Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 12:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
There is a very nasty bug in LyX 1.2.2 configure script: if you
configure as root and an error occurs during the configure step
(e.g. xforms not found), the the script will delete the /dev/null
device. This undoubtly leads to very
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Hello,
It seems that we need to release LyX 1.2.3 right now. Please find
appended the list of changes that are in cvs currently. If there is a
patch that you really think should be added, please tell me about it.
i have one
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 18:10 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
[...]
so it should work for rh62 and above
LyX is useful even if perl is not installed. I am no friend of unnecessary
dependencies.
you're right PreReq perl
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 12:32 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> There is a very nasty bug in LyX 1.2.2 configure script: if you
> configure as root and an error occurs during the configure step
> (e.g. xforms not found), the the script will delete the /dev/null
> device. This undoubtly leads to
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that we need to release LyX 1.2.3 right now. Please find
> appended the list of changes that are in cvs currently. If there is a
> patch that you really think should be added, please tell me about it.
i have one
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 18:10 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:07:05PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > [...]
> > so it should work for rh62 and above
>
> LyX is useful even if perl is not installed. I am no friend of unnecessary
> dependencies.
Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:45 schrieb Moritz Moeller-Herrmann:
Ronny Buchmann wrote:
you can find one for rh73 here (together with xforms-1.0):
source rpms should be fine for rh7.x and rh8 (and maybe others)
my spec file for lyx is attached (uses the icon from angus)
I have
Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:45 schrieb Moritz Moeller-Herrmann:
> Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > you can find one for rh73 here (together with xforms-1.0):
> > source rpms should be fine for rh7.x and rh8 (and maybe others)
> > my spec file for lyx is attached (uses the i
}
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
%changelog
* Wed Dec 18 2002 Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.2-2
- remove '' from desktop file
- change Group
- desktop file as config file
* Tue Dec 17 2002 Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.2-1
- update to 1.2.2
- add desktop file
* Fri Aug 23 2002 Ronny
x.desktop
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man?/*
%{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_datadir}/texmf/tex/latex/%{name}
%changelog
* Wed Dec 18 2002 Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.2.2-2
- remove '"' from desktop file
- change Group
- desktop file as config file
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%_xlibdir/*.so.*
%files -n %name-devel
%defattr(-,root,root)
/usr/X11R6/bin/*
/usr/X11R6/include/*
%_xlibdir/*.so
%_xlibdir/*.a
%changelog
* Thu Dec 10 2002 Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0-1
- cleanup
-lGL -ljpeg -lXpm"
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" install
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
%_xlibdir/*.so.*
%files -n %name-devel
%defattr(-,root,root)
/usr/X11R6/bin/
* Reinhard Stepanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-09-01 14:41] wrote:
On 31-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Jürgen,
you asked for feedback, so...
The new banner is VERY bright IMO. Moreover, the background of the
1.2.0cvs
clashes badly with that of banner.xpm.
Personally,
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-31 17:53] wrote:
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff
* Reinhard Stepanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-09-01 14:41] wrote:
>
> >
> >On 31-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > Jürgen,
> > >
> > > you asked for feedback, so...
> > >
> > > The new banner is VERY bright IMO. Moreover, the background of the
> > "1.2.0cvs"
> > > clashes badly with that of
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:53] wrote:
> * Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
|
| Good question. I don't know ;-)
|
| I
* Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-31 17:10] wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> | > what do I need to do to get the new symbols stuff working in mathed?
> |
> | Good question. I don't know ;-)
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-23 07:03] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
And, potentially, you could actually properly display (simple) macros
that the user himself might have defined in the LaTeX preamble window,
directly, or by
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-23 11:07] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:37:16AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
It is not hard to generate the information we need for all latex symbols
from the latex files (fontmath.ltx and amssymb.sty).
Looks like you are volunteering.
Would
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-23 11:34] wrote:
- so-called latex-symbols:
- we have symbols without any package
- with package latexsym
- amsmath symbols
- lots of other packages with special symbols,
like wasysym, marvosym a.s.o.
it makes sense to support
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-23 07:03] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > And, potentially, you could actually properly display (simple) macros
> > that the user himself might have defined in the LaTeX preamble window,
> > directly, or by
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-23 11:07] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:37:16AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > It is not hard to generate the information we need for all latex symbols
> > from the latex files (fontmath.ltx and amssymb.sty).
>
> Looks like you are volunteering.
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-23 11:34] wrote:
> > - so-called latex-symbols:
> > - we have symbols without any package
> > - with package latexsym
> > - amsmath symbols
> > - lots of other packages with special symbols,
> > like wasysym, marvosym a.s.o.
> >
> > it
* Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-22 14:37] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:11:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Could anybody please try the attached patch and report failure or success?
It works, but the rendering is not correct.
It appears that the problem is only with the
* Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-22 14:37] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:11:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > Could anybody please try the attached patch and report failure or success?
>
> It works, but the rendering is not correct.
> It appears that the problem is only
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-21 15:47] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:48:46PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:54:56AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Attached is a tar file with maps for the main TeX math fonts and the Type1
version of these fonts (from
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-21 15:47] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:48:46PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 06:54:56AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > > Attached is a tar file with maps for the main TeX math fonts and the Type1
> > > > version of
* Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 22:20] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:41:23PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
%define _prefix /usr/local
you dont need this, use Prefix: /usr/local instead
Well, I told you I build RPMs quite often. The above is not correct.
You can
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-17 11:16] wrote:
* Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-17 07:50] wrote:
I have an HP4050 which is a duplexing printer that understands Postscript. My
lyx file is defined as 2 side, and indeed it has a binding margin that's left
on odd pages
* Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-17 07:50] wrote:
I have an HP4050 which is a duplexing printer that understands Postscript. My
lyx file is defined as 2 side, and indeed it has a binding margin that's left
on odd pages and even on right pages. But I can't find any place to tell the
* Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 22:20] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 08:41:23PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > > %define _prefix /usr/local
> > you dont need this, use "Prefix: /usr/local" instead
> >
>
> Well,
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-17 11:16] wrote:
> * Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-17 07:50] wrote:
> > I have an HP4050 which is a duplexing printer that understands Postscript. My
> > lyx file is defined as 2 side, and indeed it has a
* Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-17 07:50] wrote:
> I have an HP4050 which is a duplexing printer that understands Postscript. My
> lyx file is defined as 2 side, and indeed it has a binding margin that's left
> on odd pages and even on right pages. But I can't find any place to tell
* Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 13:06] wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know whether the rpm files for development snapshots provided
by Kayvan can also be applied safely to a Suse system? AFAIK there are
some differences between the various distributions and the rpms are
primarily
* Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 09:31] wrote:
On 15-Aug-2001 Reinhard Stepanek wrote:
I would prefer the version with 30 colors. The antialiasing effect is
better there.
24 colors or so wouldn't make any difference to the version with 16 colors
refering to antialiasing.
* Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 18:50] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
does anybody know whether the rpm files for development snapshots provided
by Kayvan can also be applied safely to a Suse system? AFAIK there are
some differences between
* Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 19:23] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
You're right Michael. Kayvan's RPM use very few RPM features. I have
made recently RPM's that use RPM macros only (instead of /usr/man
(RH6.2) or /usr/share/man (RH7.1) I use
* Reinhard Stepanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 19:26] wrote:
Ronny proposed a combination of traditional colors and new version line...
Look's not bad... ;-)
http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_artwork_banner.html
(in the last half...)
Reinhard
wow, you're fast
but
* Zvezdan Petkovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 19:59] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:33:55PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
the point is, that its not clear, which macros are supported in which
rpm version so maybe zvezdan's rpms dont compile on (older) suse imo
the spec files should
* Reinhard Stepanek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-16 20:45] wrote:
Ronny Buchmann wrote:
wow, you're fast
but the color of the line should be changed (im not sure to what)
it was the same as the blue LYX, right?
so it's a bit alone now
--
ronny
Obviously right! (The first
* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 13:06] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know whether the rpm files for development snapshots provided
> by Kayvan can also be applied safely to a Suse system? AFAIK there are
> some differences between the various distributions and the rpms are
>
* Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 09:31] wrote:
>
> On 15-Aug-2001 Reinhard Stepanek wrote:
> > I would prefer the version with 30 colors. The antialiasing effect is
> > better there.
> > 24 colors or so wouldn't make any difference to the version with 16 colors
> > refering to
* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 18:50] wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
>
> > > does anybody know whether the rpm files for development snapshots provided
> > > by Kayvan can also be applied safely to a Suse system? AFAIK th
* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 19:23] wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > You're right Michael. Kayvan's RPM use very few RPM features. I have
> > made recently RPM's that use RPM macros only (instead of /usr/man
> > (RH6.2) or /usr/share/man (RH7.1) I
* Reinhard Stepanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 19:26] wrote:
> Ronny proposed a combination of traditional colors and "new" version line...
> Look's not bad... ;-)
>
> http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/Reinhard.Stepanek/lyx/lyx_artwork_banner.html
> (in the last half...)
>
> Reinhard
wow, you're
* Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 19:59] wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:33:55PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > the point is, that its not clear, which macros are supported in which
> > rpm version so maybe zvezdan's rpms dont compile on (older) suse i
* Reinhard Stepanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-16 20:45] wrote:
>
> Ronny Buchmann wrote:
>
> >wow, you're fast
> >
> >but the color of the line should be changed (im not sure to what)
> >it was the same as the blue LYX, right?
> >so it's a
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-06 08:42] schrieb:
One thing that would have worked is keeping a separate tree that you
never modify, but only update and try to build that after commits...
That's a good idea. I'll try that at least if I go away for more than a
night...
when you
* John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-06 13:30] schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
when you do cvs commit *, it gives messages about files not in repository
with cvs diff, the files are marked with '?'
When I try 'cvs commit *' it gives 'Use
* John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-08-06 17:45] schrieb:
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
but be careful that it doesnt merge modified files with the (older one) from
repository
eh ? that's what you want anyway. you won't be able to commit unless you're
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-06 08:42] schrieb:
> > One thing that would have worked is keeping a separate tree that you
> > never modify, but only update and try to build that after commits...
>
> That's a good idea. I'll try that at least if I go away for more than a
> night...
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-06 13:30] schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:14:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > when you do "cvs commit *", it gives messages about files not in repository
> > > with "cvs diff", the files are marked with '?'
> >
> > When I try 'cvs commit
* John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-08-06 17:45] schrieb:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
>
> > but be careful that it doesnt merge modified files with the (older one) from
>repository
>
> eh ? that's what you want anyway. you won
* Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-30 16:26] schrieb:
| Only to those people who know all the various in-jokes and references.
eh? '666'?
what do _you_ think/assosiate when you see 666?
i only think hä, was is los? or for non germans what? what's going on here?
(hoping htat
* Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-30 16:26] schrieb:
> > | Only to those people who know all the various in-jokes and references.
> >
> > eh? '666'?
> >
> > what do _you_ think/assosiate when you see "666"?
>
i only think "hä, was is los?" or for non germans "what? what's going on
hi
two little bugs with latex preamble
1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed
2nd: when resizing the dialog (- wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks
really ugly)
--
thanks
ronny
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-21 09:19] schrieb:
hi
two little bugs with latex preamble
1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed
2nd: when resizing the dialog (- wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks
really ugly)
i forgot: lyx
hi
two little bugs with latex preamble
1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed
2nd: when resizing the dialog (-> wider), right scrollbar is also resized (und looks
really ugly)
--
thanks
ronny
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-21 09:19] schrieb:
> hi
>
> two little bugs with latex preamble
>
> 1st (important): in read-only files copy (with mouse) is not allowed
>
> 2nd: when resizing the dialog (-> wider), right scrollbar is also resized
* Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-21 09:21] schrieb:
>
> This site is now updated and looks just as pretty as www.lyx.org.
> (still waiting for the update of the main site but my test site looks
> pretty anyway -- should be only a couple of minutes)
>
> I think there are only a few minor
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-07-12 15:11] schrieb:
Edwin == Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Edwin I'll take these if no one objects (could someone with web
Edwin access set these as pending please?)
I'll do that. BTW, should I kill the kde column in the guii
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-07-12 15:11] schrieb:
> > "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Edwin> I'll take these if no one objects (could someone with web
> Edwin> access set these as pending please?)
>
> I'll do that. BTW, should I kill the kde
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-06-08 18:02] schrieb:
Ronny == Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronny * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronny [2001-06-06 16:57] schrieb:
Hello,
Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix2
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-06-08 18:02] schrieb:
> >>>>> "Ronny" == Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ronny> * Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ronny> [2001-06-06 16:57] schrieb:
> &g
hi
i have a ugly problem with tables made with lyx-1.1.6fix(1,2) on win32: 1.1.6fix(1,2)
on linux can't read them correctly
but it can be read with 1.2.0cvs, and when i save it, it can also be read with 1.1.6
(both linux and win)
but i have a Floatstable now
what to do?
lyx output and
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-06-08 10:06] schrieb:
hi
i have a ugly problem with tables made with lyx-1.1.6fix(1,2) on win32:
1.1.6fix(1,2) on linux can't read them correctly
but it can be read with 1.2.0cvs, and when i save it, it can also be read with 1.1.6
(both linux
hi
i have a ugly problem with tables made with lyx-1.1.6fix(1,2) on win32: 1.1.6fix(1,2)
on linux can't read them correctly
but it can be read with 1.2.0cvs, and when i save it, it can also be read with 1.1.6
(both linux and win)
but i have a "Floatstable" now
what to do?
lyx output and
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-06-08 10:06] schrieb:
> hi
>
> i have a ugly problem with tables made with lyx-1.1.6fix(1,2) on win32:
>1.1.6fix(1,2) on linux can't read them correctly
>
> but it can be read with 1.2.0cvs, and when i save it, it can also be
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-06-06 16:57] schrieb:
Hello,
Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix2.
Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for
1.1.6fix3. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes.
please add
* Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-06-06 16:57] schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> Appended as usual is a list of what has been fixed since 1.1.6fix2.
>
> Please tell me what are the open bugs you consider important for
> 1.1.6fix3. Also tell me if I forgot some of the changes.
please add
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 08:56] schrieb:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:54:52PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
hi
last week i've been using lyx the first time with linuxdoc
but there are problems with verbatim environment: characters are (wrongly) quoted
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 22:38] schrieb:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:27:01PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 08:56] schrieb:
i have a file attached, showing the behaviour
it should only show
* Ronny Buchmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 22:42] schrieb:
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 22:38] schrieb:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:27:01PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-21 08:56]
schrieb:
i have
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-05-21 08:56] schrieb:
> On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:54:52PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > last week i've been using lyx the first time with linuxdoc
> > but there are problems with verbatim env
* Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-05-21 22:38] schrieb:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:27:01PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > * Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-05-21 08:56] schrieb:
>
> > i have a file attached, showing th
* Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-05-21 22:42] schrieb:
> * Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-05-21 22:38] schrieb:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:27:01PM +0200, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > > * Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECT
hi
last week i've been using lyx the first time with linuxdoc
but there are problems with verbatim environment: characters are (wrongly) quoted
i.e. ~, ^ are translated to \~{}, \^{}
looks like tex style?
should they be quoted at all?
also things like are translated (to amp; ), but i dont
hi
last week i've been using lyx the first time with linuxdoc
but there are problems with verbatim environment: characters are (wrongly) quoted
i.e. ~, ^ are translated to \~{}, \^{}
looks like tex style?
should they be quoted at all?
also things like "&" are translated (to ), but i dont
* Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-04-09 19:14] schrieb:
Hi,
please read the statement concerning gcc 2.96 at gcc.gnu.org and you will see
they are definitely not be willing to have a look at the problem. However, if
the bug also occurs with gcc-3.0-cvs, they should know about it, of
* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-04-09 19:14] schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> please read the statement concerning gcc 2.96 at gcc.gnu.org and you will see
> they are definitely not be willing to have a look at the problem. However, if
> the bug also occurs with gcc-3.0-cvs, they should know about
hi all,
sorry for this offtopic thread, but maybe i can later help with hp-ux
testing (at least with bug reports)
i got a used C110 for free but without any installation medium, does
anybody have hp-ux = 10.20 on cd for free/minimal cost?
tia
ronny
hi all,
sorry for this offtopic thread, but maybe i can later help with hp-ux
testing (at least with bug reports)
i got a used C110 for free but without any installation medium, does
anybody have hp-ux >= 10.20 on cd for free/minimal cost?
tia
ronny
John Levon wrote:
Mention the compile problems with older versions of xforms.
This OK JMarc ?
Also should go in 1.2.0cvs ...
thanks
john
Index: ChangeLog
John Levon wrote:
> Mention the compile problems with older versions of xforms.
>
> This OK JMarc ?
>
> Also should go in 1.2.0cvs ...
>
> thanks
> john
>
>
>
>
>
> Index: ChangeLog
>
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 29-Jan-2001 John Levon wrote:
Uh, where did you get your xforms RPM from ? Powertools upgrade or
something ? It's not on the standard RH7.0 CDs (I just checked on
ftp.redhat.com).
Well I don't know, this gives rpm -qi
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
>
>> On 29-Jan-2001 John Levon wrote:
>>
>>> Uh, where did you get your xforms RPM from ? Powertools upgrade or
>>> something ? It's not on the standard RH7.0 CDs (I just checked on
>>> ftp.redhat.com).
>>>
>>
>> Well I don't
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Ronny Buchmann wrote:
look at http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/ (archived lyx tips)
Wow, what a comprehensive list of tricks! If the LyX developers feel like LyX
is feature complete, they should (first ask me ;-) and than) have a look at
your page
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Ronny Buchmann wrote:
>
>
>> look at http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/ (archived lyx tips)
>
>
> Wow, what a comprehensive list of tricks! If the LyX developers feel like LyX
> is feature complete, they should (first ask m
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
when opening the LyX user manual as a read-only document, menu item
"Layout/Character" is disabled, whereas "paragraph" and "document" can still be
selected. I think the latter two (or at least "paragraph") should be disabled
as well!?
Michael
why is any
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when opening the LyX user manual as a read-only document, menu item
> "Layout/Character" is disabled, whereas "paragraph" and "document" can still be
> selected. I think the latter two (or at least "paragraph") should be disabled
> as well!?
>
> Michael
why
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in
/usr/local)
i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect
/usr/local/bin/gs is 6.60 and i want gs6.01 for inline
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote:
> > i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in
> > /usr/local)
> > i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect
/usr/local/bin/gs i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix
John release (6.51 ?)
John So it is not a lyx bug ...
OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then
(since ghostscript
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix
> John> release (6.51 ?)
>
> John> So it is not a lyx bug ...
>
> OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then
95 matches
Mail list logo
