Hi Uwe Angus,
- I've never compiled LyX under Win. I'll try this if I have another
compiler than MinGW. But I think that Michael Schmidt can help me here.
I just returned from the US and I am trying to read through all those
600+ emails...
Uwe, if you like to, I can provide you with fresh
Hi Uwe & Angus,
- I've never compiled LyX under Win. I'll try this if I have another
compiler than MinGW. But I think that Michael Schmidt can help me here.
I just returned from the US and I am trying to read through all those
600+ emails...
Uwe, if you like to, I can provide you with
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
activities in the very near future.
Good for you, and congratulations with the delivery to come!
Regards,
Asger
Asger Alstrup wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
activities in the very near future.
Good for you, and congratulations with the delivery to come!
LOL. Thanks, Asger. Not sure that I'll be able to help much with the
delivery bit
Hello LyXers,
Asger wrotes:
Yes, there is maintenance involved in keeping such a package up-to-date,
and it will be fragile for a while until all missing pieces have been
found, but there are lots and lots of Windows users, and some of those
are bound to help out with keeping such a package
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I agree with you. Here my proposal:
http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/lyx_setup_136proposal.exe
When I run it, it finds out that I lack LaTeX, but it does not display any
link or other information about where I can get it. See attached. Clicking
next just exits the
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
activities in the very near future.
I hope this are good news for you. I you've a new job congratulations.
I think that now would be a good
time to hand over the reigns for this installer thingie
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 14:59, you wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my
LyX activities in the very near future.
I hope this are good news for you. I you've a new job
congratulations.
Nooo, I'm in the market for one ;-)
nor agree
Angus Leeming wrote:
Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
It seems that you can stop after sub-src
To get the library only
Peter Kümmel wrote:
A, we have a lurker! Hi, Peter!
Angus Leeming wrote:
Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
It
Asger Alstrup wrote:
When I run it, it finds out that I lack LaTeX,
Was this correct? I mean was LaTeX installed at this time or not. If it
was installed, could you send me the registry path of your distribution
where it stores the path to the latex.exe. At the moment the installer
Angus Leeming wrote:
In other words, I think that the installer should lead the user
through the installation. It shouldn't just do it for him. That's
why I think a summary page at the beginning listing everything that
LyX has found (or not found) that it can use would be a good thing.
So I
Angus Leeming wrote:
A, we have a lurker! Hi, Peter!
I've waited for a good moment to jump out.
H, but does LyX? Might do, but LyX makes much more heavy use of
templates than Qt. Still, most of this is encapsulated by Boost and they
do try and get things to work on Borland.
I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But I still disable the Launch LyX option in the finish page. Because
if one uses it, LyX appears always in english. First if you restart LyX
it will be in the chosen language. Has anybody an idea why this happens.
Angus?
No, I don't know. Perhaps you could set the LANG
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:56:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
It seems that you can
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:59:02PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I you've a new job congratulations.
Aber irgendwas ist Dir verlorengegangen
Andre'
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
activities in the very near future.
Good for you, and congratulations with the delivery to come!
Regards,
Asger
Asger Alstrup wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
>> activities in the very near future.
>
> Good for you, and congratulations with the delivery to come!
LOL. Thanks, Asger. Not sure that I'll be able to help much with the
Hello LyXers,
Asger wrotes:
Yes, there is maintenance involved in keeping such a package up-to-date,
and it will be fragile for a while until all missing pieces have been
found, but there are lots and lots of Windows users, and some of those
are bound to help out with keeping such a package
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I agree with you. Here my proposal:
http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/lyx_setup_136proposal.exe
When I run it, it finds out that I lack LaTeX, but it does not display any
link or other information about where I can get it. See attached. Clicking
next just exits the
Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my LyX
activities in the very near future.
I hope this are good news for you. I you've a new job congratulations.
I think that now would be a good
time to hand over the reigns for this installer thingie
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 14:59, you wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, as I said to Jean-Marc earlier, I'm going to cut back on my
> > LyX activities in the very near future.
>
> I hope this are good news for you. I you've a new job
> congratulations.
Nooo, I'm in the market for one ;-)
> >
Angus Leeming wrote:
Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
It seems that you can stop after sub-src
To get the library only
Peter Kümmel wrote:
A, we have a lurker! Hi, Peter!
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
>> distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
>>
>> all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
Asger Alstrup wrote:
When I run it, it finds out that I lack LaTeX,
Was this correct? I mean was LaTeX installed at this time or not. If it
was installed, could you send me the registry path of your distribution
where it stores the path to the latex.exe. At the moment the installer
Angus Leeming wrote:
In other words, I think that the installer should lead the user
through the installation. It shouldn't "just do it" for him. That's
why I think a summary page at the beginning listing everything that
LyX has found (or not found) that it can use would be a good thing.
So
Angus Leeming wrote:
A, we have a lurker! Hi, Peter!
I've waited for a good moment to jump out.
H, but does LyX? Might do, but LyX makes much more heavy use of
templates than Qt. Still, most of this is encapsulated by Boost and they
do try and get things to work on Borland.
I
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> But I still disable the "Launch LyX" option in the finish page. Because
> if one uses it, LyX appears always in english. First if you restart LyX
> it will be in the chosen language. Has anybody an idea why this happens.
> Angus?
No, I don't know. Perhaps you could set the LANG
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:56:27PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Actually, you do realise that you don't need to compile the whole Qt
> distribution? Looking at the Makefile in the top level qt directory:
>
> all: symlinks src-moc sub-src sub-tools sub-tutorial sub-examples
>
> It seems that
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 03:59:02PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I you've a new job congratulations.
Aber irgendwas ist Dir verlorengegangen
Andre'
Hello Angus and volunteer installer testers,
I just uploaded an improved version of the installer to:
http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/
NOTE: My installer version is not a replacement for Angus' version. It
is based on Angus' code (version 13) and implements new features that
will be
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello Angus and volunteer installer testers,
I just uploaded an improved version of the installer to:
http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/
Woo! You've been busy!
Uwe, why don't you get Lars to give you CVS write access to
development/Win32/packaging ? That way you can
Angus Leeming wrote:
Uwe, why don't you get Lars to give you CVS write access to
development/Win32/packaging ?
I'll ask him. But I still need some space to access test releases to
testers.
I've been thinking over Asger's suggestion on how best to present all
these packages.
I don't know
I wrote:
I think about to omit the install of imagemagick, as LyX
uses only its convert.exe. I think it is possible...
Sorry. Forget this. Of course convert.exe needs nearly all imagemagick
dll's to be able to convert all the different image formats.
Ruurds file repository is just the
I agree with Uwe that your proposal is too complicated. I'm completely
on his side in terms of making the complete installation process as
simple and convenient as possible.
I'm also all in favour of the bundled approach: The installer can
include the minimal python, perl, imagemagick, etc.
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
I agree with Uwe that your proposal is too complicated. I'm completely
on his side in terms of making the complete installation process as
simple and convenient as possible.
I'm also all in favour of the bundled approach: The installer can
include the minimal
Uwe Sthr wrote:
Install the math-fonts automatically.
It was a challenge but it is now implemented. The font installation
should now work on XP, 2000, ME, and 98. I found some useful scripts in
the NSIS forum but has to modyfy them to work with NSIS 2.06 and for
special LyX purposes. I
Hello Angus and volunteer installer testers,
I just uploaded an improved version of the installer to:
http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/
NOTE: My installer version is not a replacement for Angus' version. It
is based on Angus' code (version 13) and implements new features that
will be
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hello Angus and volunteer installer testers,
> I just uploaded an improved version of the installer to:
> http://fkurth.de/uwest/LyX/Installer/
Woo! You've been busy!
Uwe, why don't you get Lars to give you CVS write access to
development/Win32/packaging ? That way you can
Angus Leeming wrote:
Uwe, why don't you get Lars to give you CVS write access to
development/Win32/packaging ?
I'll ask him. But I still need some space to access test releases to
testers.
I've been thinking over Asger's suggestion on how best to present all
these packages.
I don't know
I wrote:
I think about to omit the install of imagemagick, as LyX
uses only its convert.exe. I think it is possible...
Sorry. Forget this. Of course convert.exe needs nearly all imagemagick
dll's to be able to convert all the different image formats.
Ruurds file repository is just the
I agree with Uwe that your proposal is too complicated. I'm completely
on his side in terms of making the complete installation process as
simple and convenient as possible.
I'm also all in favour of the bundled approach: The installer can
include the minimal python, perl, imagemagick, etc.
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
I agree with Uwe that your proposal is too complicated. I'm completely
on his side in terms of making the complete installation process as
simple and convenient as possible.
I'm also all in favour of the bundled approach: The installer can
include the minimal
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Install the math-fonts automatically.
It was a challenge but it is now implemented. The font installation
should now work on XP, 2000, ME, and 98. I found some useful scripts in
the NSIS forum but has to modyfy them to work with NSIS 2.06 and for
special LyX purposes. I
44 matches
Mail list logo
