Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

2014-04-24 0:29 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org: You could sign me up for those two. Done. However, I'm not sure what it means to be the ticket owner. I think the main purpose is that someone knowledgeable in the respective area checks the severity of the bug, maybe invites

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

2014-04-24 0:29 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn : > > You could sign me up for those two. > Done. > However, I'm not sure what it means to be the ticket owner. > I think the main purpose is that someone knowledgeable in the respective area checks the severity of the bug, maybe

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Op 22 apr. 2014 09:47 schreef Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org: 2014-04-19 19:22 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck: Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him?

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Op 22 apr. 2014 09:47 schreef "Jürgen Spitzmüller" : > > 2014-04-19 19:22 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck: > >> >> Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

2014-04-19 19:22 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck: Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really means is that you get an email when

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

2014-04-19 19:22 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck: > > Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and > frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file > and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really > means is that you get an email

Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really means is that you get an email when a bug in that category has been filed,

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

On 19/04/2014 19:22, Richard Heck wrote: Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really means is that you get an email when

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: undo/redo lasgouttes Remove I think this one should remain. P

Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really means is that you get an email when a bug in that category has been filed,

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

On 19/04/2014 19:22, Richard Heck wrote: Abdel has asked to be removed as default owner for the dialog and frontend-qt4 bugs, and I've also removed him as default owner of the file and menu bugs. Would anyone like to replace him? The only thing this really means is that you get an email when

Re: Anybody Wanna Own Some Bugs?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> undo/redo lasgouttes > > Remove I think this one should remain. P

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? See the attached patch. since nobody responded feel free to put it

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 13.12.2010 um 13:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? See the attached patch.

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. > > > > Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? > > See the attached patch. since nobody responded feel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 13.12.2010 um 13:07 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. >>> >>> Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? >> >> See

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? See the attached patch. Stephan Index: src/rowpainter.cpp

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. > > Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? See the attached patch. Stephan Index: src/rowpainter.cpp

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Le 10 déc. 2010 à 21:35, Liviu Andronic a écrit : On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style for spellchech errs? I hate to nag, but the

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? A little bit buried. But it may resurrect. Starting to dig soon. :-) Others, do you like more

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Le 10 déc. 2010 à 21:35, Liviu Andronic a écrit : On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? >> Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style >> for spellchech errs? >> > I hate to nag,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 10.12.2010 um 18:34 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. > > Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? A little bit buried. But it may resurrect. Starting to dig soon. :-) > Others, do you

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style for spellchech errs? pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style for spellchech errs? I hate to nag, but the current implementation is very eye-catchy. But I feel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > Looks ok - I cannot see any artifacts. Of course this isn't any evidence. Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style for spellchech errs? pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan what is the current state-of-art patch for 7120? > Others, do you like more the current thick line or zoomming-line style > for spellchech errs? > I hate to nag, but the current implementation is very eye-catchy. But I

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 20:08 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first -

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). so we are at circles,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original implementation (although then the wavy

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 15:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll get another ones ... few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Another example: Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar. Where to start and what classes has to be changed? void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;) and pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5, yo_ - row_.ascent(), 3, height, Color_changebar); 5 is the offset

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll get another ones ... few times i tried to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:13, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: and soon you'll get another ones ... few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as possible :) Quite frankly when I look at this LaTeX dependent code I find the painting code very simple in comparison :-) then we should establish refugees

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Another example: Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar. Where to start and what classes has to be changed? void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;) and pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5, yo_ -

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:23, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 12/03/2010 12:21 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hum I have a better one: the graphics stuff!!! Speaking of which, can you look again at #6949? Richard

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 20:08 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > >> Stephan Witt wrote: >>> >>> Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >>> Stephan Witt wrote: > Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare > the two

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). so we are at circles,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Liviu Andronic wrote: >> >>> I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS >>> Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original >>> implementation (although

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 15:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 3-12-2010 15:54, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: > On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >> >> >>> On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Liviu Andronic wrote: > I would suspect that a wavy line

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > I did no serious investigation until now... > Only one example: > I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... > The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll get another ones ... few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Another example: Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar. Where to start and what classes has to be changed? void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;) and pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5, yo_ - row_.ascent(), 3, height, Color_changebar); 5 is the offset

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll get another ones ... few times i tried to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what happened... The cursor was misplaced badly. and soon you'll

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:13, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:54 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 03/12/2010 15:52, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 03.12.2010 um 15:31 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: On 30/11/2010 17:33, Pavel Sanda wrote: Liviu Andronic wrote: I

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> and soon you'll get another ones ... >> few times i tried to touch painting stuff and escaped as far as possible >> :) >> > > Quite frankly when I look at this LaTeX dependent code I find the painting > code very simple in comparison :-) then we should establish

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 03.12.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > Another example: >> Imagine you want to increase the thickness of the change bar. >> Where to start and what classes has to be changed? > > void RowPainter::paintChangeBar() sounds like it :) ;) > > and > >pi_.pain.fillRectangle(5,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 03/12/2010 16:23, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 3-12-2010 16:19, Abdelrazak Younes schreef: On 03/12/2010 16:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: I did no serious investigation until now... Only one example: I tried to adjust the left margin to zoom factor. Guess what

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On 12/03/2010 12:21 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hum I have a better one: the graphics stuff!!! Speaking of which, can you look again at #6949? Richard

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 17:33 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). so we are at circles, since

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: To break the circle I propose to adjust the line thickness to zoom factor. The attached patch does this. I think it's better now. The problem is the somewhat obfuscated rowpainter code. This makes the patch hard to read, sorry. Perhaps some kind soul is able to apply

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 17:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: To break the circle I propose to adjust the line thickness to zoom factor. The attached patch does this. I think it's better now. The problem is the somewhat obfuscated rowpainter code. This makes the patch hard to read, sorry.

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: i tried it and thickness zoom works. however my suspiction that together with change tracking the current code produce some mess was confirmed :) Sorry, I'm not sure I understand you. Do you refer to the screen appearance or to the rowpainter code? i speak about the

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century Schoolbook L font. (patched version) pavel attachment: p1.pngattachment: p2.png

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century Schoolbook L font. (patched

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. this is how

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Do you refer to the different vertical line positions? i refer to the the red line jumping like a goat on the hills. this is intended? Yes. Do you have another idea? aha :) i didn't got that its intended... The optimal solution would be a two pass algorithm for

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Pavel Sanda wrote: Stephan Witt wrote: btw i have unrelated question. the native string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus technicus like other aspell/enchant/hunspell strings which i'm going to kill right

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Pavel Sanda wrote: btw i have unrelated question. the native string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus technicus like other aspell/enchant/hunspell strings

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Pavel Sanda wrote: btw i have unrelated question. the native string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus technicus like other

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 21:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Stephan Witt wrote: Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: Pavel Sanda wrote: btw i have unrelated question. the native string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: i see, so using applespell is correct, right? Hmm.. I'm not sure. Perhaps Mac OS Speller or OS Spell Service? i will use Mac OS Speller, thanks. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 17:33 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS >> Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original >> implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). > > so we are at

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > To break the circle I propose to adjust the line thickness to zoom factor. > The attached patch does this. I think it's better now. > The problem is the somewhat obfuscated rowpainter code. > This makes the patch hard to read, sorry. > > Perhaps some kind soul is able to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 17:47 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> To break the circle I propose to adjust the line thickness to zoom factor. >> The attached patch does this. I think it's better now. >> The problem is the somewhat obfuscated rowpainter code. >> This makes the patch hard to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > > i tried it and thickness zoom works. however my suspiction that together > > with change tracking the current code produce some mess was confirmed :) > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand you. > Do you refer to the screen appearance or to the rowpainter code? i speak about

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare > the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century Schoolbook L font. (patched version) pavel <><>

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare >> the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. > > this is how it looks on linux qt 4.6.3, Century Schoolbook L font. >

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare > >> the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any chaos. > > > > this is how it looks on linux qt

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> >> Am 02.12.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Stephan Witt wrote: Ok, but that's what I tried too. I attach some screen shot to compare the two versions, unpatched first - patched second. I cannot see any

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Do you refer to the different vertical line positions? > > > > i refer to the the red line jumping like a goat on the hills. this is > > intended? > > Yes. Do you have another idea? aha :) i didn't got that its intended... > The optimal solution would be a two pass

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: btw i have unrelated question. the "native" string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus technicus like other aspell/enchant/hunspell strings which i'm going to kill

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > btw i have unrelated question. > the "native" string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our > invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus technicus > like other aspell/enchant/hunspell

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > btw i have unrelated question. > > the "native" string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our > > invetion? i wonder whether it should be translated or is it terminus > >

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 02.12.2010 um 21:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 02.12.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Pavel Sanda: >> >>> Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> >>> btw i have unrelated question. >>> the "native" string translation. this is standard naming in mac world or our >>> invetion? i wonder whether it

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Stephan Witt wrote: > > i see, so using applespell is correct, right? > > Hmm.. I'm not sure. > Perhaps "Mac OS Speller" or "OS Spell Service"? i will use Mac OS Speller, thanks. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 08:21 schrieb Michal: I have to admit I think it costs not much time to report a bug in LyX's bug tracker. Fortunately, it's not bugzilla. :-) And some of the bugs you reported are easier to fix with example files. Well, I've just reported the bugs (see my other mail on

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Could you please specify to which bug reports should I attach examples? Only if it's not too much work... Thank you, it is very considerate of you. Such a rare thing nowadays! :) * For ticket 7115 a screen shot and a small example file would be helpful.

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 11:58 schrieb Michal: * For ticket 7115 a screen shot and a small example file would be helpful. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7115 But as I cannot solve it, I'm only guessing. Unfortunately, I don't own a copy of Scientific Workplace. Me too. I don't have Windows

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Liviu Andronic wrote: I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). so we are at circles, since the wavy line was killed not so long ago :) not

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 08:21 schrieb Michal: >> I have to admit I think it costs not much time to report a bug in >> LyX's bug tracker. Fortunately, it's not bugzilla. :-) >> And some of the bugs you reported are easier to fix with example >> files. >Well, I've just reported the bugs (see my other

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

> >Could you please specify to which bug reports should I attach > > examples? > > Only if it's not too much work... Thank you, it is very considerate of you. Such a rare thing nowadays! :) > * For ticket 7115 a screen shot and a small example file would be > helpful.

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 30.11.2010 um 11:58 schrieb Michal: >> * For ticket 7115 a screen shot and a small example file would be >> helpful. http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/7115 >> >> But as I cannot solve it, I'm only guessing. >Unfortunately, I don't own a copy of Scientific Workplace. Me too. I don't have

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Liviu Andronic wrote: > I would suspect that a wavy line might be more desirable (as in MS > Word, gtkspell, OOo, etc.), and if I remember this was the original > implementation (although then the wavy line was too big :) ). so we are at circles, since the wavy line was killed not so long ago :)

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

. And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs. :-) To continue the digression.. Some people consider reporting bugs as a form of contributing to an open-source project

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

I don't want to be offending. But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs. :-) You don't want to be offending, so

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 29.11.2010 um 12:42 schrieb Michal: I don't want to be offending. But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

2010/11/28 Michal ms-li...@ms.sebdan.com:    In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win XP SP3 Polish.    If something is unclear,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: [BUG #6]    Document settings cannot be reverted via undo. Or is it by design? That might be by design. It's rather unwanted that settings are undone and the user doesn't see this happen. this is a regression which works in 1.6, i remember to use it... pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Hello On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: [BUG #5]    The dotted line used to mark misspelled words is almost invisible (under some conditions). Is the color/thickness of the line configurable? No, this is hardcoded. Under which conditions is it

  1   2   >