On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 08:12:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
>
> The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker.
>
> Fortunately
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Georg can you confirm that 5c2d0499 (and the amendment at 9267b2b2) is
> all we need to do for 2.2.0 regarding #9841?
Yes, this is fine now.
I did also update the docs regarding the swapped \output_changes position
using the experimental mode of updatedocs.py which
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:30:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > I looked at the thread (actually it timed out for me but I could search
> > the MID and found it on mail-archive here [1]). From what I see, there
> > is
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > I hope both of you are not serious.
>
> I was completely serious. I did not follow the issue and did not want to
> invest the time when I know there were
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:30:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> I looked at the thread (actually it timed out for me but I could search
> the MID and found it on mail-archive here [1]). From what I see, there
> is no response to that message.
Eh, you got a bronze contract service and that
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:06:25PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> > > I hope both of you are not serious.
> >
> > I was completely serious. I did not
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:30:14PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 12/01/2016 00:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
> >>
>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:46:04PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>Also, what is this timeout issue? Some people do not get new messages sent
> >>to old threads?
> >
> >I don't understand. Did I bring up the timeout issue? Which quoted text
> >are you referring to?
>
> below
>
> >>>I looked
e release manager notes that I am collecting.
I want to add that I think our situation is special because we are
really hoping that there is only one beta release (we have not said this
explicitly but I think it is easy to pick up on this sentiment from
almost every developer). If we were open to mu
Le 12/01/2016 20:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can anyone +1 this issue as a beta blocker? I did not follow the
discussion closely.
I think this should be done before release. Does it mean that I have to make
it a beta blocker?
No. In my opinion, a beta blocker is something that falls into
Le 12/01/2016 22:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I hope both of you are not serious.
I was completely serious. I did not follow the issue and did not want to
Le 12/01/2016 00:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see
changing its
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >
> >Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
>
> The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see
> changing its symbol and fixing the insertion of an
Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see
changing its symbol and fixing the insertion of an empty environment
before with Enter (described at the beginning of
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker?
The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker.
Fortunately Guillaume implemented a proper solution, so the only thing which
is needed is
Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else?
Unfortunately I do not know much about this origin business. My
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
> >>
>
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:03:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> > >>
On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
>>
>> JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else?
>
>
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org
> >>
>
on the list until we set a new date for beta. There are some
issues with the installer and some critical Windows-specific regressions
(#9900, #9892) that I think must be addressed before a beta release.
There has also been a lot of activity on the list recently, most likely
due to the list serve
I wrote:
Shortly after the last version I'm proud to announce the third version
(0.3) of the LyXWinInstaller
I'm very sorry, I accidently uploaded an old buggy version so that I
need to release a new version 0.31:
I wrote:
Shortly after the last version I'm proud to announce the third version
(0.3) of the LyXWinInstaller
I'm very sorry, I accidently uploaded an old buggy version so that I
need to release a new version 0.31:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=8047
Uwe Stöhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello LyXers,
[...]
The first beta release 0.1 of the installer can be downloaded from:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117
Can you point to some mirror? I'm having trouble reaching your website.
Luis.
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hello LyXers,
>
> [...]
>
> The first beta release "0.1" of the installer can be downloaded from:
>
> http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117
>
Can you point to some mirror? I'm having trouble reaching your website.
Luis.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I decided to write a new one that includes all neccessary files and
programs.
Fantastic!
I'm downloading it now.
I've worked a bit on the English texts, which it is downloading the
complete package. A patch to english.nsh attached, along with the new
english.nsh.
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
I've worked a bit on the English texts, which it is downloading the
complete package. A patch to english.nsh attached, along with the new
english.nsh.
Thanks, I'll have a look at it. And what is about norwegian.nsh ;-)?
Suggestions:
- Change it to include at
Hello Asger,
I added the reported bugs to the bugtracker:
https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?group_id=5117
If you find other installer bugs or have some enhancements, please add
them here.
But it works! I can typeset, view DVI, and so on. Great stuff.
Cool!
Can you also view and process
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Can you also view and process pdf, eps, gif, jpg, and png images?
At least JPG and GIF works, so that's nice. However, it takes forever
and ever to preview a document with this stuff. Also, inserting a GIF
takes 10 seconds or so before it is shown in the document. The
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
Can you also view and process pdf, eps, gif, jpg, and png images?
At least JPG and GIF works, so that's nice. However, it takes forever
and ever to preview a document with this stuff.
Do you mean to preview it as DVI? In PDF it would take less time because
there
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I decided to write a new one that includes all neccessary files and
programs.
Fantastic!
I'm downloading it now.
I've worked a bit on the English texts, which it is downloading the
complete package. A patch to english.nsh attached, along with the new
english.nsh.
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
I've worked a bit on the English texts, which it is downloading the
complete package. A patch to english.nsh attached, along with the new
english.nsh.
Thanks, I'll have a look at it. And what is about norwegian.nsh ;-)?
Suggestions:
- Change it to include at
Hello Asger,
I added the reported bugs to the bugtracker:
https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?group_id=5117
If you find other installer bugs or have some enhancements, please add
them here.
But it works! I can typeset, view DVI, and so on. Great stuff.
Cool!
Can you also view and process
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Can you also view and process pdf, eps, gif, jpg, and png images?
At least JPG and GIF works, so that's nice. However, it takes forever
and ever to preview a document with this stuff. Also, inserting a GIF
takes 10 seconds or so before it is shown in the document. The
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
Can you also view and process pdf, eps, gif, jpg, and png images?
At least JPG and GIF works, so that's nice. However, it takes forever
and ever to preview a document with this stuff.
Do you mean to preview it as DVI? In PDF it would take less time because
there
. (For example actual versions of ImageMagick have problems
with EPS-files. That's why the installer includes an older version
without this problem.)
The first beta release 0.1 of the installer can be downloaded from:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117
There are two
. (For example actual versions of ImageMagick have problems
with EPS-files. That's why the installer includes an older version
without this problem.)
The first beta release "0.1" of the installer can be downloaded from:
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117
The
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:47:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
At last for some...
Perhaps someone should begin finishing up a revtex4.layout?
Takers?
Finally!
I will work on this when I get back (see below), if Marc Mengel or someone
else doesn't beat me to it.
The good news is
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:47:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> At last for some...
>
> Perhaps someone should begin finishing up a revtex4.layout?
> Takers?
Finally!
I will work on this when I get back (see below), if Marc Mengel or someone
else doesn't beat me to it.
The good
At last for some...
Perhaps someone should begin finishing up a revtex4.layout?
Takers?
Lgb
--- Start of forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Doyle)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: ANNOUNCE: REVTeX 4 public beta release
Date: 24 May 1999 18:26:10 GMT
At last for some...
Perhaps someone should begin finishing up a revtex4.layout?
Takers?
Lgb
--- Start of forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Doyle)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: ANNOUNCE: REVTeX 4 public beta release
Date: 24 May 1999 18:26:10 GMT
41 matches
Mail list logo
