James W Dow schrieb:
LyX is a wonderful word processor. It is best one for writing mathematics
directly from the keyboard. Please don't spend a huge time developing it for
Windows. Windows will gradually fade away. Putting nice programs like LyX on
that operating system just delays people
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well depends on the effort needed to make it happen... and since
we are in the Open Source world it is really is the community on the
operating systems in question that should to the work to make it
happen.
I agree.
LyX is developed on
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Harris wrote:
A version of MikTeX (called ProTeXt)
Okay now what you just said spits on the entire *nix community.
I myself use LyX less than I do LaTeX with Kile on Debian [don't get
me started with the transition LyX is having with the Debian upgrades
after Sarge] and I use LyX for OS X and TeXShop for OS X.
This particular section is
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Angus Leeming leeming at ... writes:
[...]
Should we
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So if I read this correctly, because a Win32 port of LyX has been
made possible to show the Windows User the Power of the UNIX/Linux
World Design approach to Software and what Free Tools can produce
using the TeX/LaTeX systems and their many
Sven Schreiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There is no way that they switch OS because we need some specialized
apps that only run under Windows. (Please don't reply with hints on
wine, qemu, etc., I've tried it all.)
What app you have that don't run under vmware?
Bottom line: If Angus (and
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do it
yourself. There is not really much developer attention on gtk.
--
Lgb
Gour wrote:
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So if I read this correctly, because a Win32 port of LyX has been
made possible to show the Windows User the Power of the UNIX/Linux
World Design approach to Software and what Free Tools can produce
using the TeX/LaTeX systems
Before this develops into a flamewar, let me rectify something:
I *like* Linux more than I like Windows, but that doesn't change the fact that
some very specialized
apps simply don't exist on *nix. I'm very glad though that many open-source
apps are cross-platform
so that I can work with them.
On 08 Nov 2005 13:19:46 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) wrote:
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do it
yourself. There is not really much developer attention
Helge Hafting ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Not really. The win32 version of lyx does not in any way make it a
more serious solution. More accessible of course, but no
more serious.
Who said that?
Me? Marc?
Now, if we're making wishes - scratch the bloated gtk and
go for fltk.
Sven Schreiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Sven!
I don't understand why such a statement results in angry accusations.
I hope you didn't take my argument as a angry accusations, at least it
was not meant to be so, just a slightly provoking statement to backup your
statement :-)
People are
Hi Stephen:
Thanks for the explanation. I am using WindowsXP Professional (with
absolute lates SP's installed). I did a Large ( not Total) MixTex
installation. Do you think that matters ? The size difference between Large
Total seems to be less than 15MB.
I'd certainly perform the actions
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien
John Coppens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd have a go at the GTK+ version, in which I am also interested, but
I'll surely need a hand, as I am not an ace programmer. Can someone
indicate what has to be done?
As I wrote earlier, I cannot code, but can contribute my time to
testing.
Probably
- Original Message -
From: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: Forget Windows
Gour wrote:
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd also like to see more focus
Hi Folks,
We may try to wish-away windows or maybe flame-it-down, but the fact is
that by saying things like -- don't spend any more effort on developing it
further on Windows, what you are saying is turn the development into a
prejudiced-OpenSource, not a truely world-hugging OpenSource as
John Coppens wrote:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do
it yourself. There is not really much developer attention on gtk.
I subscribed to this list to get LyX info for Linux, not Windoze.
Lately, way
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, there is code-share, but every individial port (win32, gtk) takes
| away the energy time of devs, and that's why I'd prefer to e.g. have
| gtk port which could (if) cover Win32, Linux-like OS-es MaC OS in one
| stroke.
Note that code share is in the very
While I agree w/ Marc in wanting a Cocoa / GNUstep front-end for LyX, I
would like to echo the statements of Banibrata and others that it's
better to have a wide variety, and please don't abandon people who need
to use Windows for one reason or other.
Having Windows as an option makes LyX far
Stephen Harris wrote:
Yes, I looked at fltk and it is intended to be cross-platform.
I've also seen some great screenshots and fltk was used for
(and a variation is used for making special effects in movies)
porting flpsed using Minsys rather than Cygwin on Windows.
The result was as good as
Alex Streit wrote:
Hi all,
I am using LyX 1.3.6 (Mac), although I've noticed the same behaviour on
Linux and Windows builds.
One thing that keeps getting me is that I find the selection behaviour
un-intuitive. Because it is very much a character - to - character
selection, which makes it hard
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris techmech at ... writes:
The TeXLive
On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Angus Leeming wrote:
However, before any eager soul jumps on this frontend bandwagon, I'd
like to introduce a note of caution and suggest that you really,
really shouldn't create yet another frontend to LyX. Time is limited,
there are only so many of us and another
_/ On Tue 08 Nov 2005 15:09:51 GMT, [Paul A. Rubin] wrote : \_
Alex Streit wrote:
Hi all,
I am using LyX 1.3.6 (Mac), although I've noticed the same behaviour on
Linux and Windows builds.
Yes, all are rather uniform in terms of their behaviour.
One thing that keeps getting me is
Tysdag 8. november 2005 15:57 skreiv Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, there is code-share, but every individial port (win32, gtk) takes
| away the energy time of devs, and that's why I'd prefer to e.g. have
| gtk port which could (if) cover Win32, Linux-like OS-es
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Note that code share is in the very high 90's %.
Really?
Did not know that.
So, it means that, in case qt goes non-gpl or something, it would not be
too hard to port to another toolkit?
It is packaging that takes time, and you won't get that
William F. Adams wrote:
I think we'd all like to see improved core functionality in future
releases. The last three or four years have seen increased
prettiness and stability and *much* nicer code but little real
increase in what LyX can actually do. Now that we have something
that's at least
Ingar == Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
Ingar each have to be translated manually.
I'm a LyX nubie.
I'm using Ubuntu 5.10, and have installed LyX via the Ubuntu package
manager.
How do I install Memoir? Where do I put the sty files, etc?
Jack
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
Cause I tried to export surfer to EMF, but the result in the DVI file
was a huge picture, and when I tried to
Ingar Pareliussen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits increase the amount
of work for the translators as well. Different toolsets have different ways
to specify shortcuts and each have to be translated manually.
Good point.
So as a
- Original Message -
From: Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Forget Windows
So as a translator I would like to have only one toolset to work with, and
if
I could have chosen I would loved a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Ingar == Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
_/ On Tue 08 Nov 2005 17:32:49 GMT, [hagit lev] wrote : \_
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and
I wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export
them first to jpeg and only then import ?
Although this depends on various settings
Tysdag 8. november 2005 17:59 skreiv Gour:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Note that code share is in the very high 90's %.
So, it means that, in case qt goes non-gpl or something, it would not be
too hard to port to another toolkit?
Lyx source code was divided in 2000(-01?)
Tysdag 8. november 2005 18:48 skreiv Stephen Harris:
SH: Hmmm. I like the KDE desktop and looked into the Cygwin port
of KDE to Windows, which has been abandoned. Now the effort is
to produce a native Windows KDE. I thought I read that this effort
relied on Qt (3?) similar to LyX?
For the
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 18:32 schrieb hagit lev:
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
You can import any figure material directly if you have
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 17:47 schrieb Roy Schestowitz:
I noticed that too, but never complained. I re-adjusted my mind and
got
accustomed *over time*. This behaviour is attributed to the LaTeX/LyX
for-
mat underneath, yet a few tweaks could probably correct this.
Selections
do
hagit lev wrote:
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
Cause I tried to export surfer to EMF, but the result in the DVI file
was a huge picture, and
Dear All,
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
Ingar each have to be translated manually.
JML Note we could make an effort to change
On Nov 8, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Angus Leeming wrote:
You have a strange definition of ``for free'', William. There are 295
files in the Qt frontend totalling some 27,000 lines of code. And
that's neglecting the .ui files that define the dialog structure.
Yes, but all those lines and the QT
On Nov 8, 2005, at 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to create a translation code internally, to handle the
differences in GUIs?
I have (almost) finshed the translation of Qt strings. It would be
useful, If I could reuse all of them, without doublecating thoose
strings.
This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
Ingar each have to be translated manually.
JML Note we
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:53:06 +
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frankly, I don't think that's true. Looking back over the mail list
archive as far as 22 Oct, I see the list of messages below. (Sorted
alphabetically.) Most all of 'em are probelms that aren't specific to
Windows, even
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 22:18 schrieb John Coppens:
Anyway, I see there is some interest (mine included) for a native GTK+
version, so I'll try and compile one (I suspect it compiles at least?).
Yes, it does, and it is also somewhat useful, since it borrows xforms
dialogs.
Who is the
Dear Angus List,
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
JML Note we could make an effort to change this: use the shortcut
Is it possible to create a translation code internally, to handle the
William == William F Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have (almost) finshed the translation of Qt strings. It would be
useful, If I could reuse all of them, without doublecating thoose
strings.
William This is one of the things one could get ``for free'' w/ a
William move to
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus It doesn't actually make anybody's life easier because the
Angus different frontends do actually have subtly different dialogs
Angus and messages.
I suspect 50% of the strings would turn out to be common.
JMarc
Alex == Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Why? The GUI indepence means same content, different look. Isn't
Alex it?
The idea is that each frontend author is free to implement the dialogs
as he wants. There is no contraint on their layout and/or text.
JMarc
On 11/8/05, Gill, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a LyX nubie.
I'm using Ubuntu 5.10, and have installed LyX via the Ubuntu package
manager.
How do I install Memoir? Where do I put the sty files, etc?
Jack,
If you have a working LaTeX installation, memoir should be accessible
from
On 11/8/05, Gill, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the files from CTAN, followed the instructions in the
readme file, and it still didn't show up. I restarted LyX several
times, and nothing. Then I rebooted the PC, and there it is.
In such a situations, one must reconfigure LyX
Is there any way of write debug info in a text file?
I do this -- lyx -dbg latex
for show debug info, but this write into console.
Thx.
P.D. sorry for my bad english ;)
William F. Adams wrote:
For those interested in such stats, the whole LyX source tree
(neglecting non-Qt frontend code) comprises 970 files and 170,000
lines of code. The thing is *big* and doesn't need to get any bigger.
I thought that the whole point to GUI-Independence was that it would
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:53:39 +0100 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Alex == Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Why? The GUI indepence means same content, different look. Isn't
Alex it?
The idea is that each frontend author is free to implement the dialogs
as he wants.
Abel Fernández Fernández wrote:
Is there any way of write debug info in a text file?
I do this -- lyx -dbg latex
for show debug info, but this write into console.
You can redirect the standard error output to a file on unix systems:
lyx -dbg latex 2err.log
On windows it looks maybe
James W Dow schrieb:
LyX is a wonderful word processor. It is best one for writing mathematics
directly from the keyboard. Please don't spend a huge time developing it for
Windows. Windows will gradually fade away. Putting nice programs like LyX on
that operating system just delays people
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well depends on the effort needed to make it happen... and since
we are in the Open Source world it is really is the community on the
operating systems in question that should to the work to make it
happen.
I agree.
LyX is developed on
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Harris wrote:
A version of MikTeX (called ProTeXt)
Okay now what you just said spits on the entire *nix community.
I myself use LyX less than I do LaTeX with Kile on Debian [don't get
me started with the transition LyX is having with the Debian upgrades
after Sarge] and I use LyX for OS X and TeXShop for OS X.
This particular section is
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Angus Leeming leeming at ... writes:
[...]
Should we
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So if I read this correctly, because a Win32 port of LyX has been
made possible to show the Windows User the Power of the UNIX/Linux
World Design approach to Software and what Free Tools can produce
using the TeX/LaTeX systems and their many
Sven Schreiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There is no way that they switch OS because we need some specialized
apps that only run under Windows. (Please don't reply with hints on
wine, qemu, etc., I've tried it all.)
What app you have that don't run under vmware?
Bottom line: If Angus (and
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do it
yourself. There is not really much developer attention on gtk.
--
Lgb
Gour wrote:
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So if I read this correctly, because a Win32 port of LyX has been
made possible to show the Windows User the Power of the UNIX/Linux
World Design approach to Software and what Free Tools can produce
using the TeX/LaTeX systems
Before this develops into a flamewar, let me rectify something:
I *like* Linux more than I like Windows, but that doesn't change the fact that
some very specialized
apps simply don't exist on *nix. I'm very glad though that many open-source
apps are cross-platform
so that I can work with them.
On 08 Nov 2005 13:19:46 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) wrote:
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do it
yourself. There is not really much developer attention
Helge Hafting ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Not really. The win32 version of lyx does not in any way make it a
more serious solution. More accessible of course, but no
more serious.
Who said that?
Me? Marc?
Now, if we're making wishes - scratch the bloated gtk and
go for fltk.
Sven Schreiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Sven!
I don't understand why such a statement results in angry accusations.
I hope you didn't take my argument as a angry accusations, at least it
was not meant to be so, just a slightly provoking statement to backup your
statement :-)
People are
Hi Stephen:
Thanks for the explanation. I am using WindowsXP Professional (with
absolute lates SP's installed). I did a Large ( not Total) MixTex
installation. Do you think that matters ? The size difference between Large
Total seems to be less than 15MB.
I'd certainly perform the actions
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien
John Coppens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd have a go at the GTK+ version, in which I am also interested, but
I'll surely need a hand, as I am not an ace programmer. Can someone
indicate what has to be done?
As I wrote earlier, I cannot code, but can contribute my time to
testing.
Probably
- Original Message -
From: Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: Forget Windows
Gour wrote:
Marc J. Driftmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd also like to see more focus
Hi Folks,
We may try to wish-away windows or maybe flame-it-down, but the fact is
that by saying things like -- don't spend any more effort on developing it
further on Windows, what you are saying is turn the development into a
prejudiced-OpenSource, not a truely world-hugging OpenSource as
John Coppens wrote:
| I'd also like to see more focus (especially) on GTK+.
The only way to make that happen is to get someone to do it, or do
it yourself. There is not really much developer attention on gtk.
I subscribed to this list to get LyX info for Linux, not Windoze.
Lately, way
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, there is code-share, but every individial port (win32, gtk) takes
| away the energy time of devs, and that's why I'd prefer to e.g. have
| gtk port which could (if) cover Win32, Linux-like OS-es MaC OS in one
| stroke.
Note that code share is in the very
While I agree w/ Marc in wanting a Cocoa / GNUstep front-end for LyX, I
would like to echo the statements of Banibrata and others that it's
better to have a wide variety, and please don't abandon people who need
to use Windows for one reason or other.
Having Windows as an option makes LyX far
Stephen Harris wrote:
Yes, I looked at fltk and it is intended to be cross-platform.
I've also seen some great screenshots and fltk was used for
(and a variation is used for making special effects in movies)
porting flpsed using Minsys rather than Cygwin on Windows.
The result was as good as
Alex Streit wrote:
Hi all,
I am using LyX 1.3.6 (Mac), although I've noticed the same behaviour on
Linux and Windows builds.
One thing that keeps getting me is that I find the selection behaviour
un-intuitive. Because it is very much a character - to - character
selection, which makes it hard
Stephen Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: TeXLive 2005, LyX and Windows xp
Stephen Harris techmech at ... writes:
The TeXLive
On Nov 8, 2005, at 10:07 AM, Angus Leeming wrote:
However, before any eager soul jumps on this frontend bandwagon, I'd
like to introduce a note of caution and suggest that you really,
really shouldn't create yet another frontend to LyX. Time is limited,
there are only so many of us and another
_/ On Tue 08 Nov 2005 15:09:51 GMT, [Paul A. Rubin] wrote : \_
Alex Streit wrote:
Hi all,
I am using LyX 1.3.6 (Mac), although I've noticed the same behaviour on
Linux and Windows builds.
Yes, all are rather uniform in terms of their behaviour.
One thing that keeps getting me is
Tysdag 8. november 2005 15:57 skreiv Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes, there is code-share, but every individial port (win32, gtk) takes
| away the energy time of devs, and that's why I'd prefer to e.g. have
| gtk port which could (if) cover Win32, Linux-like OS-es
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Note that code share is in the very high 90's %.
Really?
Did not know that.
So, it means that, in case qt goes non-gpl or something, it would not be
too hard to port to another toolkit?
It is packaging that takes time, and you won't get that
William F. Adams wrote:
I think we'd all like to see improved core functionality in future
releases. The last three or four years have seen increased
prettiness and stability and *much* nicer code but little real
increase in what LyX can actually do. Now that we have something
that's at least
Ingar == Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
Ingar each have to be translated manually.
I'm a LyX nubie.
I'm using Ubuntu 5.10, and have installed LyX via the Ubuntu package
manager.
How do I install Memoir? Where do I put the sty files, etc?
Jack
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
Cause I tried to export surfer to EMF, but the result in the DVI file
was a huge picture, and when I tried to
Ingar Pareliussen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits increase the amount
of work for the translators as well. Different toolsets have different ways
to specify shortcuts and each have to be translated manually.
Good point.
So as a
- Original Message -
From: Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Forget Windows
So as a translator I would like to have only one toolset to work with, and
if
I could have chosen I would loved a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Ingar == Ingar Pareliussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ingar As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits
Ingar increase the amount of work for the translators as well.
Ingar Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and
_/ On Tue 08 Nov 2005 17:32:49 GMT, [hagit lev] wrote : \_
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and
I wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export
them first to jpeg and only then import ?
Although this depends on various settings
Tysdag 8. november 2005 17:59 skreiv Gour:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Note that code share is in the very high 90's %.
So, it means that, in case qt goes non-gpl or something, it would not be
too hard to port to another toolkit?
Lyx source code was divided in 2000(-01?)
Tysdag 8. november 2005 18:48 skreiv Stephen Harris:
SH: Hmmm. I like the KDE desktop and looked into the Cygwin port
of KDE to Windows, which has been abandoned. Now the effort is
to produce a native Windows KDE. I thought I read that this effort
relied on Qt (3?) similar to LyX?
For the
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 18:32 schrieb hagit lev:
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
You can import any figure material directly if you have
Am Dienstag, 8. November 2005 17:47 schrieb Roy Schestowitz:
I noticed that too, but never complained. I re-adjusted my mind and
got
accustomed *over time*. This behaviour is attributed to the LaTeX/LyX
for-
mat underneath, yet a few tweaks could probably correct this.
Selections
do
hagit lev wrote:
Hi
I have lots of material - such as Surfer maps, Origin graphs etc. and I
wondered if I can import them directly to Lyx or need to export them
first to jpeg and only then import ?
Cause I tried to export surfer to EMF, but the result in the DVI file
was a huge picture, and
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
