On 08/05/2017 10:49 AM, mn wrote:
On 05.08.17 16:26, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
FWIW, I subscribe through GMail, using a filter to put the dev and user
lists in separated virtual folders, but access my GMail account in
Thunderbird (IMAP). The messages are individual. I don't know if there's
a way to
On 08/05/2017 10:49 AM, mn wrote:
On 05.08.17 16:26, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
FWIW, I subscribe through GMail, using a filter to put the dev and user
lists in separated virtual folders, but access my GMail account in
Thunderbird (IMAP). The messages are individual. I don't know if there's
a way to
On 05.08.17 16:26, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> FWIW, I subscribe through GMail, using a filter to put the dev and user
> lists in separated virtual folders, but access my GMail account in
> Thunderbird (IMAP). The messages are individual. I don't know if there's
> a way to maintain threads in T-bird
On 08/04/2017 10:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On 2 August 2017 at 10:03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I'm using gmail's web interface these days. This might be why I'm finding
it difficult to efficiently follow threads that ar
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:22:40AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 2 August 2017 at 10:03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > I'm using gmail's web interface these days. This might be why I'm finding
> > > it difficult to efficiently follow threads that are so long.
> > > - The gm
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On 2 August 2017 at 11:29, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Ah I did not realize you did that on purpose. I actually found it
> > annoying when
> > > I wanted to go up the discussion and couldn't because it was cut off
> >
> > +1
> >
>
> I just
On 2 August 2017 at 10:03, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm using gmail's web interface these days. This might be why I'm finding
> > it difficult to efficiently follow threads that are so long.
> > - The gmail labs thing I used for replying to parts of an e-mail is no
> > longer working.
>
On 2 August 2017 at 11:29, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Ah I did not realize you did that on purpose. I actually found it
> annoying when
> > I wanted to go up the discussion and couldn't because it was cut off
>
> +1
>
I just want to check you understood that I primarily mean
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Ah I did not realize you did that on purpose. I actually found it annoying
> when
> I wanted to go up the discussion and couldn't because it was cut off
+1
Pavel
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:20:24AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
> > We have spent an enormous amount of time on this ...
> >
>
> HI,
>
> Regarding the discussion of LyX's safety I'd like to make a few remarks
> related to ... ?list etiquette? Not sure what the correct t
Richard wrote:
> We have spent an enormous amount of time on this ...
>
HI,
Regarding the discussion of LyX's safety I'd like to make a few remarks
related to ... ?list etiquette? Not sure what the correct term should be,
but it ought to be clear below.
Really long threads:
Are we really ok wit
11 matches
Mail list logo