José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
>> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
>>
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make it fast. :-)
It seems that this time has come :)
JMarc
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make it
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make it fast. :-)
It seems that this time has come :)
JMarc
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just after we should make it
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just
On Sunday 26 October 2008 20:38:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
> > conversion is taking place.
>
> And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
> this is
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
> reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
> making it correct, and just after we should make it fast. :-)
It seems that this time has come :)
JMarc
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
> > reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
> > making it correct, and just after we should
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2008 15:29:05 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So yes it should be possible to speed the conversion but there are
reasons for the slow response. Up until this moment we have focused on
making it correct, and just
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in python?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in python?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
> conversion is taking place.
And more importantly we should do basic profiling on lyx2lyx. I guess
this is possible in python?
JMarc
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my fast, dual
core amd64 architecture (also
On 25/10/2008 17:49, William Seager wrote:
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot. Of course that was the problem - instant loading once
the 1.6 format version was in place :)
--
William Seager
University of Toronto Scarborough
On 25/10/2008 19:26, William Seager wrote:
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot.
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
Of
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my fast, dual
core amd64 architecture (also
On 25/10/2008 17:49, William Seager wrote:
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot. Of course that was the problem - instant loading once
the 1.6 format version was in place :)
--
William Seager
University of Toronto Scarborough
On 25/10/2008 19:26, William Seager wrote:
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot.
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
Of
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On my fast, dual
core amd64 architecture (also
On 25/10/2008 17:49, William Seager wrote:
Hi all. I'm not sure this is a problem or just reflects
the unfinished state of lyx 1.6. But I have a large-ish
document (about 140 pages when output to pdf).
On my old slow laptop running lyx 1.5.6 (under gentoo
linux btw) this loads in 2 seconds. On
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
> conversion
OK, I'm an idiot. Of course that was the problem - instant loading once
the 1.6 format version was in place :)
--
William Seager
University of Toronto
On 25/10/2008 19:26, William Seager wrote:
On October 25, 2008 12:34:14 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I guess the 37 seconds you are seeing is probably due to lyx2lyx
conversion
OK, I'm an idiot.
You are not. We should probably indicate more prominently that a
conversion is taking place.
Of
30 matches
Mail list logo
