Re: compilation for coverity fails

On 06/12/2016 02:45 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 12/06/2016 19:39, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 06/12/2016 09:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 12/06/2016 15:05, Georg Baum a écrit : >>>> If others want to join the effort please keep in mind that the goa

Re: compilation for coverity fails

On 06/12/2016 09:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/06/2016 15:05, Georg Baum a écrit : >> If others want to join the effort please keep in mind that the goal >> is not >> to get zero coverity errors, but to fix dangerous code. So if you do not >> understand an issue 100%, or understand it

Fwd: [LyX/master] Add comment about coverity #23335.

Anyone have any thoughts about this? I'm not terribly familiar with this part of the code. Richard Forwarded Message Subject:[LyX/master] Add comment about coverity #23335. Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 06:46:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>

Fwd: [LyX/master] Add comment about coverity #102061.

+0200 (CEST) From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Reply-To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org To: lyx-...@lists.lyx.org commit f19d6507523de69850a7dc2e522411b1d91eeefc Author: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Date: Sun Jun 12 00:22:09 2016 -0400 Add comment about coverity #1

Re: LyX 2.2.0 Linux Compilation Error

On 06/11/2016 12:32 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 11/06/2016 04:40, Joel Kulesza a écrit : >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org >> <mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>> wrote: >> >> You could try adding: >> >> #include &

Merge 2.2.2-staging?

If anyone would like to go ahead and merge 2.2.2-staging into 2.2.x, feel free to do so. I'd do it myself but am about to be away for a week for a conference and may not have the time. Richard

Re: [LyX/master] Correct path names were to look for RPM based dictionaries for hunspell on Linux.

On 06/11/2016 06:11 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 29.05.2016 um 23:56 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >> commit 3a2fc1595b316e0847d25b0604ec9188d953af01 >> Author: Stephan Witt <sw...@lyx.org> >> Date: Tue May 10 18:06:48 2016 +0200 >> >>

What Qt Version for 2.2.x?

The INSTALL file says that one can use Qt as far back as 4.5.0. But we use QFont::Monospace in GuiApplication.cpp, and this appears not to have existed in Qt 4.6. See http://doc.qt.io/archives/4.6/qfont.html in particular, the QFont::StyleHint enum. Richard

Re: LyX 2.2.0 Linux Compilation Error

On 06/10/2016 11:40 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org > <mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>> wrote: > > You could try adding: > > #include > > to support/filetools.cpp. > > > Richard, thanks for

Re: LyX 2.2.0 Linux Compilation Error

On 06/10/2016 04:25 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote: > LyX Developers, > > I'm attempting to compile LyX 2.2.0 for local/single user use on RHEL6 > with GCC 5.3.0 / Python 3.4 (see below signature for configure > summary) and very quickly run into errors on make. Specifically, I see: > > CXX

Re: please put new LyX 2.2.0 Win installer on ftp.lyx org

On 06/09/2016 09:00 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hello Scott, > > I released a new installer versions in which LyX 2.2.0 is built > against Qt 5.6.1 and that includes updated versions of MiKTeX and JabRef. > (Also the user having problems with LyX 2.2.0 on Windows confirmed > that they went away after a

Re: [LyX/master] Improve build for FreeBSD.

On 06/08/2016 10:35 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> commit 3f4901de9ce36866b75e56ec6864354e4119e647 >> Author: Pavel Sanda >> Date: Wed Jun 8 19:33:08 2016 -0700 >> >> Improve build for FreeBSD. >> >> Patch from Shankar Giri Venkita Giri. >> >> diff

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/08/2016 03:57 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> Our use of git would make it very easy for us to have a branch in which >>> new features not requiring format changes could also be put. >>&g

Re: [LyX/2.2.x] Fix some problems with the preamble in th eKoma-script letter template.

On 06/07/2016 04:38 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> diff --git a/lib/templates/koma-letter2.lyx >> b/lib/templates/koma-letter2.lyx index 43cbdb0..7251ff3 100644 >> --- a/lib/templates/koma-letter2.lyx >> +++ b/lib/templates/koma-letter2.lyx >>

Re: Wishlist for future LyX

On 06/07/2016 12:27 PM, Edwin Leuven wrote: > On 03 Jun 2016, at 18:35, Helge Hafting wrote: >> here are some wishes for the future: > Hide changes (in lyx) Some work was done on this a few years ago by me and Vincent. I think all of it is in his features/HideChanges

Re: #10197: Lyx 2.2 scrambles Vector graphics (and general Layout)

On 06/06/2016 07:18 PM, Steffen Guhlemann wrote: > On june, first i installed Lyx2.2. I'll second Uwe's suggestion here. It's not wise to update to a new major version at such a critical juncture. Go back to 2.1.4 for now, at least. > 1. exported pdf differs. Same if you export tex(pdflatex) =>

[PATCH] Inserting references to label

s purpose, but that seems like overkill. Richard >From 302e23844b15b18d1cb0bb503ba45c4e895d973e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:36:27 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Restore last selected label when using the "go to label" feature of the referenc

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 06:40 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > The point of the proposal is to enabling the early testing and release > of *non-file-format* changes. Then for a proper master release only > file-format changes remain to be fully tested. This assumes these aspects do not interact. Oftentimes,

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 06:10 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/06/2016 9:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> >>>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>>>> Yet, mos

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether >>> one could introduce a single compilation variable to disable them, >>> and ask developers to

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 04:27 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 06/06/2016 20:33, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could introduce a single

Fwd: Blurry inserted figures for retina display in Lyx 2.2 Mac

Questions like this one are better sent to the developers' list, so I'm forwarding it there. Forwarded Message Subject:Blurry inserted figures for retina display in Lyx 2.2 Mac Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:05:03 -0400 From: Zhexuan Gong To:

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

On 06/04/2016 01:28 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> OK, please commit to 2.2.x. (Safe enough, yes?) > Done. Yes, it is safe. And even if something went wrong you would now see it > in the diffs when sommitting .po files: The only visible diffs should now

Re: [LyX/master] Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings

On 06/04/2016 11:54 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >> commit 960bcc71c18b21e0444cfce3d9a5e7c10cb3172a >> Author: Georg Baum >> Date: Sat Jun 4 17:33:19 2016 +0200 >> >> Get rid of pseudo diffs when remerging strings >> >> cmake sorts the input files for

Re: One official build system?

On 06/03/2016 04:28 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016 um 12:42:33, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >>> I guess maybe there is a question worth discussing here about how many >>

Re: One official build system?

On 06/03/2016 11:37 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, June 3, 2016 1:16:04 AM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> From what I understand, most developers on Linux use autotools. I can't >> tell if this is because that is what most developers have experience >> with or if it is because autotools

Re: Horizontal crolling impossible in table in float in LyX 2.2.0

On 06/01/2016 04:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/06/16 à 18:34, Richard Heck a écrit : >> I hope to do the 2.1.5 release in a week or so. Once that's been done, >> and if nothing really bad has appeared in the meanwhile, then we let's >> merge 2.2.2-staging and

Re: [LyX/2.1.x] Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is in preparation for the 2.1.5 release.

On 06/01/2016 03:08 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> commit 4eb3ed96e53ab0eb2af519caa6125cac79c823ad >> Author: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >> Date: Wed Jun 1 12:31:48 2016 -0400 >> >> Update lyx2lyx from 2.2.0. This is i

Re: Horizontal crolling impossible in table in float in LyX 2.2.0

On 06/01/2016 08:02 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 23:20, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> Since it is a regression and the patch is simple, this could actually >>> be candidate for branch right now, Richard. >> >> Sure, looks safe enough. > >

Re: Horizontal crolling impossible in table in float in LyX 2.2.0

On 05/30/2016 05:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 30/05/2016 11:20, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : >> LyX 2.2.0, windows 7 >> >> For a table outside a float the arrow-key horizontal scrolling works >> fine. If the table is in a float, there is no scrolling at all. I've >> attached an example

Re: Git Branch Update

On 05/29/2016 03:40 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 28/05/2016 22:49, Richard Heck a écrit : >> The old 2.3-staging >> branch has been merged into master. I'll plan to delete 2.3-staging >> completely in a few days. > > Rebasing local branches fails with strange

Re: What should trac issues be marked as that are fixed in master and 2.2.2-staging?

On 05/29/2016 06:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I would say that they should be marked as fixed in master, but the > fixedinstaging keyword should be kept. Yes, that seems right. Richard

Re: new installer for LyX 2.1.4 available

On 05/26/2016 09:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 26.05.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >> everything is now ready. Please put the new installer for LyX 2.1.4 to >> the ftp server: >> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.1.4/ > > I uploaded there version a new version 7 of the installer for 2.1.4 to > avoid

Git Branch Update

With 2.2.0 having been released, we are back to a more normal development model. The master branch is now open for normal development work toward 2.3.0, with a tentative release date of November. ;-) The old 2.3-staging branch has been merged into master. I'll plan to delete 2.3-staging

Re: Merging 2.3-staging

On 05/28/2016 05:41 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, den 28.05.2016, 05:30 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >> To branch 2.2.x can't we always do >> >> git branch 2.2.x 2.2.0 >> >> regardless of whether 2.3-staging was merged into master? > You're right, I didn't think of that

Translations for 2.1.5

. Richard Heck Branch Maintainer

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 05/24/2016 06:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading >> the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors. > > Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your patient work. > > I built it

Re: Minor last minute edits in fr.po

On 05/24/2016 04:02 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 23/05/2016 23:22, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Jean-Marc pointed out to me a mistake and a shortcut conflict, I have >> 2 commits >> ready fot these. Should this wait for 2.2.1 or may I push to master ? >> > > Richard, one

Re: [patch] fix bug 10124 (XHTML export of some symbols)

On 05/21/2016 05:11 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > While testing imagemagick 7 (more on that later) I stumbled upon bug 10124 as > well. It is a simple typo where LyX outputs / instead of . OK for > 2.2.0? Scott's call, of course, but it certainly looks safe to me. Richard

Re: new installer for LyX 2.1.4 available

On 05/17/2016 05:13 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.05.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> Hello Richard, >> >> users informed me about a serious problem:... > > Hello Richard, > > please don't upload this installer. The MiKTeX developer said me that > he will release this week a new installer that

InsetLayout Argument Delimiters

Suppose I do something like this: InsetLayout Flex:Test LyXType custom LatexName test LatexType command Decoration classic LabelString test LeftDelim [ RightDelim ] End I'd expect to get as output something like: \test[This is the argument] In fact, what I get is:

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Do not use 'u' flag for ar

On 05/12/2016 11:59 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/05/2016 à 18:02, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 11/05/2016 à 17:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >>>> commit 987fc1d15d017c192a566fc922e3967d9

Re: LyX doesn't work with ImageMagick 7

On 05/12/2016 01:28 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Am 11.05.2016 um 23:40 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: >> Am 11.05.2016 um 22:11 schrieb Georg Baum: >> >>> Uwe, can you please tell what "broken" means? >> >> LyXHTML still triggers the comand "convert" for the image >> conversions. But in IM7 there is now only the

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Do not use 'u' flag for ar

On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/05/2016 à 17:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> commit 987fc1d15d017c192a566fc922e3967d9d280668 >> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> Date: Wed May 11 17:09:34 2016 +0200 >> >> Do not use 'u' flag for ar > >

Re: LyX doesn't work with ImageMagick 7

On 05/10/2016 06:00 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Good news. IM decided now to continue the IM6 series. they just > released 6.9.4: > http://www.imagemagick.org/download/binaries/ > > So there is no to hurry with LyXHTML. It would nevertheless bee > helpful if LyXHTML can support IM7 and its new command

Re: In some cases, document settings will appear as uneditable in 2.2.x after lyx2lyx (10095)

On 05/04/2016 02:21 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:25:29PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/25/2016 01:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >>>> On 04/24/2016 10:21 PM, Cyrille Arth

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] TocWidget: Fix perf regression

On 05/02/2016 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:17:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Le 01/05/2016 00:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: This is candidate for 2.2.0 and 2.1.5. >>> How noticeable

Re: 2.2.0rc1 tar balls are available

On 04/28/2016 07:14 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/04/2016 22:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Ran the tests and everything looks good. >> >> The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6. > > Not bad :) Richard, interested for 2.1.5? Yes, sure. rh

Re: #10096: Keyboard shortcut for interword space does not work on Mac

On 04/27/2016 05:55 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 27.04.2016 um 17:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 27.04.2016 um 07:43 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker : #10096: Keyboard shortcut for interword space

Re: [PATCH] 2.2rc1: Horizontal scrolling table floats

On 04/26/2016 05:15 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 26.04.2016 um 17:51 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >> On 04/26/2016 03:02 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 26.04.2016 um 06:10 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >>>> On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Stepha

Re: Extra space before nested sublist

On 04/27/2016 11:36 AM, Kemal Ilgar Eroglu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using LyX version 2.1.4. My problem is as follows: > > When creating a nested list environment, LyX inserts a blank line > before the \begin{enumerate} of the sublist. It creates code like: > > \begin{enumerate} > \item One >

Re: [PATCH] 2.2rc1: Horizontal scrolling table floats

On 04/26/2016 03:02 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 26.04.2016 um 06:10 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >> On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 25.04.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: >>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at

Re: [PATCH] 2.2rc1: Horizontal scrolling table floats

On 04/25/2016 11:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 25.04.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:09:56AM -0500, disinteres...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I did figure out a recipe: Open a blank document, then immediately open >>> another blank document in a

Re: [LyX/master] Revert part of c053a9394d1075ecad02ccce2f34c95f08c1f00f This change introduced a regression and is not needed anymore.

Since you've reverted this in master, you don't need to worry about any of the other branches. They will get merged into master. Richard On 04/25/2016 03:00 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > commit 21e4e939be5e7f02ca1fc1c25b1fd15caf60ae6d > Author: Stephan Witt > Date: Mon Apr 25

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Revert part of c053a9394d1075ecad02ccce2f34c95f08c1f00f This change introduced a regression and is not needed anymore.

On 04/25/2016 03:41 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Richard, is this ok for 2.2 branches as well? Yes, it's fine. You can commit to any branch where this is present. Richard > Stephan > >> Am 25.04.2016 um 20:57 schrieb Stephan Witt : >> >> commit

Re: In some cases, document settings will appear as uneditable in 2.2.x after lyx2lyx (10095)

On 04/25/2016 01:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:48:00AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/24/2016 10:21 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote: >>> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>> In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative >

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.2rc1: Horizontal scrolling table floats

On 04/25/2016 12:09 PM, disinteres...@gmail.com wrote: > I did figure out a recipe: Open a blank document, then immediately > open another blank document in a new *window*, open preferences, > toggle cursor follows scrollbar, and hit apply. Reliable sigsev. As > far as I can tell, it doesn't

Re: In some cases, document settings will appear as uneditable in 2.2.x after lyx2lyx (10095)

On 04/24/2016 10:21 PM, Cyrille Artho wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative >> values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed >> for 2.2.0dev but what that means is that if you open such a document >> with

Re: In some cases, document settings will appear as uneditable in 2.2.x after lyx2lyx (10095)

On 04/24/2016 09:46 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 04:24:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/24/2016 01:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative >>> values to be input into some

Re: In some cases, document settings will appear as uneditable in 2.2.x after lyx2lyx (10095)

On 04/24/2016 01:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > In 2.1.x, because of a bug in our validator code, we allowed negative > values to be input into some document settings. This bug has been fixed > for 2.2.0dev but what that means is that if you open such a document > with LyX 2.2.0dev, you will not

Re: English letters in the index

On 04/23/2016 09:46 AM, edu Gpl wrote: > > Dear lyx team > When i used lyx 2.2 beta2 in windows10. I got some english letters in > the index. > Please see the image in attachment. > I'm no expert with indices, but I do know that we'd need to see some kind of example file to be able to figure this

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Simplify class structure in TocBackend

On 04/22/2016 01:49 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: commit d7d4f65b39f44cf7f56bd81eb329e5bf89858027 Author: Guillaume Munch Date: Fri Jan 8 19:06:50 2016 + Simplify class structure in TocBackend Deriving from std::vector to provide helper functions appears a

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.2rc1: Horizontal scrolling table floats

On 04/22/2016 06:22 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 21/04/2016 10:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 21/04/2016 01:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:23:54PM -0500, disinteres...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, a little more digging lead me to this: If there is text in the

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On 04/17/2016 04:35 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 04:10:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 04/16/2016 04:01 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> Le 24/01/2016 23:08, Enrico Forestieri a �crit : >>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:41:39

Re: bug in LyX, space afte TeX

On 04/20/2016 01:20 PM, GNU Support wrote: > Hello, > > Now I understand it, it is not something to be handled by LyX, in that case > it is not a "bug". It is very unexpected, though, I'll agree. One might wonder whether the space in LyX itself should not be handled as a space in this case. But

Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 insert-citation problems

On 04/20/2016 08:39 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 20/04/2016 14:31, bruce muirhead a écrit : > >> I have, apparently, been wasting your time, but all I can say is thank >> you---without confirmation that the file worked, I would not have found >> what was causing my problem. > > Don't

LyX/2.2.2-staging Discussion [Was: Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views]

On 04/19/2016 05:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 17:01:58, schrieb Richard Heck >> <rgh...@lyx.org> >>> >>> Note that nothing goes to 2.2.x-staging that is n

Re: [LyX/2.2.2-staging] Fix display of InsetCollapsable with split views

On 04/19/2016 04:58 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 15:09:40, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > >> Le 19/04/2016 14:05, Kornel Benko a écrit : >>> Am Dienstag, 19. April 2016 um 12:04:19, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >>> commit

Staging Branches: A Brief Explanation

Since there seems still to be some confusion about this, let me just try to put it all down in the simplest form I can: 1. Anything that would ordinary have gone to master should go to 2.3-staging. 2. The rules for 2.1.x are as normal. 3. Anything that goes to 2.3-staging is also eligible, in

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/19/2016 03:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> The other two 2.2.x-staging branches are entirely for book-keeping >> purposes. It is just easier for me to have the various fixes that are >> intended for 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 in git branches rather than

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/19/2016 04:49 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:07:01PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> We should already be on 2.2 and not on master, which is the future: 2.3 >>> >> Yes, that was also my proposal. >> >> However, people appear to be afraid to not have the

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/18/2016 05:07 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > > > > We should already be on 2.2 and not on master, which is the future: 2.3 > > > > Yes, that was also my proposal. > > However, people appear to be afraid to not have the 2.2.0 tag in master. > > But note that if the 2.2-branch in this

Re: [RFC] Staging Branches and Trac

On 04/18/2016 05:19 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > Op 16 apr. 2016 21:50 schreef "Richard Heck" <rgh...@lyx.org > <mailto:rgh...@lyx.org>>: > > > > > > As Scott pointed out, my previous suggestions for how fixes committed to > > th

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/18/2016 05:02 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 18. April 2016 22:56:06 MESZ, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >> On 04/18/2016 04:32 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> Am 18. April 2016 22:29:51 MESZ, schrieb "Peter Kümmel" >> <syntheti...@gmx.net>:

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/18/2016 04:32 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am 18. April 2016 22:29:51 MESZ, schrieb "Peter Kümmel" : >> I also think these branches are overkill. >> >> I would only use master and 2.2. No 2.3, it is so far away that it could be >> in master. >> >> 2.2 should be always

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Change mouse cursor on tabular selection zones

On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/04/2016 14:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> commit 5b7be5eb61d68466f808099ea3524cb2966333f9 >> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> Date: Tue Feb 2 17:07:29 2016 +0100 >> >> Change mouse cursor on tabular

Re: [RFC] Staging Branches and Trac

On 04/18/2016 12:21 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/04/2016 18:08, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 04/18/2016 06:13 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 16/04/2016 21:49, Richard Heck a écrit : >>>> >>>> As Scott pointed out, my previou

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On 04/18/2016 08:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/04/2016 06:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> <0001-Make-monolithic-build-code-portable-to-Mac-OS.patch> >> >> Sorry for the late response: yes, it works here on my Mac. > > I put it in 2.3-staging. > > Richard, is it OK for 2.2.2? Yes. rh

Re: [RFC] Staging Branches and Trac

On 04/18/2016 06:13 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/04/2016 21:49, Richard Heck a écrit : >> >> As Scott pointed out, my previous suggestions for how fixes committed to >> the staging branches should be handled in trac was silly. We can't reuse >> "fixedinm

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Handle activateWindow in LFUN_BUFFER_SWITCH like in saveBufferIfNeeded() and doShowDialog() methods. This is a requirement on Mac to get the current buffer view topmost after buf

On 04/17/2016 11:12 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 17.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org>: >> On 04/17/2016 09:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Am 16.04.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Stephan Witt <sw...@lyx.org>: >>>> commit 5f368aec7b3206c873c94294

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Sanitize InsetMathHull and add a check for mutability in LFUN_MATH_MUTATE

On 04/16/2016 07:15 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 17/04/2016 00:09, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 04/16/2016 05:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> commit 9b45121e4fbecd6c15f42d81a6d522236079760c >>> Author: Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> >>&

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Handle activateWindow in LFUN_BUFFER_SWITCH like in saveBufferIfNeeded() and doShowDialog() methods. This is a requirement on Mac to get the current buffer view topmost after buf

On 04/17/2016 09:09 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 16.04.2016 um 22:30 schrieb Stephan Witt : >> commit 5f368aec7b3206c873c94294def906911523dc8e >> Author: Stephan Witt >> Date: Sat Apr 16 22:30:33 2016 +0200 >> >>Handle activateWindow in LFUN_BUFFER_SWITCH like

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Sanitize InsetMathHull and add a check for mutability in LFUN_MATH_MUTATE

On 04/16/2016 05:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 9b45121e4fbecd6c15f42d81a6d522236079760c > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Mon Dec 14 01:54:27 2015 + > > Sanitize InsetMathHull and add a check for mutability in LFUN_MATH_MUTATE > > Remove in particular all

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Correct col spacing in Cases environment

On 04/16/2016 05:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 112367ed4de65d1cd2456408bf8df54a3841bcf4 > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Fri Apr 8 20:24:12 2016 +0200 > > Correct col spacing in Cases environment Fine for 2.2.2. rh

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

On 04/16/2016 05:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit ada69c1f81d1f088ffdd43ac0cbfebe3031aac80 > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Sun Dec 13 03:32:32 2015 + > > Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments > > A longstanding problem... (related:

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Fix the display of column spacing in AMS environments

On 04/16/2016 05:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 7e59242874f6a29c1fa5818deb5cad4d9c759391 > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Sun Dec 20 20:56:34 2015 + > > Fix the display of column spacing in AMS environments Fine for 2.2.2. rh

Re: [LyX/2.2.2-staging] status.22x

On 04/16/2016 06:23 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 72ce4519de0933660d246944ca2266e0d26b0d94 > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Sat Apr 16 23:23:03 2016 +0100 > > status.22x Thanks for creating this file. rh

Re: Staging Branches [REVISED]

On 04/16/2016 04:25 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/04/2016 20:44, Richard Heck a écrit : >> >> We now have three staging branches. These are: >> >> 2.3-staging >> 2.2.1-staging >> 2.2.2-staging >> >> >> 2.3-staging c

Re: [RFC] Staging Branches and Trac

On 04/16/2016 04:19 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/04/2016 20:49, Richard Heck a écrit : >> >> As Scott pointed out, my previous suggestions for how fixes committed to >> the staging branches should be handled in trac was silly. We can't reuse >> "fixedinm

Re: [LyX/2.3-staging] Raise the maxlastfiles cap

On 04/16/2016 04:09 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 3f5c2b11e543e126224181edcbb4c34289a9e342 > Author: Guillaume Munch > Date: Wed Jan 13 01:30:05 2016 + > > Raise the maxlastfiles cap > > This only changes the maximum value that the user can choose in the UI,

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On 04/16/2016 04:01 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 24/01/2016 23:08, Enrico Forestieri a �crit : >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:36:03PM -0500, Guillaume Munch wrote: Maybe we can go with the improvements you already

[RFC] Staging Branches and Trac

As Scott pointed out, my previous suggestions for how fixes committed to the staging branches should be handled in trac was silly. We can't reuse "fixedinmaster" for 2.3-staging. I'm also not sure that we want to introduce a new status "fixedinstaging" for such a short time. Here, then, is a

Re: Staging Branches

On 04/16/2016 01:45 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/04/16 19:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:34:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> >>> As usual, fixes for bugs committed to 2.2.1-staging (=2.2.x) should >>> first be >

Staging Branches [REVISED]

We now have three staging branches. These are: 2.3-staging 2.2.1-staging 2.2.2-staging 2.3-staging can be treated as master usually is: It is for development on what will become 2.3 and is now open for commits. This branch will be merged into master after the release of 2.2.0.

Re: Staging Branches

On 04/16/2016 01:31 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:34:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >> As usual, fixes for bugs committed to 2.2.1-staging (=2.2.x) should first be >> committed to 2.3-staging (=master). These should be marked "fi

Re: Staging Branches

On 04/16/2016 09:30 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 16. April 2016 um 08:34:47, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >> I have just created two staging branches, as discussed in a previous >> thread. These are: >> >> 2.3-staging >> 2.2.1-

Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic

On 04/15/2016 05:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:20:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 07/04/2016 00:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not personal

Re: lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

On 04/15/2016 05:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:09:56PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:49:55AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 28/03/2016 00:04, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : It seems we currently use "git show ${hash}" in our script.

Staging Branches

I have just created two staging branches, as discussed in a previous thread. These are: 2.3-staging 2.2.1-staging The former can be treated as master usually is: It is for development on what will become 2.3 and is now open for commits. This branch will be merged into master

Re: CRASH 2.2.0dev with XeLaTeX and Utopia font

On 04/15/2016 01:10 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > Don't ask me how I find these... > I'm at 744f6e3cd802 now, compiled with Qt 5.6.0 on Linux Fedora 24. I > get the same behavior with an older binary compiled with Qt 4.8.7. > Before filing a bug report, I need someone to confirm: > > Start LyX 2.2 >

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >