Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we didn't know about that. Or maybe footmisc is not a
required package so it's better to make this by hand. I don't know!
Herbert it's nearly the same code in footmisc. the texcode is always
Herbert
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Maybe we didn't know about that. Or maybe footmisc is not a
> >> required package so it's better to make this by hand. I don't know!
>
> Herbert> it's nearly the same code in footmisc. the
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dekel Tsur wrote:
|
| On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 05:01:16PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
| this is the better way, because it's controlled by the users.
| on the other hand a lot of user uses footmisc with the
|
On 13-Aug-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
my idea is to support ALL locally installed style packages.
this may be important for the user, because he never knows
what packages are on his local tex-system (647 on my own!)
my problem is, that I'm not familiar with c++. so I tried
to write at first a
if someone is interested in the script for further developping,
let me know. at this point there are some minor problems
with the script. maybe that this idea is the whole nonsense
because it's only three days old, than let it be ... :-)
I like the idea.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
Juergen Vigna wrote:
How do you know if options are additive or mutual exclusive?
at this time I'll get only options which are independent
from each other. They all look like
\DeclareOption{name}{%
--- what to do ---
}
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 13-Aug-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
Juergen Vigna wrote:
How do you know if options are additive or mutual exclusive?
at this time I'll get only options which are independent
from each other. They all look like
You mean they are mutual exclusive (you can
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Dekel Tsur wrote:
> | >
> | > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 05:01:16PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> | > > this is the better way, because it's controlled by the users.
> | > > on the other hand a lot of user uses footmisc
On 13-Aug-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> my idea is to support ALL locally installed style packages.
> this may be important for the user, because he never knows
> what packages are on his local tex-system (647 on my own!)
> my problem is, that I'm not familiar with c++. so I tried
> to write at
> if someone is interested in the script for further developping,
> let me know. at this point there are some minor problems
> with the script. maybe that this idea is the whole nonsense
> because it's only three days old, than let it be ... :-)
I like the idea.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> How do you know if options are additive or mutual exclusive?
at this time I'll get only options which are independent
from each other. They all look like
\DeclareOption{name}{%
--- what to do ---
}
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 13-Aug-2001 Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Juergen Vigna wrote:
> >>
> >> How do you know if options are additive or mutual exclusive?
> >
> > at this time I'll get only options which are independent
> > from each other. They all look like
>
> You mean they are mutual
12 matches
Mail list logo
