On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:14:14AM -0700, Jane McKean wrote:
Yes, it is annoying that accepting all the changes bounces you to the
end of the doc, but it's something I found I can live with.
It is still a bug though; if it's not filed already, it should be.
regards
john
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:14:14AM -0700, Jane McKean wrote:
Yes, it is annoying that accepting all the changes bounces you to the
end of the doc, but it's something I found I can live with.
It is still a bug though; if it's not filed already, it should be.
regards
john
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:14:14AM -0700, Jane McKean wrote:
> Yes, it is annoying that accepting all the changes bounces you to the
> end of the doc, but it's something I found I can live with.
It is still a bug though; if it's not filed already, it should be.
regards
john
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
* open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the
document open;
* open a different document and selecting something therein;
* return to the first document and look at the open ERT.
Please file a bug on
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
* open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the
document open;
* open a different document and selecting something therein;
* return to the first document and look at the open ERT.
Please file a bug on
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 04:26:07PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> * open a new document and open an empty ERT, keeping the ERT and the
> document open;
> * open a different document and selecting something therein;
> * return to the first document and look at the open ERT.
Please file a bug on
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much our way or no way
at all in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
hard to do if we
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:06:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Wherever it makes sense we do use the Qt library for UI, as much as
> > possible. Unfortunately the Qt library is very much "our way or no way
> > at all" in large part... in particular truly separated MVC seems very
> > hard to
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
At the time there was a lot of brokenness around tables, insets, undo
etc. This may indeed
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping interface. What we need is
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
At the time there was a lot of brokenness around tables, insets, undo
etc. This may indeed
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping interface. What we need is
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I just repeat what John Levon said a few months ago. He seemd to thing
> that there was a lot of work to do on it (maybe for undo).
At the time there was a lot of brokenness around tables, insets, undo
etc. This may
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Charles de Miramon wrote:
> http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qtextdocument.html
I just had a quick look at this. Unfortunately it's unsuitable. It is
designed as a simple "hand over the keys to the car and bring back my
shopping" interface. What we need is
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:06:34AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John A pity that there's nowhere we can put these patches and
John officially release them...
Huh? We have a web site and a ftp site, after all...
I meant a release of LyX.
regards
john
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:06:34AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John A pity that there's nowhere we can put these patches and
John officially release them...
Huh? We have a web site and a ftp site, after all...
I meant a release of LyX.
regards
john
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:06:34AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> A pity that there's nowhere we can put these patches and
> John> officially release them...
>
> Huh? We have a web site and a ftp site, after all...
I meant a release of LyX.
regards
john
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:12:12AM -0800, Jane McKean wrote:
in Pittsburgh. All of the compiler and debugger docs are written in LyX!
So now, finally, I have the change bar patches for LyX 1.3.5. I've been
Cool! Glad you found them useful.
1.3.5 version and made a couple of small bug
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:12:12AM -0800, Jane McKean wrote:
in Pittsburgh. All of the compiler and debugger docs are written in LyX!
So now, finally, I have the change bar patches for LyX 1.3.5. I've been
Cool! Glad you found them useful.
1.3.5 version and made a couple of small bug
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 11:12:12AM -0800, Jane McKean wrote:
> in Pittsburgh. All of the compiler and debugger docs are written in LyX!
>
> So now, finally, I have the change bar patches for LyX 1.3.5. I've been
Cool! Glad you found them useful.
> 1.3.5 version and made a couple of small bug
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:05:43PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
During the configure step of the instalation of lyx, the scripts
deleted my /dev/null. How can I reconstruct it? Somebody could
help-me?
How do you know it was caused by the lyx configuration?
Can you show us how it
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:05:43PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
During the configure step of the instalation of lyx, the scripts
deleted my /dev/null. How can I reconstruct it? Somebody could
help-me?
How do you know it was caused by the lyx configuration?
Can you show us how it
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 03:05:43PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > > During the configure step of the instalation of lyx, the scripts
> > > deleted my /dev/null. How can I reconstruct it? Somebody could
> > > help-me?
>
> How do you know it was caused by the lyx configuration?
>
> Can you show
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
I think it would be helpful (for identifying and managing messages) to
have the label [lyx-users] automatically inserted in the subject line
of the messages of this list, similarly to what happens with other
mailing lists. Do you
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
I think it would be helpful (for identifying and managing messages) to
have the label [lyx-users] automatically inserted in the subject line
of the messages of this list, similarly to what happens with other
mailing lists. Do you
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> I think it would be helpful (for identifying and managing messages) to
> have the label "[lyx-users]" automatically inserted in the subject line
> of the messages of this list, similarly to what happens with other
> mailing lists.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:29:29PM +0200, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
I was am not certain if this has been noticed by others, but if I select text
in lyx-1.3.4 (qt) and select another desktop in kpager, kicker becomes
unresponsive. I can use the ctrl-tab and tab to move between the different
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:29:29PM +0200, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
I was am not certain if this has been noticed by others, but if I select text
in lyx-1.3.4 (qt) and select another desktop in kpager, kicker becomes
unresponsive. I can use the ctrl-tab and tab to move between the different
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 05:29:29PM +0200, Ingar Pareliussen wrote:
> I was am not certain if this has been noticed by others, but if I select text
> in lyx-1.3.4 (qt) and select another desktop in kpager, kicker becomes
> unresponsive. I can use the ctrl-tab and tab to move between the
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:42:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Err, things in the stable 1.3.x branch are supposed to be zorking all
the time...
Freudian slip perchance?
john
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:42:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Err, things in the stable 1.3.x branch are supposed to be zorking all
the time...
Freudian slip perchance?
john
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 12:42:09AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Err, things in the stable 1.3.x branch are supposed to be zorking all
> the time...
Freudian slip perchance?
john
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote:
using a static password, which is posted in a mailinglist, isn't very secure.
It doesn't need to be secure, it needs to foil the automated spamming
scripts the intruders are using.
john
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote:
using a static password, which is posted in a mailinglist, isn't very secure.
It doesn't need to be secure, it needs to foil the automated spamming
scripts the intruders are using.
john
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Roland Schmitz wrote:
> using a static password, which is posted in a mailinglist, isn't very secure.
It doesn't need to be secure, it needs to foil the automated spamming
scripts the intruders are using.
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 06:29:04PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
F9 and S-F9 etc work well but C-F9 etc do not work. There is no response
for C-F9, F10 and F11.
Yeah, weird isn't it? No idea what the problem is.
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 06:29:04PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
F9 and S-F9 etc work well but C-F9 etc do not work. There is no response
for C-F9, F10 and F11.
Yeah, weird isn't it? No idea what the problem is.
john
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 06:29:04PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> F9 and S-F9 etc work well but C-F9 etc do not work. There is no response
> for C-F9, F10 and F11.
Yeah, weird isn't it? No idea what the problem is.
john
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Reuben Thomas wrote:
First, in most programs, Text is a file type listed on the save dialog,
not under Export, which tends to be reserved for non-editable formats
such as PDF. This is certainly the case in most word processors. Hence,
she was confused
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Reuben Thomas wrote:
First, in most programs, Text is a file type listed on the save dialog,
not under Export, which tends to be reserved for non-editable formats
such as PDF. This is certainly the case in most word processors. Hence,
she was confused
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 10:25:26PM +0200, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> First, in most programs, "Text" is a file type listed on the save dialog,
> not under "Export", which tends to be reserved for non-editable formats
> such as PDF. This is certainly the case in most word processors. Hence,
> she was
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 06:29:19PM +, Les Denham wrote:
This is not just useful for spellchecking: it makes the text within the ERT
visible as normal text in the Lyx window. I found you could do this by trial
and error -- is it documented anywhere?
I don't know. Read through the lyx
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 06:29:19PM +, Les Denham wrote:
This is not just useful for spellchecking: it makes the text within the ERT
visible as normal text in the Lyx window. I found you could do this by trial
and error -- is it documented anywhere?
I don't know. Read through the lyx
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 06:29:19PM +, Les Denham wrote:
> This is not just useful for spellchecking: it makes the text within the ERT
> visible as normal text in the Lyx window. I found you could do this by trial
> and error -- is it documented anywhere?
I don't know. Read through the lyx
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:23:04PM -0500, Yu-Xi Lim wrote:
I've the src and bin rpm's up at http://128.61.49.129/lyx/, compiled for
my system, which is Fedora Core 1. Hadn't really tested them, but the
bin works fine on my system.
Guys, if you've made a package, please ftp into ftp.lyx.org
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Public release of LyX version 1.3.4
===
Can someone update freshmeat ? I'm a bit busy
thanks
john
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:23:04PM -0500, Yu-Xi Lim wrote:
I've the src and bin rpm's up at http://128.61.49.129/lyx/, compiled for
my system, which is Fedora Core 1. Hadn't really tested them, but the
bin works fine on my system.
Guys, if you've made a package, please ftp into ftp.lyx.org
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Public release of LyX version 1.3.4
===
Can someone update freshmeat ? I'm a bit busy
thanks
john
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:23:04PM -0500, Yu-Xi Lim wrote:
> I've the src and bin rpm's up at http://128.61.49.129/lyx/, compiled for
> my system, which is Fedora Core 1. Hadn't really tested them, but the
> bin works fine on my system.
Guys, if you've made a package, please ftp into
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 1.3.4
> ===
>
Can someone update freshmeat ? I'm a bit busy
thanks
john
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 05:42:25PM +0100, Richard O'Regan wrote:
might be more practical than the programs I have mentioned.
If so, where can I get some clear one-two-three explanations of how a
complete beginner would go about installing and using Lyx? I find that
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 05:42:25PM +0100, Richard O'Regan wrote:
might be more practical than the programs I have mentioned.
If so, where can I get some clear one-two-three explanations of how a
complete beginner would go about installing and using Lyx? I find that
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 05:42:25PM +0100, Richard O'Regan wrote:
> might be more practical than the programs I have mentioned.
> If so, where can I get some clear one-two-three explanations of how a
> complete beginner would go about installing and using Lyx? I find that
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:41:42PM -0800, christoff pale wrote:
When is the 1.4 release date?
2005 probably.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:41:42PM -0800, christoff pale wrote:
When is the 1.4 release date?
2005 probably.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:41:42PM -0800, christoff pale wrote:
> When is the 1.4 release date?
2005 probably.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
What about the environment 'LyX Code' ?
this should be deleted in LyX, it is misleading,
because no real verbatim, no real listing, no
real parbox, no real alltt. Only lines of typewriter
format, which doesn't allow linebreaks.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
What about the environment 'LyX Code' ?
this should be deleted in LyX, it is misleading,
because no real verbatim, no real listing, no
real parbox, no real alltt. Only lines of typewriter
format, which doesn't allow linebreaks.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >What about the environment 'LyX Code' ?
>
> this should be deleted in LyX, it is misleading,
> because no real verbatim, no real listing, no
> real parbox, no real alltt. Only lines of typewriter
> format, which doesn't allow
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:55:55AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
How should the warning message look like? I don't think a full blown
message box is in order,
It is not a very bad idea. A big message box will be intrusive (and
scary) but users will learn very quickly how to avoid it.
No they
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:55:55AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
How should the warning message look like? I don't think a full blown
message box is in order,
It is not a very bad idea. A big message box will be intrusive (and
scary) but users will learn very quickly how to avoid it.
No they
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:55:55AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > How should the warning message look like? I don't think a full blown
> > message box is in order,
>
> It is not a very bad idea. A big message box will be intrusive (and
> scary) but users will learn very quickly how to avoid it.
No
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:31:45AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
we were talking about page size and not page margin.
Oops, sorry
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:31:45AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
we were talking about page size and not page margin.
Oops, sorry
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:31:45AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> we were talking about page size and not page margin.
Oops, sorry
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Herbert Vo? wrote:
Marko wrote:
when trying to set the page size of a document to a custom size I notized
that this does not work in Lyx 1.3.2 (QT frontend). Any custom size seems
to be completely ignored!
Attached are two small examples: test1
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Herbert Vo? wrote:
Marko wrote:
when trying to set the page size of a document to a custom size I notized
that this does not work in Lyx 1.3.2 (QT frontend). Any custom size seems
to be completely ignored!
Attached are two small examples: test1
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:53:49PM +0100, Herbert Vo? wrote:
> Marko wrote:
>
> >when trying to set the page size of a document to a custom size I notized
> >that this does not work in Lyx 1.3.2 (QT frontend). Any custom size seems
> >to be completely ignored!
> >Attached are two small
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:05:59AM -0800, Ed Sawicki wrote:
I love LyX but I dislike the way an index is created.
The indexed words are turned into boxes on the screen that
I find annoying. I'd also like a bit more automation to make
indexing easier. I'm wondering whether I'm overlooking a
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:04:48PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
What effort would be required to display an index box with the marked
word/phrase as a lable, similar to the way ERT is displayed? In my book I've
Not much effort
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:05:59AM -0800, Ed Sawicki wrote:
I love LyX but I dislike the way an index is created.
The indexed words are turned into boxes on the screen that
I find annoying. I'd also like a bit more automation to make
indexing easier. I'm wondering whether I'm overlooking a
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:04:48PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
What effort would be required to display an index box with the marked
word/phrase as a lable, similar to the way ERT is displayed? In my book I've
Not much effort
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:05:59AM -0800, Ed Sawicki wrote:
> I love LyX but I dislike the way an index is created.
> The indexed words are turned into boxes on the screen that
> I find annoying. I'd also like a bit more automation to make
> indexing easier. I'm wondering whether I'm overlooking
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:04:48PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> What effort would be required to display an index box with the marked
> word/phrase as a lable, similar to the way ERT is displayed? In my book I've
Not much effort
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Wei Zhou wrote:
Could any one tell me what is the input box at the bottom used for?
If I try to type something, it says unknown function.
It's for entering commands, for example lyx-quit. It's not
particulalrly useful most of the time
regards
john
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Wei Zhou wrote:
Could any one tell me what is the input box at the bottom used for?
If I try to type something, it says unknown function.
It's for entering commands, for example lyx-quit. It's not
particulalrly useful most of the time
regards
john
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Wei Zhou wrote:
> Could any one tell me what is the input box at the bottom used for?
>
> If I try to type something, it says unknown function.
It's for entering commands, for example "lyx-quit". It's not
particulalrly useful most of the time
regards
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:05:06AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
I seem to have version 1.3.3 installed in both /usr and /usr/local. When I
locate *.layout I find the same files -- same file size, too -- in both
/usr/share/lyx and /usr/local/share/lyx. I believe that /usr/local/ is where
it
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:05:06AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
I seem to have version 1.3.3 installed in both /usr and /usr/local. When I
locate *.layout I find the same files -- same file size, too -- in both
/usr/share/lyx and /usr/local/share/lyx. I believe that /usr/local/ is where
it
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:05:06AM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I seem to have version 1.3.3 installed in both /usr and /usr/local. When I
> locate *.layout I find the same files -- same file size, too -- in both
> /usr/share/lyx and /usr/local/share/lyx. I believe that /usr/local/ is where
>
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:21:55PM -0500, David Utidjian wrote:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.3.3/lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
package and did a:
rpmbuild --rebuild lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
Could you upload the rebuilt RPMs to ftp.lyx.org (dir incoming/) ?
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:21:55PM -0500, David Utidjian wrote:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.3.3/lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
package and did a:
rpmbuild --rebuild lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
Could you upload the rebuilt RPMs to ftp.lyx.org (dir incoming/) ?
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:21:55PM -0500, David Utidjian wrote:
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.3.3/lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
> package and did a:
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild lyx-1.3.3-1_qt.src.rpm
Could you upload the rebuilt RPMs to ftp.lyx.org (dir incoming/) ?
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:31:20PM -0500, Ronald Florence wrote:
LyX users have -- workarounds. Why can't the scrolling be fixed? It
would be very useful to be able to mark large blocks of text with the
mouse.
It could be fixed. It just needs somebody to do it.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:31:20PM -0500, Ronald Florence wrote:
LyX users have -- workarounds. Why can't the scrolling be fixed? It
would be very useful to be able to mark large blocks of text with the
mouse.
It could be fixed. It just needs somebody to do it.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:31:20PM -0500, Ronald Florence wrote:
> LyX users have -- workarounds. Why can't the scrolling be fixed? It
> would be very useful to be able to mark large blocks of text with the
> mouse.
It could be fixed. It just needs somebody to do it.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Uwe St?hr wrote:
QT 2.3 was the only version released with a free licence. Of course,
if you and other Win32 users were to chip in and buy LyX a commercial
Win32 Qt licence...
Isn't the LyX founder Matthias Ettrich able to underwrite a QT3
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:16:33PM -0700, Henry Pfister wrote:
Could you explain this to me? Right now, Lyx is compatible with the
Qt toolkit for unix (which is under the GPL). What prevents a single
Lyx developer from buying the single user windows Qt toolkit from
Trolltech for $1500, and
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Uwe St?hr wrote:
QT 2.3 was the only version released with a free licence. Of course,
if you and other Win32 users were to chip in and buy LyX a commercial
Win32 Qt licence...
Isn't the LyX founder Matthias Ettrich able to underwrite a QT3
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:16:33PM -0700, Henry Pfister wrote:
Could you explain this to me? Right now, Lyx is compatible with the
Qt toolkit for unix (which is under the GPL). What prevents a single
Lyx developer from buying the single user windows Qt toolkit from
Trolltech for $1500, and
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Uwe St?hr wrote:
> > QT 2.3 was the only version released with a free licence. Of course,
> > if you and other Win32 users were to chip in and buy LyX a commercial
> > Win32 Qt licence...
>
> Isn't the LyX founder Matthias Ettrich able to underwrite a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:16:33PM -0700, Henry Pfister wrote:
> Could you explain this to me? Right now, Lyx is compatible with the
> Qt toolkit for unix (which is under the GPL). What prevents a single
> Lyx developer from buying the single user windows Qt toolkit from
> Trolltech for $1500,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:35:56PM +0400, Peter Ringwood wrote:
I am a little new to the game, but is it usual for someone to put things as
strongly as 'refusing' to fix? 'Haven't got the time' or 'the issue is
considered low priority at the current stage' I understand, but 'refuse to
fix'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:35:56PM +0400, Peter Ringwood wrote:
I am a little new to the game, but is it usual for someone to put things as
strongly as 'refusing' to fix? 'Haven't got the time' or 'the issue is
considered low priority at the current stage' I understand, but 'refuse to
fix'
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:35:56PM +0400, Peter Ringwood wrote:
> I am a little new to the game, but is it usual for someone to put things as
> strongly as 'refusing' to fix? 'Haven't got the time' or 'the issue is
> considered low priority at the current stage' I understand, but 'refuse to
>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:10:32PM +0200, Tomasz Koziara wrote:
HOW TO CENTER A TABLE OR A FIGURE (e.g. in float field) IN LYX
There's no need to shout.
Centre the paragraph it is in (Layout-Paragraph)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:24:03PM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
Is there a lyx way to put two dots over an e (not in maths mode)? My
name has such a character in it :) In latex it is \{e}.
Just type it directly in...
You may need to set up a compose key in X (search the net for how: you
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:10:32PM +0200, Tomasz Koziara wrote:
HOW TO CENTER A TABLE OR A FIGURE (e.g. in float field) IN LYX
There's no need to shout.
Centre the paragraph it is in (Layout-Paragraph)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:24:03PM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
Is there a lyx way to put two dots over an e (not in maths mode)? My
name has such a character in it :) In latex it is \{e}.
Just type it directly in...
You may need to set up a compose key in X (search the net for how: you
1 - 100 of 1752 matches
Mail list logo
