John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| OK to apply ?
yes.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:41:16PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > 3. no core code is polluted with toolkit headers
>
> I see you added an X11-include into the pimpl.h file.
> Why is that needed?
For KeySym. It's a temporary step (my tree uses a struct instead).
> So I'd say, depend
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, John Levon wrote:
> I'm going to try new "executive summaries" in the hope that this makes
> the purpose AND the rationale of each patch clearer.
>
> o removes useless methods belowMouse() and active() from workarea
> o hides access to the work area behind workarea()
Good st
I'm going to try new "executive summaries" in the hope that this makes
the purpose AND the rationale of each patch clearer.
o removes useless methods belowMouse() and active() from workarea
o hides access to the work area behind workarea()
o makes workarea a scoped_ptr rather than a child
The f
