Am Donnerstag, dem 31.03.2022 um 19:35 +0300 schrieb Veselin:
> Attached is an updated file from lyx 2.4.0dev for the bulgarian
> translation.
>
> I send you an update as the translation was under 50%.
Thanks. Committed.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:59:22 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 09:49 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Nothing wrong. Search for bold string instead.
> > Any feature not used in the search-window will be ignored at the
> > moment.
>
> Is this really the lfun
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 10:10 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> ATM, it works like this:
> Any feature deselected with the lfun is ignored no matter what is in
> the search window.
I still do not understand. How can I make AdvSearch search in a note?
"search-ignore non-output-content false"
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:48:45 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 10:10 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > ATM, it works like this:
> > Any feature deselected with the lfun is ignored no matter what is in
> > the search window.
>
> I still do not understand. How can
Am Freitag, dem 11.03.2022 um 14:38 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Of course, thanks. If you have ideas, what I can do, I would like to
> collaborate.
I have a GUI ready, but it doesn't work. I am not sure I understand how
this is supposed to be used. If I have a text file with "test
\textbf{test}
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 09:49 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Nothing wrong. Search for bold string instead.
> Any feature not used in the search-window will be ignored at the
> moment.
Is this really the lfun being in effect here or rather the old "ignore
setting"?
I am still not sure how
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:35:46 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 11.03.2022 um 14:38 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Of course, thanks. If you have ideas, what I can do, I would like to
> > collaborate.
>
> I have a GUI ready, but it doesn't work. I am not sure I understand
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:49:50 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 09:35:46 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Freitag, dem 11.03.2022 um 14:38 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > Of course, thanks. If you have ideas, what I can do, I would like to
> > > collaborate.
>
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2022 11:03:31 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:48:45 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 10:10 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > ATM, it works like this:
> > > Any feature deselected with the lfun is ignored no matter what
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Attached example.
But this gives the same result if "search-ignore non-output-content"
is set to false or true. In both cases, the inset is found.
But anyway, my concern would rather be: how do I find a string _inside_
this inset?
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> This will take a while :(
No problem.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> You cannot if it is a lyx-comment. If the note is latex, then you can
> type the string in the search window in a note.
Does not work.
Anyway, I think I have completely misunderstood the purpose of "search-
ignore
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:15:12 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Attached example.
>
> But this gives the same result if "search-ignore non-output-content"
> is set to false or true. In both cases, the inset is found.
Ah,
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2022 11:24:34 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:15:12 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:07 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > Attached example.
> >
> > But this gives the same result if "search-ignore
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:53:38AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> If you agree with this proposal, I can ask on lyx-users. If
> you disagree, let's continue discussion and hopefully someone else has
> an opinion.
I am completely fine with your proposal, please ask on user list.
If no one is
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 09:50:48AM -0300, Hernán Gustavo Solari wrote:
> I hereby grant permission to use my work for LyX under the license
> GPL version 2 or later.
>
> I am attaching the last version of the bash-completion script with a
> minor bug-fix (*)
I commited your changes and added you
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 31.03.2022 um 19:35 +0300 schrieb Veselin:
> > Attached is an updated file from lyx 2.4.0dev for the bulgarian
> > translation.
> >
> > I send you an update as the translation was under 50%.
>
> Thanks.
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2022 16:08:53 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:02:05 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 15:59 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > What is missing is the search in comments only.
> >
> > Do we really need this?
> >
> >
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 18:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Apropos, do you have objections in regard of the patch in
> InsetText.cpp?
I think there is no need to restrict it to comment. Otherwise no
objection.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:21:47 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 18:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Apropos, do you have objections in regard of the patch in
> > InsetText.cpp?
>
> I think there is no need to restrict it to comment. Otherwise no
> objection.
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 22:54, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 March 2022 20.12.23 WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
>
> > XHTML 1 dates back from 2001... LyX generates XHTML 5, but the doctype
> is kept
>
> > from XHTML 1 for compatibility issues (some browsers completely change
> their
>
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 20:17 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > I think there is no need to restrict it to comment. Otherwise no
> > objection.
>
> Do you have some ideas what else could be included?
LyX Notes.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2022 13:52:15 +0200
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:35:58 +0200
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > This will take a while :(
> >
> > No problem.
> >
> > Jürgen
>
> Now at least one
Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 15:59 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> What is missing is the search in comments only.
Do we really need this?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:02:05 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 15:59 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > What is missing is the search in comments only.
>
> Do we really need this?
>
> Jürgen
>
It would be consistent with other features, like searching for red
Am Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:35:58 +0200
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Freitag, dem 01.04.2022 um 11:33 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > This will take a while :(
>
> No problem.
>
> Jürgen
Now at least one can search the string inside a comment, but
the feature is ignored.
This will need more
26 matches
Mail list logo
