
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:09 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > You have to add an option to the config file for your systemd
> > containers.
> >
> > lxc.autodev = 1
> Phrasing it this way makes me wonder, should lxc l
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:00 +, John wrote:
> On 04/12/12 21:29, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >> I raised the question about LXC/systemd a while back and have been
> >> trying to follow the conversation but I have to admit it's going
> >> somewhat over my h
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 20:40 +, John wrote:
> On 26/10/12 22:02, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 12:11 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:15 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > Serge...
> >
> > You need to go in for doing psychic readings or buy lots of lottery
> > ticks because I think you must have been channeling me and reading my
out this
combination"...
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 12:30 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com):
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
... [big snip] ...
> > > [root@forest Plover]# cat 2012-10-31-06:41:37.log
> > &
work-around is to simply remount the root tree to private before
> invoking LXC.
In another thread, Serge had some heartburn over this shared mount
propagation which then rang a bell in my head about past problems we
have seen.
> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 08:51 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
nodev,noexec,relatime,devices)
> -cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer type cgroup
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer)
> -cgroup on /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio type cgroup
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio)
> -hugetlbfs on /dev/hugepages type hugetlbfs (rw,relatime)
&
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 23:09 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 09:41 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:20 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >> On 11/01/2012 09:08 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >>> I know, I KNOW this is an 11th ho
ogmein12331_d2d
> ___________
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
>
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ |
pivot root problem, this may not help. That will
probably have to be addressed sooner or later from what I've read from
the systemd guys.
> Take care,
> Peter
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-09
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 20:15 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 19:17 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 23:28 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > On Thu, 2012-11-0
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 19:17 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 23:28 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 22:44 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > > Quoting Michael
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 23:28 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 22:44 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > > > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:20 +0100, Dani
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 22:44 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:20 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > On 11/01/2012 09:08 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > > I know, I KNOW this is an 11th ho
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 21:20 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 09:08 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > I know, I KNOW this is an 11th hour request. Can we please get Serge's
> > autodev stuff into this release? Please?
> release early, release often?
> j
3918854fd40f77b2b6f49
> > Author: Serge Hallyn
> > Date: Thu Aug 16 21:11:50 2012 -0500
> >
> > Cleanup partial container if -h was passed to template
> >
> > If user calls 'lxc-create -t ubuntu -- -h' (as opposed to
> > &#x
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:30 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 18:15 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Can you tell me the exact git tree and branch you are using?
> >
> > I'm usi
too.
> -serge
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | m...@wittsend.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF| possible wo
hor: Serge Hallyn
> > Date: Thu Aug 16 21:11:50 2012 -0500
> >
> > Cleanup partial container if -h was passed to template
> >
> > If user calls 'lxc-create -t ubuntu -- -h' (as opposed to
> > 'lxc-create -t ubuntu -h') t
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
