On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:00:33AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 25/06/2015 23:45, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
This more or less completes this work?
I think so. The most important
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:00:33AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 25/06/2015 23:45, Richard Heck a écrit :
> >On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>>This more or less completes this work?
> >>I think so. The most
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
applied the better patch to master but there is a glitch with it.
Namely, if a preview snippet produces a blank image, its metrics are
not invalidated
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
applied the better patch to master but there is a glitch with it.
Namely, if a
On 06/25/2015 02:13 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
applied the better patch to master but
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/25/2015 02:13 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The third patch is the simpler one proposed by
On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
This more or less completes this work?
I think so. The most important glitches were identified and solved.
(For which thanks very much, to you
and Guillaume.)
The credit goes
Le 25/06/2015 23:45, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
This more or less completes this work?
I think so. The most important glitches were identified and solved.
(For which thanks very much,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:36:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/24/2015 08:49 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font sizes
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 09:36:50PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 08:49 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >>>
> >>>3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
> applied the better patch to master but there is a glitch with it.
> Namely, if a preview snippet produces a blank image, its metrics are
> not
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
> > applied the better patch to master but there is a glitch with it.
> >
On 06/25/2015 02:13 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The third patch is the simpler one proposed by Guillaume. I have already
applied the better patch to master but
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 02:13 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:16:21AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>>The third patch is the simpler one
On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
This more or less completes this work?
I think so. The most important glitches were identified and solved.
(For which thanks very much, to you
and Guillaume.)
The credit goes
Le 25/06/2015 23:45, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 06/25/2015 02:58 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:16:19PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
This more or less completes this work?
I think so. The most important glitches were identified and solved.
(For which thanks very much,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:14:29AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/22/2015 06:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx no longer
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font sizes other
than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy method offers a
function that retrieves the actual font size and calculates the actual dpi.
On 06/24/2015 08:49 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font
sizes other
than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy
Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font sizes other
than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy method offers a
function that retrieves the actual
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
> > with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
> > the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:14:29AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 06:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >>
> >>>Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
>
> 3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font sizes other
> than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy method offers a
> function that retrieves the actual font size and calculates the actual dpi.
>
Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font sizes other
than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy method offers a
function that retrieves the actual
On 06/24/2015 08:49 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 25/06/2015 00:44, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
3) Previews have the incorrect size with layouts that offer font
sizes other
than 1[0-2]pt (lyx-preview-fontsize.lyx). The legacy
On 06/22/2015 06:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx no longer lasserts but on opening the
preview is not generated because
Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Still there at cd046f0e (master). But here's the trace I get when it crashes
right at the first Ctrl+C:
I doubt
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:23:18PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Indeed, this has to do with the general problem of copying macros and
how the various structures are carried on when copying.
OK for the fact that this is not a regression, but
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:23:18PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Indeed, this has to do with the general problem of copying macros and
how the various structures are carried on when copying.
OK for the fact that this is not a regression, but
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time MacroData::xlmname()
is called so that it contains bogus values. This
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Still there at cd046f0e (master). But here's the trace I get when it crashes
right at the first Ctrl+C:
I doubt this has anything to do with the recent
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 23/06/2015 02:36, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 23/06/2015 02:36, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
> >Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
> >>Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
> >>well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >
> > Still there at cd046f0e (master). But here's the trace I get when it crashes
> > right at the first Ctrl+C:
>
> I doubt this has anything to do with the
Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:18:56AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:44:00AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Still there at cd046f0e (master). But here's the trace I get when it crashes
right at the first Ctrl+C:
I doubt
On 06/22/2015 06:59 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx no longer lasserts but on opening the
preview is not generated because
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:23:18PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> >Indeed, this has to do with the general problem of copying macros and
> >how the various structures are carried on when copying.
>
> OK for the fact that this is not a
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:23:18PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 23/06/2015 10:46, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >
> >Indeed, this has to do with the general problem of copying macros and
> >how the various structures are carried on when copying.
>
> OK for the fact that this is not a
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
> with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
> the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time MacroData::xlmname()
> is called so that it contains bogus values.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I don't know, maybe this is a case of a race condition. Most probably,
> > with preview on, updateMacros() is not called (or is called later) and
> > the MacroData:sym_ pointer is not updated at the time
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
1) SIGSEGV with previews (no math macros involved). I believe this is the
one I mentioned in a previous message. See the attached
lyx-preview-sigsegv.lyx for instructions.
Thanks for catching this. I fixed this issue at cd046f0e.
Three bugs in the current stable (93c0512b). The third one has an easy
fix (and also a very trivial partial fix if you want to move forward
with the release). The first two could be postponed after the release,
or maybe they are trivial as well to Enrico. Found the first two while
testing my
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx no longer lasserts but on opening the
preview is not generated because \Coloneqq is not defined. This looks like
the bug
Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold Ctrl+C until it
segfaults. Sometimes it happens on
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold Ctrl+C until it
segfaults. Sometimes it happens on the first press. This is pretty
annoying
Le 23/06/2015 02:36, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold
Three bugs in the current stable (93c0512b). The third one has an easy
fix (and also a very trivial partial fix if you want to move forward
with the release). The first two could be postponed after the release,
or maybe they are trivial as well to Enrico. Found the first two while
testing my
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 02:11:53AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
>
> > Also, lyx-preview-macros-2-lassert.lyx no longer lasserts but on opening the
> > preview is not generated because \Coloneqq is not defined. This looks like
> >
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
>
> 1) SIGSEGV with previews (no math macros involved). I believe this is the
> one I mentioned in a previous message. See the attached
> lyx-preview-sigsegv.lyx for instructions.
Thanks for catching this. I fixed this issue at
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold Ctrl+C until it
segfaults. Sometimes it happens on the first press. This is pretty
annoying
Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold Ctrl+C until it
segfaults. Sometimes it happens on
Le 23/06/2015 02:36, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Le 23/06/2015 02:34, Guillaume M-M a écrit :
Another segfault in the stable branch involving previews (and master as
well). When Instant preview is on and one copies a formula, it randomly
crashes. In the attached, select the math inset and hold
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/20/2015 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Thank you for the convenience.
I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
LyX users across the globe
Guillaume M-M wrote:
Thank you very much, this is really quick now. Thanks also for the timer
for generating previews. Also I only had 1 segmentation error, which I
could not reproduce unfortunately. It happened after changing from
Instant preview: On to No maths and zooming. But probably
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 06/20/2015 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >
> >>Thank you for the convenience.
> >>
> >>I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
> >LyX users
Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Thank you very much, this is really quick now. Thanks also for the timer
> for generating previews. Also I only had 1 segmentation error, which I
> could not reproduce unfortunately. It happened after changing from
> "Instant preview: On" to "No maths" and zooming. But
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Lastly I see that you prevent loading the microtype package by redefining
\usepackage as you described earlier in the
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Lastly I see that you prevent loading the
Le 20/06/2015 15:58, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Lastly I see that you prevent loading the microtype package by
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Thank you for the convenience.
I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
LyX users across the globe win now :)
Thanks to both of you!
Scott
On 06/20/2015 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Thank you for the convenience.
I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
LyX users across the globe win now :)
Thanks to both of you!
For stable, this is again
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >
> >>Lastly I see that you prevent loading the microtype package by redefining
> >>\usepackage as you described
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:58:35PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> > Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > >On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> > >
> > >>Lastly I see that you prevent
Le 20/06/2015 15:58, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 08:14:03AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 20/06/2015 01:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Lastly I see that you prevent loading the microtype package by
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Thank you for the convenience.
>
> I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
LyX users across the globe win now :)
Thanks to both of you!
Scott
On 06/20/2015 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 01:38:55AM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Thank you for the convenience.
I have no other issue to report for stable, Enrico wins :)
LyX users across the globe win now :)
Thanks to both of you!
For stable, this is again
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
from the list. The third inset works and
Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work
without the patch.
Here I was
Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work
without the patch.
Here I was
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 04:50:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 07/06/2015 12:49, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >>
> >>lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
> >>from the list. The third
2015-06-14 13:31 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org:
Jürgen, this is going to become complicated and fragile. What about
following the same strategy used in stable?
This implies reverting bc47054b.
Since I do not have time to investigate further, please do whatever you see
fit.
I
2015-06-14 16:04 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org:
I agree that this would have been better but, unfortunately, it doesn't
fit the instant preview infrastructure. You wold have to output different
definitions depending on whether you compile the whole set of snippets
or only some of
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:25:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:56:46PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2015-06-04 18:39 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org:
Yes, I can reproduce in master. It does not occur in stable, where a
different strategy
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
2015-06-14 13:31 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org:
Jürgen, this is going to become complicated and fragile. What about
following the same strategy used in stable?
This implies reverting bc47054b.
Since I
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:25:25PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:56:46PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > 2015-06-04 18:39 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri :
> >
> > > Yes, I can reproduce in master. It does not occur in stable, where a
> > >
2015-06-14 13:31 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri :
> Jürgen, this is going to become complicated and fragile. What about
> following the same strategy used in stable?
> This implies reverting bc47054b.
>
Since I do not have time to investigate further, please do whatever you see
fit.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2015-06-14 13:31 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri :
>
> > Jürgen, this is going to become complicated and fragile. What about
> > following the same strategy used in stable?
> > This implies reverting bc47054b.
> >
2015-06-14 16:04 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri :
> I agree that this would have been better but, unfortunately, it doesn't
> fit the instant preview infrastructure. You wold have to output different
> definitions depending on whether you compile the whole set of snippets
> or only
On 06/07/2015 07:49 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The attached patch solves all of the above problems (and also the
segfault you report separately) for me. I am also attaching the patch
for #9354 accordingly updated. Please test both and report the issues
you find. If your paper pass the tests,
On 06/07/2015 07:49 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The attached patch solves all of the above problems (and also the
segfault you report separately) for me. I am also attaching the patch
for #9354 accordingly updated. Please test both and report the issues
you find. If your paper pass the tests,
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work
without the patch.
Here I was forgetting to also scan nested insets.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org
wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the
beginning of the file, such
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Obvious one to test for
Thanks for spotting this. It is due to the recursion in the macro
definitions. The patch I sent takes this into account and lyx does
not segfaults anymore, but latex will be caught in an endless loop
and
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
But I wonder why there are preview entries in the lyxpreview*.tex
...
\begin{document}
\begin{preview}
${\displaystyle {#1}}$
\end{preview}
\begin{preview}
$#1$
\end{preview}
\begin{preview}
${\scriptstyle {#1}}$
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:07:12PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
>
> lyx-preview-macros2-failure.lyx shows two cases where a macro is forgotten
> from the list. The third inset works and is meant as a control. All 3 work
> without the patch.
Here I was forgetting to also scan nested insets.
>
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:20:43PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
>
> Obvious one to test for
Thanks for spotting this. It is due to the recursion in the macro
definitions. The patch I sent takes this into account and lyx does
not segfaults anymore, but latex will be caught in an endless loop
and
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 08:18:12PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> But I wonder why there are preview entries in the lyxpreview*.tex
> ...
> \begin{document}
> \begin{preview}
> ${\displaystyle {#1}}$
> \end{preview}
>
> \begin{preview}
> $#1$
> \end{preview}
>
> \begin{preview}
> ${\scriptstyle
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> wrote:
> > Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>
> >> A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the
> >> beginning of
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 09:40:39AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the
beginning of the file, such that they are seen by all snippets, and then
the specific one appearing in a
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Le 05/06/2015 08:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:32:03PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
On 06/04/2015 07:13 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
Bad news, it seems to forget that macros can use macros. With the
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 13:13:22, schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
+void InsetMathHull::usedMacros(MathData const md, MacroNameSet macros)
const
+{
+ for (size_t i = 0; i md.size(); ++i) {
+ MathMacro * mi = const_castMathMacro
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 13:13:22, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
for...@lyx.org
+void InsetMathHull::usedMacros(MathData const md, MacroNameSet macros)
const
+{
+ for (size_t i = 0; i md.size(); ++i) {
+
Le 06/06/2015 18:12, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 13:13:22, schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
+void InsetMathHull::usedMacros(MathData const md, MacroNameSet macros)
const
+{
+ for (size_t
Le 06/06/2015 18:12, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 13:13:22, schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
+void InsetMathHull::usedMacros(MathData const md, MacroNameSet macros)
const
+{
+ for (size_t
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 19:12:45, schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015 um 13:13:22, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
for...@lyx.org
+void InsetMathHull::usedMacros(MathData const md, MacroNameSet
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:03:48PM +0100, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> Le 05/06/2015 08:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:32:03PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> >>On 06/04/2015 07:13 PM, Guillaume M-M wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Bad news, it seems to forget that macros can use macros.
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo