On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:34:40PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-14 13:31 GMT+02:00 Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org>: > > > Jürgen, this is going to become complicated and fragile. What about > > following the same strategy used in stable? > > This implies reverting bc47054b. > > > > Since I do not have time to investigate further, please do whatever you see > fit. > > I would have preferred that we output proper code to begin with (with no > duplicated or wrong definitions that have to be fixed in a subsequent > step), but since I cannot invest more time to it, this is completely your > call.
I agree that this would have been better but, unfortunately, it doesn't fit the instant preview infrastructure. You wold have to output different definitions depending on whether you compile the whole set of snippets or only some of them. This would cause regenerating a preview simply because the cursor entered the inset. To correct this, a complicated strategy has to be followed. It is cleaner, safer and simpler taking care of the correct definition in the scripts. -- Enrico
