Re: Unsupported math environments

On 2014-06-30, Jacob Bishop wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. This depends

Re: Unsupported math environments

On 2014-06-30, Jacob Bishop wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. This depends

Re: Unsupported math environments

On 2014-06-30, Jacob Bishop wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> > wrote: >> Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments >> in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some

Re: Unsupported math environments

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. The reason for this is that the native LyX format for math

Re: Unsupported math environments

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote: Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. The reason for this is that the native LyX format for math

Re: Unsupported math environments

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in > LyX > without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. > The reason for this is that

Re: Unsupported math environments

in order to use the other new environments defined by mathtools, such as dcases, rcases, drcases, psmallmatrix, bsmallmatrix, etc. Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. The reason

Re: Unsupported math environments

in order to use the other new environments defined by mathtools, such as dcases, rcases, drcases, psmallmatrix, bsmallmatrix, etc. Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or do some advanced macro tricks. The reason

Re: Unsupported math environments

guess the same tweak can be applied in order to use > the other new environments defined by mathtools, such as dcases, rcases, > drcases, psmallmatrix, bsmallmatrix, etc. Unfortunately it is not possible to use unsupported math environments in LyX without putting the whole formula in ERT or

Fwd: Unsupported math environments

Forgot to reply to lyx-users...sorry. Now including reply to list. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Rudi Gaelzer rudi.gael...@ufrgs.br wrote: Dear Jacob. What I want and need is a means to implement the math ENVIRONMENTS defined by the mathtools package and that are not explicitly

Fwd: Unsupported math environments

Forgot to reply to lyx-users...sorry. Now including reply to list. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Rudi Gaelzer rudi.gael...@ufrgs.br wrote: Dear Jacob. What I want and need is a means to implement the math ENVIRONMENTS defined by the mathtools package and that are not explicitly

Fwd: Unsupported math environments

Forgot to reply to lyx-users...sorry. Now including reply to list. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Rudi Gaelzer wrote: > Dear Jacob. > > > What I want and need is a means to implement the math ENVIRONMENTS defined > by the mathtools package and that are not explicitly

Re: Unsupported math environments

Dear Jacob. Thanks for the reply. However, I think that the solution suggested by Guy Rutenberg will only work for math COMMANDS. See the attached file, where I define a math macro \pFq in order to write the symbol for generalized hypergeometric functions. What I want and need is a means to

Re: Unsupported math environments

Dear Jacob. Thanks for the reply. However, I think that the solution suggested by Guy Rutenberg will only work for math COMMANDS. See the attached file, where I define a math macro \pFq in order to write the symbol for generalized hypergeometric functions. What I want and need is a means to

Re: Unsupported math environments

Dear Jacob. Thanks for the reply. However, I think that the solution suggested by Guy Rutenberg will only work for math COMMANDS. See the attached file, where I define a math macro \pFq in order to write the symbol for generalized hypergeometric functions. What I want and need is a means to

Unsupported math environments

Using LyX 2.1.x, is it now possible to implement via ERT the still-unsupported capabilities of the mathtools package, such as the multlined (section 3.4.2), *smallmatrix (sec. 3.4.1) and *cases (sec. 3.4.3) environments? Thanks. -- Rudi Gaelzer Institute of Physics Federal University of Rio

Unsupported math environments

Using LyX 2.1.x, is it now possible to implement via ERT the still-unsupported capabilities of the mathtools package, such as the multlined (section 3.4.2), *smallmatrix (sec. 3.4.1) and *cases (sec. 3.4.3) environments? Thanks. -- Rudi Gaelzer Institute of Physics Federal University of Rio

Unsupported math environments

Using LyX 2.1.x, is it now possible to implement via ERT the still-unsupported capabilities of the mathtools package, such as the multlined (section 3.4.2), *smallmatrix (sec. 3.4.1) and *cases (sec. 3.4.3) environments? Thanks. -- Rudi Gaelzer Institute of Physics Federal University of Rio