Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 10:30, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 5. Why do we install the MikTeX packages without asking the user for permission? Because new user cannot know what a package is and what is it about. Their cryptic names are also meaningless, even if you know some basics about LaTeX. We can

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 20:17, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Now I uninstalled LyX2.0.1 (because I also wanted to test the uninstaller). Now my .lyx files can't be opened by double-click and they don't have the lyx logo anymore. Sure, because you decided to uninstall LyX. We must therefore delete

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 10:30, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 5. Why do we install the MikTeX packages without asking the user for permission? Because new user cannot know what a package is and what is it about. Their cryptic names are also meaningless, even if you know some basics about LaTeX. We can

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 20:17, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Now I uninstalled LyX2.0.1 (because I also wanted to test the uninstaller). Now my .lyx files can't be opened by double-click and they don't have the lyx logo anymore. Sure, because you decided to uninstall LyX. We must therefore delete

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 08:35, schrieb Liviu Andronic: 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the installer. Isn't this a problem now anymore ? I don't know what you are referring to. This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last page of the installer (before

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 10:30, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. What icon do you mean? The installer uses the icon of the lyx.exe file. If you want another icon, we must change the build code to link it to the lyx.exe. I see one in

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 08:35, schrieb Liviu Andronic: 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the installer. Isn't this a problem now anymore ? I don't know what you are referring to. This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last page of the installer (before

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 10:30, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. What icon do you mean? The installer uses the icon of the lyx.exe file. If you want another icon, we must change the build code to link it to the lyx.exe. I see one in

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the installer. Isn't this a problem now anymore ? I don't know what you are referring to. This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last page of the

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 05.09.2011 20:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I tried the merged installer. Many thanks! Here is some feedback: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. What icon do you mean? The

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new one. You can check whether removing the test for

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 11:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the cached value is thus pretty much random. When we call i18nLibFileSearch, we again try to translate

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation did not change... I really think the problem is related to opening too many translation files with gettext. But I would be delighted to be

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation did not change... I really think the problem is related to opening too many

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation did not change... I really think the problem

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 17:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Yes, I believe JMarc. The only problem is that it feels like shooting with a canon on a little mouse. OTOH, this availability code itself shoots with a canon on a little mouse. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

10. Now, I have both LyX2.0.0 and LyX2.0.1 installed on my pc ? Shouldn't we overwrite the previous version ? No. See the reasons above. I totally do not agree with these reasons. Because a few people might want to use multiple minor releases, ALL users have to

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:19 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the cached value is thus pretty much random.

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> 6. Joost had a reason to not allow to start the application from the >> installer. Isn't this a problem >> now anymore ? > > I don't know what you are referring to. > This has been discussed earlier on the list. Now the last

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 05.09.2011 20:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > I tried the merged installer. >> > > Many thanks! > > > Here is some feedback: >> >> 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. >> > > What

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the >>> installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet >>> able to install LyX if you install it without admin

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new one. You can check whether removing the test for

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 11:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 03/09/11 21:25, Stephan Witt a écrit : I had a go at it some time go, and it looks like the code that looks for existing translations (int Language initialization) loads all the .gmo files and after some point gettext refuses to load a new

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the cached value is thus pretty much random. When we call i18nLibFileSearch, we again try to translate

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

> > > > When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache > problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation > did not change... > > I really think the problem is related to opening too many translation files > with gettext. But I would be

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache > problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation > did not change... > > I really think the problem is related to opening too

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely the cache but the situation did not change... I really think the problem

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 06/09/11 17:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Yes, I believe JMarc. The only problem is that it feels like shooting with a canon on a little mouse. OTOH, this availability code itself shoots with a canon on a little mouse. JMarc

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

10. Now, I have both LyX2.0.0 and LyX2.0.1 installed on my pc ? Shouldn't we overwrite the previous version ? No. See the reasons above. I totally do not agree with these reasons. Because a few people might want to use multiple minor releases, ALL users have to

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 17:57 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Op 6-9-2011 15:11, Stephan Witt schreef: >> Am 06.09.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> >>> When I was still young and naive about this problem, I suspected a cache >>> problem. Therefore I tried to disable completely

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 06.09.2011 um 13:19 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 06/09/11 12:21, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : >> Now, this causes the translation of languageTestString() to be cached. >> If we try to load all languages to see whether they are available, the >> cached value is thus pretty much

Language changes within index entries (was: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available)

Le 01/09/2011 16:15, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 08:41, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=18767 regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a Imagemagick issue). is this regression wrt 2.0.0

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and the MiKTeX maintainer kindly built in some features

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 5-9-2011 17:28, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 02.09.2011 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=18767 regards Uwe Hi Uwe, I tried the merged installer.

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a Imagemagick

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 20:01, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: For these people we have the standard installer. The bundle installer is especially designed for new installations and therefore includes MiKTeX and JabRef (is optional). So the standard installer will not bother the user and is as small as

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 20:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I tried the merged installer. Many thanks! Here is some feedback: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. What icon do you mean? The installer uses the icon of the lyx.exe file. If you want another icon, we

Language changes within index entries (was: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available)

Le 01/09/2011 16:15, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 08:41, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=18767 regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the > installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet > able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a > Imagemagick issue). is this regression wrt 2.0.0

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't have Internet access, you can install LyX and it will work with its basic features. There were some reasonable user requests in the past to include MiKTeX directly and the MiKTeX maintainer kindly built in some features

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 5-9-2011 17:28, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 02.09.2011 15:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=18767 regards Uwe Hi Uwe, I tried the merged installer. Here is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 19:54, schrieb Pavel Sanda: Uwe Stöhr wrote: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin privileges (due to a Imagemagick

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 20:01, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: For these people we have the standard installer. The bundle installer is especially designed for new installations and therefore includes MiKTeX and JabRef (is optional). So the standard installer will not bother the user and is as small as

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 05.09.2011 20:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I tried the merged installer. Many thanks! Here is some feedback: 1. The icon is not the nicest one. We should have a transparent one. What icon do you mean? The installer uses the icon of the lyx.exe file. If you want another icon, we

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Are you aware that the documentation is not localized for LyX ? Was there a reason for or did

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/03/2011 09:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Are you aware that the documentation is not localized

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 03.09.2011 um 16:18 schrieb Richard Heck: On 09/03/2011 09:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Are you

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 18:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : This is the problem. The LANG variable is set to de_DE.UTF-8. Therefor the UI is german. But the docs are in english because of the i18nLibFileSearch: lang = en above. LyX 1.6 prints i18nLibFileSearch: lang = de in the same environment. I've checked

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Perhaps a look at git log for filetools.cpp would turn something up I'm afraid it's a complex interaction of gettext and the use of the Messages class. The translation of the string languageTestString() is cached, so maybe we ask for the translation of this string before gettext is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 03.09.2011 um 20:03 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 03/09/11 18:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : This is the problem. The LANG variable is set to de_DE.UTF-8. Therefor the UI is german. But the docs are in english because of the i18nLibFileSearch: lang = en above. LyX 1.6 prints

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Yes, currently I have no idea how to get it translated. A Qt thing? I figured out some things: First, LyX uses

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. > without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. > > Are you aware that the documentation is not localized for LyX ? Was there a > reason for or

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/03/2011 09:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. >> without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. >> >> Are you aware that the documentation is not

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 03.09.2011 um 16:18 schrieb Richard Heck: > On 09/03/2011 09:36 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 02.09.2011 um 18:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> >>> I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu >>> translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem.

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Le 03/09/11 18:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : This is the problem. The LANG variable is set to "de_DE.UTF-8". Therefor the UI is german. But the docs are in english because of the "i18nLibFileSearch: lang = en" above. LyX 1.6 prints "i18nLibFileSearch: lang = de" in the same environment. I've

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Perhaps a look at git log for filetools.cpp would turn something up I'm afraid it's a complex interaction of gettext and the use of the Messages class. The translation of the string languageTestString() is cached, so maybe we ask for the translation of this string before gettext is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 03.09.2011 um 20:03 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > Le 03/09/11 18:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> This is the problem. The LANG variable is set to "de_DE.UTF-8". Therefor the >> UI is german. >> But the docs are in english because of the "i18nLibFileSearch: lang = en" >> above. >> LyX 1.6

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

I've been fiddling around endlessly to get the Application menu translated.. without succces.. Unfortunately LyX has the same problem. Yes, currently I have no idea how to get it translated. A Qt thing? I figured out some things: First, LyX uses

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/**ticket/7737http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is downloading MiKTeX

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 um 03:16 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: Something more serious: -) start LyX -) open Advanced FR -) close LyX -) start LyX (Advanced FR is already there) -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice left cursor) -) type C-q (quit) and we get

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 09:09 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz I only got this warning while compiling: Server.cpp: In member function ‘bool

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/02/2011 03:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.09.2011 um 03:16 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: Something more serious: -) start LyX -) open Advanced FR -) close LyX -) start LyX (Advanced FR is already there) -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:19, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > > Was this bug fixed? >>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/**ticket/7737 >>> >> > I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 02.09.2011 um 03:16 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: > Something more serious: > > -) start LyX > -) open Advanced F > -) close LyX > > -) start LyX (Advanced F is already there) > -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice > left cursor) > -) type C-q (quit) > >

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 09:09 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: >> I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: >> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz > I only got this warning while compiling: > > Server.cpp: In member function ‘bool >

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/02/2011 03:48 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.09.2011 um 03:16 schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta: > >> Something more serious: >> >> -) start LyX >> -) open Advanced F >> -) close LyX >> >> -) start LyX (Advanced F is already there) >> -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once,

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:19, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). Can you send me a link to this installer. I want to test it. Vincent

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 um 20:23 schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sig

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck rgheck at comcast.net writes: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sighttp://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sig for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. Builds flawlessly here (Debian

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Stephan Witt wrote: for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the morning, Thursday, my time. I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. build went fine on x86 linux, everything seems to

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck wrote: Also, a question. What do people think about releasing patch files? Does anyone use them? They are not that difficult to create, I would suppose, but they do take time. I don't know if anybody really uses it, but I always used them to check the changes in advance of a

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages compile. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 07:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the morning, Thursday, my time. I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. build went fine

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 -- Julien

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:40, Julien Rioux schreef: On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed?

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is downloading MiKTeX fro somewhere. I'll have a look. In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz I only got this warning while compiling: Server.cpp: In member function ‘bool lyx::LyXComm::loadFilesInOtherInstance()’: Server.cpp:1018:45: warning:

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Something more serious: -) start LyX -) open Advanced FR -) close LyX -) start LyX (Advanced FR is already there) -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice left cursor) -) type C-q (quit) and we get SEGFAULT! Seems to crash both with instant preview on and

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 um 20:23 schrieb Richard Heck: > > I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz.sig >http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz >

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck comcast.net> writes: > http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz > http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sighttp://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.xz.sig > for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. Builds flawlessly here (Debian

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Stephan Witt wrote: > > for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. > > Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the > > morning, Thursday, my time. > > I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. build went fine on x86 linux, everything seems

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Richard Heck wrote: > Also, a question. What do people think about releasing patch files? Does > anyone use them? They are not that difficult to create, I would suppose, > but they do take time. I don't know if anybody really uses it, but I always used them to check the changes in advance of a

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 10:55, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien: Compilation of French versions of UserGuide and EmbeddedObjects fail for a similar reason: bad language change location in a sectioning heading. Where? For me all documentation files for all languages compile. regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 09/01/2011 07:43 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: >>> for testing. Please let me know if you have any trouble building it. >>> Assuming there are no problems, I will officially release in the >>> morning, Thursday, my time. >> I have no problem on Mac OS X. The build went fine. >

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 31.08.2011 20:23, schrieb Richard Heck: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: Works fine and a Win installer is ready (the merged one). I'll leave the installer for LyX 2.0.1 to Joost because the merged installer is not yet able to install LyX if you install it without admin

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 -- Julien

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Op 1-9-2011 16:40, Julien Rioux schreef: On 01/09/2011 4:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: From my point of view it is already stable enough since I tested it a lot on different Windows and computers. In case that Joost cannot provide an installer soo Was this bug fixed?

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Am 01.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Was this bug fixed? http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7737 I don't know what this is about. guess that Joost is downloading MiKTeX fro somewhere. I'll have a look. In th merged installer MiKTeX is directly included. So even if you don't

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Il 31/08/2011 20:23, Richard Heck ha scritto: I have put what I hope will be LyX 2.0.1 here: http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/lyx-2.0.1.tar.gz I only got this warning while compiling: Server.cpp: In member function ‘bool lyx::LyXComm::loadFilesInOtherInstance()’: Server.cpp:1018:45: warning:

Re: LyX 2.0.1 Sources Available

Something more serious: -) start LyX -) open Advanced F -) close LyX -) start LyX (Advanced F is already there) -) type C-m (math mode), then x, then left-cursor (try once, twice, thrice left cursor) -) type C-q (quit) and we get SEGFAULT! Seems to crash both with instant preview on and

  1   2   >