Hi all,
as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as RC2.
The repository is open again for commits but let us restrict this to
critical
bugs and regressions only
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 19:40:20 José Matos wrote:
The repository is open again for commits but let us restrict this
to critical bugs and regressions only if they imply a file format change.
This does not revert any previous OK, if I said yes after RC-2 then now is the
right time.
as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as RC2.
There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
am not sure what else are missing.
Bo
There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
am not sure what else are missing.
Of course this fails 'scons installer'.
Bo
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 22:24:56 Bo Peng wrote:
Of course this fails 'scons installer'.
Bo
Please fix it in svn. :-)
I would like to have this fixed before the final release.
--
José Abílio
There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
am not sure what else are missing.
I see them, they are in scons_manifest.
But I see that they are missing in the makefile. I fixed this:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18921
regards Uwe
I see them, they are in scons_manifest.
But I see that they are missing in the makefile. I fixed this:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18921
I can confirm that these are the only missing files.
Cheers,
Bo
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
José Hi all, as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
José http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
José If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as
José RC2.
It is on ftp now (did I do it too early?)
JMarc
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:26:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
>> > > Annoying? Yes. Should be fixed? Yes. Unusable? No. It will
>> simply > translate captions to ERT, that is all.
>>
>> wan't there a patch by hangzai ?
José> I have reviewed
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 08:32:37 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I wonder whether we could add an entry like
> Style Caption
> LatexName caption
> ObsoletedBy Standard
> End
> to our layouts. This would be invisible from inside LyX, but tex2lyx
> would see it and translated \caption
Hi all,
as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as RC2.
The repository is open again for commits but let us restrict this to
critical
bugs and regressions only
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 19:40:20 José Matos wrote:
> The repository is open again for commits but let us restrict this
> to critical bugs and regressions only if they imply a file format change.
This does not revert any previous OK, if I said yes after RC-2 then now is the
right time.
as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as RC2.
There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
am not sure what else are missing.
Bo
There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
am not sure what else are missing.
Of course this fails 'scons installer'.
Bo
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 22:24:56 Bo Peng wrote:
>
> Of course this fails 'scons installer'.
>
> Bo
Please fix it in svn. :-)
I would like to have this fixed before the final release.
--
José Abílio
> There is no examples/hu/example_lyxified.lyx, and example_raw.lyx. I
> am not sure what else are missing.
I see them, they are in scons_manifest.
But I see that they are missing in the makefile. I fixed this:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18921
regards Uwe
I see them, they are in scons_manifest.
But I see that they are missing in the makefile. I fixed this:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/18921
I can confirm that these are the only missing files.
Cheers,
Bo
>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi all, as usual I have placed the release candidate 2 in
José> http://www.lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.5/
José> If no blatant errors occur I will announce this tomorrow as
José> RC2.
It is on ftp now (did I do it too early?)
JMarc
Bo Peng wrote:
PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the
remaining
patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
Abdel.
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really fixes. But I also think that
RC2 should be released right now (after Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753)).
regards Uwe
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the
remaining
patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
How many serious bugs
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753)).
I agree. I have committed the bugfix to 3313
can not be fixed now, at
least some temporary patches can be applied to avoid crash.
I personally think RC2 can be released now and there is no real
stopper for 1.5.0.
Cheers,
Bo
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
unusable:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
unusable:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:26:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
Annoying? Yes. Should be fixed? Yes. Unusable? No. It will simply
translate captions to ERT, that is all.
wan't there a patch by hangzai ?
I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
Georg.
Also as
I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
Georg.
Also as far as I understood, the fix can be committed after 1.5.0. This is a
sensitive area and I want to play safe here. If for any reason I am mistaken
please let me know. :-)
i guess this one's for
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:18:37PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
For sure this affects Windows systems with a Portuguese locale and
maybe others. The patch is pretty
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
* [patch] Up/down cursor in math-macro jumps out of the macro, #3830
* [patch] fixing
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:04:31PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
For sure this affects Windows systems
Am 26.06.2007 um 16:18 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
Fixed in r18741.
* [patch] Up/down cursor in
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:11:26 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Fixed in r18741.
Fixed in r18774.
Fixed in 18742.
Fixed in 18737.
Stefan
OK. Nice to know. :-)
--
José Abílio
Bo Peng wrote:
PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the
remaining
patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
Abdel.
>>What is the status now?
>
> Let's just release 1.5.0.
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really fixes. But I also think that
RC2 should be released right now (after Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753)).
regards Uwe
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the
> remaining
> patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
How many ser
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What is the status now?
Let's just release 1.5.0.
No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
> fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
> Jürgen's current fixes are in (bug 3915, 3916, and 2753)).
I agree. I have committed t
can not be fixed now, at
least some temporary patches can be applied to avoid crash.
I personally think RC2 can be released now and there is no real
stopper for 1.5.0.
Cheers,
Bo
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > > Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
> >
> > This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
> > unusable:
> > htt
On Saturday 16 June 2007 18:06:50 Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 16:12 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > > Is there anything else that I am missing before RC2?
> >
> > This bug is in my opinion a blocker because it makes tex2lyx nearly
> > unusable:
> > htt
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:26:13 Leuven, E. wrote:
> >
> > Annoying? Yes. Should be fixed? Yes. Unusable? No. It will simply
> > translate captions to ERT, that is all.
>
> wan't there a patch by hangzai ?
I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
Georg.
> I have reviewed that thread and there was a dialog going on between him and
> Georg.
>
> Also as far as I understood, the fix can be committed after 1.5.0. This is a
> sensitive area and I want to play safe here. If for any reason I am mistaken
> please let me know. :-)
i guess this one's
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:18:37PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 11:07:17 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > No, we need an RC2 to test if our fixes to some crash bugs are really
> > fixes. But I also think that RC2 should be released right now (after
> > JÃ
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
> whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
> For sure this affects Windows systems with a Portuguese locale and
> maybe others. The patch is pretty
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
> why not:
>
> * [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
> * [patch] Up/down cursor in math-macro jumps out of the macro, #3830
> * [patch] fixing
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:04:31PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 14:59:58 Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Please consider also bug 3904. This is a show stopper on systems
> > whose locale is not utf8 and the tempdir contains non-ascii chars.
> > For sure this affects Windows
Am 26.06.2007 um 16:18 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
Fixed in r18741.
* [patch] Up/down cursor in
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:11:26 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Fixed in r18741.
> Fixed in r18774.
> Fixed in 18742.
> Fixed in 18737.
>
> Stefan
OK. Nice to know. :-)
--
José Abílio
PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the remaining
patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Bo
PS: The plan is to release RC2 in a couple of days as soon as the remaining
patches are committed, and this should happen before Tuesday night.
What is the status now?
Bo
José Matos wrote:
I will start looking to remaining issues before RC2, AFAIR there are two
patches that I would like to have before the release, one by Jürgen that
has a file format change and another related with reverting documents to
1.4.
Yes. I keep on waiting for you to do the python
José Matos wrote:
> I will start looking to remaining issues before RC2, AFAIR there are two
> patches that I would like to have before the release, one by Jürgen that
> has a file format change and another related with reverting documents to
> 1.4.
Yes. I keep on waiting for you to d
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
The other languages are not supported by LyX, so I don't see any
reason to make dictionaries available for these languages.
LyX supports now for example Farsi (fa) and Armenian (hy). But anyway
,as people
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
LyX supports now for example Farsi (fa) and Armenian (hy).
But anyway ,as people downloaded the other dictionaries, they have a
reason for this. We should not impose their will.
These people probably want to download dictionaries for all supported
languages. There is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree we should compile all the dictionaries, under the condition that
it is not too much extra work. However, I don't buy the argument about
imposing their will, since this is the LyX project and not the Aspell
project. Anyway, as I said. If it's not too much work
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree we should compile all the dictionaries, under the condition that
it is not too much extra work. However, I don't buy the argument about
imposing their will, since this is the LyX project and not the Aspell
project.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is involved in creating an installer dictionary? If you (or Uwe?)
could explain a bit about it, I'll learn and understand more about it.
Feel free to point me to some help instructions if those already exist.
It's not good if you're the only one that knows about
It's already automated with a Cygwin shell script. I'll generate
dictionaries for all languages if you think it's necessary.
The point here is that Christian would like to know how to automate
the generation of dictionaries, namely having a look at your cygwin
script.
Same hold for the
Bo Peng wrote:
The point here is that Christian would like to know how to automate
the generation of dictionaries, namely having a look at your cygwin
script.
Sure.
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/aspell_installer_data%2Bdict.zip
Joost
Uwe, could I have your input on the following questions:
* What do you think about creating a separate sourceforge project for
storing the dictionary installers?
Why? I already have a berlos.de procect, so why not use the space I already
have there?
* Which, if any, components does your
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
The other languages are not supported by LyX, so I don't see any
reason to make dictionaries available for these languages.
LyX supports now for example Farsi (fa) and Armenian (hy). But anyway
,as people
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
LyX supports now for example Farsi (fa) and Armenian (hy).
But anyway ,as people downloaded the other dictionaries, they have a
reason for this. We should not impose their will.
These people probably want to download dictionaries for all supported
languages. There is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree we should compile all the dictionaries, under the condition that
it is not too much extra work. However, I don't buy the argument about
imposing their will, since this is the LyX project and not the Aspell
project. Anyway, as I said. If it's not too much work
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree we should compile all the dictionaries, under the condition that
it is not too much extra work. However, I don't buy the argument about
imposing their will, since this is the LyX project and not the Aspell
project.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is involved in creating an installer dictionary? If you (or Uwe?)
could explain a bit about it, I'll learn and understand more about it.
Feel free to point me to some help instructions if those already exist.
It's not good if you're the only one that knows about
It's already automated with a Cygwin shell script. I'll generate
dictionaries for all languages if you think it's necessary.
The point here is that Christian would like to know how to automate
the generation of dictionaries, namely having a look at your cygwin
script.
Same hold for the
Bo Peng wrote:
The point here is that Christian would like to know how to automate
the generation of dictionaries, namely having a look at your cygwin
script.
Sure.
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/aspell_installer_data%2Bdict.zip
Joost
Uwe, could I have your input on the following questions:
* What do you think about creating a separate sourceforge project for
storing the dictionary installers?
Why? I already have a berlos.de procect, so why not use the space I already
have there?
* Which, if any, components does your
José Matos wrote:
what about
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3840
and
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
If Jürgen gives an OK to these I give my OK as well.
If it works as advertised, I think it should go in.
Edwin, if you post the most recent patch again, I'll
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
what about
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3840
and
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
If Jürgen gives an OK to these I give my OK as well.
If it works as advertised, I think it should go in.
Edwin, if you post the most recent
We are also finding a second home for aspell dictionaries so that the
windows installer will work even ftp.lyx.org is unusable.
What about the berlios.de repository that I currently use in LyXWinInstaller as second home for the
dictionaries?:
What about the berlios.de repository that I currently use in LyXWinInstaller as
second home for the
dictionaries?:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=9651
I am not sure because Joost said that these dictionaries are for an
earlier version of aspell and
Bo Peng schrieb:
I am not sure because Joost said that these dictionaries are for an
earlier version of aspell and can not be used for the one compiled for
the official installer.
I can upload the actual ones tomorrow, no problem.
But also the current dictionaries work well together with the
If it works as advertised, I think it should go in.
I tested the patch and there are some issues left:
- It is still not possible to insert two consecutive symbols because the panel is closed after every
selection, see also
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839#c1
- Bug 3840 is not
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
If it works as advertised, I think it should go in.
I tested the patch and there are some issues left:
- It is still not possible to insert two consecutive symbols because the
panel is closed after every selection, see also
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839#c1
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Bo Peng schrieb:
I am not sure because Joost said that these dictionaries are for an
earlier version of aspell and can not be used for the one compiled for
the official installer.
I can upload the actual ones tomorrow, no problem. But also the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I can upload the actual ones tomorrow, no problem.
But also the current dictionaries work well together with the one
compiled for the official installer.
There have been changes in the dictionary installers for multi-user
installations and some other things. The outdated
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are aspell dictionaries the only thing that we should provide?
Are there and components used by the downloading installers that we
should provide a (backup) location for?
Only Aspell is used on Windows.
If it's more then aspell dictionaries, how about a directory
Edwin Leuven wrote:
you'll find it here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/87886
Works for me. Put it in.
Jürgen
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
- It is still not possible to insert two consecutive symbols because
the panel is closed after every selection, see also
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839#c1
this is intentional.
But this is no excuse ;-). I also have often the case that I want to insert
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
this is intentional.
But this is no excuse ;-). I also have often the case that I want to insert
some symbols from the same panel and it is annoying that I always have to
reopen the panel.
IMHO Edwin's proposal is just perfect: whenever you want to insert multiple
sybols,
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
- It is still not possible to insert two consecutive symbols because
the panel is closed after every selection, see also
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839#c1
this is intentional.
But this is no excuse ;-)
it isn't?!
I also have often
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are aspell dictionaries the only thing that we should provide?
Are there and components used by the downloading installers that we should
provide a (backup) location for?
Only Aspell is used on Windows.
What about some
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I can upload the actual ones tomorrow, no problem.
But also the current dictionaries work well together with the one compiled
for the official installer.
There have been changes in the dictionary installers for multi-user
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The version number of the dictionary format (6) is already in the
name. If there would ever be a new Aspell version with a different
dictionary format (which is very unlikely), the dictionaries will be
uploaded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about some of the components themselves? I have some (vague)
memory of this being discussed. (The original location of the components
should probably the primary place to look for them, but we could supply
a backup location for the installer. Not necessarily for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been changes in the dictionary installers for multi-user
installations and some other things. The outdated dictionaries on
berlios.de don't work in all situations. The files on wiki.lyx.org are
even older.
Did the file format change? (Just curious)
There
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, it's not all clear to me that this directory only contains
dictionaries. I think the name should say this, so I'm modifying my
suggestion to the following:
Why create a whole directory structure if we only need to host
dictionaries? If you change the name there
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about some of the components themselves? I have some (vague) memory
of this being discussed. (The original location of the components should
probably the primary place to look for them, but we could supply a backup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an alternative suggestion if we are really only talking about
dictionaries for Aspell. Why should we host them? Let's put them on
sourceforge instead. Either get them in with the Aspell project, or
start a separate project for the Aspell dictionaries.
Creating
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an alternative suggestion if we are really only talking about
dictionaries for Aspell. Why should we host them? Let's put them on
sourceforge instead. Either get them in with the Aspell project, or start
a separate
Edwin Leuven schrieb:
I also have often the case that I want to insert some symbols from the
same panel and it is annoying that I always have to reopen the panel.
but that's why you can tear 'em off now
OK, I understand. So what is only missing is the documentation how to detach a
panel in
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, it's not all clear to me that this directory only contains
dictionaries. I think the name should say this, so I'm modifying my
suggestion to the following:
Why create a whole directory structure if we only need to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It feels like I'm missing something here. You say you'd like to be able
to update the files now and then. However, the format is not going to
change.
The dictionary file format is not going to change anytime soon.
Reading what you wrote earlier, I wonder: Is this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I looked in the directory again, and I think I understand it better now.
For an installer of a dictionary, e.g.
.../aspell6-windows/aspell6-af-0.50-0.exe
* The '6' in 'aspell6' stands for dictonary format '6'.
* The '-af-' stands for the language
* The '0.50-0'
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
Do we ever need to support old versions of a dictionary? (For instance
if a new version of a dictionary contains a spelling of a word that
someone thinks is incorrect).
I keep the old versions for older installers. If you want the installers
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are older versions kept somewhere else? Or have the dictionary
installers newer been updated?
The old versions are somewhere in the wiki uploads directory.
Joost
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Joost Verburg wrote:
Softlinks on the FTP server to the most recent versions will do. Like
aspell6-en-latest.exe.
Hmm.. that's not necessarily so easy to synchronize between different
servers. We don't want to create a lot of work for Jean-Marc. (Or whoever
it is that
401 - 500 of 646 matches
Mail list logo
