Re: XForms 1.0 and LyX 1.2.3 RPMs and SRPMs for Red Hat Linux 7.3 and 8.0

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Daniel == Daniel Tschan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel Hi JMarc I have taken your binaries and put them on ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.3. I hope they will work fine with the xforms rpm we have at ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib :) Daniel Great. It looks like they work with all xforms rpms in

Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the NEWS file. Ok. I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are conceptual

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | | | Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this | | patch has any relevance? | | | | It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until | | I have

[PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the NEWS file. Ok. See attachment for patch. I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default No. There are

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful feature unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not default to on. I know the first

Re: CJK-LyX-1.2.3

2003-01-21 Thread cghan
On 20 Jan 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: That's OK woth me. I was just pointing out that, if you want to have a release of xforms you can rely on, it would be nice to try to propose something right now... JMarc With your encouragement(?), I've changed my mind and will send the patch

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: Yes, I guess so. Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to provide a patch for it The ERT problem is unsolvable. :-) I didn't refer to the ERT problem but to the extension of the configure script to list all third-party products (pspell, aiksaurus, checktex,

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 09:19, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This patch became a bit larger than intended, due to ws changes. I noticed that, it was the reason why I didn't look to it before. :-) This is the cut down version. | @@ -1400,7 +1400,8 @@ sub ConvertToLayout { | print

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I am not a reLyX people :-), but I see the logic of your change and I say go | with it. To be on the safe side you need Kayvan's opinion. :-) Some more testing on tex files is also needed. -- Lgb

lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread Nabil Hathout
Hello, I would like to switch to lyx 1.3pre2 but it does not allow me to type oe (AltGr + S + g) and euro (AltGr + e) symbols. This was possible in lyx 1.2.X. How could I do so ? Is the answer in the documentation ? regards, --Nabil Hathout

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful feature unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not default to

Why is pspell not activated by default?

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
File NEWS states: - If you configure with --with-pspell (which uses the PSpell library for spellchecking), you will be able to automatically spell-check multi-language documents, assuming you have the right dictionaries installed. Why isn't this activated by default? Doesn't configure

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:30:36AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Ummm. We already loop over the document to output all math macros. Could we also output all ERT insets? All up to the position of the snippet. And if the snippet is moved, we can't use the cached image. And so on. This is a can of

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX file). If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file: \layout Enumerate + \begin_deeper \begin_float tab - \begin_deeper \layout Standard \align center \LyXTable ... then lyx reads the file

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: It's probably better to produce a single full dvi preview in the background all the time and snip from there instead of the current snippet based approach (which is simple and cute, but not robust at all). Please do not put too much effort into something that can't be

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which works very well in general. But you accept that very well in general is not sufficient to

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: This is the cut down version. | @@ -1400,7 +1400,8 @@ sub ConvertToLayout { | print \nChanging $dummy $name to layout $layout if $debug_on; | | # Nest if the layout stack has more than just Standard in it | -if ($#{$CurrentLayoutStack} 0) { | +

Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix with cxx. Reasons are: - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but it does after a patch that I sent to the xforms list. So far, so

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX | file). | | If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file: | | \layout Enumerate | + \begin_deeper | \begin_float tab | - \begin_deeper |

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix | with cxx. Reasons are: | | - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its | own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but | it does

[patch] mathtt fix

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
\mathtt is currently not properly displayed in LyX. This is just an optical issue but qualifies as a bug I suppose. The attached patch fixes that. Ok to apply? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why doesn't gcc have problems? fprintf is not in std:: there either... Old gcc actively ignores std, i.e. std:: and :: are the same. Andre' -- Those who desire to

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why doesn't gcc | have problems? fprintf is not in std:: there either... | | Old gcc actively ignores std, i.e. std:: and

Re: [patch] mathtt fix

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | \mathtt is currently not properly displayed in LyX. | This is just an optical issue but qualifies as a bug I suppose. | | The attached patch fixes that. | | Ok to apply? yes. -- Lgb

chktex problems in 1.3.0pre2

2003-01-21 Thread Helge Hafting
I tried chktex and got lots of: Interword spacing (`\ ') should perhaps be used. Lyxx place the error boxes in the wrong locations, about a line after where they ought to be when comparing to chktex on the exported tex file. A snippet of text: på salgsavd.(1) slik det stod. Og hvis dette ble

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:03:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Lars | BUT if boost thinks that all C functions are in std::, why Lars doesn't gcc | have problems? fprintf is not in

footnotes preview in lyx-1.3

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Hi, I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs. Thanks, -- Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wiss. Mitarbeiter, IMGB La loi, dans un grand souci

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix with cxx. Reasons are: - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but it does after a patch that I

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which works very well in general. But you accept that very well in

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:14:31PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: The problems should simply be documented. AFAICS, if you do not use ERT, preview-latex will work fine. Simply go into a 'a^b' inset and press C-I to lock it. No fancy preview anymore... Ok, this is the only bug I am

Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: Hi, I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs. Thanks, I don't see a problem. Attached is a screenshot. Works both when typing

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex snippets. This indicates that preview uses the write to .lyx method instead of write to .tex (I think this is a boolean flag somewhere, haven't looked at it, though) Do you mean the 'nice' flag passed to

Re: Why is pspell not activated by default?

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:24:09AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: Why isn't this activated by default? Doesn't configure check for the availability of pspell? There is no reason, IMHO. I was nervous before becuase my pspell install crashed in initialisation, but it seems this was my screwed-up

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:48:40PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: There is another one: Currently, \lyxlock gets written to the .tex snippets. This indicates that preview uses the write to .lyx method instead of write to .tex (I think this is a boolean flag somewhere, haven't looked at it,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: Judging from int InsetFormula::latex(Buffer const *, ostream os, bool fragile, bool) const { WriteStream wi(os, fragile, true); par_-write(wi); return wi.line(); } that's not the place. Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself? Ie, it

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself? Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to the WriteStream c-tor. We could certainly use that, but I don't know what the 'nice' flag is good

bug: preview of includegraphics without extension broken

2003-01-21 Thread Christian Noack
Hi, when I include a graphic in my LyX document I do not want to add the exetension of the filename. This is, because I want to be able to export the document to LaTeX and then be able to run either latex or pdflatex. For this I have to versions of my graphcis in my folder one is myGraphic.eps

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:12:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Is this your way of saying that the problem lies in mathed itself? Ie, it would go away if we had control over the 'true' passed to the WriteStream c-tor. We could certainly use that, but I don't know what

What is rpmbuild?

2003-01-21 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Make rpmdist now fails again on the latest CVS: /bin/sh /home/kayvan/src/lyx/config/missing --run tar chof - lyx-1.3.0pre2 | +GZIP=--best gzip -c lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz chmod -R a+w lyx-1.3.0pre2 /dev/null 21; rm -rf lyx-1.3.0pre2 ln -s lib/images/lyx.xpm . ; \ rpmbuild -ta lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz ;

Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Angus Leeming wrote: Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs. I don't see a problem. Attached is a screenshot. Works both when

Re: What is rpmbuild?

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: Make rpmdist now fails again on the latest CVS: /bin/sh /home/kayvan/src/lyx/config/missing --run tar chof - lyx-1.3.0pre2 | +GZIP=--best gzip -c lyx-1.3.0pre2.tar.gz chmod -R a+w lyx-1.3.0pre2 /dev/null 21; rm -rf lyx-1.3.0pre2 ln -s lib/images/lyx.xpm . ; \

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix with cxx. Reasons are: - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its own. the one provided in xforms lib does not

Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: Angus Leeming wrote: Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: I am now using lyx-1.3-pre2 for my dissertation and it looks great so far. Is there any possibility to turn on preview-latex for the footnotes? It seems to work in Emacs. I don't see a problem. Attached

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: Happy if I apply it? Yes. Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-) I suppose so. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 04:12:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: It's just that, having done so, I'm not sure what /real/ benefit these previews provide for most people. Welcome to the club ;-) Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they

footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Angus Leeming wrote: Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: It seems as if you can set \usepackage[footnotes]{preview} in Emacs and have a preview of the footnote mark. [...] LyX uses a little box saying foot (possibly translated) to show a footnote. Would you write better documents if LyX

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature myself? Two months. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature myself? Two months. How long would it take you and how much money would you (or anyone else on this list) want for it?

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:44:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: | Happy if I apply it? | | Yes. | | Guess that Lars should give his Ok too ;-) | | I suppose so. Does it fix a real problem? If so, commit it. -- Lgb

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | LyX uses a little box saying foot (possibly translated) to show a | footnote. Would you write better documents if LyX displayed some | symbol or other? I doubt it. Sure, we /could/ do it, at the cost of | complicating the code (read

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: | | On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: | How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature | myself? | | Two months. | | How long would it take you and how

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: How hard would it be to learn enough C++ and lyx to add this feature myself? Two months. How long would it take you Depends on the end of the feature freeze. Probably less than two months. and how much money

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Does it fix a real problem? Yes. preview does not work without it if only a single formula is locked. [Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?] Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes all | of them labeled as [foot] in lyx, because lyx is unable to show the | footnote number, you would see why it is helpful to see the footnote mark.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper corrections (can you change this in footnote 6) to the right place in lyx is a bit of a hassle... Ed.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote: What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits does it give? Actually I accept his argument that a sequential numbering of all footnotes might be some navigation help if the number of footnotes gets large. What

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | If you had ever tried editing a document with more than 1000 footnotes | all of them labeled as [foot] in lyx, because lyx is unable to show | the footnote number, you would see why it is helpful to

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Edwin Leuven wrote: even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper corrections (can you change this in footnote 6) to the right place in lyx is a bit of a hassle... One way to solve this problem is to implement inverse search

Re: What is rpmbuild?

2003-01-21 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:14:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: rpm has been split in 2 on RH8. rpm will install, update, query and rpmbuild will generate an rpm from the source files. So, I guess that there needs to be a test for the presence of rpmbuild somewhere. How about this? It

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 21 January 2003 16:57, Andre Poenitz wrote: What would you like to see the footnote number or mark? What benefits does it give? One can e.g. make the (sequential!) numbers appear in print as well. Going back from the proofs to the .lyx would be easy then.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: I am sick of getting this argument against implementing a fscking simple footnote counter in lyx. So after reading your very long answer, I can only conclude, that lyx does not and will never have a useful implementation to see the footnote number, either using

Re: Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix with cxx. Reasons are: - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:54:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: [Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?] What is this ? john -- Anyone who quotes Rusty in their sig is an idiot. - me

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Jos Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 17:20, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: The argument goes like this: Mr. Moeller-Herrmann, in footnote 477, your argument is wrong and you have to cite XYZ. At the moment I have to compile the lyx document, check the dvi, find footnote 477, look for and remember

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: [...] Here we go. Very quickdirty and only barely functional (it takes a while after an insertion until the change has propagated) Moritz could apply this in hid local tree and remind us during the 1.4 cycle to discuss

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 05:56:12PM +, John Levon wrote: [Looks like I am the only one using inset locking?] What is this ? If you press C-i inset a mathinset, it gets locked and Cursor Left/Right jumps over it with a single keystroke. To unlock, press C-i again. Up/Down isn't affected.

[PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
This patch: * updates the version of lyx2lyx to match the corresponing lyx version; * updates the reference to the copyright date. * adds two new options to list the supported lyx versions, and allow to specify it instead of the final file format. * if both the

Re: lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: my $LANG is set to fr_FR@euro. Its is the only available value defined in /etc/locale.gen : fr_FR@euro ISO-8859-15 What should be the $LANG value that would make lyx choose the iso8859-15 encoding ? Press control-x please,

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 18:35, José Matos wrote: This patch: * updates the version of lyx2lyx to match the corresponing lyx version; * updates the reference to the copyright date. * adds two new options to list the supported lyx versions, and allow to specify it instead

Re: very small Pb in lyx-1.3pre2 build

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 02:25:33PM +0100, Roger Gadiou wrote: I have build lyx-1.3pre2 with qt frontend on my mandrake distribution. the only pb was the version of autoconf which is 2.52d. So the place for a letter should be added to the $autoversion test in autogen.sh file: case

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
Angus Leeming wrote: Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: * You would like some on-screen way to differentiate between different footnotes. Correct. * Lars thinks that you really need footnote labels. False. I do not need these labels. * André and myself both think that preview-latex is the

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: I will :-) I have also created bug number 838 and added your patch as attachment. This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) regards john -- When you start off by telling those who disagree with you that

bugzilla banner

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
it's coming up as a broken img now ... john -- When you start off by telling those who disagree with you that they are not merely in error but in sin, how much of a dialogue do you expect ? - Thomas Sowell

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote: even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper corrections (can you change this in footnote 6) to the right place in lyx is a bit of a hassle... It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numbering

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread Moritz Moeller-Herrmann
John Levon wrote: This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug, nor did I get sent the additional responses.

Re: footnote numbering [was: Re: footnotes preview in lyx-1.3]

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote: This is now bug 409 as it was a dupe (as you know ...) Sorry, I searched for footnote and footnotes and did not find my old bug, You need to change the default search setting to include closed bugs too, it's quite

Re: lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread Nabil Hathout
John Levon writes: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 04:18:16PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: my $LANG is set to fr_FR@euro. Its is the only available value defined in /etc/locale.gen : fr_FR@euro ISO-8859-15 What should be the $LANG value that would make lyx choose the iso8859-15

lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread Nabil Hathout
In fact, the problem exists only with the Qt front-end. It seems (-dbg 512) that the font encoding is guessed from the language value and that the ones associated with Français are either iso8859-1 and iso10646-1. I have added the relevant encoding variables in the preferences but it seems they

Re: lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:14:37PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: In fact, the problem exists only with the Qt front-end. It seems (-dbg 512) that the font encoding is guessed from the language value and that the ones associated with Français are either iso8859-1 and iso10646-1. I have added

Re: lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread Nabil Hathout
John Levon writes: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:14:37PM +0100, Nabil Hathout wrote: In fact, the problem exists only with the Qt front-end. It seems (-dbg 512) that the font encoding is guessed from the language value and that the ones associated with Français are either iso8859-1 and

Re: Prerelease #2 of LyX 1.3.0

2003-01-21 Thread Nicolas Ferre'
I'm trying to compile it on ibm power4/aix5.1 (with xforms-1.0), using gcc3.2. It fails with: g++ -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -o lyx BufferView.o BufferView_pimpl.o Bullet.o Chktex.o CutAndPaste.o DepTable.o FloatList.o Floating.o FuncStatus.o InsetList.o LColor.o LaTeX.o LaTeXFeatures.o

Re: XForms 1.0 and LyX 1.2.3 RPMs and SRPMs for Red Hat Linux 7.3 and 8.0

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Daniel" == Daniel Tschan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Daniel> Hi JMarc >> I have taken your binaries and put them on >> ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.2.3. I hope they will work fine with the >> xforms rpm we have at ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/contrib :) Daniel> Great. It looks like they work with all

Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the > NEWS file. Ok. > I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | | | Can some of you relyx people have a look at case 638 and see if this | | patch has any relevance? | | | | It kindo seems that it fixes things, but I won't apply anything until | | I have

[PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: I think we should provide a link to the preview-latex homepage in the NEWS file. Ok. See attachment for patch. I also wonder whether we should activate preview-latex by default No. There are

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > >No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are > >conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful feature > >unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not default to on. > > I know the

Re: CJK-LyX-1.2.3

2003-01-21 Thread cghan
On 20 Jan 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > That's OK woth me. I was just pointing out that, if you want to have a > release of xforms you can rely on, it would be nice to try to propose > something right now... > > JMarc > With your encouragement(?), I've changed my mind and will send

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: Yes, I guess so. Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to provide a patch for it The ERT problem is unsolvable. :-) I didn't refer to the ERT problem but to the extension of the configure script to list all third-party products (pspell, aiksaurus, checktex,

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 09:19, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > This patch became a bit larger than intended, due to ws changes. I noticed that, it was the reason why I didn't look to it before. :-) > This is the cut down version. > > | @@ -1400,7 +1400,8 @@ sub ConvertToLayout { > |

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I am not a reLyX people :-), but I see the logic of your change and I say go | with it. To be on the safe side you need Kayvan's opinion. :-) Some more testing on tex files is also needed. -- Lgb

lyx 1.3pre2 does not display oe and euro symbol

2003-01-21 Thread Nabil Hathout
Hello, I would like to switch to lyx 1.3pre2 but it does not allow me to type oe (AltGr + S + g) and euro (AltGr + e) symbols. This was possible in lyx 1.2.X. How could I do so ? Is the answer in the documentation ? regards, --Nabil Hathout

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: >> >No. There are still rough edges (display jumping) and there are >> >conceptual problems (fancy preambles) that make this wonderful >> >feature unusable under some circumstances. It certainly should not >>

Why is pspell not activated by default?

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
File "NEWS" states: > - If you configure with --with-pspell (which uses the PSpell library for > spellchecking), you will be able to automatically spell-check > multi-language documents, assuming you have the right dictionaries > installed. Why isn't this activated by default? Doesn't

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 10:30:36AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ummm. We already loop over the document to output all math macros. > Could we also output all ERT insets? All up to the position of the snippet. And if the snippet is moved, we can't use the cached image. And so on. This is a can

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX > file). If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file: \layout Enumerate + \begin_deeper \begin_float tab - \begin_deeper \layout Standard \align center \LyXTable ... then lyx reads the file

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Schmitt
Andre Poenitz wrote: It's probably better to produce a single full dvi preview in the background "all the time" and snip from there instead of the current "snippet based" approach (which is simple and cute, but not robust at all). Please do not put too much effort into something that can't be

Re: [PATCH] Re: Link to preview-latex in NEWS file

2003-01-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote: > After all, the problem will only occur for real power users. IMHO it > would be a complete waste of time to redesign the preview code which > works very well in general. But you accept that "very well in general" is not

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > This is the cut down version. > > | @@ -1400,7 +1400,8 @@ sub ConvertToLayout { > | print "\nChanging $dummy $name to layout $layout" if $debug_on; > | > | # Nest if the layout stack has more than just "Standard" in it > | -if ($#{$CurrentLayoutStack} >

Boost thinks that every C functions are in std::

2003-01-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
It seems that I am really not able to compile 1.3.0cvs on tru64 unix with cxx. Reasons are: - there is no snprintf in tru64 4.0f, so xforms has to provide its own. the one provided in xforms lib does not compile on tru64, but it does after a patch that I sent to the xforms list. So far, so

Re: [patch] relyx

2003-01-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Spitzmueller) writes: | Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: | > This does still loop on my test file (export -- reimport the attached LyX | > file). | | If I change the order in the reLyXed lyx file: | | \layout Enumerate | + \begin_deeper | \begin_float tab | - \begin_deeper

  1   2   >