Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/13/2015 09:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Here's a screenshot: >http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Playground/LyX_screenshot_HiDPI_13inch_display_3200x1800_2015-09-13_Qt5.png Ouch that indeed does not look good. I feel like this is a Qt bug. Unless our .ui files are not well-defined, Qt is

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Hi, > > > Note that under Linux+Qt5, there's this bug: > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9731 > > presumably fixed in Qt5.6: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/126136/ > > 1) Is your testing environment still Linux? > 2) Does the slowness disappear if you

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

PhilipPirrip wrote: > Is 2.2 going to be a Qt5 app by default (or is it up to packagers)? 2.2 will support both qt4 and qt5, where qt4 support is probably most important for older linux distros. The windows and Mac binaries are likely to be compiled with qt5. Georg

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 05/10/2015 12:38, PhilipPirrip a écrit : Hi, It is pretty bad that 2.2 is slower than 2.1. Could you share your lorem ipsum document? JMarc Hi JMarc, It was a plain text lorem ipsum copied from the web to a text editor and then to LyX, nothing special about it. It had paragraphs of some

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 05/10/2015 13:38, PhilipPirrip a écrit : One thing though - (two finger touchpad) scrolling in both versions feels a bit *shaky*, and you can actually see the scroll bar go down, then slightly up, then continuing down (and v.v.). Has probably to do with insets (I inserted a few figure floats)

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 05/10/2015 13:38, PhilipPirrip a écrit : It scrolls super fast (but so does 2.1.4, can't see much difference - possibly because my laptop is fast). I it is in particular on macs that the performance should be better. JMarc

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Hi, It is pretty bad that 2.2 is slower than 2.1. Could you share your lorem ipsum document? JMarc Hi JMarc, It was a plain text lorem ipsum copied from the web to a text editor and then to LyX, nothing special about it. It had paragraphs of some 6-7 lines, no special characters etc. I've

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Hi, It is pretty bad that 2.2 is slower than 2.1. Could you share your lorem ipsum document? JMarc Hi JMarc, It was a plain text lorem ipsum copied from the web to a text editor and then to LyX, nothing special about it. It had paragraphs of some 6-7 lines, no special characters etc. I've

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 14/09/2015 14:57, PhilipPirrip a écrit : On 09/14/2015 04:09 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Performance is good. Is it really better than 2.1? (it should) I guess I first need to learn how to test this. I just made a document with some 25k characters (a few copies of lorem ipsum from

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Just an update: with Qt 4.8.7 and the most recent master it is now possible to have Huge and Giant sized icons and most things look well. Widgets of the class="QGroupBox" are still broken, but this depends on the Qt4 GUI Style chosen. Can't test with Qt5, the binary gets core dumped. While

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 14/09/2015 09:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 14/09/2015 03:34, Guillaume Munch a écrit : For the record, if Scott's indication on using CMake is not suitable, I had to ./configure in Ubuntu as follows: ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/14/2015 04:04 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What is the file layout in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5? This is for Fedora Linux 22: /usr/lib64/qt5/ bin/ imports/ libexec/ mkspecs/ plugins/ qml/

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/14/2015 04:09 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Performance is good. Is it really better than 2.1? (it should) I guess I first need to learn how to test this. I just made a document with some 25k characters (a few copies of lorem ipsum from the web). 2.1 scrolls pretty fast, the scroll

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 08:57:39AM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 09/14/2015 04:09 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>Performance is good. > >Is it really better than 2.1? (it should) > > I guess I first need to learn how to test this. > > I just made a document with some 25k characters (a few

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Monday 14 September 2015 02:34:34 Guillaume Munch wrote: > For the record, if Scott's indication on using CMake is not suitable, I > had to ./configure in Ubuntu as follows: > > ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 >

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 14/09/2015 03:34, Guillaume Munch a écrit : For the record, if Scott's indication on using CMake is not suitable, I had to ./configure in Ubuntu as follows: ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-qt-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 --with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 14/09/2015 04:58, PhilipPirrip a écrit : Performance is good. Is it really better than 2.1? (it should) The workarea does feel a bit tight (inset boxes in neighboring lines almost touch), the scrollbar is narrow and figures render too small. Check this: Note that you can make icons

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:39:48AM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 09/12/2015 09:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > rom what I understand. > > > >I know you are using Windows, but if by chance you dual boot with > >Ubuntu, let me know and I can give you installation files you can test. > > Hi Scott,

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/12/2015 09:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: rom what I understand. I know you are using Windows, but if by chance you dual boot with Ubuntu, let me know and I can give you installation files you can test. Hi Scott, I have a 3200x1800 laptop with Fedora 22 installed (Gnome), and would be

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/13/2015 11:22 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Yes this would be best. I only know how to make .deb files. The branch is 'master' (which is the default branch I believe). Our master branch is what will become 2.2.0. It would be great if you could test. From what I understand, we (well not I but

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Le 14/09/2015 00:34, PhilipPirrip a écrit : On 09/13/2015 06:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Ah it seemes that Qt 5 is needed in order to take advantage of the commits. see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9130#comment:15 I would warn that you should use Qt 5.5 as using previous versions caused

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/13/2015 06:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Ah it seemes that Qt 5 is needed in order to take advantage of the commits. see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9130#comment:15 I would warn that you should use Qt 5.5 as using previous versions caused regressions. Oh, OK. Thanks Scott. I might

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 07:34:02PM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 09/13/2015 06:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >Ah it seemes that Qt 5 is needed in order to take advantage of the commits. > >see > >http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9130#comment:15 > >I would warn that you should use Qt 5.5 as

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/13/2015 07:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Hopefully one of the Fedora users around here has an idea. Just in case, give CMake a try. # First clean the source directory (I assume you don't have any changes # you care about): git clean -xdf ./ # Make a directory somewhere (outside the

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:27:52PM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 09/13/2015 07:42 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >Hopefully one of the Fedora users around here has an idea. > > > >Just in case, give CMake a try. > > > ># First clean the source directory (I assume you don't have any changes > >#

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 04:50:43PM -0400, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 09/13/2015 11:22 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >Yes this would be best. I only know how to make .deb files. The branch > >is 'master' (which is the default branch I believe). Our master branch > >is what will become 2.2.0. It

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On 09/13/2015 09:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Ouch that indeed does not look good. I feel like this is a Qt bug. Unless our .ui files are not well-defined, Qt is responsible for the dialog elements not running into each other. This even with Qt4 depends on the selected Qt GUI Style

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

Am 13.09.2015 um 22:50 schrieb PhilipPirrip : > On 09/13/2015 11:22 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> Yes this would be best. I only know how to make .deb files. The branch >> is 'master' (which is the default branch I believe). Our master branch >> is what will become 2.2.0. It would

LyX on high resolution displays

OS: Windows 10 LyX version: 2.1.4 I recently purchased a 4K resolution monitor (3840 by 2160). By using LyX's zoom settings I can make text and formulas look a nice size. However, the icons on the toolbar in LyX now appear very small as do the pallets at the bottom of the window. Is it on the

Re: LyX on high resolution displays

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:48:37PM +, David wrote: > OS: Windows 10 > LyX version: 2.1.4 > > I recently purchased a 4K resolution monitor (3840 by 2160). > > By using LyX's zoom settings I can make text and formulas look a nice size. > However, the icons on the toolbar in LyX now appear