Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"R" == R Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: R 1) What if the layout list would be user-configurable, like the R menu bar is at present? Ship LyX with a default layout list, but R let the user define his/her own when desired. What do you mean? You can define your own styles already. If your only

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they are. Allan Maybe we really need to start looking at the layout abstraction Allan idea we've discussed before. Such that LyX knows what styles Allan are of similar types¹ -- sections etc.

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread John Levon
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: 2) Slightly distantly related to this: Is there a plan to include right-mouse-click-contex-sensitive menus? (Does XForms allow this technique?) We need to be careful with these. Remember it's a shootable UI design offence to have something

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: R> 1) What if the layout list would be user-configurable, like the R> menu bar is at present? Ship LyX with a default layout list, but R> let the user define his/her own when desired. What do you mean? You can define your own styles already. If

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they are. Allan> Maybe we really need to start looking at the layout abstraction Allan> idea we've discussed before. Such that LyX knows what styles Allan> are of similar types¹ --

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-16 Thread John Levon
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: > 2) Slightly distantly related to this: >Is there a plan to include right-mouse-click-contex-sensitive >menus? (Does XForms allow this technique?) We need to be careful with these. Remember it's a shootable UI design offence to have something

Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread R. Lahaye
Hi, The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...) is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the item I need. I would suggest to have the list ordered alphabetically; maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better organized if it was in

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: Hi, The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...) is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the item I need. In the classes I've converted to layouts I've tried to organize the entries by type/class eg. sections

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread R. Lahaye
Allan Rae wrote: On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: I would suggest to have the layout list ordered alphabetically; maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better organized if it was in alphabetical order. Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they

Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread R. Lahaye
Hi, The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...) is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the item I need. I would suggest to have the list ordered alphabetically; maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better organized if it was in

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: > > Hi, > > The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...) > is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the > item I need. In the classes I've converted to layouts I've tried to organize the entries by type/class eg.

Re: Ordering the Layout list alphabetically.

2001-01-15 Thread R. Lahaye
Allan Rae wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote: > > I would suggest to have the layout list ordered alphabetically; > > maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better > > organized if it was in alphabetical order. > > Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way