Re: 2.3.6.1 (Ubuntu 16.04) cannot import the exam class?

> On 3/22/22 09:23, Uwe Brauer wrote: > In order to use a LaTeX class in LyX, you have to have a corresponding > layout file (which essentially maps elements of the LaTeX class to > visual elements in the GUI). As far as I know, LyX does not provide a > layout file for

2.3.6.1 (Ubuntu 16.04) cannot import the exam class?

quot; I attach the file just in case. Any change to convert that? Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer -- I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine. I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. I support the ban of Russia from SWIFT. I support the EU membership of th

Re: cannot run lyx on MacOS 10.15 catalina

>>> "SW" == Stephan Witt writes: > Am 19.03.2022 um 15:28 schrieb Uwe Brauer : >> >>>>> "SW" == Stephan Witt writes: >> >>> Am 19.03.2022 um 09:04 schrieb Uwe Brauer : >>> Hi >>> >>> I usu

Re: cannot run lyx on MacOS 10.15 catalina

space 894.9M 581 Model: MacBookAir9,1, BootROM 1715.81.2.0.0 (iBridge: 19.16.10744.0.0,0), 2 processors, Dual-Core Intel Core i3, 1,1 GHz, 8 GB, SMC Graphics: kHW_IntelIrisPlusGraphicsItem, Intel Iris Plus Graphics, spdisplays_builtin Memory Module: BANK 0/ChannelA-DIMM0, 4 GB, LPDDR4X, 3733 M

Re: cannot run lyx on MacOS 10.15 catalina

>>> "SW" == Stephan Witt writes: > Am 19.03.2022 um 09:04 schrieb Uwe Brauer : >> Hi >> >> I usually run LyX on Ubuntu, but I gave a MacOS laptop a try, so I >> downloaded it from >> https://www.lyx.org/Download#toc4 > There are tw

Re: support git (mercurial) push and pull

>>> "SK" == Scott Kostyshak writes: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 06:31:17PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Are there any plans that lyx could interact with git (or even >> mercurial), and could even push and pull to a server, say

cannot run lyx on MacOS 10.15 catalina

up to be sent to Apple. At this point I have to ask you. Is this a bug of sorts, and can it be resolved or is this not known and I shall sent a bug report? Regards Uwe Brauer -- I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine. I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's

support git (mercurial) push and pull

Hi Are there any plans that lyx could interact with git (or even mercurial), and could even push and pull to a server, say bitbucket or github or helix. That would be great for collaboration. Regards Uwe Brauer -- I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine. I support

(kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

has no problems. Any help is appreciated regards Uwe Brauer

Re: (kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

Liviu == Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com writes: Hello Liviu Dear Uwe, The 1.6.x branch is no longer maintained, so it is very unlikely that this issue could be solved for you. I would advise updating to 2.1.x via the PPA:

Re: (kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote: I see. I would advise then to open a bug report on http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome Have you tried to copy `~/.config/ibus` from the user that works to the user where LyX crashes? And can you

(kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

ser 2 has no problems. Any help is appreciated regards Uwe Brauer

Re: (kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

>> "Liviu" == Liviu Andronic writes: Hello Liviu > Dear Uwe, > The 1.6.x branch is no longer maintained, so it is very unlikely that > this issue could be solved for you. I would advise updating to 2.1.x > via the PPA: >

Re: (kubuntu 10.04) lyx 1.6.7 bug because of ibus?

> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> wrote: > I see. I would advise then to open a bug report on > http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome > Have you tried to copy `~/.config/ibus` from the user that works to > the user where LyX

show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. Well why not instead of displaying the latex source display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution be

show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

>> >> > This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you > look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution

save as latex file: displaymath instead of \[, newline

displayed in (X)emacs. Uwe Brauer

feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

window, that would to obtain even better control about the final document. Uwe Brauer

Re: save as latex file: displaymath instead of \[, newline

On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:21:44 +0200, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: That's a matter of taste. Some users prefer the space to make it better readable for humans. We cannot satisfy everybody's wishes in this respect but have to find a compromise. ok \[\] is the standard LaTeX

save as latex file: displaymath instead of \[, newline

displayed in (X)emacs. Uwe Brauer

feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code

window, that would to obtain even better control about the final document. Uwe Brauer

Re: save as latex file: displaymath instead of \[, newline

> On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:21:44 +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > That's a matter of taste. Some users prefer the space to make it > better readable for humans. We cannot satisfy everybody's wishes in > this respect but have to find a compromise. ok > \[\] is the

execute code in verbatim env: matlab etc

it. This is a very useful future for people who like to have source code in their documents. regards Uwe Brauer

execute code in verbatim env: matlab etc

it. This is a very useful future for people who like to have source code in their documents. regards Uwe Brauer

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In case you don't need a lot of math (which I doubt), the MimeTeX plugin well actually I do need a lot of math (look at my address :)) can be used: http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/MimeTeX so this is not

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In case you don't need a lot of math (which I doubt), the MimeTeX > plugin well actually I do need a lot of math (look at my address :)) > can be used: >http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/MimeTeX so

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Michel Lavaud wrote: Uwe Brauer a écrit : Christian Ridderström wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: This solution exists. See here for instance http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/PublishPDF Having read this again, it seems to be that you cannot directly write Latex

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Michel Lavaud wrote: Uwe Brauer a écrit : Christian Ridderström wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: > This solution exists. See here for instance > http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/PublishPDF Having read this again, it seems to be that you cannot directly write

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Correct. It converts wiki (via XML, then LaTeX) to PDF. Please note that allowing plain, arbitrary LaTeX to be parsed on an open wiki is a security risk. why is this so, what a pity that would be ideal for collaboration. To which of the above parts do you refer? The

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

>>> >>> Correct. It converts wiki (via XML, then LaTeX) to PDF. Please >>> note that allowing plain, arbitrary LaTeX to be parsed on an open >>> wiki is a security risk. >> >> why is this so, what a pity that would be ideal for collaboration. > To which of the above parts

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian Ridderström wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: This solution exists. See here for instance http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/PublishPDF Having read this again, it seems to be that you cannot directly write Latex or Lyx input into the wiki which

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian Ridderström wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: > This solution exists. See here for instance > http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/Cookbook/PublishPDF Having read this again, it seems to be that you cannot directly write Latex or Lyx input into the wiki

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, rgheck wrote: I'm primarily waiting for the LyX file format to migrate to XML

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: [snip] - a document which is around 50 pages I really think you'd be better of with a VCS, but it might be worth a try. The adavantage is to have a server, which looks

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm primarily waiting for the LyX file format to migrate to XML. That would be really great. As an aside, it is already possible to use an extension to the wiki that takes wiki pages, convert them to

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 22/09/2008 12:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: The adavantage is to have a server, which looks intuive. VCS seems to have a non flat learning curve and then it is not clear to me how to interchange files, by email? No, LyX would take care of all the complicated stuff

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: >>>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Uwe Brauer wrote: [snip] >> >> - a document which is around 50 pages > I really think you'd be better of with a VCS, but it might be

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: >> > I'm primarily waiting for the LyX file format to migrate to XML. >> >> That would be really great. >> >> > As an aside, it is already possible to use an extension to the >> > wiki that

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 22/09/2008 12:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: The adavantage is to have a server, which looks intuive. VCS seems to have a non flat learning curve and then it is not clear to me how to interchange files, by email? No, LyX would take care of all the complicated stuff

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

often. So resolving editing conflicts might be important for *huge* projects with a lot of authors, like wikipedia or software projects, but are in my opinion not utmost important for scientific collaboration say in Mathematics. Thanks very much Uwe Brauer

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian == Christian Ridderström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, rgheck wrote: I mainly answered to your points in the other post but you mention some interesting facts I did not know about. That sounds a lot like my old (not yet dead idea) of storing/editing LyX

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian Ridderström wrote: * To download a page source: curl 'http://wiki.lyx.org/Group/File?action=source' File.lyx what is supposed to do, when I tried it I just obtained an empty file!

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

question of pictures for the moment and concentrate on the simultaneous editing, then I would say at most people would edit _different_ section at the same time and may they would not do this very often. So resolving editing conflicts might be important for *huge* projects with a lot of authors, like wikipedia or software projects, but are in my opinion not utmost important for scientific collaboration say in Mathematics. Thanks very much Uwe Brauer

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, rgheck wrote: I mainly answered to your points in the other post but you mention some interesting facts I did not know about. > That sounds a lot like my old (not yet dead idea) of >

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Christian Ridderström wrote: * To download a page source: curl 'http://wiki.lyx.org/Group/File?action=source' > File.lyx what is supposed to do, when I tried it I just obtained an empty file!

lyx and collaborative editing.

on that Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer I found the following link interesting. http://www.sububi.org/2007/02/06/tools-for-collaborative-writing/

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

rgheck == rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Uwe Brauer wrote: LyX has included interfaces to vc for some time, and the new version will extend the backends that can be used from rcs and cvs to svn and even git, I believe. More could be added fairly simply. but I

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

rgheck == rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No. I suppose it could be done, but it would be a huge amount of work. That I was afraid of. It reminds me of the hen/egg problem. Not very many people miss such a software, but once it is there...(like with

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rgheck wrote: Uwe Brauer wrote: No, it's not so much that. I could be wrong, but it seems to me like doing this would involve writing a whole new program, more or less. Not entirely. We could extend the lyxserver

lyx and collaborative editing.

on that Thanks and regards Uwe Brauer I found the following link interesting. http://www.sububi.org/2007/02/06/tools-for-collaborative-writing/

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

>>>>> "rgheck" == rgheck >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uwe Brauer wrote: >> >> > LyX has included interfaces to vc for some time, and the new > version will extend the backends that can be used from r

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

> "rgheck" == rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > No. I suppose it could be done, but it would be a huge amount of >> > work. >> >> >> That I was afraid of. It reminds me of the hen/egg problem. Not >> very many people miss such a software, but once it is >>

Re: lyx and collaborative editing.

>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > rgheck wrote: >> Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> >> No, it's not so much that. I could be wrong, but it seems to me like >> doing this would involve writing a

Re: include openoffice export and import filter

On 24 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2004 16:42 schrieb Uwe Brauer: ok, what is about the first filter oolatex? Should be even easier to include. The configure bit is probably easy, but: I wanted to test oolatex, and failed. The system installed version of tex4ht

Re: include openoffice export and import filter

On 24 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2004 16:42 schrieb Uwe Brauer: >> ok, what is about the first filter oolatex? Should be even easier >> to include. > > The configure bit is probably easy, but: I wanted to test oolatex, > and failed. The

Re: include openoffice export and import filter

On 24 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2004 09:31 schrieb Andre Poenitz: Could you please provide a patch to implement this for current CVS? Sure. Georg ok, what is about the first filter oolatex? Should be even easier to include.

Re: include openoffice export and import filter

On 24 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. März 2004 09:31 schrieb Andre Poenitz: > Could you > please provide a patch to implement this for current CVS? > > > Sure. > > Georg ok, what is about the first filter oolatex? Should be even easier to include.

include openoffice export and import filter

to latex. I think the first converter could be easily accessed from lyx. The second one requires java, and can be also executed from the command line. The latex file produced will need a special writer.sty. Uwe Brauer

include openoffice export and import filter

to latex. I think the first converter could be easily accessed from lyx. The second one requires java, and can be also executed from the command line. The latex file produced will need a special writer.sty. Uwe Brauer

lyx-1.1.2, problems under SuSe 5.3 (libc5)

Hello While I had so far no problems in compiling LyX-1.0.3 I was faced for 1.1.2 with a compiler problem, as is seems to me. I did not try out 1.1.1. I have attached the error message and the config.status. Thanks Uwe Brauer This file contains any messages produced by compilers while

lyx-1.1.2, problems under SuSe 5.3 (libc5)

Hello While I had so far no problems in compiling LyX-1.0.3 I was faced for 1.1.2 with a compiler problem, as is seems to me. I did not try out 1.1.1. I have attached the error message and the config.status. Thanks Uwe Brauer This file contains any messages produced by compilers while