On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:45:44PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think everybody has now heard enough arguments from anybody else, so
> I suggest we stop arguing and go voting to see how the preferences are.
>
> Three options have been proposed:
>
> A. Include the change without way to
On 2020-08-17 12:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
Personally I don't care whether old or new combo version is used,
but I haven't
seen much support for the change from the others.
Thanks a lot for your feedback. Here are my initial, maybe
Am 17.08.2020 um 12:45 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
>>> Personally I don't care whether old or new combo version is used,
>>> but I haven't
>>> seen much support for the change from the others.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your feedback. Here
On 2020-08-17 18:25, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 8/17/20 10:48 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 17/8/20 15:49, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Daniel wrote:
I guess you don't like the current Preferences > Editing > Control
because
it contains two GUI switches that seem
On 8/17/20 10:48 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 17/8/20 15:49, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Daniel wrote:
>>> I guess you don't like the current Preferences > Editing > Control
>>> because
>>> it contains two GUI switches that seem to apply to a single combobox
>>
>>
On 8/17/20 1:35 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2020, 21:26 +0100 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
>> What is wrong with
>>
>> pos_type ipos = min(cur.pos(), cell(i).size());
>>
>> it expresses intent better than the other code, no? :-)
> This was my first choice, too. However,
On 8/16/20 6:10 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 02:21:35PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 10:01:22AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I like that idea a lot and would personally find it
On 17/8/20 15:49, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Daniel wrote:
I guess you don't like the current Preferences > Editing > Control because
it contains two GUI switches that seem to apply to a single combobox
Indeed.
I have suggested the formatted combobox a
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> But we can. Add the cases to invertedTests, together with your
> comment.
I meant in terms of making it compile.
> Will do.
Thanks.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:51:18 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > > Thanks. So the remaining /ru/ documents have to wait for
> > polyglossia.
> > > (I checked with polyglossia from repo, but the that alone did not
> > >
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> What do you mean with 'complete distribution'?
>
> All I did was
> $ kpsewhich polyglossia.sty
> --> /usr/local/texlive/2020/texmf-
> dist/tex/latex/polyglossia/polyglossia.sty
> $ cd ~/polyglossia
> $ git pull
> $ cd
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > Thanks. So the remaining /ru/ documents have to wait for
> polyglossia.
> > (I checked with polyglossia from repo, but the that alone did not
> > help)
>
> Did you check with the polyglossia style file only or with the
>
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:04:24 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 14:40 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Thanks. So the remaining /ru/ documents have to wait for polyglossia.
> > (I checked with polyglossia from repo, but the that alone did not
> > help)
>
> Did you
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Daniel wrote:
> I guess you don't like the current Preferences > Editing > Control because
> it contains two GUI switches that seem to apply to a single combobox
Indeed.
> I have suggested the formatted combobox a little while ago with reasons for
> why
Le 17 août 2020 15:28:22 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
>On 17/8/20 14:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 17 août 2020 14:46:34 GMT+02:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> a écrit :
>>> 3/ new prefs that make debugging difficult, among others
>>
>> s/that//
>
>What does that mean?
>--
>Daniel
>
>--
On 17/8/20 14:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 17 août 2020 14:46:34 GMT+02:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a
écrit :
3/ new prefs that make debugging difficult, among others
s/that//
What does that mean?
--
Daniel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 15:17 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> Maybe something like this could fix it?
The voting is running. Either name your vote or don't. I am not going
to change the procedure in any way.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel
On 17/8/20 14:49, Daniel wrote:
On 17/8/20 14:04, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:58 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
The choices are:
A. Include the change without way to opt-out
B. Include the change but only if it can be opted out
(i.e., do not include it if it cannot
Le 17 août 2020 14:46:34 GMT+02:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a
écrit :
>3/ new prefs that make debugging difficult, among others
s/that//
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 14:40 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Thanks. So the remaining /ru/ documents have to wait for polyglossia.
> (I checked with polyglossia from repo, but the that alone did not
> help)
Did you check with the polyglossia style file only or with the complete
distribution?
On 17/8/20 14:04, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:58 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
The choices are:
A. Include the change without way to opt-out
B. Include the change but only if it can be opted out
(i.e., do not include it if it cannot be opted out)
C. Do not include
Le 17 août 2020 12:45:44 GMT+02:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" a
écrit :
>I think everybody has now heard enough arguments from anybody else, so
>I suggest we stop arguing and go voting to see how the preferences are.
With a result along the lines of the latest screenshot posted by Daniel I think
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:12:19 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:57 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > Ignore these. This document is not set for XeTeX or LuaTeX (I am not
> > going to investigate the necessary document changes).
>
> OK, I set some appropriate
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:57 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Ignore these. This document is not set for XeTeX or LuaTeX (I am not
> going to investigate the necessary document changes).
OK, I set some appropriate non-TeX fonts, so the tests with system
fonts should pass now.
LuaTeX with
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:58 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> The choices are:
>
>
>
> A. Include the change without way to opt-out
>
> B. Include the change but only if it can be opted out
>
> (i.e., do not include it if it cannot be opted out)
>
> C. Do not include the change
>
>
>
> I
On 14/4/20 9:23, Daniel wrote:
If I read correctly, then drop-down list items can be styled in Qt. I
think it would look awesome and, more importantly, enhance finding items
if the layout list would provide some of the WYSIWYM styles from the
work area. I'd suggest font attributes and
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> 463 - export/export/latex/languages/mixed_ltr-art_arabi-standard-
> font_dvi3_texF (Failed)
> 464 - export/export/latex/languages/mixed_ltr-art_arabi-standard-
> font_dvi3_systemF
> (Failed)
> 468 -
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:26:03 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2020, 19:27 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > The following tests FAILED:
> > 462 - export/export/latex/languages/mixed_ltr-art_arabi-standard-
> > font_dvi (Failed)
> > 463 -
On 17/8/20 13:44, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:53:37PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Three options have been proposed:
A. Include the change without way to opt-out
B. Include the change but only if it can be opted out
(i.e., do not include it if it cannot be opted out)
C. Do
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 13:42 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> I guess questions are still allowed.
I only count votes in this subthread and ignore everything else.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:53:37PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Three options have been proposed:
> >
> > A. Include the change without way to opt-out
> > B. Include the change but only if it can be opted out
> >(i.e., do not include it if it cannot be opted out)
> > C. Do not include the
Am 17.08.2020 um 13:30 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 08:38 +0100 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
>> pos_type ipos = min(cur.pos(), pos_type(cell(i).size()));
>
> Changed on top of Stephan's fix (plus constify).
That’s better indeed. Fine.
Stephan
--
lyx-devel mailing
On 17/8/20 12:53, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:45:44 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
Personally I don't care whether old or new combo version is used,
but I haven't
seen much support for the change from the others.
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 08:38 +0100 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> pos_type ipos = min(cur.pos(), pos_type(cell(i).size()));
Changed on top of Stephan's fix (plus constify).
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2020, 19:27 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> The following tests FAILED:
> 462 - export/export/latex/languages/mixed_ltr-art_arabi-standard-
> font_dvi (Failed)
> 463 - export/export/latex/languages/mixed_ltr-art_arabi-standard-
> font_dvi3_texF (Failed)
> 464 -
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:45:44 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> > > Personally I don't care whether old or new combo version is used,
> > > but I haven't
> > > seen much support for the change from the others.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:13 +0200 schrieb Daniel:
> > Personally I don't care whether old or new combo version is used,
> > but I haven't
> > seen much support for the change from the others.
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback. Here are my initial, maybe not well
> thought through, thoughts
On 2020-08-17 10:59, Daniel wrote:
On 2020-08-17 10:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 17 août 2020 09:28:11 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
The answer to "Do we want the feature at all? If not, how could it be
changed to be good for everyone?" seems to be:
First question: Some seem to want it,
Am Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:59:31 +0200
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 17 août 2020 09:28:11 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
> >I think you missed to send the link. But I seem to remember to have
> >read
> >it before but found it quite controversial. Anyway, it would be nice if
> >
> >you could
On 2020-08-17 10:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 17 août 2020 09:28:11 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
The answer to "Do we want the feature at all? If not, how could it be
changed to be good for everyone?" seems to be:
First question: Some seem to want it, one seems to be indifferent only
if
Le 17 août 2020 09:28:11 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
>I think you missed to send the link. But I seem to remember to have
>read
>it before but found it quite controversial. Anyway, it would be nice if
>
>you could share it again, so I can refresh my memory.
Sorry, here it is.
Le 17 août 2020 09:28:11 GMT+02:00, Daniel a écrit :
>The answer to "Do we want the feature at all? If not, how could it be
>changed to be good for everyone?" seems to be:
>
>First question: Some seem to want it, one seems to be indifferent only
>if there is a GUI switch, others are
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 08:38 +0100 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> OK then what about
>
> pos_type ipos = min(cur.pos(), pos_type(cell(i).size()));
Looks better.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
On Monday, 17 August 2020 06.35.27 WEST Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2020, 21:26 +0100 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> > What is wrong with
> >
> > pos_type ipos = min(cur.pos(), cell(i).size());
> >
> > it expresses intent better than the other code, no? :-)
>
> This was my
On 2020-08-17 00:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 16 août 2020 21:27:44 GMT+02:00, racoon a écrit :
In general, ever thought about a further switch called "Advanced
Preferences"?
Adding an "advanced preference" section is a good sign that there is a
preference issue ;)
Here is some
On 2020-08-16 23:13, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 09:16:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 16 ao??t 2020 16:08:25 GMT+02:00, racoon a écrit :
On 2020-08-16 16:06, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Pavel was joking.
Was he?
I was actually serious. It's absurd to
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 01:50 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Here is the entry in the nlo file:
> >
> > \nomenclatureentry{a"@, "|, "!, ""{}@[{"@, "|, "!,
> > ""{}}]\begingroup
> > Das Anführungszeichen wird im TeX-Code
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 01:50 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Here is the entry in the nlo file:
>
> \nomenclatureentry{a"@, "|, "!, ""{}@[{"@, "|, "!, ""{}}]\begingroup
> Das Anführungszeichen wird im TeX-Code mit der Sequenz ' ""{}""{} '
> ausgegeben.\nomeqref {6.0}|nompageref}{120}
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:24:07AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The script seems to be called whenever I choose *any* option from the
> context menu, not just the "Open citation content" option.
Should be fixed now.
> Regarding the hardcoding, it's hard to think of an alternative. If we
>
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 08:10 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> And which index processor do you use?
nomencl processor, for that matter.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Am Montag, den 17.08.2020, 01:50 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Here is the entry in the nlo file:
>
> \nomenclatureentry{a"@, "|, "!, ""{}@[{"@, "|, "!, ""{}}]\begingroup
> Das Anführungszeichen wird im TeX-Code mit der Sequenz ' ""{}""{} '
> ausgegeben.\nomeqref {6.0}|nompageref}{120}
And
51 matches
Mail list logo
