Le 12/09/2019 à 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
I like this patch. Is it safe to put it into my personal 2.3 patchset
(in the terms of the patch being congruent with old 2.3 codebase
or way too many changes were done around in 2.4?)
I like the patch too, and I checked that it applies almost cleanl
Le 11/09/2019 à 21:56, Daniel a écrit :
On 11/9/19 15:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 06/09/2019 à 18:09, Daniel a écrit :
The 'surrounding layout' problem is actually more general. Suppose you
have a section, with header and associated text. Select the whole thing
and make it a branch. It w
On 2019-09-12 10:08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/09/2019 à 21:56, Daniel a écrit :
On 11/9/19 15:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 06/09/2019 à 18:09, Daniel a écrit :
The 'surrounding layout' problem is actually more general. Suppose you
have a section, with header and associated text.
Le 12/09/2019 à 12:53, Daniel a écrit :
I suspect that as well now. With 2.3, if I typeset my example, I get an
empty document. This is because the section layout is a starred one.
That's cheating :) You have a section that takes vertical space, but you
do not see it.
Do you mean, that I get
On 2019-09-12 14:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 12/09/2019 à 12:53, Daniel a écrit :
I suspect that as well now. With 2.3, if I typeset my example, I get
an empty document. This is because the section layout is a starred one.
That's cheating :) You have a section that takes vertical space,
On 2019-09-12 16:35, Daniel wrote:
On 2019-09-12 14:41, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 12/09/2019 à 12:53, Daniel a écrit :
I suspect that as well now. With 2.3, if I typeset my example, I get
an empty document. This is because the section layout is a starred one.
That's cheating :) You have
Le 12/09/2019 à 17:02, Daniel a écrit :
By the way, what happens with your patch if one dissolves the inset?
Currently, if I try to recreate the behaviour in LyX (as far as I
understood it) by setting the sourrounding layout to normal, the first
paragraph is changed to Standard. That does not s
On 2019-09-12 17:22, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 12/09/2019 à 17:02, Daniel a écrit :
By the way, what happens with your patch if one dissolves the inset?
Currently, if I try to recreate the behaviour in LyX (as far as I
understood it) by setting the sourrounding layout to normal, the first
Am 08.09.2019 um 10:57 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Am 25.09.2018 um 17:21 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>>
>> Am 25.09.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, den 21.09.2018, 15:55 +0200 schrieb pdv:
I came across a deprecated call in the LinkBack code, and discovered
t
On 9/12/19 4:04 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 12/09/2019 à 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> I like this patch. Is it safe to put it into my personal 2.3 patchset
>> (in the terms of the patch being congruent with old 2.3 codebase
>> or way too many changes were done around in 2.4?)
>
> I like
Le 12/09/2019 à 20:54, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
But if there is a consensus about 2.3, I am OK with it.
The basic idea seems correct. I've played around with this before, too.
I haven't tested, but one question that arose when I was dealing with
this was with lists and depth issues.
On
On 9/12/19 3:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 12/09/2019 à 20:54, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
>>> But if there is a consensus about 2.3, I am OK with it.
>>
>> The basic idea seems correct. I've played around with this before, too.
>> I haven't tested, but one question that arose when I
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:04:19AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But if there is a consensus about 2.3, I am OK with it.
I was not actually suggesting to push it into official 2.3.x, just
wanted to know whether putting into my private patchset is likely
to cause some harm...
Pavel
On 2019-09-04 16:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I propose in the following patch to reset the outer layout to Plain if
it only contains the newly insert inset.
It seems to me that my original example had some specific features that
triggered a solution of which I don't think it solves the who
14 matches
Mail list logo