Jens Nöckel wrote:
Great! Could someone send me the WIki password? Then I'll add a line under
Miscellaneous.
sent privately
p
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> Great! Could someone send me the WIki password? Then I'll add a line under
> "Miscellaneous".
sent privately
p
Jens Nöckel wrote:
Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by
everyone...
no its octet-stream now. next guess is .txt :)
cant be this code:
+// GUI_DONTSWAPCB_VISIBLE reveals checkbox for switching Ctrl and Meta on Mac:
On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jens Nöckel wrote:
Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by
everyone...
no its octet-stream now. next guess is .txt :)
Or using a different mailer, sigh.
cant be this code:
+// GUI_DONTSWAPCB_VISIBLE
Jens Nöckel wrote:
+ connect(dontswapCB, SIGNAL(toggled(bool)),
+ this, SIGNAL(changed()));
+ dontswapCB-setVisible(false);
+#ifdef Q_WS_MACX
+#if QT_VERSION 0x040600
On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jens Nöckel wrote:
+ connect(dontswapCB, SIGNAL(toggled(bool)),
+ this, SIGNAL(changed()));
+ dontswapCB-setVisible(false);
+#ifdef Q_WS_MACX
Jens Nöckel wrote:
That's perfect - please feel free to modify my patch this way.
its in. perhaps you want to add oneliner into misc section of newinlyx20 wiki...
pavel
On Sep 19, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jens Nöckel wrote:
That's perfect - please feel free to modify my patch this way.
its in. perhaps you want to add oneliner into misc section of newinlyx20
wiki...
pavel
Great! Could someone send me the WIki password? Then I'll add a line
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by
> everyone...
no its octet-stream now. next guess is .txt :)
cant be this code:
+// GUI_DONTSWAPCB_VISIBLE reveals checkbox for switching Ctrl and Meta on Mac:
On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:02 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jens Nöckel wrote:
>> Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by
>> everyone...
>
> no its octet-stream now. next guess is .txt :)
>
Or using a different mailer, sigh.
> cant be this code:
>
> +//
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> + connect(dontswapCB, SIGNAL(toggled(bool)),
> + this, SIGNAL(changed()));
> + dontswapCB->setVisible(false);
> +#ifdef Q_WS_MACX
> +#if QT_VERSION > 0x040600
On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jens Nöckel wrote:
>> + connect(dontswapCB, SIGNAL(toggled(bool)),
>> + this, SIGNAL(changed()));
>> + dontswapCB->setVisible(false);
>> +#ifdef Q_WS_MACX
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> That's perfect - please feel free to modify my patch this way.
its in. perhaps you want to add oneliner into misc section of newinlyx20 wiki...
pavel
On Sep 19, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jens Nöckel wrote:
>> That's perfect - please feel free to modify my patch this way.
>
> its in. perhaps you want to add oneliner into misc section of newinlyx20
> wiki...
> pavel
Great! Could someone send me the WIki password? Then I'll add a
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
anyone to have it in there, with the default being not to change the key
On Sep 18, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
anyone to have it in
OK, here is the new patch for the current LyX 2.0 in svn trunk:
please note that its difficult to directly comment on your pacthes, because the
attachment is signed as octet-stream type. one need for examples
application/text
(maybe only naming the attachment .patch would help, depends on your
Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by everyone...There was one additional line in GuiApplication.cpp that I took out - it was commented out anyway and corresponded to the initial test I described
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
>>> As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
>>> anyone to have it in there, with the default being not to change
On Sep 18, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
> OK, here is the new patch for the current LyX 2.0 in svn trunk:
please note that its difficult to directly comment on your pacthes, because the
attachment is signed as octet-stream type. one need for examples
application/text
(maybe only naming the attachment .patch would help, depends on your
Another version of the patch is attached, this time hopefully readable by everyone... There was one additional line in GuiApplication.cpp that I took out - it was commented out anyway and corresponded to the initial test I described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Mac/LyXmodifierKeys#sMac.LyXmodifierKeys_5
Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a
On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc
Am 17.09.2010 um 08:49 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net writes:
You're right. My proposal was not thought to the end. But I can
imagine to make it three-state: No, Yes, Auto. When Yes then swap,
when No then don't swap, when Auto then check the bindings for
some emacs like usage. But it remains guessing...
The
Stephan Witt wrote:
... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the unused
top lines
There is now a new checkbox in frontend/qt/ui/PrefInput.ui which determines
the role of Control and Apple keys, but this new UI element will appear for
all versions of Qt and
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the unused
top lines
There is now a new checkbox in frontend/qt/ui/PrefInput.ui which determines
the role of Control and Apple keys, but this new
Am 17.09.2010 um 21:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Stephan Witt wrote:
... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the
unused top lines
I don't know, but I would look for a function to hide the UI element
Stephan Witt wrote:
So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
anyone to have it in there, with the default being not to change the key
mapping.
I'd have no problem with that.
+1
Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
>>>
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le
On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>>> Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>>>
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
>
> On Jun
Am 17.09.2010 um 08:49 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Am 17.09.2010 um 07:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
> On Jun 5,
Stephan Witt writes:
> You're right. My proposal was not thought to the end. But I can
> imagine to make it three-state: No, Yes, Auto. When "Yes" then swap,
> when "No" then don't swap, when "Auto" then check the bindings for
> some emacs like usage. But it remains guessing...
Stephan Witt wrote:
... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the unused
top lines
> > There is now a new checkbox in frontend/qt/ui/PrefInput.ui which determines
> > the role of Control and Apple keys, but this new UI element will appear for
> > all versions of
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> ... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the unused
> top lines
>
>>> There is now a new checkbox in frontend/qt/ui/PrefInput.ui which determines
>>> the role of Control and Apple keys,
Am 17.09.2010 um 21:57 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
> On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>> ... its little bit hard to follow the thread when people dont kill the
>> unused top lines
>>>
>>> I don't know, but I would look for a function to hide the UI
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > So if I put Pavel's suggestion in, would my checkbox patch be acceptable?
> > As I said, I'd be OK without GUI, but I don't really think it will hurt
> > anyone to have it in there, with the default being not to change the key
> > mapping.
>
> I'd have no problem with
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference
item that lets the
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would
Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
> On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>>> Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:30 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 17.09.2010 um 06:31 schrieb Jens Nöckel:
>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Jens Nöckel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
> So my question
Jens Nöckel wrote:
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
this looks easy to do. either add it to the bugzilla or you can try mimic
Your email message not delivered.
Please send all your inquires via our web site form located here.
http://hb9.net/mailer.php
Thank you.
Hb9 Management.
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
can be made dependent on that flag? Maybe the simplest place to put this in
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
can be made
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
> that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
> setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
this looks easy to do. either add it to the bugzilla or you can try mimic
Your email message not delivered.
Please send all your inquires via our web site form located here.
http://hb9.net/mailer.php
Thank you.
Hb9 Management.
Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
can be made dependent on that flag? Maybe the simplest place to put this in
On Jun 5, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 05/06/2010 18:45, Jens Nöckel a écrit :
>> So my question to the LyX dev team would be: could you add a preference item
>> that lets the user set some flag, so that the call
>> setAttribute(Qt::AA_MacDontSwapCtrlAndMeta);
>> can be
50 matches
Mail list logo