Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 2010-04-01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit : I wonder if we could use utf-8 as default latex source encoding for most (all) languages if the locale is UTF-8. AFAIK, UTF8 support is too weak in LaTeX right now. While it is weak in LaTeX, LyX's own

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 2010-04-01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit : >> I wonder if we could use utf-8 as default latex source encoding for most >> (all) languages if the locale is UTF-8. > AFAIK, UTF8 support is too weak in LaTeX right now. While it is weak in LaTeX,

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit : On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Pavel Sandasa...@lyx.org writes: last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current locale. This fails as soon as the locale is

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : - pass the noae option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our font settings. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624 This one is fixed now. JMarc

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Le 31/03/2010 13:07, Guenter Milde a écrit : On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Pavel Sanda writes: last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current locale. This fails as soon as the locale is

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Le 30/03/2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : - pass the "noae" option to Sweave to make sure it does not ruin our font settings. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6624 This one is fixed now. JMarc

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes: last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the document is 8bit (because the

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 2010-03-30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Pavel Sanda writes: >> last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. > - currently, Sweave reads the files in the encoding of the current > locale. This fails as soon as the locale is UTF-8 and the document is > 8bit (because

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes: last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. I am really late with this, but I am a bit overwhelmed by work and baby, * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4072 Default document settings in .layout files Personnally, I am against this feature as it is

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this. something to be done with these two? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6137 I have also work

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Hi, Please read bellow. On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: ... - find a way to read local files. If I have a   read.table(foo.txt)  in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since   there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not know how

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org writes: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this. something to be done with these two? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48 This one I do

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Gregor GORJANC gregor.gorj...@bfro.uni-lj.si writes: On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: ... - find a way to read local files. If I have a   read.table(foo.txt)  in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since   there is no PATH-like

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: JMarc? btw i'm generally lost whats the sweave status. are there some issues you still plan to do or just documentation is missing now? one more thing - adding entry to newinlyx20 wiki section, so documentation is not forgotten. i would add it myself if i had a

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda writes: > last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. I am really late with this, but I am a bit overwhelmed by work and baby, > > * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/4072 > Default document settings in .layout files > Personnally, I am against this feature as

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate > problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this. something to be done with these two? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6137 > I have also

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Hi, Please read bellow. On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... > - find a way to read local files. If I have a >   read.table("foo.txt") >  in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since >   there is no PATH-like support in R, I do not

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I marked the bug as fixedintrunk and opened new ones for each separate >> problem. The milestone is 2.0.0 for now, but we have to discuss this. > > something to be done with these two? > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/48 This

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Gregor GORJANC writes: > On 30 March 2010 14:01, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > ... >> - find a way to read local files. If I have a >>   read.table("foo.txt") >>  in the file, it will fail because R is ran from the tmp dir. Since >>   there is

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > JMarc? btw i'm generally lost whats the sweave status. > > are there some issues you still plan to do > > or just documentation is missing now? one more thing - adding entry to newinlyx20 wiki section, so documentation is not forgotten. i would add it myself if i

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865 implement to define color definitions in document settings i guess c. Uwe? This issue is very complicated because we have to store all colors that the user might already have defined previously in a document. For stability reasons of 2.0, I would

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

>> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865 >> implement to define color definitions in document settings >> >> i guess c. Uwe? > > This issue is very complicated because we have to store all colors that the user might already > have defined previously in a document. For stability reasons of 2.0, I

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions? anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c. I've already done some work on it. I really want to have this in 2.0.0, so

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog with the bar ? yes that was the proposal. pavel

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Leuven recently proposed a rework of the current simple-search dialog. Are we going to have 3 search facilities ? - simple-search dialog - advanced-search pane - simple-search bar ? I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed. Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions? anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c. I've already done some work on it. I really want to have this in 2.0.0, so

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog with the bar > ? yes that was the proposal. pavel

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Leuven recently proposed a rework of the current simple-search dialog. Are we going to have 3 search facilities ? - simple-search dialog - advanced-search pane - simple-search bar ? I'm not sure I remember what Edwin proposed. Or, are you thinking to just replace the simple-search dialog

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 03/25/2010 09:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action should we take on each of the requests. a) do it

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action should we take on each of the requests. a) do it for 2.0 b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want to

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Richard Heck wrote: We need 2.0.x and 2.1 milestones now then. i have already asked about this. pavel

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865 implement to define color definitions in document settings i guess c. Uwe? This should be done as soon as possible. Why do you want to remove all milestones almost ? this list was little bit biased because i

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2591 text inset for tipa Juergen, Uwe? I won't have time to work on that for 2.0. * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2605 Add checkbox for automatic equation, figure and table numbering corresponding to section number no activity for 3 years. c? I will

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda wrote: * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1714 LyX doesn't allow environments with options - actually support for environments (and commands) with multiple mandatory arguments, JMarc, Juergen? I have started to implement that some time ago, but I got no time to finish it, and

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625 convert the search dialog to a search bar to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions? anybody wants to work on it? otherwise c.

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Would it not be better to have one searchreplace dialog and a button to toggle between simple mode and advanced mode. The simple search will be a toolbar if it's up to me. Today the advanced mode pane design is different than the simple one in term of place of the find button, replace button,

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Did you update today ? I think they are now exactly the same. Thank you. It is much better. Still, I would go further and get rid of the advanced tab: - At the top of the pane I would put the scope as a combo box - Then a smaller Find TextEdit - Then

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 03/25/2010 02:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6455 Multiple index UI polishment - index inset should display something besides just Idx - InsertToc menu should probably say Index: Names rather than just Names. Juegen, Richard? I don't see a quick

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 03/25/2010 09:52 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action should we take on each of the requests. a) do it

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

last call for 2.0 feature requests we have reported. i'm going to cleanup bugzilla from enhacenments we wont offer in 2.0. i have listed those which are not clear and we have to decide which action should we take on each of the requests. a) do it for 2.0 b) postpone for 2.1 in case you want to

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Richard Heck wrote: > We need 2.0.x and 2.1 milestones now then. i have already asked about this. pavel

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > >* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3865 > >implement to define color definitions in document settings > > > >i guess c. Uwe? > > > > This should be done as soon as possible. > > Why do you want to remove all milestones almost ? this list was little bit

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

> * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2591 > text inset for tipa > > Juergen, Uwe? I won't have time to work on that for 2.0. > * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2605 > Add checkbox for automatic equation, figure and table > numbering corresponding to section number > > no activity for 3 years. c?

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Pavel Sanda wrote: > * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/1714 > LyX doesn't allow environments with options > - actually support for environments (and commands) with > multiple mandatory arguments, > > JMarc, Juergen? I have started to implement that some time ago, but I got no time to finish it,

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: >>* http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2625 >>convert the search dialog to a search bar >> >>to me it was fixed by new search pane. Vincent however have idea >>to convert the current simple search dialog into search bar. opinions? >>anybody wants to work on it?

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

>Would it not be better to have one search dialog and a >button to toggle between simple mode and advanced mode. The simple search will be a toolbar if it's up to me. >Today the advanced mode pane design is different than the simple one in >term of place of the find button, replace button,

RE: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > > Did you update today ? I think they are now exactly the same. > Thank you. It is much better. Still, I would go further and get rid of the advanced tab: - At the top of the pane I would put the scope as a combo box - Then a smaller Find TextEdit - Then

Re: Enhancement bugs for 2.0

On 03/25/2010 02:16 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: * http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6455 Multiple index UI polishment - index inset should display something besides just "Idx" - Insert>Toc menu should probably say "Index: Names" rather than just "Names". Juegen, Richard? I don't see a