De Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ?
De I don't see how can this happen.
De
De Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ?
St I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem
St exists on my system, too.
St
St I searched the archive about this
De Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ?
De I don't see how can this happen.
De
De Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ?
St I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem
St exists on my system, too.
St
St I searched the archive about this
De> > Are you sure that you didn't have this problem with fix1 ?
De> > I don't see how can this happen.
De>
De> > Maybe you updated latex and this caused the problem ?
St> I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem
St> exists on my system, too.
St>
St> I searched the archive
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96
(but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older
version should really upgrade).
Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:07:26PM +0200, Steffen Seufert wrote:
I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem
exists on my system, too.
I searched the archive about this problem:
Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling
options of gcc as mentioned
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96
(but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older
version should really upgrade).
Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:07:26PM +0200, Steffen Seufert wrote:
> I don't think it's an update problem, because the problem
> exists on my system, too.
>
> I searched the archive about this problem:
>
> Is it possible that it's caused by some optimizing compiling
> options of gcc as mentioned
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:10:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> It is possible to disable compiler optimization if the compiler is gcc 2.96
> (but recent versions of gcc 2.96 work correctly, so people with older
> version should really upgrade).
Just to be clear: the latest available upgrade for
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
JMarc
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed
Beyer, == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
JMarc
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
JMarc Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
JMarc that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
I am not quite sure if I understand you.
Certainly there are many bugs fixed from
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
JMarc
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JMarc I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
Marcus Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed
Beyer, == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
JMarc
Marcus That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
JMarc Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
JMarc that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
I am not quite sure if I understand you.
Certainly there are many bugs fixed from
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Beyer, Marcus wrote:
I am not quite sure if I understand you.
Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2.
And that is very nice. (thank you!)
But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying.
So I wouldn't have installed fix2
> "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JMarc> I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
Marcus> Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
JMarc
> > "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JMarc> I _think_ it will be fixed in 1.1.6fix3.
>
> Marcus> Should perhaps users of pdflatex be warned somewhere?
>
> Warned about what? That it is broken now, or that it will work soon?
That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't
> "Beyer," == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
JMarc
Marcus> That it is broken now. e.g. I wouldn't have installed fix2.
JMarc > Well, we did not know about it at the time :) However, I am not sure
JMarc > that the sutuation is worse now than it was earlier (is it?)
I am not quite sure if I understand you.
Certainly there are many bugs fixed
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:39:06PM +0200, Beyer, Marcus wrote:
> I am not quite sure if I understand you.
> Certainly there are many bugs fixed from fix1 to fix2.
> And that is very nice. (thank you!)
>
> But this bug is a new one (since fix2), and it is annoying.
>
> So I wouldn't have
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the
Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in
Marcus the target document
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the
Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again, the changes are not in
Marcus the target document
Marcus> Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus> Doing 1. "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" on a document, 2. close the
Marcus> viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus> then do "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" again, the changes are not in
Marcus> the target
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the
Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again,
Marcus == Beyer, Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marcus Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus Doing 1. View - PDF (pdflatex) on a document, 2. close the
Marcus viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus then do View - PDF (pdflatex) again,
> "Marcus" == Beyer, Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> Hi all, I have a problem with LyX 1.1.6fix2 and pdflatex.
Marcus> Doing 1. "View -> PDF (pdflatex)" on a document, 2. close the
Marcus> viewer (acrobat), 3. edit the document (e.g. add a word), 4.
Marcus> then do "View -> PDF
28 matches
Mail list logo
