On 2010-04-01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
I wonder if we could use utf-8 as default latex source encoding for most
(all) languages if the locale is UTF-8.
AFAIK, UTF8 support is too weak in LaTeX right now.
While it is weak in LaTeX, LyX's own
On 2010-04-01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
>> I wonder if we could use utf-8 as default latex source encoding for most
>> (all) languages if the locale is UTF-8.
> AFAIK, UTF8 support is too weak in LaTeX right now.
While it is weak in LaTeX,
Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sandasa...@lyx.org writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
- currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
locale. This fails as soon as the locale is
Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
- pass the noae option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our
font settings.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624
This one is fixed now.
JMarc
Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit :
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
- currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
locale. This fails as soon as the locale is
Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
- pass the "noae" option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our
font settings.
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624
This one is fixed now.
JMarc
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
- currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the document is
8bit (because the
On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda writes:
>> last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
> - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current
> locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the document is
> 8bit (because
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
I am really late with this, but I am a bit overwhelmed by work and baby,
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4072
Default document settings in .layout files
Personnally, I am against this feature as it is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
something to be done with these two?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6137
I have also work
Hi,
Please read bellow.
On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
...
- find a way to read local files. If I have a
read.table(foo.txt)
in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not know how
Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
something to be done with these two?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
This one I do
Gregor GORJANC gregor.gorj...@bfro.uni-lj.si writes:
On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote:
...
- find a way to read local files. If I have a
read.table(foo.txt)
in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
there is no PATH-like
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
JMarc? btw i'm generally lost whats the sweave status.
are there some issues you still plan to do
or just documentation is missing now?
one more thing - adding entry to newinlyx20 wiki section, so documentation
is not forgotten. i would add it myself if i had a
Pavel Sanda writes:
> last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
I am really late with this, but I am a bit overwhelmed by work and baby,
>
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4072
> Default document settings in .layout files
>
Personnally, I am against this feature as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
> problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
something to be done with these two?
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6137
> I have also
Hi,
Please read bellow.
On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> - find a way to read local files. If I have a
> read.table("foo.txt")
> in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
> there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not
Pavel Sanda writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate
>> problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this.
>
> something to be done with these two?
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48
This
Gregor GORJANC writes:
> On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> ...
>> - find a way to read local files. If I have a
>> read.table("foo.txt")
>> in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since
>> there is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > JMarc? btw i'm generally lost whats the sweave status.
> > are there some issues you still plan to do
> > or just documentation is missing now?
one more thing - adding entry to newinlyx20 wiki section, so documentation
is not forgotten. i would add it myself if i
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
implement to define color definitions in document settings
i guess c. Uwe?
This issue is very complicated because we have to store all colors that the
user might already
have defined previously in a document. For stability reasons of 2.0, I would
>> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
>> implement to define color definitions in document settings
>>
>> i guess c. Uwe?
>
> This issue is very complicated because we have to store all colors that the
user might already
> have defined previously in a document. For stability reasons of 2.0, I
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c.
I've already done some work on it. I really want to have this in 2.0.0,
so
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog with the bar
?
yes that was the proposal.
pavel
Leuven recently proposed a rework of the current simple-search dialog.
Are we going to have 3 search facilities ?
- simple-search dialog
- advanced-search pane
- simple-search bar ?
I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed.
Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog
Vincent van Ravesteijn v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl wrote:
I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed.
at one point i suggested to keep only the advanced one
you then suggested to keep the simple one and perhaps turn it into a
search bar
if i remember well the issue was mainly speed
of
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c.
I've already done some work on it. I really want to have this in 2.0.0,
so
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog with the bar
> ?
yes that was the proposal.
pavel
Leuven recently proposed a rework of the current simple-search dialog.
Are we going to have 3 search facilities ?
- simple-search dialog
- advanced-search pane
- simple-search bar ?
I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed.
Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed.
at one point i suggested to keep only the "advanced" one
you then suggested to keep the "simple" one and perhaps turn it into a
search bar
if i remember well the issue was mainly speed
hi,
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer
in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to
decide which action should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it for 2.0
b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want
On 03/25/2010 09:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer
in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to
decide which action should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i
have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action
should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it for 2.0
b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want to
Richard Heck wrote:
We need 2.0.x and 2.1 milestones now then.
i have already asked about this.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
implement to define color definitions in document settings
i guess c. Uwe?
This should be done as soon as possible.
Why do you want to remove all milestones almost ?
this list was little bit biased because i
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2591
text inset for tipa
Juergen, Uwe?
I won't have time to work on that for 2.0.
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2605
Add checkbox for automatic equation, figure and table
numbering corresponding to section number
no activity for 3 years. c?
I will
Pavel Sanda wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1714
LyX doesn't allow environments with options
- actually support for environments (and commands) with
multiple mandatory arguments,
JMarc, Juergen?
I have started to implement that some time ago, but I got no time to finish
it, and
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
convert the search dialog to a search bar
to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c.
Would it not be better to have one searchreplace dialog and a
button to toggle between simple mode and advanced mode.
The simple search will be a toolbar if it's up to me.
Today the advanced mode pane design is different than the simple one in
term of place of the find button, replace button,
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Did you update today ? I think they are now exactly the same.
Thank you. It is much better. Still, I would go further and get rid of the
advanced tab:
- At the top of the pane I would put the scope as a combo box
- Then a smaller Find TextEdit
- Then
On 03/25/2010 02:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6455
Multiple index UI polishment
- index inset should display something besides just Idx
- InsertToc menu should probably say Index: Names rather than just
Names.
Juegen, Richard?
I don't see a quick
hi,
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer
in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to
decide which action should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it for 2.0
b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want
On 03/25/2010 09:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer
in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to
decide which action should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it
last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported.
i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i
have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action
should we take on each of the requests.
a) do it for 2.0
b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want to
Richard Heck wrote:
> We need 2.0.x and 2.1 milestones now then.
i have already asked about this.
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865
> >implement to define color definitions in document settings
> >
> >i guess c. Uwe?
> >
>
> This should be done as soon as possible.
>
> Why do you want to remove all milestones almost ?
this list was little bit
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2591
> text inset for tipa
>
> Juergen, Uwe?
I won't have time to work on that for 2.0.
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2605
> Add checkbox for automatic equation, figure and table
> numbering corresponding to section number
>
> no activity for 3 years. c?
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1714
> LyX doesn't allow environments with options
> - actually support for environments (and commands) with
> multiple mandatory arguments,
>
> JMarc, Juergen?
I have started to implement that some time ago, but I got no time to finish
it,
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625
>>convert the search dialog to a search bar
>>
>>to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea
>>to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions?
>>anybody wants to work on it?
>Would it not be better to have one search dialog and a
>button to toggle between simple mode and advanced mode.
The simple search will be a toolbar if it's up to me.
>Today the advanced mode pane design is different than the simple one in
>term of place of the find button, replace button,
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> Did you update today ? I think they are now exactly the same.
>
Thank you. It is much better. Still, I would go further and get rid of the
advanced tab:
- At the top of the pane I would put the scope as a combo box
- Then a smaller Find TextEdit
- Then
On 03/25/2010 02:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6455
Multiple index UI polishment
- index inset should display something besides just "Idx"
- Insert>Toc menu should probably say "Index: Names" rather than just
"Names".
Juegen, Richard?
I don't see a
52 matches
Mail list logo