On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:35:56PM +0400, Peter Ringwood wrote:
> I am a little new to the game, but is it usual for someone to put things as
> strongly as 'refusing' to fix? 'Haven't got the time' or 'the issue is
> considered low priority at the current stage' I understand, but 'refuse to
> fix' struck me as a little odd. Well, to each their own.
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
1. To deny, as a request, demand, invitation, or command; to
decline to do or grant.
This is exactly what Trolltech did: acknowledged the bug, and stated it
would never be fixed.
I do not think it is relevant to your problem, however.
regrds
john
