Re: namespaces

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported on the different platforms. So people please test: namespace { int foo() { return 1; } } int main() { int i = foo(); }

Re: namespaces

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported > on the different platforms. > > > So people please test: > > > namespace { > > int foo() { return 1; } > > } > > int main() { > int i =

RE: namespaces

On 15-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: So people please test: It compiles with RedHat7.0 (but you probably already knew:) Jrgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jrgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax:

Re: namespaces

In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with gcc-3.0 How std is std? Garst

Re: namespaces

"Garst R. Reese" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with gcc-3.0 | How std is std? very. but we should not use cerr in code, that is taken care of by lyxerr. Lgb

Re: namespaces

"Garst R. Reese" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with | gcc-3.0 Probably because iostream is not included. but I changed this to lyxerr. Lgb

RE: namespaces

On 15-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > So people please test: It compiles with RedHat7.0 (but you probably already knew:) Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N

Re: namespaces

In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with gcc-3.0 How std is std? Garst

Re: namespaces

"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with gcc-3.0 | How std is std? very. but we should not use cerr in code, that is taken care of by lyxerr. Lgb

Re: namespaces

"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | In math_cursor.C:48 (using std::cerr) I got cerr undefined with | gcc-3.0 Probably because iostream is not included. but I changed this to lyxerr. Lgb

Re: namespaces

What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported on the different platforms. Supported in 2.95.2. Andre' -- Andr Pnitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: namespaces

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To:

Re: namespaces

> What I now need is a poll to see if anonymous namespaces are supported > on the different platforms. Supported in 2.95.2. Andre' -- André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: namespaces

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:20:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Precedence: bulk > X-No-Archive: yes > List-Post: > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: >

Re: Namespaces

"Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go Angus through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code Angus like: Angus #ifdef SIGC_CXX_NAMESPACES using SigC::Object; #endif If you are going to do that, then remove

Re: Namespaces

On 14 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go Angus through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code Angus like: Angus #ifdef SIGC_CXX_NAMESPACES using

Re: Namespaces

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 14 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | "Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Angus As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go | Angus through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code | Angus like:

Re: Namespaces

On Wednesday 14 March 2001 11:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go Angus through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code Angus like: Angus #ifdef SIGC_CXX_NAMESPACES

Re: Namespaces

On 14 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Look at the tests already used in configure. Lgb *doh* another moron day for me I think :) john (where did I think CXX_WORKING_NAMESPACES came from ? :P ) -- "Never use a big word when a diminutive one would suffice. Be more or less

Re: Namespaces

Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wednesday 14 March 2001 11:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | "Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Angus As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go | Angus through the header files (not the .C files) and remove

Re: Namespaces

This will only make it harder to do the merge... Lars Gullik Bjønnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! Are you happy with things as they stand? Shall I make a patch of BRANCH_MVC's current contents against HEAD and submit it to you? I can easily undiff the changes I've made in my

Re: Namespaces

Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This will only make it harder to do the merge... | | Lars Gullik Bjnnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! Just give me some hours. I want to have the compability code for minipages work first. (at least I now know why it does not work) I

Re: Namespaces

On Wednesday 14 March 2001 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This will only make it harder to do the merge... | | Lars Gullik Bjnnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! Just give me some hours. I want to have the compability code for

Re: Namespaces

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go Angus> through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code Angus> like: Angus> #ifdef SIGC_CXX_NAMESPACES using SigC::Object; #endif If you are going to do that,

Re: Namespaces

On 14 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go > Angus> through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code > Angus> like: > > Angus> #ifdef

Re: Namespaces

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 14 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Angus> As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go | > Angus> through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code

Re: Namespaces

On Wednesday 14 March 2001 11:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go > Angus> through the header files (not the .C files) and remove code > Angus> like: > > Angus> #ifdef

Re: Namespaces

On 14 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Look at the tests already used in configure. > > Lgb *doh* another moron day for me I think :) john (where did I think CXX_WORKING_NAMESPACES came from ? :P ) -- "Never use a big word when a diminutive one would suffice. Be more or less

Re: Namespaces

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wednesday 14 March 2001 11:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Angus> As Lars says that namespaces are "GO, GO", I'd like to go | > Angus> through the header files (not the .C

Re: Namespaces

> This will only make it harder to do the merge... Lars Gullik Bjønnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! Are you happy with things as they stand? Shall I make a patch of BRANCH_MVC's current contents against HEAD and submit it to you? I can easily undiff the changes I've made in my

Re: Namespaces

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > This will only make it harder to do the merge... | | Lars Gullik Bjønnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! Just give me some hours. I want to have the compability code for minipages work first. (at least I now know why it does not work)

Re: Namespaces

On Wednesday 14 March 2001 12:25, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > This will only make it harder to do the merge... > | > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes! You mean it's going to happen? W! > > Just give me some hours. > > I want to have the

Re: namespaces

On Wednesday 07 March 2001 18:08, Allan Rae wrote: On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing everywhere mean that we are now using namespaces officially and that I can write (for example): namespace frontends { namespace

Re: namespaces

On Thursday 08 March 2001 09:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: namespace citation { class ControlCitation : public ControlCommand Isn't one of the ideas of namespaces that instead of citation::ControlCitation citation::GUICitation one could use shorter names like

Re: namespaces

And if we're still in that interim #ifdef CXX_HAS_NAMESPACES namespace citation #endif Ok... if people use compilers without namespace support we'll certainly get into trouble if we rely on them... Question is: What compilers do people use and what features do these compilers support? In

Re: namespaces

"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And if we're still in that interim #ifdef CXX_HAS_NAMESPACES namespace citation #endif Andre Ok... if people use compilers without namespace support we'll Andre certainly get into trouble if we rely on them... Andre Question is: What

Re: namespaces

If we decide to do so, I can compile with gcc 2.8.1 from time to time to check that it still works. Having namespaces can be really nice... it took me a while to arrive at this conclusion but I am a convinced "namespacer" by now... Andre In the Linux world, I'd say 2.95 and later is usable

Re: namespaces

"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andre Good idea... Would you do that? Andre PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase on the question looks like. JMarc

Re: namespaces

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase | on the question looks like. "ukase"?? Lgb

Re: namespaces

| I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase | on the question looks like. "ukase"?? Maybe it's not the proper plural... I'd vote for 'ukases' in English and 'ukasi' in Russian. In German 'Ukase' is certainly an acceptable abbreviation for 'edicts of the Czar' ;-)

Re: namespaces

"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase | on the question looks like. "ukase"?? Andre Maybe it's not the proper plural... It was not meant to be plural, anyway. Andre I'd vote for 'ukases' in English and

Re: namespaces

On 08-Mar-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) Well I bet 1 cent he want's to wait till all have upgraded their compilers ;P Jrgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jrgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: namespaces

Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 08-Mar-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: | | PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) | | Well I bet 1 cent he want's to wait till all have upgraded their | compilers ;P For me is gcc 3.0 the turning point. That compiler is roumored to compile the

Re: namespaces

For me namespaces is "Go! Go!", exceptions must still wait a bit (exceptions will also mean a lot of changes in lyx code). Ok... although I do not want to sprinkle mathed with 'mathed::' already, I'd like to reserve 'mathed::' (or maybe 'math::') for mathed related stuff. I.e. I would not

Re: namespaces

Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Would you mind if somebody asked on the users' list what compilers people | are using? Certainly not. Lgb

Re: namespaces

On Wednesday 07 March 2001 18:08, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing everywhere mean > > that we are now using namespaces officially and that I can write (for > > example): > > > > namespace frontends {

Re: namespaces

On Thursday 08 March 2001 09:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > namespace citation { > > > > class ControlCitation : public ControlCommand > > Isn't one of the ideas of namespaces that instead of > > citation::ControlCitation > citation::GUICitation > > one could use shorter names like >

Re: namespaces

> And if we're still in that interim > > #ifdef CXX_HAS_NAMESPACES > namespace citation > #endif Ok... if people use compilers without namespace support we'll certainly get into trouble if we rely on them... Question is: What compilers do people use and what features do these compilers

Re: namespaces

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> And if we're still in that interim >> >> #ifdef CXX_HAS_NAMESPACES namespace citation #endif Andre> Ok... if people use compilers without namespace support we'll Andre> certainly get into trouble if we rely on them... Andre>

Re: namespaces

> If we decide to do so, I can compile with gcc 2.8.1 from > time to time to check that it still works. Having namespaces can be really nice... it took me a while to arrive at this conclusion but I am a convinced "namespacer" by now... > Andre> In the Linux world, I'd say 2.95 and later is

Re: namespaces

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Good idea... Would you do that? Andre> PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase on the question looks like. JMarc

Re: namespaces

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase | on the question looks like. "ukase"?? Lgb

Re: namespaces

> | I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase > | on the question looks like. > > "ukase"?? Maybe it's not the proper plural... I'd vote for 'ukases' in English and 'ukasi' in Russian. In German 'Ukase' is certainly an acceptable abbreviation for 'edicts of the Czar' ;-)

Re: namespaces

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | I guess the two questions are related. Let's see how Lars' ukase >> | on the question looks like. >> >> "ukase"?? Andre> Maybe it's not the proper plural... It was not meant to be plural, anyway. Andre> I'd vote for 'ukases' in

Re: namespaces

On 08-Mar-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) Well I bet 1 cent he want's to wait till all have upgraded their compilers ;P Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL

Re: namespaces

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 08-Mar-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: | | > PS: Anybody betting how Lars would vote? ;-) | | Well I bet 1 cent he want's to wait till all have upgraded their | compilers ;P For me is gcc 3.0 the turning point. That compiler is roumored to compile the

Re: namespaces

> For me namespaces is "Go! Go!", exceptions must still wait a bit > (exceptions will also mean a lot of changes in lyx code). Ok... although I do not want to sprinkle mathed with 'mathed::' already, I'd like to reserve 'mathed::' (or maybe 'math::') for mathed related stuff. I.e. I would not

Re: namespaces

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Would you mind if somebody asked on the users' list what compilers people | are using? Certainly not. Lgb

Re: namespaces

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing everywhere mean that we are now using namespaces officially and that I can write (for example): namespace frontends { namespace citation { ... } } You could but why would you

Re: namespaces

Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing everywhere mean that we are now using namespaces officially You could but why would you need namespace citation? Maybe we should have some rules fixed first... like 'no caps' in the names or how much should go in a namespace

Re: namespaces

On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing everywhere mean > that we are now using namespaces officially and that I can write (for > example): > > namespace frontends { > namespace citation { > ... > > } > } You could but why

Re: namespaces

> > Does the fact that "boost::scoped_ptrs" etc are now appearing > > everywhere mean that we are now using namespaces officially > You could but why would you need namespace citation? Maybe we should have some rules fixed first... like 'no caps' in the names or how much should go in a

Re: namespaces

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x | Lars series currently compiles on? It

Re: namespaces

On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x > | Lars> series currently

Re: namespaces

"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x Lars series currently compiles on? gcc 2.8.1: fantomas: g++ -Wall -ansi -pedantic nsp.C nsp.C:1: sorry, not implemented: namespace cxx 6.1: OK. Lars IMO if this

Re: namespaces

"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars | cxx 6.1: OK. | | Lars IMO if this works we should begin using Lars a LyX namespace right | Lars away. We have already had the sqrt Lars clash. | | I'd rather avoid it for now :) Lars The pity, is that now we use structs to hack

Re: namespaces

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars | cxx 6.1: OK. | | Lars IMO if this works we should begin using | Lars a LyX namespace right | Lars away. We have already had the sqrt | Lars clash. | | I'd rather avoid it for now

Re: namespaces

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Does namespace support work on all the compilers that the 1.1.x Lars> series currently compiles on? gcc 2.8.1: fantomas: g++ -Wall -ansi -pedantic nsp.C nsp.C:1: sorry, not implemented: namespace cxx 6.1: OK. Lars> IMO

Re: namespaces

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | cxx 6.1: OK. | | Lars> IMO if this works we should begin using Lars> a LyX namespace right | Lars> away. We have already had the sqrt Lars> clash. | | I'd rather avoid it for now :) Lars> The pity, is that now we use

Re: namespaces

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> | cxx 6.1: OK. | | Lars> IMO if this works we should begin using | Lars> a LyX namespace right | Lars> away. We have already had the sqrt | Lars> clash. | | I'd rather

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to a certain extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce the notion of ownership to the various modules. So we could have a gui namespace and an Inset namespace among others. If we then use namespaces in our code we can

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to Allan a certain extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce Allan the notion of ownership to the various modules. So we could Allan have a gui namespace and an Inset

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

> Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to a certain > extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce the notion of > ownership to the various modules. So we could have a gui namespace and an > Inset namespace among others. If we then use namespaces in our code we >

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> Asger seems to want to make extensive use of namespaces and to Allan> a certain extent I can see that as being a good way to enforce Allan> the notion of ownership to the various modules. So we could Allan> have a gui namespace and

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan # We still need portability to other platforms of course but we Allan can draw a line and say "it must support namespaces" or Allan whatever else we desire. We can probably get away without Allan partial specialization of templates. Could

Re: Namespaces (was: string vs. LString)

> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> # We still need portability to other platforms of course but we Allan> can draw a line and say "it must support namespaces" or Allan> whatever else we desire. We can probably get away without Allan> partial specialization of