Re: testing 1.6.2-svn

Maybe it is because I did not a new checkout but a switch from trunk? This is what I suspect. JMarc

Re: r28768 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: ANNOUNCE sr...

v...@lyx.org writes: | Author: vfr | Date: Sat Mar 14 11:47:29 2009 | New Revision: 28768 | Modified: lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp?rev=28768 |

Re: r28768 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: ANNOUNCE sr...

Lars Gullik Bjønnes schreef: v...@lyx.org writes: | Author: vfr | Date: Sat Mar 14 11:47:29 2009 | New Revision: 28768 | Modified: lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp?rev=28768

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: The test tarball is available here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (probably end of next week). Thanks,

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I've committed the two fixes for Qt4.5. thanks. Are we set now or are there still more issues open ? no, we are ready now. I'll set up the final tarball now. By the way, note that ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx is still not available, so before releasing 1.6.2, we'll

1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple errors. First involves the use of the arrow symbol (pointing down and to the left) for the return key: the error is: Could not find LaTeX command for character '[arrow

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

BH wrote: I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple errors. No problem here. Jürgen

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: BH wrote: I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple errors. No problem here. The first error -- with the return symbol -- is an

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

BH wrote: The first error -- with the return symbol -- is an error in generating LaTeX rather than typesetting. (Thus, File Export LaTeX fails.) Concerning the second set of errors, when I create a new file with the Comment or Greyed Out notes, I don't get anything in the preamble

LyX 1.6.2

LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can log into the server, but I cannot upload anything). Thanks everybody for testing,

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

spitz wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Mar 14 15:20:37 2009 New Revision: 28773 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28773 Log: back to work. Branch is open for commits again. Jürgen

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: BH wrote: The first error -- with the return symbol -- is an error in generating LaTeX rather than typesetting. (Thus, File Export LaTeX fails.) Concerning the second set of errors, when I create a new file with the

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: spitz wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Mar 14 15:20:37 2009 New Revision: 28773 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28773 Log: back to work. Branch is open for commits again. Is anyone getting the CVS log stuff at this point? I'm not, though I am

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

rgheck wrote: Is anyone getting the CVS log stuff at this point? I'm not, though I am getting mail sent to rgh...@lyx.org. Lars told me that cvslog is (and probably remains) dead. Try to subscribe to lyx-cvs. Jürgen

Trac instead of bugzilla.

I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) -- Lgb

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. What does it buy us? Jürgen

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 16:37, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. What does it buy us? Simpler system. -- Lgb

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi Juergen, LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in

Re: LyX 1.6.2

Sven Hoexter wrote: Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be sufficient? Jürgen lyx-1.6.2.tar.gz.sig Description: PGP signature lyx-1.6.2.tar.bz2.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) No objection but did you manage to migrate all bugs? Abdel.

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 17:52, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote: On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) No objection but

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On 14/03/2009 17:57, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 17:52, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org mailto:you...@lyx.org wrote: On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections?

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can log into

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be sufficient? Sure. Thanks. Now I just need to meet you to

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Hi, No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad... Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible to retain the

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Please, find a cygwin binary here: http://www.lyx.org/~forenr/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz -- Enrico

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:36:05 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) As long as it works I have no preference between trac or bugzilla. A nice bonus

slashdot thread on Collaborative Academic Writing Software

http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/13/1925238 : ...One solution to this is to simply pair up LaTeX with version control software (such as Subversion) to allow multiple collaborators to work on the same document at one time. But adding Subversion to the mix only seems to increase the

eLyXer logo

Hi all, I have published eLyXer successfully: http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/ELyXer and announced it on lyx-users, and it seems there is some interest in it even now, when it is not too polished. So I have decided to go on and host it on Savannah, the FSF facility for hosting GNU and non-GNU

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 19:36, José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote: On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:36:05 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) As long

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? I'm very comfortable with bugzilla. I therefore also requested from time to time to upgrade to bugzilla 3.x, because this brought some other nice features. But its only a matter of taste that I like bugzilla

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

First involves the use of the arrow symbol (pointing down and to the left) for the return key: the error is: Could not find LaTeX command for character '[arrow symbol]' (code point 0x21b5). This is because we don't have this character in the unicodesymbols file, because there is no

Re: LyX 1.6.2

LyX 1.6.2 is here: I've uploaded the alternative Windows installer here: http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=15926 Can you please put it to ftp.lyx.org? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: testing 1.6.2-svn

Maybe it is because I did not a new checkout but a switch from trunk? This is what I suspect. JMarc

Re: r28768 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: ANNOUNCE sr...

v...@lyx.org writes: | Author: vfr | Date: Sat Mar 14 11:47:29 2009 | New Revision: 28768 > | Modified: lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp?rev=28768 |

Re: r28768 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: ANNOUNCE sr...

Lars Gullik Bjønnes schreef: v...@lyx.org writes: | Author: vfr | Date: Sat Mar 14 11:47:29 2009 | New Revision: 28768 | Modified: lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp | URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X/src/support/FileName.cpp?rev=28768

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: The test tarball is available here: http://www.lyx.org/~spitz/lyx-1.6.2rc1.tar.gz If no regressions are reported, this will become LyX 1.6.2. Please test. Meanwhile, branch remains frozen until the freeze lift is announced (probably end of next week). Thanks,

Re: LyX 1.6.2 release candidate

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I've committed the two fixes for Qt4.5. thanks. > Are we set now or are there still more issues open ? no, we are ready now. I'll set up the final tarball now. > By the way, note that ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx is still not available, so > before releasing 1.6.2, we'll

1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple errors. First involves the use of the arrow symbol (pointing down and to the left) for the return key: the error is: "Could not find LaTeX command for character

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

BH wrote: > I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with > Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple > errors. No problem here. Jürgen

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BH wrote: >> I've just recompiled latest branch to test its compatibility with >> Qt-4.5. However, typesetting the User's Guide leads to multiple >> errors. > > No problem here. The first error -- with the "return"

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

BH wrote: > The first error -- with the "return" symbol -- is an error in > generating LaTeX rather than typesetting. (Thus, File > Export > LaTeX > fails.) > > Concerning the second set of errors, when I create a new file with the > Comment or Greyed Out notes, I don't get anything in the

LyX 1.6.2

LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can log into the server, but I cannot upload anything). Thanks everybody for testing,

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

spitz wrote: > Author: spitz > Date: Sat Mar 14 15:20:37 2009 > New Revision: 28773 > > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28773 > Log: > back to work. Branch is open for commits again. Jürgen

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BH wrote: >> The first error -- with the "return" symbol -- is an error in >> generating LaTeX rather than typesetting. (Thus, File > Export > LaTeX >> fails.) >> >> Concerning the second set of errors, when I create a

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: spitz wrote: Author: spitz Date: Sat Mar 14 15:20:37 2009 New Revision: 28773 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28773 Log: back to work. Branch is open for commits again. Is anyone getting the CVS log stuff at this point? I'm not, though I am

Re: r28773 - in /lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_6_X: configure.a...

rgheck wrote: > Is anyone getting the CVS log stuff at this point? I'm not, though I am > getting mail sent to rgh...@lyx.org. Lars told me that cvslog is (and probably remains) dead. Try to subscribe to lyx-cvs. Jürgen

Trac instead of bugzilla.

I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) -- Lgb

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. What does it buy us? Jürgen

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 16:37, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. > > What does it buy us? Simpler system. -- Lgb

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi Juergen, > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in

Re: LyX 1.6.2

Sven Hoexter wrote: > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your > system? I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be sufficient? Jürgen lyx-1.6.2.tar.gz.sig Description: PGP signature lyx-1.6.2.tar.bz2.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions? Objections? (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) No objection but did you manage to migrate all bugs? Abdel.

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 17:52, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. >> >> Opinions? Objections? >> (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) >> >> > >

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On 14/03/2009 17:57, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 17:52, Abdelrazak Younes > wrote: On 14/03/2009 16:36, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. Opinions?

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable > > As usual, I will wait a bit with the announce, to give the packagers the time > to set up the binaries. I hope ftp.lyx.org will be back until then (I can

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your > > system? > > I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be > sufficient? Sure. Thanks. Now I just need to

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Hi, > No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad... Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible to retain the

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Please, find a cygwin binary here: http://www.lyx.org/~forenr/lyx-1.6.2-cygwin.tar.gz -- Enrico

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:36:05 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. > > Opinions? Objections? > (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...) As long as it works I have no preference between trac or bugzilla. A nice

slashdot thread on Collaborative Academic Writing Software

http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/13/1925238 : "...One solution to this is to simply pair up LaTeX with version control software (such as Subversion) to allow multiple collaborators to work on the same document at one time. But adding Subversion to the mix only seems to increase

eLyXer logo

Hi all, I have published eLyXer successfully: http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/ELyXer and announced it on lyx-users, and it seems there is some interest in it even now, when it is not too polished. So I have decided to go on and host it on Savannah, the FSF facility for hosting GNU and non-GNU

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 19:36, José Matos wrote: > On Saturday 14 March 2009 15:36:05 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. > > > > Opinions? Objections? > > (Keep in mind that you are setting yourself up for admin duties...)

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

> I'd like to use trac for tracking bugs instead of bugzilla. > > Opinions? Objections? I'm very comfortable with bugzilla. I therefore also requested from time to time to upgrade to bugzilla 3.x, because this brought some other nice features. But its only a matter of taste that I like bugzilla

Re: 1.6.2: Can't compile User's Guide

> First involves the use of the arrow symbol (pointing down and to the > left) for the return key: the error is: "Could not find LaTeX command > for character '[arrow symbol]' (code point 0x21b5)". This is because we don't have this character in the unicodesymbols file, because there is no

Re: LyX 1.6.2

> LyX 1.6.2 is here: I've uploaded the alternative Windows installer here: http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=15926 Can you please put it to ftp.lyx.org? thanks and regards Uwe