On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would like
to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
(it's strange, but later versions of RH need better hardware...)
What is strange here?
I was being ironic...
Obviously you
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 13:58, Christian Ridderström wrote:
I was being ironic...
Oh, ok. :-)
Obviously you put this script in wiki, I suppose? ;-)
Bah.. now you made me do it... I even documented the bloody thing.
I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc? ;-)
Jose' == Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Obviously you put this script in wiki, I suppose? ;-)
Bah.. now you made me do it... I even documented the bloody thing.
Jose' I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc? ;-)
I did not know I was as annoying as that :)
JMarc
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 17:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose' I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc? ;-)
I did not know I was as annoying as that :)
Not annoying but persuasive. :-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would like
> > to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
> > (it's strange, but later versions of RH need better hardware...)
>
> What is strange here?
I was being ironic...
>
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 13:58, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I was being ironic...
Oh, ok. :-)
> > Obviously you put this script in wiki, I suppose? ;-)
>
> Bah.. now you made me do it... I even documented the bloody thing.
I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc?
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Obviously you put this script in wiki, I suppose? ;-)
>>
>> Bah.. now you made me do it... I even documented the bloody thing.
Jose'> I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc? ;-)
I did not know I was as annoying as
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 17:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Jose'> I learned with the masters. (Are you hearing Jean-Marc? ;-)
>
> I did not know I was as annoying as that :)
Not annoying but persuasive. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors like
this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
-I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost -I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30
Christian Ridderström wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
like this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
-I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost
-I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O
-fno-exceptions
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external library, then
changing that code isn't an option, is it?
If nothing else helps, simply #include iostream
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external library, then
changing that code isn't an option, is it?
If nothing else helps, simply #include iostream
Are you suggesting
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external library, then
changing that code isn't an option, is it?
If nothing else helps, simply #include iostream
And similarly,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:29:10PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external library, then
changing that code isn't an option,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
like this:
-c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file included from
../../../src/support/debugstream.h:17,
from
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
If it's important to make LyX compile with 2.9.6 in the future, I can
take
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
If it's important to make LyX
Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
like this:
-c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file included from
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
| other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
| If it's important to make LyX compile with
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Also first gcc compiler in the 3 series was released June 18. 2001.
that is now almost two years ago... still there are distributions that
use gcc 2.95 in their stable setups.
--
Lgb
And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which may
Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which may
| explain why some dists use it. There's no excuse for 2.96 tho.
And I'll claim that those apps really need a brush up, and don't
deserve to be called a C++ program. :-)
Or perhaps
Hi
I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors like
this:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
-I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost -I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -ftemplate-depth-30
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
> like this:
>
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/insets -I../../src
> -I../../../src/insets/../ -I../../../boost
> -I/pkg/mdhacks/grp/util/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O
>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> changing that code isn't an option, is it?
If nothing else helps, simply #include
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > changing that code isn't an option, is it?
>
> If nothing else helps, simply #include
Are you
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > changing that code isn't an option, is it?
>
> If nothing else helps, simply #include
>
And similarly,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 03:29:10PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > So, how should I fix this? If boost is an external "library", then
> > > changing that code isn't
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
> > like this:
> >
> > -c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file included from
> > ../../../src/support/debugstream.h:17,
> >
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
>
> If it's important to make LyX compile with 2.9.6 in the future, I can
>
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> > other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
> >
> > If it's important to
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I'm trying to compile lyx-xforms using gcc 2.96, but I get errors
>> > like this:
>> >
>> > -c ../../../src/insets/ExternalSupport.C In file
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9
Lars> is still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
Lars> I am of course a strange creature, but I see no reason to stick
Lars> with RH 7.3,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
> | other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc 3.3.2 instead.
> >
> | If it's important to make LyX
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> yeah... RH 7.3 how old is that now? RH 8 has come and gone, RH 9
| Lars> is still going strong, with RH 10 looming on the horizon...
>
| Lars> I am of course a strange
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 16:18, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would like
> to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
> (it's strange, but later versions of RH need better hardware...)
What is strange here?
> In my case (on our
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Unless you are ranting, I was mainly thinking about users who would
> like to be able to install lyx 1.4 on RH 7.3...
Specifically, uers who would like to run the Qt frontend will need to
compile the Qt libraries too if they use anything other than the
default
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Could be... it's what came with RedHat 7.3. Anyway, linking only produces
>> | other errors, so I'll just keep on working using gcc
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Also first gcc compiler in the 3 series was released June 18. 2001.
> that is now almost two years ago... still there are distributions that
> use gcc 2.95 in their "stable" setups.
>
> --
> Lgb
And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| And I still run into apps that will only compile with 2.95, which may
| explain why some dists use it. There's no excuse for 2.96 tho.
And I'll claim that those apps really need a brush up, and don't
deserve to be called a C++ program. :-)
Or
39 matches
Mail list logo
