Add alignment in graphics option

Dear lyx team Thank you for all. Now, when after i added any gaphics in my book: - click right on the image, then setting, then i sellected width and ... , closed. - then paragraph setting/ alignment/center. I hope you can make it easy, by add alignment in the graphics setting, to let us adding

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: prepare for a new 2.3 release (hopefully a beta)

El 03.08.2017 a las 00:03, Scott Kostyshak escribió: Should this be beta1? This depends on you, either alpha2 or beta 1. regards Uwe

Re: What kinds of "code" can be embedded in a LyX document and "run" from LyX?

On 3/08/2017 8:45 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:50:47PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: * Execution occurs at preview or when related to exporting a document. I agree it is a good idea to discuss specifically what can happen during preview and what can

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: prepare for a new 2.3 release (hopefully a beta)

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:27:53PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:31:50AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > commit 52025d5c9b5857ae9a0df67d78cd75f8e955e288 > > Author: Uwe Stöhr > > Date: Tue Jul 25 00:31:45 2017 +0200 > > > > Win installer: prepare

Re: [LyX/master] Preferences shows current zoom instead of preference's default zoom (#10455)

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 08:23:39AM +1000, racoon wrote: > On 25.07.2017 07:49, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 07:41:32PM +1000, racoon wrote: > > > On 22.07.2017 08:38, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > No, sorry. Most importantly, I do not understand what the debug messages >

Safety/security: I've received some good advice

Hi, I've consulted about LyX with someone who's an IT security professional. I'll later post that stuff separately to developers list, and/or add it to the wiki page. This post is just to make sure you guys can remind if I manage to forget as I'm tired and won't do it tonight. /Christian

Re: What kinds of "code" can be embedded in a LyX document and "run" from LyX?

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:50:47PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > * Execution occurs at preview or when related to exporting a document. I agree it is a good idea to discuss specifically what can happen during preview and what can only happen during export. Scott

Re: [LyX/master] Cmake build: Ignore boost settings if we are using std-regex

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:48:42AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 31. Juli 2017 um 01:09:09, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 07:41:02AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Samstag, 29. Juli 2017 um 19:14:01, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > >

Re: Solved: lyx executable built with cmake will not run

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 1. August 2017 um 15:11:03, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Am Dienstag, 1. August 2017 um 14:47:36, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > > > Le 01/08/2017 à 10:57, Scott Kostyshak a

Re: Solved: lyx executable built with cmake will not run

Am Dienstag, 1. August 2017 um 15:11:03, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Dienstag, 1. August 2017 um 14:47:36, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > Le 01/08/2017 à 10:57, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Jean-Pierre

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On 08/02/2017 10:11 AM, Guillaume MM wrote: > Please do not let Enrico's new attacks affect you. Can we please put an end to this kind of public comment? If you want to make such remarks privately, that is totally reasonable. But this sort of snark is totally uncalled for, and it is not helping

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On 08/02/2017 07:25 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:05:19AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> [[So the situation is as Richard described it:]] we can of course decide to >> remove something before the final release. > Moreover, this last sentence means that you still want

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On 08/01/2017 07:13 PM, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 1 August 2017 at 21:24, Richard Heck > wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > It sounds like you complain about the time spent on discussing what I > assume is not just the minted patch but safety/security in

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:11:42PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > The first thing we will remember about your handling of this discussion > is your commitment of rationality. Please do not let Enrico's new > attacks affect you. I have really no words able to correctly describe you. -- Enrico

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Le 01/08/2017 à 10:50, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: I am sure that Scott meant to include in some way the option that I have been advocating constantly from the beginning, which I understand is probably 1. (Otherwise, I do not see what

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:05:19AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I expected the point about a second vote being unfair, but since I did not > consider the first vote fair (due to my poor structuring of the options), I > chose to do a second vote. I must add that your fairness was lacking well

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Agreed too. I will add that we should not neglect the harm we are inflicting to our smallish team by making people increasingly pissed off at each other. Security is important, but bikeshedding has a cost, and I am not sure that we can afford it. We have to take into account that the minted

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:05:19AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I am going to take the advice of the senior developers and to cancel the > second vote. Dear Scott, you can try to remove the nail but the hole remains. > we can of course decide to remove something before the final release.

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Am 01.08.2017 9:24 nachm. schrieb "Richard post-beta1 vote, we may decide to remove it. It's obviously up to you, Scott, as release manager, but I agree with Enrico, to some extent, that this isn't the best policy. We have spent an enormous amount of time on this and finally have come to some

Re: [patch] update PDF viewers in configure.py

On 2017-08-02, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Master PDF is a PDF editor, not viewer. -> it should be added to PDF editors I an not sure PDF editors are already supported by configure.py, but they can be set via Tools>Preferences. + no interference with PDF viewers - it is not clear how to use this entry.

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 1 August 2017 at 01:25, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Would you mind pointing me to that post? I don't know if I simply missed it > or was unable to read/consider/reply at the time. I can, but would you mind start using some reasonable technical

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:15:23AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > It's obviously up to you, Scott, as release manager, but I agree with > > Enrico, > > to some extent, that this isn't the best policy. We have spent an enormous > > amount of time on this and finally have come

Re: Long threads? / list etiquette? (Was: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue)

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Ah I did not realize you did that on purpose. I actually found it annoying > when > I wanted to go up the discussion and couldn't because it was cut off +1 Pavel

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

Richard Heck wrote: > It's obviously up to you, Scott, as release manager, but I agree with Enrico, > to some extent, that this isn't the best policy. We have spent an enormous > amount of time on this and finally have come to some kind of resolution. It > really would be best to close that part

Re: Discussing minted/safety/etc (Was: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue)

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:00:47AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > Hmm, and perhaps in case of votes, Scott should (be allowed to) weigh them > differently depending on the persons knowledge. E.g., since I don't > know/understand the (intended) safety design, why should my vote count as >

Re: Long threads? / list etiquette? (Was: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue)

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:20:24AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > Richard wrote: > > > We have spent an enormous amount of time on this ... > > > > HI, > > Regarding the discussion of LyX's safety I'd like to make a few remarks > related to ... ?list etiquette? Not sure what the correct

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:13:14AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote: > On 1 August 2017 at 21:24, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 08/01/2017 04:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:35:27AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >> Pavel Sanda wrote: > > >>> I did

Re: Options for resolving the minted + shell-escape issue

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:24:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 08/01/2017 04:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:35:27AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Pavel Sanda wrote: > >>> I did not hear your reaction to it either. > >> I see you just did that, sorry... P > > I

Re: [LyX/master] UserGuide.lyx: accept and distribute description of inverted branches

On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 01:52:14PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >   Original Message   > From: Scott Kostyshak > Sent: Dienstag, 1. August 2017 10:57 > > >  So I guess that for Additional, I will create a > > Changelog-Additional-LyX_23x.txt retaining only what is to be done once I've > > done the

Re: Ad a section in the wiki page about LaTeX safety

Le 02/08/2017 à 09:30, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : Hello, Following Christian's suggestion, I've added a section about the subject http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SafetyAndSecurity#toc2 I've been unable to approve the last link, none of the passwords would work. -- Jean-Pierre

Ad a section in the wiki page about LaTeX safety

Hello, Following Christian's suggestion, I've added a section about the subject http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/SafetyAndSecurity#toc2 Is it useful/appropriate? There is also in the Customization manual a section (6.4) about security and safety for externel material. Should this be rewritten in