I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
nothing like your DVI ...
I didn't change anything in the file.
Hope it can help.
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:52, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile.
On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:19, Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
nothing like your
Steve Litt wrote:
Confirmed!
I placed this:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
near the top of my layout file, and the underscores assumed their correct
length. Just to make sure, I removed that line and the underscores were once
again much too short.
Good work Paul. Nice job of exploiting the
I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
nothing like your DVI ...
I didn't change anything in the file.
Hope it can help.
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:52, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile.
On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:19, Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
nothing like your
Steve Litt wrote:
Confirmed!
I placed this:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
near the top of my layout file, and the underscores assumed their correct
length. Just to make sure, I removed that line and the underscores were once
again much too short.
Good work Paul. Nice job of exploiting the
I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
nothing like your DVI ...
I didn't change anything in the file.
Hope it can help.
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:52, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> >> Steve Litt wrote:
> >>> I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
> >>> commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it
On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:19, Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
> I don't know if it can help, but I tried your file on my LyX 1.5.4 on
> Windows XP and checked DVI, PDF and PS output and it is nearly OK.
> Only a very little difference in the lengths in the PDF output. But
> nothing like
Steve Litt wrote:
Confirmed!
I placed this:
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
near the top of my layout file, and the underscores assumed their correct
length. Just to make sure, I removed that line and the underscores were once
again much too short.
Good work Paul. Nice job of exploiting the
On 19.03.2008, at 03:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum).
I'm guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got
just underscores, no escapes.
Hm...
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
I
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_ commands.
Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't compile. I guess an
underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
So, your MiKTeX 2.6 on WinXP gives \_ the right monospace width, but
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
So, your
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
On 19.03.2008, at 03:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum).
I'm guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got
just underscores, no escapes.
Hm...
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
I
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_ commands.
Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't compile. I guess an
underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
So, your MiKTeX 2.6 on WinXP gives \_ the right monospace width, but
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
So, your
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
On 19.03.2008, at 03:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum).
I'm guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got
just underscores, no escapes.
Hm...
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Doh!
>
> And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
> underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
> guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
> underscores, no escapes.
>
>
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 22:01, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Doh!
>
> And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
> underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
> guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
> underscores, no escapes.
>
>
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_ commands.
Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't compile. I guess an
underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
So, your MiKTeX 2.6 on WinXP gives \_ the right monospace width, but
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
> > commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
> > compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
> >
> >
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 14:57, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
I exported to LaTeX, and it indeed did turn my underscores into \_
commands. Within LaTeX, if I deleted the underscores, it wouldn't
compile. I guess an underscore is some kind of a LaTeX reserved word.
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's box comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything but underscores.
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's box comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's box comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything but underscores.
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's box comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's "box" comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything but underscores.
Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
In my latest book I have a screenshot of UMENU, whose license screen has a
poor man's "box" comprised of underscores on top and bottom, and pipe symbols
on the side. In the book, it's in LyX-Code style, which should be a
monospaced font, and in fact is on everything
Doh!
And here's why it worked for me and not you: I typed in the
underscores, and LyX cleverly escaped them as \_\_ (ad nauseum). I'm
guessing you pasted them in or imported them as text, and got just
underscores, no escapes.
/Paul
39 matches
Mail list logo
