"R" == R Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R 1) What if the layout list would be user-configurable, like the
R menu bar is at present? Ship LyX with a default layout list, but
R let the user define his/her own when desired.
What do you mean? You can define your own styles already. If your only
"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they are.
Allan Maybe we really need to start looking at the layout abstraction
Allan idea we've discussed before. Such that LyX knows what styles
Allan are of similar types¹ -- sections etc.
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
2) Slightly distantly related to this:
Is there a plan to include right-mouse-click-contex-sensitive
menus? (Does XForms allow this technique?)
We need to be careful with these. Remember it's a shootable UI design
offence to have something
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> 1) What if the layout list would be user-configurable, like the
R> menu bar is at present? Ship LyX with a default layout list, but
R> let the user define his/her own when desired.
What do you mean? You can define your own styles already. If
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they are.
Allan> Maybe we really need to start looking at the layout abstraction
Allan> idea we've discussed before. Such that LyX knows what styles
Allan> are of similar types¹ --
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> 2) Slightly distantly related to this:
>Is there a plan to include right-mouse-click-contex-sensitive
>menus? (Does XForms allow this technique?)
We need to be careful with these. Remember it's a shootable UI design
offence to have something
Hi,
The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
item I need.
I would suggest to have the list ordered alphabetically; maybe
"Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
organized if it was in
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
Hi,
The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
item I need.
In the classes I've converted to layouts I've tried to organize the
entries by type/class eg. sections
Allan Rae wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
I would suggest to have the layout list ordered alphabetically;
maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
organized if it was in alphabetical order.
Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they
Hi,
The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
item I need.
I would suggest to have the list ordered alphabetically; maybe
"Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
organized if it was in
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
> is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
> item I need.
In the classes I've converted to layouts I've tried to organize the
entries by type/class eg.
Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > I would suggest to have the layout list ordered alphabetically;
> > maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
> > organized if it was in alphabetical order.
>
> Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way
12 matches
Mail list logo