Uwe Stöhr wrote:
p.s. please CC answers to me
Please consider reading the list via the mailing list-news interface at
gmane (see http://www.gmane.org, the group name is gmane.editors.lyx.devel)
if you don't want to get it by mail. You can even use a browser interface
there. Gmane is very
Angus Leeming wrote:
But, somehow, I'm not understanding you.
If no dialog pops up then sh configure ran correctly, no?
Yes, if no dialog pops up the configuration runs correctly.
path_prefix is stored in the configure script so that LyX can grab it
from the generated lyxrc.defaults ---
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 17:24, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
But, somehow, I'm not understanding you.
If no dialog pops up then sh configure ran correctly, no?
Yes, if no dialog pops up the configuration runs correctly.
That's the case now. It wasn't. The difference between today
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> p.s. please CC answers to me
Please consider reading the list via the mailing list<->news interface at
gmane (see http://www.gmane.org, the group name is gmane.editors.lyx.devel)
if you don't want to get it by mail. You can even use a browser interface
there. Gmane is very
Angus Leeming wrote:
But, somehow, I'm not understanding you.
If no dialog pops up then "sh configure" ran correctly, no?
Yes, if no dialog pops up the configuration runs correctly.
path_prefix is stored in the configure script so that LyX can grab it
from the generated lyxrc.defaults ---
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 17:24, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > But, somehow, I'm not understanding you.
> > If no dialog pops up then "sh configure" ran correctly, no?
>
> Yes, if no dialog pops up the configuration runs correctly.
That's the case now. It wasn't. The difference
On Monday 06 June 2005 22:41, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Why extensive testing? We know which files are needed and
provide the official actual versions (the same that are used in
the actual MSYS version).
I'm afraid that I don't believe that this is so. Several scripts
Angus Leeming wrote:
Then the user chooses an install directory for LyX and the
LyX-files are extracted there. The stripped versions of python etc.
are included in the install package. Assuming the install directory
is C:\LyX they are extracted in C:\LyX\bin (the same directory like
the
Hi Angus,
I've some more annotations:
I mean that the folder of the stripped files have to be in the
system environment variable PATH so that every script can find
them.
That's what happens now. LyX fires up, reads its lyxrc.defaults file
and prepends its PATH environment variable with the
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Now two general annotations for LyX 1.3.6CVS's preferences:
- Why is the screen DPI decreased to 72? Could you please reset its
default value to 96 as it is the case in LyX 1.2.x till now?
I don't touch \screen_dpi and, indeed, there is no such entry in
lyxrc.defaults or in
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I can't get the spellchecker to work altough aspell is installed. This
is a regression as it works in Ruurds version. I wrote once a section in
the WindowsSetup wiki page about enabling the spellchecker in LyXWin.
Hopefully this helps you to enable aspell for your version.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi Angus,
Good eening, Uwe.
I've some more annotations:
I mean that the folder of the stripped files have to be in the
system environment variable PATH so that every script can find
them.
That's what happens now. LyX fires up, reads its lyxrc.defaults file
and prepends
Do you get a pop up dialog appearing
Failed attempting to set 'path_prefix' in the configure script
OK
No because the 'path_prefix' is set correctly. As the path to the sh.exe
isn't in the PATH (I haven't installed MSYS and use stripped files),
Windows shows
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 00:05, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Do you get a pop up dialog appearing
Failed attempting to set 'path_prefix' in the configure
script
OK
No because the 'path_prefix' is set correctly. As the path to the
sh.exe isn't in the PATH (I
On Monday 06 June 2005 22:41, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> Why extensive testing? We know which files are needed and
> >> provide the official actual versions (the same that are used in
> >> the actual MSYS version).
> >
> > I'm afraid that I don't believe that this is so.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Then the user chooses an install directory for LyX and the
LyX-files are extracted there. The stripped versions of python etc.
are included in the install package. Assuming the install directory
is C:\LyX they are extracted in C:\LyX\bin (the same directory like
the
Hi Angus,
I've some more annotations:
I mean that the folder of the stripped files have to be in the
system environment variable "PATH" so that every script can find
them.
That's what happens now. LyX fires up, reads its lyxrc.defaults file
and prepends its PATH environment variable with
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Now two general annotations for LyX 1.3.6CVS's preferences:
- Why is the screen DPI decreased to 72? Could you please reset its
default value to 96 as it is the case in LyX 1.2.x till now?
I don't touch \screen_dpi and, indeed, there is no such entry in
lyxrc.defaults or in
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I can't get the spellchecker to work altough aspell is installed. This
is a regression as it works in Ruurds version. I wrote once a section in
the WindowsSetup wiki page about enabling the spellchecker in LyXWin.
Hopefully this helps you to enable aspell for your version.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hi Angus,
Good eening, Uwe.
I've some more annotations:
I mean that the folder of the stripped files have to be in the
system environment variable "PATH" so that every script can find
them.
That's what happens now. LyX fires up, reads its lyxrc.defaults file
and
> Do you get a pop up dialog appearing
> Failed attempting to set 'path_prefix' in the configure script"
OK
No because the 'path_prefix' is set correctly. As the path to the sh.exe
isn't in the PATH (I haven't installed MSYS and use stripped files),
Windows
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 00:05, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Do you get a pop up dialog appearing
> >
> > Failed attempting to set 'path_prefix' in the configure
> > script"
>
> OK
>
> No because the 'path_prefix' is set correctly. As the path to the
> sh.exe isn't
Angus Leeming wrote:
The archive unpacks to
I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32. OK?
Angus
packaging/
README
clean_dvi.py
package_lyxwin.sh
dtl/
README
Makefile
dt2dv.c
dt2dv.man
dtl.doc
dtl.h
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Angus Leeming wrote:
The archive unpacks to
Angus I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32.
Be careful with binary status of the files in cvs. Also, binary files
mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32.
Be careful with binary status of the files in cvs.
OK, but that warning applies only to these files in the icons directory.
lyx_32x32_16colors.png
lyx_32x32.png
lyx_doc_32x32_16colors.png
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
Angus I don't follow. Could you explain further?
Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
LyX 1.3.5 + patch-1.3.6 != LyX 1.3.6
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
| Angus I don't follow. Could you explain further?
| Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
| LyX 1.3.5 + patch-1.3.6
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
Angus I don't follow. Could you explain further?
Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
LyX 1.3.5 + patch-1.3.6 != LyX 1.3.6
`diff -a` ?
That's true for more than just the files I've just
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, Uwe Sthr wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Find it at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/lyx_setup_136.exe
Hi Angus,
first many thanks for your work. I tested it and have the following
annotations:
- Your installer asks for several programs. If one of these are
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- While LyX reconfigures, it doesn't recognize acrobat:
+checking for acrobat... no
altough it is installed on my system. The reason is that the
acrobat.exe istn't in the PATH but in the registry (as most of Win
programs) under
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, Uwe Sthr wrote:
- At last a crash report of your LyX 1.3.6CVS version:
Go to Edit - Preferences, choose Paths and press one of the
Browse buttons for the working directories. Result CRASH:
Fixed in 1.3.x CVS.
Angus
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, you wrote:
- Your installer asks for several programs. If one of these are not
present, the installer opens the download/install webpage of the
programs but jumps to the next step without waiting until the
missing program is installed.
- Is it really necessary
Angus Leeming wrote:
Its download size is huge (23 MB for Perl + Python) for modem/ISDN
users. Ruurd only used the executables perl.exe, python.exe and
sh.exe. Is it possible to include them to the installer package?
Just thinking out loud...
Perhaps:
[x] Download the official Python
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
- While LyX reconfigures, it doesn't recognize acrobat:
+checking for acrobat... no
altough it is installed on my system. The reason is that the
acrobat.exe istn't in the PATH but in the registry (as most of Win
programs) under
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus See development/Win32/packaging/installer/lyx_path_prefix.C
Angus which adds shell code to the configure script to generate a
Angus path_prefix entry in lyxrc.defaults and which goes on to use
Angus start to run sh.exe configure.
That's
Angus Leeming wrote:
- Is it really necessary to install msys, perl and phthon fully?
Also, why not point the installer to the folder containing Ruurd's
stripped down versions? Or something equivalent.
That's a good solution.
Basically, I don't want to commit myself to creating, testing
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:54, Uwe Sthr wrote:
I can certainly adapt the installer to open up a
web page pointing to the stripped down version in addition to the
official version.
I'll create a wiki page with all needed files.
I think we need
- perl.exe
- perlx.dll
- phython.exe
-
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:39, Uwe Sthr wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Its download size is huge (23 MB for Perl + Python) for
modem/ISDN users. Ruurd only used the executables perl.exe,
python.exe and sh.exe. Is it possible to include them to the
installer package?
Just thinking out
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus I also don't think that we have to do everything this time
| Angus around. Moreover, I think we're forgetting that our users are
| Angus capable individuals who can do stuff themselves too...
| I think you have to draw a line at some point.
Angus Leeming wrote:
What other files are needed?
That's precisely my point. I don't know. Off the top of my head:
sed, tr, cut, grep...
Looking at Ruurds Version, I know what is needed. I uploaded the files
as .rar to
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Tools/LyXWinTest/lyxutils.rar
The files
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
What other files are needed?
That's precisely my point. I don't know. Off the top of my head:
sed, tr, cut, grep...
Looking at Ruurds Version, I know what is needed. I uploaded the files
as .rar to
Angus Leeming wrote:
Why extensive testing? We know which files are needed and provide the
official actual versions (the same that are used in the actual MSYS
version).
I'm afraid that I don't believe that this is so. Several scripts have
changed since Ruurd released LyX/Win 1.3.5 and
Angus Leeming wrote:
> The archive unpacks to
I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32. OK?
Angus
> packaging/
> README
> clean_dvi.py
> package_lyxwin.sh
> dtl/
> README
> Makefile
> dt2dv.c
> dt2dv.man
> dtl.doc
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> The archive unpacks to
Angus> I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32.
Be careful with binary status of the files in cvs. Also, binary files
mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> I propose to add this tree as-is to development/Win32.
>
> Be careful with binary status of the files in cvs.
OK, but that warning applies only to these files in the icons directory.
lyx_32x32_16colors.png
lyx_32x32.png
lyx_doc_32x32_16colors.png
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
Angus> I don't follow. Could you explain further?
Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
LyX 1.3.5 + patch-1.3.6 != LyX 1.3.6
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
>
| Angus> I don't follow. Could you explain further?
>
| Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
| LyX
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Also, binary files mean that patch-1.3.6 will not work reliably.
> Angus> I don't follow. Could you explain further?
> Binary file do not appear in patches. Therefore
> LyX 1.3.5 + patch-1.3.6 != LyX 1.3.6
`diff -a` ?
That's true for more than just the files
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Find it at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/lyx_setup_136.exe
>
> Hi Angus,
>
> first many thanks for your work. I tested it and have the following
> annotations:
>
> - Your installer asks for several programs. If one of
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - While LyX reconfigures, it doesn't recognize acrobat:
>>
>> +checking for "acrobat"... no
>>
>> altough it is installed on my system. The reason is that the
>> acrobat.exe istn't in the PATH but in the registry (as most of Win
>>
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> - At last a crash report of your LyX 1.3.6CVS version:
> Go to Edit -> Preferences, choose "Paths" and press one of the
> "Browse" buttons for the working directories. Result CRASH:
Fixed in 1.3.x CVS.
Angus
On Monday 06 June 2005 14:38, you wrote:
> - Your installer asks for several programs. If one of these are not
> present, the installer opens the download/install webpage of the
> programs but jumps to the next step without waiting until the
> missing program is installed.
>
> - Is it really
Angus Leeming wrote:
Its download size is huge (23 MB for Perl + Python) for modem/ISDN
users. Ruurd only used the executables perl.exe, python.exe and
sh.exe. Is it possible to include them to the installer package?
Just thinking out loud...
Perhaps:
[x] Download the official Python
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> - While LyX reconfigures, it doesn't recognize acrobat:
>>>
>>> +checking for "acrobat"... no
>>>
>>> altough it is installed on my system. The reason is that the
>>> acrobat.exe istn't in the PATH but in the registry (as most of Win
>>> programs) under
>>>
>>>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> See development/Win32/packaging/installer/lyx_path_prefix.C
Angus> which adds shell code to the configure script to generate a
Angus> path_prefix entry in lyxrc.defaults and which goes on to use
Angus> "start" to run "sh.exe
Angus Leeming wrote:
- Is it really necessary to install msys, perl and phthon fully?
Also, why not point the installer to the folder containing Ruurd's
stripped down versions? Or something equivalent.
That's a good solution.
Basically, I don't want to commit myself to creating, testing
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:54, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > I can certainly adapt the installer to open up a
> > web page pointing to the stripped down version in addition to the
> > official version.
>
> I'll create a wiki page with all needed files.
>
> I think we need
>
> - perl.exe
> - perlx.dll
> -
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:39, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >>Its download size is huge (23 MB for Perl + Python) for
> >> modem/ISDN users. Ruurd only used the executables perl.exe,
> >> python.exe and sh.exe. Is it possible to include them to the
> >> installer package?
> >
> > Just
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus> I also don't think that we have to do everything this time
| Angus> around. Moreover, I think we're forgetting that our users are
| Angus> capable individuals who can do stuff themselves too...
>
| I think you have to draw a line at some
Angus Leeming wrote:
What other files are needed?
That's precisely my point. I don't know. Off the top of my head:
sed, tr, cut, grep...
Looking at Ruurds Version, I know what is needed. I uploaded the files
as .rar to
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Tools/LyXWinTest/lyxutils.rar
The files
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>>>What other files are needed?
>>
>> That's precisely my point. I don't know. Off the top of my head:
>>
>> sed, tr, cut, grep...
>
> Looking at Ruurds Version, I know what is needed. I uploaded the files
> as .rar to
>
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Why extensive testing? We know which files are needed and provide the
>> official actual versions (the same that are used in the actual MSYS
>> version).
> I'm afraid that I don't believe that this is so. Several scripts have
> changed since Ruurd released LyX/Win 1.3.5
62 matches
Mail list logo
