Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Hello Rob On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote: PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas yet?).  To prevent it from destroying your system, though, I

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Hello Rob On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Rob Oakes wrote: > PS, if there is interest from the developer/user community, I would also be > happy to create a PPA for the latest alpha of LyX 2 (or we on the betas > yet?).  To prevent it from destroying your system, though,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org: Rob Oakes wrote:  Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Just updated as well with Lucid. Works well. Thanks for the ppa. On 08/17/2010 11:45 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Users and Developers, I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX). I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

2010/8/17 Pavel Sanda : > Rob Oakes wrote: >>  Dear LyX Users and Developers, > > firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report > is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's > policies permit this but it would be great if all

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Just updated as well with Lucid. Works well. Thanks for the ppa. On 08/17/2010 11:45 AM, Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Users and Developers, I wanted to provide a bit of an update to my adventures with Ubuntu packaging (insofar as they are related to LyX). I've spoken with the Ubuntu developers,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 automatically updated through

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :( But it never hurts to ask. Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the instructions in the original email. Once a user

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :( But it never hurts to ask. you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very unstable package

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

I'll see what I can do. Those are both strong points. Fortunately, the next version of Ubuntu (due in October) will ship with the latest version of LyX. I've also created the packages on Launchpad, so I think it's just a matter of getting them incorporated. On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Just installed 1.6.7 on my laptop (Mint Isadora/Ubuntu Lucid). Many thanks! /Paul

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: > Dear LyX Users and Developers, firstly, thanks to care about ubuntu repos. the most frequent bug report is the combination of lyx 1.6.5 & qt-4.6 in lynx; dont know if buntu's policies permit this but it would be great if all buntu users got 1.6.7 automatically updated through

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :( But it never hurts to ask. Other users can upgrade using the PPA I set up this morning and the instructions in the original email. Once a user

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Rob Oakes wrote: > I'll look into it and see if I can get them included for current users of > Ubuntu. Based on what I've read, I'm not sure it's very likely, though :( > But it never hurts to ask. you can argue by the fact that this is no update, but rather bugfix of very unstable package

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

I'll see what I can do. Those are both strong points. Fortunately, the next version of Ubuntu (due in October) will ship with the latest version of LyX. I've also created the packages on Launchpad, so I think it's just a matter of getting them incorporated. On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:00 PM,

Re: LyX 1.6.7 Packages for Ubuntu

Just installed 1.6.7 on my laptop (Mint Isadora/Ubuntu Lucid). Many thanks! /Paul

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org writes: It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks like every time I do a make install, I lose some session information like toolbar position

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Le 9 août 10 à 00:16, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then the Qt session information is reset. So if make install copy this file thus losing date information, instead of merely updating it if needed, you session will be reset. I

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: > Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES writes: > > It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks > > like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information > > like

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Le 9 août 10 à 00:16, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : More exactly, everytime the toolbar ui config file is changed; then the Qt session information is reset. So if "make install" copy this file thus losing date information, instead of merely updating it if needed, you session will be reset.

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Hi, Any idea what might have happened? I guess I should've forwarded http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332 but I never found a way to reproduce it. :( And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no writes: Removing .lyx/ did not help. So I used strace to find the difference between the two users. I found there is also a per-user .config/LyX/ directory. I removed this, and now LyX worked fine! It looks like these session file stored via qt cause

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES lasgout...@lyx.org writes: It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks like every time I do a make install, I lose some session information like toolbar position (on a mac). How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a place that

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Hi, > Any idea what might have happened? I guess I should've forwarded http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332 but I never found a way to reproduce it. :( And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Helge Hafting writes: > Removing .lyx/ did not help. So I used "strace" to find the difference > between the two users. > > I found there is also a per-user .config/LyX/ directory. I removed this, > and now LyX worked fine! It looks like these session file stored via qt

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES writes: > It looks like these session file stored via qt cause problem. It looks > like every time I do a "make install", I lose some session information > like toolbar position (on a mac). > > How come it is so fragile? Do we really need to have it in a

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it. Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE. Wouldn't it be better to disable

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Am 12.07.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Enrico Forestieri wrote: Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? The file

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Stephan Witt wrote: In case it is of interest... These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too. Built successfully with autotools. Thanks. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more? I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects which I really do not

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: > On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Very nice! >> >> Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still >> stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it. > > Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE. Wouldn't it be better

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Am 12.07.2010 um 13:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: >>> Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at >>> >>> >>>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz >>>ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? >> >> The file

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Stephan Witt wrote: > In case it is of interest... > > These files (as of 12.07.2010,13:17) are ok on mac too. > Built successfully with autotools. Thanks. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/13/2010 4:22 AM, Peter Kümmel wrote: Wouldn't it be better to disable LYX_INSTALL by default and to enable all deploy releant options if LYX_INSTALL is set: aspell, nls, no console, more? I'm always annoyed about all the translations and lyx file processing projects which I really do not

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Peter Kuemmel wrote: It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10: http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch, so now I have no

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Peter Kuemmel wrote: It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10: http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition We already

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Enrico Forestieri wrote: Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the tarball. It was

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Verburg wrote: On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/

Re: LyX 1.6.7

With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just clicking lyx.exe, without the need for a launcher or any registry keys or environment variables. Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it. Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE. I've created up-to-date binaries of all the

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Peter Kuemmel wrote: > It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10: > > http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1 > 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition > > We already had a workaround in trunk, which is now also in branch, > so now I have

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:46:04AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > It's a bug in the STL implementation of msvc10: > > > > http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/572376/msvc1 > > 0-c-std-numpunct-has-a-hardcoded-dllimport-in-definition > > > >

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? > > The file src/support/numpunct_lyx_char_type.h is missing from the >

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > Joost, can you please try the new tarballs at > > > > > > > > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 ? > > > > The file

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Verburg wrote: > On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. > > I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/ >

Re: LyX 1.6.7

> With the latest updates in trunk it's now possible to run LyX by just clicking lyx.exe, > without the need for a launcher or any registry keys or environment variables. Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/12/2010 9:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Very nice! Can you please tell me how to compile LyX to achieve this? I'm still stuck with your new compilation option and don't know where to specify it. Use CMake in Trunk and set LYX_NOCONSOLE. > I've created up-to-date binaries of all the

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller spitz at lyx.org writes: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. Compiles and installs fine on Debian Lenny.

Re: LyX 1.6.7

BH wrote: Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here: http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg Thanks, I downloaded it. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default. There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could not test it. Does it work? The tr1 errors

Re: LyX 1.6.7

We can go on ... I've uploaded my installer: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=17719 Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr wrote: I've uploaded my installer: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id =17719 Thanks, I grabbed them. Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org? I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out (waiting for Joost's

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Does now mean after Peter's recent commits? Yes. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: Does now mean after Peter's recent commits? Yes. So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball? Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out (waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release 1.6.7 after these problems are solved. The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball? No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC 2010 doesn't work. I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then. All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:40:04 +0200 Von: Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org CC: Joost Verburg jo...@lyx.org Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.7 Joost Verburg wrote: The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Am 11.07.2010 16:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours, Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt. Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/ ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/ This

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller lyx.org> writes: > > I've uploaded the tarballs to > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 > > Please check and report back. Compiles and installs fine on Debian Lenny.

Re: LyX 1.6.7

BH wrote: > Seems to work fine on Mac. I've put the binary here: > > http://edisk.fandm.edu/bennett.helm/LyX/LyX-1.6.7-Mac-Universal.dmg Thanks, I downloaded it. Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: > On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: > > Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default. > > There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts > > with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could > > not test it. Does it work? > > The

Re: LyX 1.6.7

> We can go on ... I've uploaded my installer: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=17719 Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org? thanks and regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I've uploaded my installer: > https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id > =17719 Thanks, I grabbed them. > Can you please put them on ftp.lyx.org? I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out (waiting for Joost's

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 5:08 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits? Yes. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: > > Does "now" mean after Peter's recent commits? > > Yes. So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball? Jürgen

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 10:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I will probably set up a new tarball after the cmake issues are sorted out (waiting for Joost's feedback now). I will upload the binaries and release 1.6.7 after these problems are solved. The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 11:10 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: So everything is OK now? Can I set up a new tarball? No, there's still another compile error. See my previous message. Joost

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Joost Verburg wrote: > The problems also exist in SCons. It's about the compiler version: MSVC > 2010 doesn't work. I see. I suppose Uwe used another version then. > All the new versions of the dependencies have been prepared for MSVC > 2010 so I think it's a good idea to set up a new tarball

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:40:04 +0200 > Von: "Jürgen Spitzmüller" <sp...@lyx.org> > An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org > CC: Joost Verburg <jo...@lyx.org> > Betreff: Re: LyX 1.6.7 > Joost Verburg wrote: > >

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Am 11.07.2010 16:47, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: I do not think, though, that the binaries that do not use cmake (i.e., yours, Enrico's and Bennett's) need to be rebuilt. Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 5:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Fine. I use MSVC 2008 and am therefore not affected by the MSVC problems. I've created up-to-date binaries of all the dependencies for MSVC 2010: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/bin/ ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/contrib/windows/branch16/ This

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday. I've deleted them again due to the

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I plan to release 1.6.7 on

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: We can go on ... Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this time ...) so far. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45: No

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to         ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz         ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday. I'm getting

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Original-Nachricht On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default. There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could not test it. Does it work? The tr1 errors are fixed now when using

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I've uploaded the tarballs to > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 > > Please check and report back. > > I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday. I've deleted them again due

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > I've uploaded the tarballs to > > > > > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 > > > > > > Please check and report back. > > > > > > > > I

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > We can go on ... Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this time ...) so far. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45:

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> > I've uploaded the tarballs to >> > >> > >> >         ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz >> >        

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've uploaded the tarballs to ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 Please check and report back. I plan to release 1.6.7 on Monday. I'm getting

Re: LyX 1.6.7

Original-Nachricht > On 7/10/2010 10:39 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > I've uploaded the tarballs to > > > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.gz > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.7.tar.bz2 > > > > Please check and report

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On 7/11/2010 12:24 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote: Msvc 10 enables tr1 by default. There are the tr1 symbols in the std namespace, so we will get conflicts with boost. I've checked in a patch which should disable tr1, but could not test it. Does it work? The tr1 errors are fixed now when using