Re: Debugging LyX server on Windows

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:22 PM Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > No, this seems to be an issue introduced in recent versions of Windows. > When an overlapped write operation to a pipe is in progress, GetLastError() > used returning ERROR_IO_PENDING while now it seems to also return NO_ERROR. > This

Re: [LyX/master] Fix LyX server on Windows

gt;> Date: Tue Aug 7 17:56:07 2018 +0200 >>> >>> Fix LyX server on Windows >>> >>> On some recent Windows versions, GetLastError() may also return >>> NO_ERROR instead of ERROR_IO_PENDING during an overlapped write >>> op

Re: [LyX/master] Fix LyX server on Windows

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 07:21:03PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 08/07/2018 12:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > commit cf5f2661dc0a902e541704172ab369ba3e5a54d6 > > Author: Enrico Forestieri > > Date: Tue Aug 7 17:56:07 2018 +0200 > > > &

Re: [LyX/master] Fix LyX server on Windows

On 08/07/2018 12:05 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > commit cf5f2661dc0a902e541704172ab369ba3e5a54d6 > Author: Enrico Forestieri > Date: Tue Aug 7 17:56:07 2018 +0200 > > Fix LyX server on Windows > > On some recent Windows versions, GetLastError() may also

Re: Debugging LyX server on Windows

On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 01:58:37AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Will S wrote: > > I have been helping a user debug a problem with a tool (LyZ, > > https://github.com/willsALMANJ/lyz) that I maintain that interfaces with > > LyX through the LyX server. The main symptom is that t

Re: Debugging LyX server on Windows

Will S wrote: > I have been helping a user debug a problem with a tool (LyZ, > https://github.com/willsALMANJ/lyz) that I maintain that interfaces with > LyX through the LyX server. The main symptom is that the lyxserver.out file > appears to be empty. Specifically, when LyZ writ

Re: Debugging LyX server on Windows

On 07/31/2018 10:36 PM, Will S wrote: > I have been helping a user debug a problem with a tool (LyZ, > https://github.com/willsALMANJ/lyz > <https://github.com/willsALMANJ/lyz>) that I maintain that interfaces > with LyX through the LyX server. The main symptom is that the &g

Debugging LyX server on Windows

I have been helping a user debug a problem with a tool (LyZ, https://github.com/willsALMANJ/lyz) that I maintain that interfaces with LyX through the LyX server. The main symptom is that the lyxserver.out file appears to be empty. Specifically, when LyZ writes a command into lyxserver.in, LyX

FTP service on regular LyX server (Was: 404 on manuals on lyx.org)

ble? Hi Uwe, Yes, there's been a working ftp server on the regular LyX server for some time. Don't remember for how long though. > if so I would switch back to wiki.lyx.org. That's kind of funny: I thought you intentionally were using a separate FTP server to reduce the load on our regular

Re: FTP server now setup for the LyX server

Christian Ridderström christian.ridderstrom at gmail.com writes: Hi, A long time ago (2012) I tried setting up an FTP server but couldn't get it to work in a fashion I felt was secure enough. But now during my vacation I've had time to try again in peace and quiet. And it seems I've got

Re: FTP server now setup for the LyX server

Christian Ridderström gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > A long time ago (2012) I tried setting up an FTP server but couldn't get it to work in a fashion I felt was secure enough. But now during my vacation I've had time to try again in peace and quiet. And it seems I've got it working.

FTP server now setup for the LyX server

Hi, A long time ago (2012) I tried setting up an FTP server but couldn't get it to work in a fashion I felt was secure enough. But now during my vacation I've had time to try again in peace and quiet. And it seems I've got it working. The FTP server is VSFTP

FTP server now setup for the LyX server

Hi, A long time ago (2012) I tried setting up an FTP server but couldn't get it to work in a fashion I felt was secure enough. But now during my vacation I've had time to try again in peace and quiet. And it seems I've got it working. The FTP server is VSFTP

Reminder: Downtime for lyx server - today

This is just a reminder that the LyX server running the web pages, the wiki, and subversion will go down later today for reloacation to a different server. I expect the server will go down about 22:00 +0100, perhaps a bit before, perhaps a bit later. The expectation is that the downtime

Reminder: Downtime for lyx server - today

This is just a reminder that the LyX server running the web pages, the wiki, and subversion will go down later today for reloacation to a different server. I expect the server will go down about 22:00 +0100, perhaps a bit before, perhaps a bit later. The expectation is that the downtime

LyX Server Downtime - server on the move

Hi all, The LyX server running the web pages, the wiki and subversion will be moved from one virtual server to another during next week. This move will consist of a complete re-install since the virtual-servers in question are not compatible. The Downtime will be from Tuesday evening/night

LyX Server Downtime - server on the move

Hi all, The LyX server running the web pages, the wiki and subversion will be moved from one virtual server to another during next week. This move will consist of a complete re-install since the virtual-servers in question are not compatible. The Downtime will be from Tuesday evening/night

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Hi, I'll be partially off-line until tuesday when I'm at Esrange, but I'll try to help if I can. Best to send to my gmail adress to get my attention. regards, Christian Christian Ridderstr On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: There are some problems. I am in contact with the

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Hi, I'll be partially off-line until tuesday when I'm at Esrange, but I'll try to help if I can. Best to send to my gmail adress to get my attention. regards, Christian Christian Ridderstr On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: There are some problems. I am in contact with the

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Gullik Bjønnes lar...@gullik.org writes: The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about mid-week. (this week.) I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. Do you know whether a downtime is to be expected? JMarc -- Lgb

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org writes: I am quite sure that a downtime is to be expected. Not quite sure the exact time. The best I have is mid-week. I'll see if I can get some more info so that we can at least put out a notification on this list. Thanks! JMarc

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

t; wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes <lar...@gullik.org> writes: > >> The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about >> mid-week. (this week.) >> >> I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. > > Do you know whether a downtime is to be expected? > > JMarc > -- Lgb

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes: > I am quite sure that a downtime is to be expected. > Not quite sure the exact time. The best I have is "mid-week". > > I'll see if I can get some more info so that we can at least put out a > notification on this list. Thanks! JMarc

Upgrade of lyx server

The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about mid-week. (this week.) I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. -- Lgb

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@gullik.org writes: The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about mid-week. (this week.) I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. Do you know whether a downtime is to be expected? JMarc

Upgrade of lyx server

The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about mid-week. (this week.) I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. -- Lgb

Re: Upgrade of lyx server

Lars Gullik Bjønnes <lar...@gullik.org> writes: > The lyx server will be upgraded to new hardware and new os about > mid-week. (this week.) > > I have little control over that, but I presume it will just work. Do you know whether a downtime is to be expected? JMarc

Re: [Ticket#2009103010000051] Upgrade Lyx Server to Debian Lenny

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 13:42, Netadmin StudNet Bonn netad...@stw-bonn.de wrote: Hello! We need to move the virtual server lyx.lyx.org (212.201.69.43) to a upgraded Hardware and another storage backend. Also we want to upgrade the server to Debian Lenny. Can we do this next week? I'll cc

Re: [Ticket#2009103010000051] Upgrade Lyx Server to Debian Lenny

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 13:42, Netadmin StudNet Bonn wrote: > Hello! > > We need to move the virtual server lyx.lyx.org (212.201.69.43) to a upgraded > Hardware and another > storage backend. Also we want to upgrade the server to Debian Lenny. > > Can we do this next week?

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I can confirm it works. No objections from me, then. I committed it. -- Enrico

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 09:25:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > I can confirm it works. > > No objections from me, then. I committed it. -- Enrico

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I can confirm it works. No objections from me, then. Jürgen

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I can confirm it works. No objections from me, then. Jürgen

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:00:52AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Enrico, I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from other commits in trunk) actually work. Index:

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use \\.\pipe\lyxpipe (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use \\.\pipe\lyxpipe (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo LYXCMD:test:file-open

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz schreef: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use \\.\pipe\lyxpipe (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:30:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: We are still in the thread that contained at some point of time [...] 5. It works. right? Yes. In particular, it is the same thread where someone confused a named pipe with a socket. -- Enrico

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:00:52AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Enrico, > > I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know > > whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from > > other commits in trunk) actually work. > > > > > > Index:

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > >> You don't need Cygwin to test it. > >> > >> 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path > >>in the preferences. > >> 2. Quit and restart LyX. > >> 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type > >>

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> You don't need Cygwin to test it. >>> >>> 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path >>>in the preferences. >>> 2. Quit and restart LyX. >>> 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type >>> echo

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz schreef: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:30:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > We are still in the thread that contained at some point of time > > > [...] > 5. It works. > > right? Yes. In particular, it is the same thread where someone confused a named pipe with a socket. -- Enrico

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico Forestieri wrote: This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch. So, Jürgen? Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front? Jürgen

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch. So, Jürgen? Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front? No, but I

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Am Thursday 10 September 2009 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch. So, Jürgen?

RE: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico Forestieri wrote: This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch. So, Jürgen? Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front? No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I interpret the silence as

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I interpret the silence as everything's Ok. Hmm.. The silence means that I haven't looked at it yet. I just didn't get to it and then I probably forgot. Could you (or someone else) do it? A second pair of

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico, I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from other commits in trunk) actually work. Index: development/cmake/src/insets/CMakeLists.txt

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use \\.\pipe\lyxpipe (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo LYXCMD:test:file-open \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.in type \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.out If the file dialog opens, it

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very > > well for me (for some aspe

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, > > I'm not opposed to put this in branch. > > So, Jürgen? Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front? Jürgen

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, > > > I'm not opposed to put this in branch. > > > > So, Jürgen? > > Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front?

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Am Thursday 10 September 2009 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well tested, > > > > I'm not opposed to put this in branch. > > > > > >

RE: [patch] LyX server for Windows

>> Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> > > This is an important addition to Win32 indeed. So if it is well >> > > tested, I'm not opposed to put this in branch. >> > >> > So, Jürgen? >> >> Did you get feedback from the SCons and CMake front? > >No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > >No, but I reproduced what they did in trunk, so I interpret > >the silence as "everything's Ok". > > Hmm.. The silence means that I haven't looked at it yet. I just didn't get > to it and then I probably forgot. Could you (or someone else) do it? A second

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico, I would appreciate feedback from Cmake and Scons users as I don't know whether the patches for these build systems (that I incorporated from other commits in trunk) actually work. Index: development/cmake/src/insets/CMakeLists.txt

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

You don't need Cygwin to test it. 1. Use "\\.\pipe\lyxpipe" (without quotes) as the LyXserver pipe path in the preferences. 2. Quit and restart LyX. 3. In a cmd.exe terminal type echo LYXCMD:test:file-open> \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.in type \\.\pipe\lyxpipe.out If the file dialog opens,

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Because QLocalSocket::socketDescriptor() is not going to work with QSocketNotifier? Wouldn't we just

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Because QLocalSocket::socketDescriptor() is not going to work

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Honestly, I was also uneasy about this platform specific code but I didn't say anything because 1) you obviously spent quite some work on it and 2) nobody else volunteered to implement the feature on Windows before you 3)

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

: On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz wrote: What was the system Qt version shipped with the Windows distribution? 4.5.2 Joost

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Because QLocalSocket::socketDescriptor() is not going to work with QSocketNotifier? Wouldn't we just

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > > > > > > > Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific > > > > lines code of

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:24:13AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Honestly, I was also uneasy about this platform specific code but I > didn't say anything because 1) you obviously spent quite some work on it > and 2) nobody else volunteered to implement the feature on Windows > before you

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

e: > > > > Andre Poenitz writes: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > > > > > > >

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz wrote: What was the system Qt version shipped with the Windows distribution? 4.5.2 Joost

[patch] LyX server for Windows

The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready for prime time even in branch. Note

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready for prime time even

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from others. Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test. I don't have Cygwin, so I can't test it on Windows. Vincent

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz writes: On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Because

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from others. Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test. I don't have Cygwin, so I can't

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Andre'

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Andre Poenitz writes: On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote: Andre Poenitz writes: On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6

[patch] LyX server for Windows

The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready for prime time even in branch. Note

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very > well for me (for some aspects, even better than the server as > implemented for *nix). So, I think that it is ready fo

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:10:23PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > I have been testing this for quite some time now and it works very > > well for me (for some aspe

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from others. Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test. I don't have Cygwin, so I can't test it on Windows. Vincent

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Andre Poenitz writes: > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific > lines code of our own instead of usi

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

Vincent van Ravesteijn writes: > > > I stress tested it and it works for me, but I have heard nothing from > > others. > > Before committing to branch, I would also like to know whether it also > > works with CMake and Scons, as I use autotools and cannot test. > > > > > I don't have Cygwin,

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. Can anybody remind me why we need to use 500+ platform specific lines code of our own instead of using, say, QLocalSocket? Andre'

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Andre Poenitz writes: > > > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > The attached patch implements the LyX server for Windows in 1.6.x. > > > > Can anyb

Re: [patch] LyX server for Windows

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:50:28PM +, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Andre Poenitz writes: > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:36:44PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > The a

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: Christian Ridderström wrote: As for conclusions, I know think I have a test that gives a difference for the LyX server compared to other machines. I think the most telling sign is when a command such as 'sleep 0.1' takes over a second to execute

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:26, Christian Ridderström christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: Christian Ridderström wrote: As for conclusions, I know think I have a test that gives a difference for the LyX server compared to other machines. I think

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: AFAIK, the VM keeps the real load hidden. I have tried looking a little bit with top, and I've also installed 'atop' and 'dstat', and looked a bit at their output. So far I haven't really seen anything suspicious. I have opened a ticket at the

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 20:28, Christian Ridderström christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: AFAIK, the VM keeps the real load hidden. I have tried looking a little bit with top, and I've also installed 'atop' and 'dstat', and looked a bit at

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Great. I suspect they're the only ones that can really look at. It seems that the latency is caused by the xen storage backend. So we just have to live with the latency for the time being. Thanks for sending me their response, I agree we

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: Christian Ridderström wrote: As for conclusions, I know think I have a test that gives a difference for the LyX server compared to other machines. I think the most telling sign is when a command such as 'sleep 0.1' takes over a second to execute

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:26, Christian Ridderström < christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Christian Ridderström wrote: >> >>> As for conclusions, I know think I have a test that gives a difference >>> f

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: AFAIK, the VM keeps the real load hidden. I have tried looking a little bit with top, and I've also installed 'atop' and 'dstat', and looked a bit at their output. So far I haven't really seen anything suspicious. I have opened a ticket at the

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 20:28, Christian Ridderström < christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > AFAIK, the VM keeps the real load hidden. I have tried looking a little >>> bit with top, and I've also installed 'atop' and 'dstat', and looked a

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Great. I suspect they're the only ones that can really look at. It seems that the latency is caused by the xen storage backend. So we just have to live with the latency for the time being. Thanks for sending me their response, I agree we

FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

of sleep 0.1 with a threshold of 0.12 s, and doing this 1 times. This test was repeated on four different machines. TestOverrun Max VM/HW System # [ms] 1 517 2600 VM LyX server (VM) 2 32 158 VM VM on Christian's home server 3 24 145 HW

Re: FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

Christian Ridderström wrote: As for conclusions, I know think I have a test that gives a difference for the LyX server compared to other machines. I think the most telling sign is when a command such as 'sleep 0.1' takes over a second to execute, then something strange is going

FYI: Some investaging weird latency on the LyX server

ution time of sleep 0.1 with a threshold of 0.12 s, and doing this 1 times. This test was repeated on four different "machines". TestOverrun Max VM/HW System # [ms] 1 517 2600 VM LyX server (VM) 2 32 158 VM VM on Christian's home server 3

  1   2   >