When I insert a table in LinuxDoc, it creates what looks like a text
table (with + and |). But it seems to forget to add the right cr. So
instead of the expected:
+---+---+
| cell1 | cell2 |
+---+---+
I get the unsightly:
+---+---+| cell1 | cell2
When I insert a table in LinuxDoc, it creates what looks like a text
table (with + and |). But it seems to forget to add the right cr. So
instead of the expected:
+---+---+
| cell1 | cell2 |
+---+---+
I get the unsightly:
+---+---+| cell1 | cell2
When I insert a table in LinuxDoc, it creates what looks like a text
table (with + and |). But it seems to forget to add the right . So
instead of the expected:
+---+---+
| cell1 | cell2 |
+---+---+
I get the unsightly:
+---+---+| cell1 | cell2
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?.
Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically,
but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs
in
documenting using the above-mentioned class
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
which comes with lyx.
Regards,
Udayan
_
Life on the fast tracks!
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:33:00AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other thing )
of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:42:29AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
which comes with lyx.
No need to, at least for now.
Regards,
Udayan
--
Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other
thing )
of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well
for
simple things. The problem was that it started as a hack
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:26:46PM +, udayan singh wrote:
Because then you are using different tools.
If using linxudoc manpage the path to pdf is:
lyx - linuxdoc - latex - pdf
while with LaTeX (book) is:
lyx - latex - pdf
Exactly, but why is it that I get the pdf while
Thanks, for your views, cleared up a lot of stuff. Will post any updates if
I get.
Regards,
Udayan
From: José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:28:50 +0100
On Wed, Sep
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?.
Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically,
but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs
in
documenting using the above-mentioned class
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
which comes with lyx.
Regards,
Udayan
_
Life on the fast tracks!
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:33:00AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other thing )
of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:42:29AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
which comes with lyx.
No need to, at least for now.
Regards,
Udayan
--
Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other
thing )
of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well
for
simple things. The problem was that it started as a hack
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:26:46PM +, udayan singh wrote:
Because then you are using different tools.
If using linxudoc manpage the path to pdf is:
lyx - linuxdoc - latex - pdf
while with LaTeX (book) is:
lyx - latex - pdf
Exactly, but why is it that I get the pdf while
Thanks, for your views, cleared up a lot of stuff. Will post any updates if
I get.
Regards,
Udayan
From: José Abílio Oliveira Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:28:50 +0100
On Wed, Sep
> >> Hi ,
> >>
> >> I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?.
Now
> >I
> >> really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically,
but
> >> couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some p
Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
which comes with lyx.
Regards,
Udayan
_
Life on the fast tracks!
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:33:00AM +, udayan singh wrote:
>
> Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other thing )
> of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It w
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:42:29AM +, udayan singh wrote:
> Would you like me to put the file here, that I got in .sgml format? Its the
> example linuxdoc_manpage.sgml that we get from the linuxdoc_manpage.lyx,
> which comes with lyx.
No need to, at least for now.
> Regards,
> Udayan
>
> Well I think if its playing some role in formatting ( or some other
thing )
> of this doc class, then it should have been mentioned ( my views) .
I agree.
But my priority is not linuxdoc, linuxdoc is a dead end. It works well
for
simple things. The problem was that it started
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:26:46PM +, udayan singh wrote:
>
> >
> > Because then you are using different tools.
> > If using linxudoc manpage the path to pdf is:
> >lyx -> linuxdoc -> latex -> pdf
> >
> > while with "LaTeX (book)&
Thanks, for your views, cleared up a lot of stuff. Will post any updates if
I get.
Regards,
Udayan
From: José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems in Using - SGML ( LinuxDoc manpage) Document Style
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:28:50 +0100
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs in
documenting using the above-mentioned class:
There was some
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:08:58AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs in
documenting using the above-mentioned class:
There was some
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:08:58AM +, udayan singh wrote:
Hi ,
I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
I
really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs
> Hi ,
>
> I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
I
> really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
> couldn?t find anything really specific to it. I am facing some probs in
> documenting using the abo
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:08:58AM +, udayan singh wrote:
> >> Hi ,
> >>
> >> I am using lyx with the document class ? ?SGML (LinuxDoc manpage)?. Now
> >I
> >> really tried to find some docs related to this class specifically, but
> >> couldn
On Friday 14 November 2003 00:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
SuSE seem to go wrong!).
Ok.
On the topic of linuxdoc Jose', I am considering doing the documentation
for the Aubit4GL project. They would like it available
On Friday 14 November 2003 00:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
SuSE seem to go wrong!).
Ok.
On the topic of linuxdoc Jose', I am considering doing the documentation
for the Aubit4GL project. They would like it available
On Friday 14 November 2003 00:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
>
> I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
> SuSE seem to go wrong!).
Ok.
> On the topic of linuxdoc Jose', I am considering doing the documentation
> for the Aubit4GL project. They would li
On Thursday 13 November 2003 04:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
The problem seems to be missing .pk
Jose' Matos wrote:
That is weird and those problems should be related.
The linuxdoc tools chain uses latex to make a dvi, so something is going
wrong in that department.
I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
SuSE seem to go wrong!).
On the topic
On Thursday 13 November 2003 04:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
The problem seems to be missing .pk
Jose' Matos wrote:
That is weird and those problems should be related.
The linuxdoc tools chain uses latex to make a dvi, so something is going
wrong in that department.
I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
SuSE seem to go wrong!).
On the topic
On Thursday 13 November 2003 04:42, John O'Gorman wrote:
> Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
> delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
>
> 1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
> The problem seem
Jose' Matos wrote:
That is weird and those problems should be related.
The linuxdoc tools chain uses latex to make a dvi, so something is going
wrong in that department.
I will try the same things on a Redhat 9 system. (Most things I try on
SuSE seem to go wrong!).
On the topic
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
The problem seems to be missing .pk files. Presumably a permission
problem or something wrong
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
The problem seems to be missing .pk files. Presumably a permission
problem or something wrong
Trying the article(linuxdoc) option, I get 2 distinct problems. Before
delving deeper into them can anyone offer suggestions.
1. Runs OK as root but will not produce a .dvi file as a normal user.
The problem seems to be missing .pk files. Presumably a permission
problem or something wrong
On Thursday 06 February 2003 19:03, Adinda Praditya wrote:
So Is it true that SGML (LinuxDoc article) class doesn't allow us to insert
image? If it is, how come?
I never saw any example of linuxdoc that presented an image. That was the
reason why it never got implemented.
I think that I
On Thursday 06 February 2003 19:03, Adinda Praditya wrote:
So Is it true that SGML (LinuxDoc article) class doesn't allow us to insert
image? If it is, how come?
I never saw any example of linuxdoc that presented an image. That was the
reason why it never got implemented.
I think that I
On Thursday 06 February 2003 19:03, Adinda Praditya wrote:
>
> So Is it true that SGML (LinuxDoc article) class doesn't allow us to insert
> image? If it is, how come?
I never saw any example of linuxdoc that presented an image. That was the
reason why it never got implemented.
I changed my class after i installed linuxdoc-tools-0.9.20-4mdk as discussed
earlier.
When i viewed both with DVI and HTML, the image didn't show up. I checked by
creating an empty file using article class, inserting a small image. I can
view the image with DVI. But after i changed the class
I changed my class after i installed linuxdoc-tools-0.9.20-4mdk as discussed
earlier.
When i viewed both with DVI and HTML, the image didn't show up. I checked by
creating an empty file using article class, inserting a small image. I can
view the image with DVI. But after i changed the class
I changed my class after i installed linuxdoc-tools-0.9.20-4mdk as discussed
earlier.
When i viewed both with DVI and HTML, the image didn't show up. I checked by
creating an empty file using article class, inserting a small image. I can
view the image with DVI. But after i changed the class
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 7:26 pm, José Matos wrote:
The information you are looking for is in
/usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
there you should modify
sect + \n\\section
to
sect+ \n\\pagebreak\n\\section
This does indeed do
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 7:26 pm, José Matos wrote:
The information you are looking for is in
/usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
there you should modify
sect + \n\\section
to
sect+ \n\\pagebreak\n\\section
This does indeed do
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 7:26 pm, José Matos wrote:
> The information you are looking for is in
> /usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
>
> there you should modify
> + "\n\\section"
>
> to
> + "\n\\
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
the linuxdoc (article) template.
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc) but
can't force a page break at the start of a new section. I've tried the Layout
| Paragraph setting
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 2:02 pm, Helge Hafting wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
using the linuxdoc (article) template.
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts
etc) but can't force a page
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
the linuxdoc (article) template.
Good. :-)
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc)
but can't force a page break
on the way. Got a work-around for the moment anyway.
The information you are looking for is in
/usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
there you should modify
sect + \n\\section
to
sect + \n\\pagebreak\n\\section
Notice
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 4:53 pm, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
using the linuxdoc (article) template.
Good. :-)
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
the linuxdoc (article) template.
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc) but
can't force a page break at the start of a new section. I've tried the Layout
| Paragraph setting
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 2:02 pm, Helge Hafting wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
using the linuxdoc (article) template.
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts
etc) but can't force a page
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
the linuxdoc (article) template.
Good. :-)
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc)
but can't force a page break
on the way. Got a work-around for the moment anyway.
The information you are looking for is in
/usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
there you should modify
sect + \n\\section
to
sect + \n\\pagebreak\n\\section
Notice
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 4:53 pm, José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
using the linuxdoc (article) template.
Good. :-)
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links
I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
the linuxdoc (article) template.
I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc) but
can't force a page break at the start of a new section. I've tried the Layout
| Paragraph setting
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 2:02 pm, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
> > I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
> > using the linuxdoc (article) template.
> >
> > I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fon
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
> I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output using
> the linuxdoc (article) template.
Good. :-)
> I like the linuxdoc pdflatex output (bookmarks, links, standard fonts etc)
> but can't force
re
> just being escaped on the way. Got a work-around for the moment anyway.
The information you are looking for is in
/usr/share/linuxdoc-tools/dist/linuxdoc-tools/latex2e/mapping
there you should modify
+ "\n\\section"
to
+ "\n
On Wednesday 22 Jan 2003 4:53 pm, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 January 2003 12:24, Richard Huxton wrote:
> > I'm putting together about a 20-page help doc for pdf and html output
> > using the linuxdoc (article) template.
>
> Good. :-)
>
> > I like the linux
the following statement for exporting to
linuxdoc:
($status, $data) = $lyx-command(buffer-export linuxdoc,[M-f E x]);
An alert says :
No information for exporting to linuxdoc
and debuging info (with -dbg 8192 option) tells me :
LyXComm: No such file or directory
and no files are created.
When
the following statement for exporting to
linuxdoc:
($status, $data) = $lyx-command(buffer-export linuxdoc,[M-f E x]);
An alert says :
No information for exporting to linuxdoc
and debuging info (with -dbg 8192 option) tells me :
LyXComm: No such file or directory
and no files are created.
When
the following statement for exporting to
linuxdoc:
($status, $data) = $lyx->command("buffer-export linuxdoc","[M-f E x]");
An alert says :
No information for exporting to linuxdoc
and debuging info (with -dbg 8192 option) tells me :
LyXComm: No such file or directory
a
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
Hello,
this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally
took a glimpse
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
Hello,
this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
Hello,
this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally
took a glimpse
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
Hello,
this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
> I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
> Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
> So I unsuccessfully browsed Herbert's website and finally
José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:44:22PM +0200, thomas schönhoff wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>this is related to LyX-1.2.0 .
>>I just wanted to start creating a file and convert this to
>>Linuxdoc-format as described in help docs.
>
I successfully installed (with some tricks) CJK-LYX on my
Debian GNU/Linux system.
I just wanted to use the DocBook or LinuxDoc document class
to write a small users guide for ami. But both classes do
not render correctly the korean characters. The article
class is okay.
Does anybody have
I successfully installed (with some tricks) CJK-LYX on my
Debian GNU/Linux system.
I just wanted to use the DocBook or LinuxDoc document class
to write a small users guide for ami. But both classes do
not render correctly the korean characters. The article
class is okay.
Does anybody have
I successfully installed (with some tricks) CJK-LYX on my
Debian GNU/Linux system.
I just wanted to use the DocBook or LinuxDoc document class
to write a small users guide for ami. But both classes do
not render correctly the korean characters. The article
class is okay.
Does anybody have
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff. SGML related
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff. SGML related
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
> > /usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff.
that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
I never used this style, so I can't say any more at
this time. will have a look tomorrow. Maybe that others
can help.
Hm ... most of the links on
http://www.lyx.org/help/layouts/templates.php appear to be broken.
all
that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
I never used this style, so I can't say any more at
this time. will have a look tomorrow. Maybe that others
can help.
Hm ... most of the links on
http://www.lyx.org/help/layouts/templates.php appear to be broken.
all
, but as I said, I'm a newbie.
>
> On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
> /usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
I never used this style, so I can't say any more at
this time. will have a look tomorrow. Maybe that others
can help.
> Hm ... most of the links
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r on your own.
Maybe some wise cutpastle from the DocBook table
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r on your own.
Maybe some wise cutpastle from the DocBook table
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
> for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r on your own.
Maybe some wise cut from the DocBook
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> > The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
> > for that?
>
> I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will output a text version
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will output a text version
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
> Mandrake 8mk).
> The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
> for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will out
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Thanks!
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Thanks!
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Thanks!
visual
représentation and menues items according to such a description file ?
Yes. If I remember correctly can already do that for menus.
I think that this is true also for 1.1.6.
If you have any ideas or hints regarding linuxdoc or docbook I would
like to hear. Thanks,
I'm probably
visual
représentation and menues items according to such a description file ?
Yes. If I remember correctly can already do that for menus.
I think that this is true also for 1.1.6.
If you have any ideas or hints regarding linuxdoc or docbook I would
like to hear. Thanks,
I'm probably
> That's what I hope. Will also Lyx be ble to configure it's visual
> représentation and menues items according to such a description file ?
Yes. If I remember correctly can already do that for menus.
I think that this is true also for 1.1.6.
> > If you have any ideas or hints
):
What were your problems?
I found that the DTD was somehow hardwired in C++ code. I dont know much
about sgml, but couldnt it be done more easily by a generic sgml/xml
engine that could parse the LinuxDoc/DocBook DTD and match it against Lyx
format ?
The only place where the docbook
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
