the error
Marcelo message when I noticed that the computer was hung. I reset it
Marcelo and now, during the starting, shows an error as if it did not
Marcelo have installed operating system. I have debian lenny 5.0.5,
Marcelo for amd64.
Did it eat your cat as well?
:-D
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
Marcelo My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason.
No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has
happened with your cat? ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
gt; error: segment violation. It was trying to read the error
Marcelo> message when I noticed that the computer was hung. I reset it
Marcelo> and now, during the starting, shows an error as if it did not
Marcelo> have installed operating system. I have debian lenny 5.0.5,
Marcelo> for amd
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña <mv...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
Marcelo> My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason.
No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has
happene
will happen with XeTeX since LuaTeX is supposed to
replace or rather become new PDFTeX and will handle Unicode as well?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
latex.
OK. That was clear enough as well.
Now I wonder what will happen with XeTeX since LuaTeX is supposed to
replace or rather become new PDFTeX and will handle Unicode as well?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
)
Otoh, just enter 'XML sucks' in Google and you will have some nice
reading. :-)
OT: Can someone explain me what is the aim of latex-3 development in
the light of LuaTeX or LuaTeX will be just another implementation?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA
t understand what problem would XML format in LyX
solve? (YAGNI)
Otoh, just enter 'XML sucks' in Google and you will have some nice
reading. :-)
OT: Can someone explain me what is the aim of latex-3 development in
the light of LuaTeX or LuaTeX will be just another implementation?
Sincerely,
is lacking proper support...
Sincerely,
Gour
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:41 +0100, Gour wrote:
I pulled the code from svn and will try to build it to see how well can
LyX play with XeTeX...both Kile Texmaker work with utf-8 so it will be
pity if LyX is lacking proper support...
Ahh, some problems with my keyboard :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
the present LaTeX limitations of
utf8 encoded files will go away.
That's why we have XeTeX ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
, should I send backtraces here or to bugzilla?
Sincerely,
Gour
be
pitty if LyX is lacking proper support...
Sincerely,
Gour
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:41 +0100, Gour wrote:
> I pulled the code from svn and will try to build it to see how well can
> LyX play with XeTeX...both Kile & Texmaker work with utf-8 so it will be
> pity if LyX is lacking proper support...
Ahh, some problems with my keyboard :-)
you can not expect that all the present LaTeX limitations of
> utf8 encoded files will go away.
That's why we have XeTeX ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
ase of segfaults, should I send backtraces here or to bugzilla?
Sincerely,
Gour
But, I'll try to build XeTeX and Gentoo and see how it goes.
Sincerely,
Gour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-order
bytes in the initial 16-bit code units). Either way, the input is
assumed to be valid Unicode.
/quote
So, by getting LyX work with Unicode in utf-8, we will get XETEX support
as well :-)
However, no fun for LyX-1.4.x
Sincerely,
Gour
rmail/xetex/2006-October/005319.html
But, I'll try to build XeTeX and Gentoo and see how it goes.
Sincerely,
Gour
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ark code, or by null high-order
bytes in the initial 16-bit code units). Either way, the input is
assumed to be valid Unicode.
So, by getting LyX work with Unicode in utf-8, we will get XETEX support
as well :-)
However, no fun for LyX-1.4.x
Sincerely,
Gour
ftxpost.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 23446 Mar 23 2005 ftxsbit.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3462 Mar 23 2005 ftxwidth.h
So, what is the proper way to include the ../freetype2 header dir?
Does the gtk front-end needs freetype1 or freetype2?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
,
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
.
Sincerely,
Gour
JMarc
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
Here I have:
Cflags: -I${includedir}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/usr/include/freetype2/config
afaics, it should work, but it doesn't.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What is your version og gtkmm? The code seems to look explicitely for
2.4, isn't it?
Huh, I have 2.8.1.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
oot root 2161 Mar 23 2005 ftxpost.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 23446 Mar 23 2005 ftxsbit.h
-rw-r--r--1 root root 3462 Mar 23 2005 ftxwidth.h
So, what is the proper way to include the ../freetype2 header dir?
Does the gtk front-end needs freetype1 or freetype2?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered
e same error,
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
e that.
That would be good.
Sincerely,
Gour
>
> JMarc
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
gs: -I${includedir}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
Here I have:
Cflags: -I${includedir}/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/usr/include/freetype2/config
afaics, it should work, but it doesn't.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What is your version og gtkmm? The code seems to look explicitely for
> 2.4, isn't it?
Huh, I have 2.8.1.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
considering the present status of LyX's GUI-independence?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
pgpHd0VcBqeDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for this info.
Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature multi-platform
toolkit with a fair licence.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key
with wxWidgets.
Unfortunately I'm not qualified to do that, but maybe someone will apper to take
a challenge.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
that some
toolkit is 'more natural'?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
is enough for me :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
) to three main platforms:
Linux, Mac Win32, instead of having devlopers working on each port separately
- saving the developer time.
Besides that, wxWidgets seems more stable than GTK on win32 and give native
widgets, and gives, imho, enough bells whistles too.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
considering the present status of LyX's GUI-independence?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
pgpHd0VcBqeDq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
Thank you for this info.
Is there any reason why wxWidgets toolkit is (somehow) avoided?
It's not that I'm pushing it, but, imho, it looks like a mature multi-platform
toolkit with a fair licence.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #27849
ething wrong with wxWidgets.
Unfortunately I'm not qualified to do that, but maybe someone will apper to take
a challenge.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
e territory, can we say that some
toolkit is 'more natural'?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
ding present LyX (which is enough for me :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
(almost automatically) to three main platforms:
Linux, Mac & Win32, instead of having devlopers working on each port separately
- saving the developer time.
Besides that, wxWidgets seems more stable than GTK on win32 and give native
widgets, and gives, imho, enough bells & whistles to
or your input.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Registered Linux User | #278493
GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
44 matches
Mail list logo
