On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.
I do believe that.
Feel free to ask further,
Well, I am a bit lost myself...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.
I do believe that.
Feel free to ask further,
Well, I am a bit lost myself...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 07:48:01PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose, actually.
I do believe that.
> Feel free to ask further,
Well, I am a bit lost myself...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
Hi again,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose,
actually.
You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.
Feel
Hi again,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose,
actually.
You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.
Feel
Hi again,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and
typed ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link anything on purpose,
actually.
You don't link anything on purpose, it is done during the build process.
Feel
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all
for your help!
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.
[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]
Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all
for your help!
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.
[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]
Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
Well, I just reinstalled gcc, which seems to be a C compiler. Since it
was my C++ compiler that was lacking, if I did have any, I also
installed gpp, the C++ compiler. This probably solved it, 'cause
configuration went fine. The machine recognized gcc as my C
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all
for your help!
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:07:30PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
> e-mail message. I use Netscape7 for e-mail.
[I always thought Netscape was a web browser ;-}]
> Is there a way I can write the output to a text file that I can
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Vinay Ramnath schrieb:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
>>
>>>Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
>>>8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
>>>that it cannot execute
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3,
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current
installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just compile and
install the
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove
my current installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do,
Hi ?,
? wrote:
Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene
Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want
1.2.3 very
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it
when I
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile
Hi Andre,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?
Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't
compile there.
Though, gcc has been
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3,
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current
installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just compile and
install the
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove
my current installation of LyX, using rpm -e lyx, or can I just
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I do,
Hi ?,
? wrote:
Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene
Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want
1.2.3 very
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it
when I
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile
Hi Andre,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple hello
world program?
Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't
compile there.
Though, gcc has been
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3,
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current
installation of LyX, using "rpm -e lyx", or can I just compile and
install
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to
1.2.3, of which there only the source code is available on the LyX
site. That's ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove
my current installation of LyX, using "rpm -e lyx", or can I just
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
> if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
>
> ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I
Hi ?,
? wrote:
Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene
Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want
1.2.3 very
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
> if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
>
> ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it
when I
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
> Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
> 8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
> that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you
Hi Andre,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
world" program?
Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't
compile there.
Though, gcc has
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks like a broken gcc
51 matches
Mail list logo
