[no subject]

Maybe it is polyglossia. Look at the Tex file or do not use the preamble, but the beginning of the document. -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: Use better subject lines, please? (Was: question)

On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 09:20 -0400, Kevin Cole wrote: > Hi, > > Since most lists that I'm on seem to consist of messages that begin as a > question, followed by replies attempting to answer the question or gather > more information, a subject line consisting of nothing but the w

Use better subject lines, please? (Was: question)

Hi, Since most lists that I'm on seem to consist of messages that begin as a question, followed by replies attempting to answer the question or gather more information, a subject line consisting of nothing but the word "question" is pretty useless. So, a gentle nudge to some: Try

[no subject]

Alright then, I will post to lyx-devel and with more info. Basically Pacstall is package manager for Debian based systems and for more info see pacstall.dev. -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

[no subject]

Hello, there is an ongoing pull request for your package at: https://github.com/pacstall/pacstall-programs/pull/971. Just a couple of questions, would you like to maintain it, and also it would be great to have this installation method in wiki (users can install via: pacstall -I lyx-deb once the

Subject index with Makeindex

The enclosed MWE shows a simple document with a series of key words with which I would like to fill a subject index. However, if I choose Makeindex as the index processor, the subject index is NOT displayed in the resulting PDF document. PLEASE, can someone tell me why? And how do I manage

Requirements for a subject index

have the lowercase letter a, b or f after the page number in the subject index, depending on which of the three sections (A, B, F) they are placed in.   MWE1 uses the index processor texindy. The associated PDF file shows that a German DUDEN order according to DIN5007-1 can be created

Re: Introductory text to subject index

Am Sonntag, dem 02.05.2021 um 18:46 +0200 schrieb Andreas Plihal: > for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject > index. However, I would like to add an introductory text to the > subject index, immediately after the heading. > Where and how should I place this

Re: Introductory text to subject index

El dom, 2 may 2021 a las 18:46, Andreas Plihal () escribió: > Hi, > > for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject index. > However, > I would like to add an introductory text to the subject index, immediately > after the heading. > Where a

Introductory text to subject index

Hi,   for a KOMA book I have created both a list of figures and a subject index. However, I would like to add an introductory text to the subject index, immediately after the heading. Where and how should I place this introductory text in the LYX file?   Best regards Andreas -- lyx-users

[no subject]

Pls subscibr me lyx development. -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

[no subject]

Dear sir, how to recover my damaged . lyx filekindly suggest me some ideayour faithfully Dolan -- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Re: rename name index and subject index

On 2017-04-01, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > I would like to rename my 'name index' and 'subject index' to the German > 'Namensverzeichnis' and 'Stichwortverzeichnis' with > \renewcommand{\indexname}{Sachverzeichnis} > in the preamble

rename name index and subject index

I would like to rename my 'name index' and 'subject index' to the German 'Namensverzeichnis' and 'Stichwortverzeichnis' with \renewcommand{\indexname}{Sachverzeichnis} in the preamble, but this does not give the desired output in the pdf file. What would be the appropriate way of doing

subject index gives error, name index is alright

###) and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works alright. The name index works alright. Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going wrong? I am using koma script book style and A5 size

Re: subject index gives error, name index is alright

an error (see ###1###) and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works alright. The name index works alright. Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going wrong? I am using koma script book style

subject index gives error, name index is alright

###) and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works alright. The name index works alright. Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going wrong? I am using koma script book style and A5 size

Re: subject index gives error, name index is alright

an error (see ###1###) and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works alright. The name index works alright. Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going wrong? I am using koma script book style

subject index gives error, name index is alright

###) and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works alright. The name index works alright. Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a hint what is going wrong? I am using koma script book style and A5 size

Re: subject index gives error, name index is alright

f the English version gives me an error (see ###1###) > and view complete log gives me (see ###2###) > > If I comment out the subject index at the end of my document it works > alright. > The name index works alright. > > Has anybody run into such an error and could give me a

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg83713.html Ok, AFAIU this refers to the XeLaTeX engine and not to LyX. Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the resources to implement

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg83713.html Ok, AFAIU this refers to the XeLaTeX engine and not to LyX. Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the resources to implement

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

>> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg83713.html > > Ok, AFAIU this refers to the XeLaTeX engine and not to LyX. > Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language > guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the > resources to

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 26.01.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Walter: I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. Relativity... Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Hello This is a long document indeed and, unfortunately, I couldn't find the will to go through it all. But I should have a couple of interesting references regarding multilingual documents. This has been discussed previously on the list, in the context of XeTeX support in LyX 2.0 SVN:

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect known dictionaries and spell checkers on a cross-platform basis?

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Walter walter.stan...@gmail.com wrote: This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 15:16 schrieb Walter: This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect known dictionaries and

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 14:05 schrieb Walter: Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however the following struck me as possible to improve. Those items

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Stephan Witt wrote: Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the resources to implement and test it - it may happen. Another option would be to have a spell checker backend including this feature.

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 26.01.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Walter: I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. Relativity... Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Hello This is a long document indeed and, unfortunately, I couldn't find the will to go through it all. But I should have a couple of interesting references regarding multilingual documents. This has been discussed previously on the list, in the context of XeTeX support in LyX 2.0 SVN:

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect known dictionaries and spell checkers on a cross-platform basis?

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Walter walter.stan...@gmail.com wrote: This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 15:16 schrieb Walter: This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect known dictionaries and

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 14:05 schrieb Walter: Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran a spell check for the first time. The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however the following struck me as possible to improve. Those items

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Stephan Witt wrote: Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the resources to implement and test it - it may happen. Another option would be to have a spell checker backend including this feature.

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 26.01.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Walter: I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had to write this. > Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran > a spell check for the first time. > > The interface is good and no doubt an

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

> I'll try to answer this - although I surely don't have so much time you had > to write this. Relativity... >> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran >> a spell check for the first time. >> >> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Hello This is a long document indeed and, unfortunately, I couldn't find the will to go through it all. But I should have a couple of interesting references regarding multilingual documents. This has been discussed previously on the list, in the context of XeTeX support in LyX 2.0 SVN:

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

> This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is > there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction layer > available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect > known dictionaries and spell checkers on a cross-platform

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Walter wrote: >> This sounds ugly.  Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs?  Is >> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction >> layer >> available? Would it be worth developing one? How

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 15:16 schrieb Walter: >> This sounds ugly. Is there any similarity between spell checking APIs? Is >> there a cross platform, spell checking library unification / abstraction >> layer >> available? Would it be worth developing one? How difficult is it to detect >> known

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Am 27.01.2011 um 14:05 schrieb Walter: >>> Whilst using LyX 2.0beta1 [since verified on LyX 2.0beta3] I recently ran >>> a spell check for the first time. >>> >>> The interface is good and no doubt an improvement on previous eras, however >>> the following struck me as possible to improve. >>>

Re: Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

Stephan Witt wrote: > Of course, if someone wants to develop a solid algorithm for language > guessing and can convince the LyX developer community of it and has the > resources to implement and test it - it may happen. Another option > would be to have a spell checker backend including this

Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

(Note: Mostly this email dates from pre-Christmas December - took me awhile to post!) (This is a bit more verbose than it should be, as I am presently stuck in an historic colonial hill station of Tunisia, by the Algerian border, and being winter the weather is bitter and I am therefore

Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

(Note: Mostly this email dates from pre-Christmas December - took me awhile to post!) (This is a bit more verbose than it should be, as I am presently stuck in an historic colonial hill station of Tunisia, by the Algerian border, and being winter the weather is bitter and I am therefore

Subject: LyX 2.0beta3: Spell Checking + Multilingualism

(Note: Mostly this email dates from pre-Christmas December - took me awhile to post!) (This is a bit more verbose than it should be, as I am presently stuck in an historic colonial hill station of Tunisia, by the Algerian border, and being winter the weather is bitter and I am therefore

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Le 14/02/2010 22:49, Giovanni Bacci a écrit : domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Le 14/02/2010 22:49, Giovanni Bacci a écrit : domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Le 14/02/2010 22:49, Giovanni Bacci a écrit : domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths

change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Hi list. I've a problem non strictly about lyx, but i hope to get an answer, maybe useful for other lyxer too. Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Giovanni Bacci a écrit : [...] Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both of them came with a center aligned text. But what i'd like to obtain is a left

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths. So I don't really understand your request: do

change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Hi list. I've a problem non strictly about lyx, but i hope to get an answer, maybe useful for other lyxer too. Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Giovanni Bacci a écrit : [...] Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both of them came with a center aligned text. But what i'd like to obtain is a left

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths. So I don't really understand your request: do

change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Hi list. I've a problem non strictly about lyx, but i hope to get an answer, maybe useful for other lyxer too. Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

Giovanni Bacci a écrit : [...] Anyway, I'd like to know if it's possible to change subject alignment in a letter koma-script v.2 class. As an option i can only choose {before,after}opening and titled/untitled. Both of them came with a center aligned text. But what i'd like to obtain is a left

Re: change subject alignment in letter koma-script v.2

domenica 14 febbraio 2010, 22:26, Jean-Marie Pacquet: > Default subject (i.e. beforeopening and untitled) is left justified. > Only the title (if selected) is centered. This can be seen on figure > 6.1: Schematic of letter paper's pseudo lengths. > So I don't really understand

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de [...] That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. I am even surprised that 36 people voted... Andre' I am surprised you said that. I've tested and voting was possible without logging in. I've just

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Manveru manv...@manveru.pl wrote: 2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. I am even surprised that 36 people voted... I am surprised you said that. I've tested

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de [...] That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. I am even surprised that 36 people voted... Andre' I am surprised you said that. I've tested and voting was possible without logging in. I've just

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Manveru manv...@manveru.pl wrote: 2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. I am even surprised that 36 people voted... I am surprised you said that. I've tested

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz > [...] > > That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. > I am even surprised that 36 people voted... > > Andre' > I am surprised you said that. I've tested and voting was possible without logging in.

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Manveru wrote: > 2009/9/17 Andre Poenitz > > > That's not really surprising for a page that needs creating an account. > > I am even surprised that 36 people voted... > > I am surprised you said that.

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/7 Manveru manv...@manveru.pl Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Manveru manv...@manveru.pl wrote: 2009/9/7 Manveru manv...@manveru.pl Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 17:52 +0200, Julio Rojas wrote: Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? I went ahead and took the survey (no opinion). I wanted to point out that filtering the list is easy without such a catch. I have evolution check the recipients for lyx-users which snags

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Manveru wrote: I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/7 Manveru manv...@manveru.pl Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Manveru manv...@manveru.pl wrote: 2009/9/7 Manveru manv...@manveru.pl Hi LyXers, I created a survey about explicit subject

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 17:52 +0200, Julio Rojas wrote: Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? I went ahead and took the survey (no opinion). I wanted to point out that filtering the list is easy without such a catch. I have evolution check the recipients for lyx-users which snags

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Manveru wrote: I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

2009/9/7 Manveru <manv...@manveru.pl> > Hi LyXers, > > I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: > http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ > > Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. > > -- > Manveru > jabber:

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? - Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Manveru <manv...@manveru.pl> wrote: > 2009/9/7 Manveru <manv...@manveru.pl> > >> Hi LyXers, >&g

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 17:52 +0200, Julio Rojas wrote: > Not a lot of people interested on the subject??? I went ahead and took the survey ("no opinion"). I wanted to point out that filtering the list is easy without such a catch. I have evolution check the recipients for "lyx-

Re: [Survey] Explicit subject tag on this list

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Manveru wrote: > > I created a survey about explicit subject tagging: > > http://surveys.polldaddy.com/s/F47471D51261D0F9/ > > > > Feel welcome to fill the answers. Please do not reply to this message. > > > > -- > &

nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

as a mime digest and with Thunderbird the user can simply double click on the message of interest (each message is listed as a mime attachment in the digest) which opens the message as a pretty much normal message and then hit reply. For some reason I had to take an extra Re: off the subject line, and I

nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

as a mime digest and with Thunderbird the user can simply double click on the message of interest (each message is listed as a mime attachment in the digest) which opens the message as a pretty much normal message and then hit reply. For some reason I had to take an extra Re: off the subject line, and I

nice digest reply Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

st is sent as a mime digest and with Thunderbird the user can simply double click on the message of interest (each message is listed as a mime attachment in the digest) which opens the message as a pretty much normal message and then hit reply. For some reason I had to take an extra Re: off the

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

It would be interesting for the Lyx website to collect this info. I assume the posting contains a typo, and should read: They can record OS statistics, **unless** they are hidden by the user. (When top posting starts, let top posting continue (8-). jon On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 21:06 +0200, Murat

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally snipped... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people this comes from the Lyx users list. It's very messing

Re: the [[Lyx] explicit mail subject] thread

Note: the quoted texts below are all liberally "snipped"... for full context see the thread... It would appear that on Sep 2, Delta moins did innocently start this thread: > there is no keyword in the mail subject that tell people > "this comes from the Lyx u

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote: Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P. on this. This is something that, surely, is easily fixed at the server end, so that each message going out from the server has, say, [LyX] prepended to the subject

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip messages from lyx

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

to bury the messages to a separate folder. I merely want to be able to tell a a glance from the Subject field that LyX is the subject. Trevor Jenkins wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote: Murray Eisenberg wrote: I agree with the O.P

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! Julio Rojas wrote: Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

messages to a separate folder. But I don't want to bury the messages to a separate folder. I merely want to be able to tell a a glance from the Subject field that LyX is the subject. There is also the difference between knowing that a message was sent TO lyx-users and whether you received

Re: [Lyx] explicit mail subject

! Julio Rojas wrote: Easy to do on a UNIX box with procmail; I do it all the time for other lists. But how do I do this with GMail which is what I use for reading lyx users? Their label scheme isn't as useful as Subject: line tags like [LyX]. It's also easy. Besides of the tag, you can skip

How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other Just to start the ball

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux Windows Mac BSD Other

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Given that it is free software and therefore nearly impossible to know what the user community size is, knowing the relative sizes of segments of the population seems to be a

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Well, Lyx Website hit statistics could give a very rough idea maybe. They can record OS statistics, if they are hidden by the user. 2009/9/11 Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com: On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:42:22AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users

Re: How many use Linux: was[LyX] explicit mail subject

Paul A. Rubin wrote: Steve Litt wrote: On Friday 11 September 2009 09:58:04 Murray Eisenberg wrote: But only a fraction of folks use Unix/Linux! I've always assumed that fraction was about 4/5 but never examined that assumption. Does anyone know the percentages of LyX users on: Linux

  1   2   3   4   5   >