>
> On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
> > I would quite like, personally, a LyX-like program which is a more generic
> > 'structured' document editor. Probably an XML editor, with the ability to
> > backend onto LaTeX, but also other formats. If I have time, I may have a
> > look at that pro
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Fabio Scardigli wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> I have the LyX version 1.0.4 (downloaded from your Primary LyX Site).
> I have also LaTex 2.09 (or LaTex 2e).
>
> I would like to use the style file "espcrc2.sty" within LyX.
I'm not familiar with this style but from your description
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Jules Bean wrote:
> I would quite like, personally, a LyX-like program which is a more generic
> 'structured' document editor. Probably an XML editor, with the ability to
> backend onto LaTeX, but also other formats. If I have time, I may have a
> look at that problem.
Don't
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote:
> > Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
> > > While we're here, allow me to suggest that LyX icon file be
> > > installed too. In rpm packages, which are destinated for Linux, icon
> > > file can be put in /usr/share/icons which is t
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 09:55:43PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> However, I decided to import the latex file i\'m currently working on
> and , it doesn\'t work. Its due to a problem with Revtex macros.
> I used the osa.sty style files given by the society which runs with
> revtex 3.1. So
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I downloaded the latest CVS (1.1.4) of Lyx and made changes to the code
| so that it supports:
|
| 1. Fraktur fonts
| 2. The "Blackboard Bold" fonts from the AMS
| 3. Math Script fonts.
|
| (all of these fonts are correctly displayed on the screen when one
| edits a
I downloaded the latest CVS (1.1.4) of Lyx and made changes to the code
so that it supports:
1. Fraktur fonts
2. The "Blackboard Bold" fonts from the AMS
3. Math Script fonts.
(all of these fonts are correctly displayed on the screen when one
edits a document).
This makes use of the Blu
2) you search everywhere for the icon. This is tedious
especially if t he locationwasn't clear at first.
rpm -ql lyx |grep lyx.xpm
/usr/local/share/lyx/images/lyx.xpm
I am using neither gnome nor kde.
Mate
---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
Offtopic.
I've just received the messages concerning the release of 1.1.3.
Strange that some of the messages come quite late to me.
Ask iname.com. All the messages to you in the last 3 days left my server
less than 1 min after the post. In other words iname's mail servers
accepted
Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
|
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
|
| > What is the reason for the -I/usr/include ion the command line?
|
| I saw "no prototype for kill" and "no definition for errno" and such
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the reason for the -I/usr/include ion the command line?
I saw "no prototype for kill" and "no definition for errno" and such so I included
this.
Now I'm trying 1.1.3 and the problems I encounted and some silly "hack" I used is
like:
1.
configur
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Seak,> I just checked that actually \tensor isn't included in
> > Seak,> standard macros in tetex. But if LyX could support things like
> > Seak,> R_i{}^j{}_{kl} it's alright good enough.
> >
> > What about the
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
> Maybe this is already suggested, but I can't find the wish-list or FAQ
> section, please forgive me if this is asked once again.
>
> I can't find the following symbols that I'm going to mention in the math
> panel (not even in LyX 1.1.2), so I suppos
Ben Cazzolato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Guys
|
| I just installed the RPM for 1.1.3. Lyx no longer recognises the old
| "lastfiles" that can be found in .lyx/lastfiles.
|
| I've recreated this file by exiting Lyx and then re-entering it. Now it works.
|
| I've never seen this before when
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Even if we are still busy doing a lot of code shuffling and
| Lars> cleanup we have time to release a new version.
|
| Lars> New Features: - the -dbg command line switch
Guys
I just installed the RPM for 1.1.3. Lyx no longer recognises the old
"lastfiles" that can be found in .lyx/lastfiles.
I've recreated this file by exiting Lyx and then re-entering it. Now it works.
I've never seen this before when upgrading. Is this a bug?
Ben
Dear Sirs,
I have the LyX version 1.0.4 (downloaded from your Primary LyX Site).
I have also LaTex 2.09 (or LaTex 2e).
I would like to use the style file "espcrc2.sty" within LyX.
How can I do?
How can I add this particular style to those (for example AMS) that LyX already
has by default?
In
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Even if we are still busy doing a lot of code shuffling and
Lars> cleanup we have time to release a new version.
Lars> New Features: - the -dbg command line switch is enhanced. f.ex.
Lars> "-dbg lyxrc" works now. - lightly bet
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> "Jean-Pierre.Chretien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Compilation on Sun/Solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1 | - configure still
Lars> doesn't deal with --program-suffix correctly: | * as is,
Lars> installs in /usr/local/share/lyx rega
> > Oh I see. In this case, could you put i586 instead of i386 in the name,
> > please?
>
> Why should one put 'i586' into the name of a package that is supposed to
> work on the i386 architecture?
Oh I see. Actually, when I asked that an i586 optimized rpm package be made,
you answer
>
> Oh I see. In this case, could you put i586 instead of i386 in the name,
> please?
Why should one put 'i586' into the name of a package that is supposed to
work on the i386 architecture?
Andre'
--
Andre' Poenitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 07:54:16AM +0100, Seak, Teng-Fong wrote:
> >
> > When will the official RPM package for 1.1.2 be available? Or even
> > 1.1.3 if it will be out very soon. While making this package, is it also
> > possible to make another one optimized fo
> "David" == David L Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Weirdness with 1.1.3: Spaces show up now in mathed. Is that
David> intentional? It is not a good idea, IMO. They should have to be
David> forced spaces. TeX handles spacing of math better than you can
David> in LyX. Now, if you a
"David L. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Weirdness with 1.1.3:
|
| Spaces show up now in mathed. Is that intentional? It is not a good idea,
| IMO. They should have to be forced spaces. TeX handles spacing of math
| better than you can in LyX. Now, if you are at the end of a mathed
Hello Michael,
About the log you sent: I think the warnings about string litterals
should be fixed in 1.1.3. The other ones are more annoying, but I am a
bit surprised:
CC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I../../images -I./../ -I/usr/include
-I/usr/local/include -I/home/fan/local/inclu
"Jean-Pierre.Chretien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Compilation on Sun/Solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1
| - configure still doesn't deal with --program-suffix correctly:
|* as is, installs in /usr/local/share/lyx regardless of
|program-suffix
I do not know the right solutions for this (yet), but I a
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Release of LyX 1.1.3.
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
>>Date: 01 Dec 1999 01:25:05 +0100
[snip]
>>Note that the internal code changes have been great, so unwanted bugs
>>might have sneaked in. No serious bug
"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > OK. But I'd suggest making --export foo == --function "buffer-export foo",
| > as it's easier to remember and explain.
|
| This option is already there since you can type
|
| --execute "buffer-export foo"
|
| and --export is transformed interna
"Andre' Poenitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To Amir: Of course often used commands should get simple aliases, and in
| fact --export foo translates directly to --execute "buffer-export foo"
| already.
I don't agree.
Lgb
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 01:25:05AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-1.1.3.tar.tgz
| > (will be moved to stable if few/no serious bugs are reported)
|
| There were some (not so serious maybe) bugs reported so fa
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It looks like the just-released 1.1.3 still has the debugging statements
| in the source:
|
| normalkey
| enter process
| finished variables
| normalkey
| enter process
| finished variables
| normalkey
no
31 matches
Mail list logo
