Hi!
I forgot the Emacs-command to update the Changelog could someone
please refresh my memory.
Thanks,
Jürgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerbergasse 60Tel:
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Hi! I forgot the Emacs-command to update the Changelog could
Juergen someone please refresh my memory.
C-x 4 a
The kind of thing which is immediately intuitive...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I do not think they will be too big, as long as GNU extensions are not
| used too often. There were problems with typename in LStrings in old
| 1.1, but I seem to remember that I could work around them.
We dont use any GNU extensions.
On 07 Oct 1999 19:30:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
"Arnd Hanses" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 07:08:37 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
|
| + MathParInset p = new MathParInset(LM_ST_TEXT);
|
| Probably a silly question, but I'm a bit confused: Why 'new'?
|
|
| +
Hi,
short time ago on this list I mentioned "everblue" being the reason,
why IMHO a port to native OS/2 PM might not be a top priority (yet it
might reduce overhead and improve stability, though).
Maybe someone wondered what I was speaking about.
So the following just for the record (and the
On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:49:20 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
On 07 Oct 1999 19:30:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
"Arnd Hanses" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 07:08:37 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
|
| + MathParInset p = new MathParInset(LM_ST_TEXT);
|
| Probably a silly
Several months ago, I sent a note to this list asking about DocBook
support in Lyx, and you all said "it'll be here soon." Well, it is here
and it is great. You guys have put out a great product, and are to be
commended. Thanks a bunch for all the hard work.
Sincerely,
Luis Villa
Well, since we do not use the top level configure.cmd
any more, could you ditch it away?
On the other hand, lib/configure.cmd must be used on OS/2,
is it not possible to do something on config/lib_configure.m4
so that the resulting lib/configure will look like
--- configure.orig Tue Sep 28
Hi all,
On 5 Oct 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
: David two more hackings (text.C and lyx_cb.C)
: David that allows to see the 'Chapter x' and 'Part #' on-screen in
: David the current locale as well as seeing 'Chapter x' in current
: David locale on the TOC popup... and corresponding
wow, lyx is *very* nice. i've wanted to see a wysiwyg front-end to latex
for some time, and you've done a great job of it! i especially like being
able to directly type the latex commands in math mode, and the extensive
keyboard shortcuts.
i thought you'd like to know that the first two links
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars There is some differences between folks that are just users and
Lars developers. And I don't think that the developers should put
Lars restraints on themselves
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:19:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Unit-testing is certainly a good thing -- tests all those promises the
| code makes and keeps Arndt happy about programming by contract since the
| interface can't change without
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Instead, it's much better to simply address each file in order,
document the header file, rename functions and variables to have
better names, in general clean it up, and try to make things better
small piece by
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Instead, it's much better to simply address each file in order,
document the header file, rename functions and variables to have
better names, in general clean it up, and try to make things better
small piece by
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 05:25:36PM +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
Else we would found the 'HardCore testing LyX never come to terms
gang', making Core Developers live impossible.
Then the real testing experts can by and by implement the rest on their
own account and risk and report the
Well, it seems that everyone thinks unit testing is a nice thing, but
nobody has the time to do it.
--
John Weiss
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, John Weiss wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:19:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Unit-testing is certainly a good thing -- tests all those promises the
| code makes and keeps Arndt happy about programming by contract since
Hi!
I forgot the Emacs-command to update the Changelog could someone
please refresh my memory.
Thanks,
Jürgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerbergasse 60Tel:
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Hi! I forgot the Emacs-command to update the Changelog could
Juergen> someone please refresh my memory.
C-x 4 a
The kind of thing which is immediately intuitive...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I do not think they will be too big, as long as GNU extensions are not
| used too often. There were problems with typename in LStrings in old
| 1.1, but I seem to remember that I could work around them.
We dont use any GNU extensions.
On 07 Oct 1999 19:30:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 07:08:37 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
>|
>| >+ MathParInset p = new MathParInset(LM_ST_TEXT);
>|
>| Probably a silly question, but I'm a bit confused: Why 'new'?
>|
Hi,
short time ago on this list I mentioned "everblue" being the reason,
why IMHO a port to native OS/2 PM might not be a top priority (yet it
might reduce overhead and improve stability, though).
Maybe someone wondered what I was speaking about.
So the following just for the record (and the
On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:49:20 +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>On 07 Oct 1999 19:30:32 +0200, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>
>>"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>| On Thu, 07 Oct 1999 07:08:37 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
>>|
>>| >+ MathParInset p = new MathParInset(LM_ST_TEXT);
>>|
>>|
Several months ago, I sent a note to this list asking about DocBook
support in Lyx, and you all said "it'll be here soon." Well, it is here
and it is great. You guys have put out a great product, and are to be
commended. Thanks a bunch for all the hard work.
Sincerely,
Luis Villa
Well, since we do not use the top level configure.cmd
any more, could you ditch it away?
On the other hand, lib/configure.cmd must be used on OS/2,
is it not possible to do something on config/lib_configure.m4
so that the resulting lib/configure will look like
--- configure.orig Tue Sep 28
Hi all,
On 5 Oct 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
: David> two more hackings (text.C and lyx_cb.C)
: David> that allows to see the 'Chapter x' and 'Part #' on-screen in
: David> the current locale as well as seeing 'Chapter x' in current
: David> locale on the TOC popup... and corresponding
wow, lyx is *very* nice. i've wanted to see a wysiwyg front-end to latex
for some time, and you've done a great job of it! i especially like being
able to directly type the latex commands in math mode, and the extensive
keyboard shortcuts.
i thought you'd like to know that the first two links
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> There is some differences between folks that are just users and
> Lars> developers. And I don't think that the developers should put
> Lars> restraints
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:19:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Unit-testing is certainly a good thing -- tests all those promises the
> | code makes and keeps Arndt happy about programming by contract since the
> | interface can't change
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Instead, it's much better to simply address each file in order,
> document the header file, rename functions and variables to have
> better names, in general clean it up, and try to make things better
> small piece by
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 08:47:31PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Instead, it's much better to simply address each file in order,
> document the header file, rename functions and variables to have
> better names, in general clean it up, and try to make things better
> small piece by
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 05:25:36PM +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
>
> Else we would found the 'HardCore testing LyX never come to terms
> gang', making Core Developers live impossible.
>
> Then the real testing experts can by and by implement the rest on their
> own account and risk and report the
Well, it seems that everyone thinks unit testing is a nice thing, but
nobody has the time to do it.
--
John Weiss
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, John Weiss wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:19:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | Unit-testing is certainly a good thing -- tests all those promises the
> > | code makes and keeps Arndt happy about programming by
34 matches
Mail list logo
