Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:48:14PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. Where do > people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of activity in the > interim. Do we need to do one more alpha? Or should we proceed directly to >

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:48:14PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. Where do > people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of activity in the > interim. Do we need to do one more alpha? Or should we proceed

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 02.12.2021 um 22:24 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > - recent toc_ related crashes (thread from Mon Nov  1 14:24:46 202; > we have Juergen's patch, but there might other pending issues I would > like to review). At least JS patch should go in before any new > release. I have this

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Daniel
On 2021-12-03 03:18, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:48:14PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Hi, all, Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. Where do people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of activity in the interim. Do we need to do

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 01/12/2021 à 22:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Hi, all, Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. Where do people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of activity in the interim. Do we need to do one more alpha? Or should we proceed directly to beta 1?

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 02.12.2021 um 08:19 +0100 schrieb Daniel: > Sorry, I should have been more specific: I mean that there are still > 2.4.0 targeted "enhancements" that would mean a format change. I take > it > that those need to be considered first. > > I would not only take the number of

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 02 Dec 2021 06:54:26 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Mittwoch, dem 01.12.2021 um 16:48 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > Heck: > > Hi, all, > > > > Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. > > Where do people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of

Re: Marking inverted branch insets

2021-12-02 Thread Yuriy Skalko
Riki, is it OK to have this also in stable? Yuriy ping... -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Yuriy Skalko
Things got a bit crazy again, but I now should have a bit of time. Where do people think we stand with 2.4.0? I've seen a bit of activity in the interim. Do we need to do one more alpha? Or should we proceed directly to beta 1? What if anything needs to be done before we move to whatever the

Re: LyX 2.4.0

2021-12-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 02/12/2021 à 11:39, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : I'm working on implementing branch expressions that was discussed here: https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg216485.html Seems like this can be done even without file format change, so it can go/backport to 2.4 later. I do not