Re: About my error in Lyx
Hi. Long time no answer. Sorry. My computer system is 64 bit Window 7 OS My problem is described in here: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9486 In here, the writer’s problem is solved, but not in mine. What should I have to do? Reconfigure failed. Massage: The system reconfiguration has failed. Default textclass is used but LyX may not be able to work properly. Please reconfigure again if needed. In my opinion, the LyX doesn’t catch the Mitex with configuration error. And, I was trying to figure it out with compiling python, but I failed. Still need some help. Thanks. > Hi lyx manager. > > > Im a starter of Lyx and I have a problem. > > > when I use an article, > > I got a following message: > > > he selected document class (Article) requires external files that are not > available. The document class can still be used, but the document cannot be > compiled until the following prerequisites are installed: article.cls > > > And I cannot reconfigure. > That is the problem. In this stage lyx is collecting some info from your system. Therefore we have to find a solution for this first. Can you send us the messages you get if configuring? > Can you help me out? > > My texworks(Miktex) works properly. > > > Your help would give me a big pleasure. > > > Thank you. > > HeonJin Kornel 고르넬 벤고
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On 02/03/2016 01:09 PM, Paul Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. Put your cursor just after the first ERT, and press ctrl + return (at least this is the shortcut on Linux). Thanks, Scott, but that does not work. (Please, see and compile the attached example; it outputs a two-lines integral...) Ah I see what you mean. In Kornel's attachment the second ERT only contained the dollarsign and not the x, so it worked. For your example, add a % at the end of the first ERT (so inside the ERT at the very end). Thanks, Scott. That works! Also: Add in Local Layout, under Document> Settings: Format 41 InsetLayout ERT MultiPar true End Then you can hit "return" inside ERT to get multiple lines. Richard Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > >> >> > Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. >> >> >> >> Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, >> >> because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. >> > >> > Put your cursor just after the first ERT, and press ctrl + return (at >> > least this is the shortcut on Linux). >> >> Thanks, Scott, but that does not work. (Please, see and compile the >> attached example; it outputs a two-lines integral...) > > Ah I see what you mean. In Kornel's attachment the second ERT only > contained the dollarsign and not the x, so it worked. > > For your example, add a % at the end of the first ERT (so inside the ERT > at the very end). Thanks, Scott. That works! Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:25:55PM +, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > >> > Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. > >> > >> Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, > >> because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. > > > > Put your cursor just after the first ERT, and press ctrl + return (at > > least this is the shortcut on Linux). > > Thanks, Scott, but that does not work. (Please, see and compile the > attached example; it outputs a two-lines integral...) Ah I see what you mean. In Kornel's attachment the second ERT only contained the dollarsign and not the x, so it worked. For your example, add a % at the end of the first ERT (so inside the ERT at the very end). Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. >> >> Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, >> because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. > > Put your cursor just after the first ERT, and press ctrl + return (at > least this is the shortcut on Linux). Thanks, Scott, but that does not work. (Please, see and compile the attached example; it outputs a two-lines integral...) Paul broken_ert_boxes_example2.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: Using Elsevier Article Class
Rich Shepard appl-ecosys.com> writes: >The problem seems related to the bibtex style file: apacite.sty. From the > displayed error log: > > (/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/fragments/subscript.sty) > (/usr/share/texmf-d > ist/tex/latex/apacite/apacite.sty > Package: apacite 2013/07/21 v6.03 APA citation > ! Undefined control sequence. > l.1216 \st rtbibchapter I'm not using the Elsevier Article Class, but rather an older LyX template from https://github.com/wwkong/Typesetting-Templates I solved this problem by removing (commenting out) the following lines in the Document -> LaTeX Preamble, that was created by the template: % For Bibliography %\usepackage{apacite} % Order here is important! %\usepackage{natbib} LyX allows you to specify natbib in Document Settings -> Bibliography, and the apacite package is problematic for reasons I don't understand (except that it's known as accidental complexity). Hope this is helpful.
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 04:23:48PM +, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. > > Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, > because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. Put your cursor just after the first ERT, and press ctrl + return (at least this is the shortcut on Linux). Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: tabu package
Am 02.02.2016 um 19:53 schrieb Simon, Klaus: I wonder if LyX perhaps does not support the tabu package? the tabu package is obsolete and no more maintained by the author. Herbert
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX >> >> >>> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get >> >> >>> errors. >> >> >> >> >> >> Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes >> >> > in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file >> >> > with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My >> >> > code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by >> >> > me.) >> >> >> >> If the two ERT boxes break a LaTeX command in the middle (one ERT box >> >> with the first part of the command and the second ERT box with the >> >> second part), then you get an error. The point is: How to avoid such >> >> an error, Kornel? >> > >> > The problem here is that the first '$' is in one paragraph, the other '$ >> > is in the next paragraph. >> > The effect in created tex is: >> > ... >> > $\int x >> > >> > $ >> > ... >> >> Correct, Kornel. But is it possible to have both in the same >> paragraph, without having to use a single ERT box (instead of two >> separate ERT boxes)? The reason why I am asking this question is to >> have the possibility of arranging my several ERT boxes more clearly in >> the LyX document, without having all of them in the same line. > > Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. Thanks, Kornel, but, unfortunately, your example does not work, because it fails to convert to the current stable LyX version. Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 um 16:06:44, schrieb Paul Smith > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX > >> >>> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get > >> >>> errors. > >> >> > >> >> Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. > >> > > >> > Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes > >> > in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file > >> > with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My > >> > code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by > >> > me.) > >> > >> If the two ERT boxes break a LaTeX command in the middle (one ERT box > >> with the first part of the command and the second ERT box with the > >> second part), then you get an error. The point is: How to avoid such > >> an error, Kornel? > > > > The problem here is that the first '$' is in one paragraph, the other '$ is > > in the next paragraph. > > The effect in created tex is: > > ... > > $\int x > > > > $ > > ... > > Correct, Kornel. But is it possible to have both in the same > paragraph, without having to use a single ERT box (instead of two > separate ERT boxes)? The reason why I am asking this question is to > have the possibility of arranging my several ERT boxes more clearly in > the LyX document, without having all of them in the same line. Sure it is. Use the ERT's in the same paragraph. > Paul Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. break_command.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX >> >>> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get >> >>> errors. >> >> >> >> Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. >> > >> > Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes >> > in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file >> > with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My >> > code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by >> > me.) >> >> If the two ERT boxes break a LaTeX command in the middle (one ERT box >> with the first part of the command and the second ERT box with the >> second part), then you get an error. The point is: How to avoid such >> an error, Kornel? > > The problem here is that the first '$' is in one paragraph, the other '$ is > in the next paragraph. > The effect in created tex is: > ... > $\int x > > $ > ... Correct, Kornel. But is it possible to have both in the same paragraph, without having to use a single ERT box (instead of two separate ERT boxes)? The reason why I am asking this question is to have the possibility of arranging my several ERT boxes more clearly in the LyX document, without having all of them in the same line. Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 um 15:35:20, schrieb Paul Smith > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > >>> > >>> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX > >>> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get > >>> errors. > >> > >> Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. > > > > Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes > > in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file > > with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My > > code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by > > me.) > > If the two ERT boxes break a LaTeX command in the middle (one ERT box > with the first part of the command and the second ERT box with the > second part), then you get an error. The point is: How to avoid such > an error, Kornel? The problem here is that the first '$' is in one paragraph, the other '$ is in the next paragraph. The effect in created tex is: ... $\int x $ ... > Paul Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Paul Smith wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX >>> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get >>> errors. >> >> Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. > > Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes > in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file > with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My > code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by > me.) If the two ERT boxes break a LaTeX command in the middle (one ERT box with the first part of the command and the second ERT box with the second part), then you get an error. The point is: How to avoid such an error, Kornel? Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX >> command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get >> errors. > > Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. Thanks, Kornel, for your reply. The point is how to have two ERT boxes in different and consecutive lines and the corresponding LaTeX file with no blank line inserted between the code of the two ERT boxes. (My code is much more complicate than the simple example provided here by me.) Paul
Re: Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 um 12:29:00, schrieb Paul Smith > Dear All, > > Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX > command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get > errors. Why don't you use _one_ ERT for it? Works here that way. > Thanks in advance, > > Paul Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: trouble submitting IEEE conference article
Neal Becker wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >> Neal Becker wrote: >> >>> Thanks! It does appear to work to export to DVI (LuaTeX) _after_ I >>> uncheck Document/settings/fonts use non-tex fonts. >> >> You mean after you uncheck or after you check the button? It is supposed >> to work like this: >> >> use non-tex fonts checked => DVI (LuaTeX) works, DVI does not work >> use non-tex fonts unchecked => DVI works, DVI (LuaTeX) might work > > No, if I check 'use no-tex fonts' -> DVI (LuaTeX) gives me: > dvipdf ascma-paper-crap.dvi > kpathsea:make_tex: Invalid fontname `"file:lmroman17-regular:script=latn; > +trep;+tlig;"', contains '"' > dvips: Font "file:lmroman17-regular:script=latn;+trep;+tlig;" not found; > using cmr10 > dvips: Design size mismatch in font "file:lmroman17-regular:script=latn; > +trep;+tlig;" > dvips: ! invalid char 8211 from font "file:lmroman17-regular:script=latn; > +trep;+tlig;" > > which apparantly is dvipdf way to say, can't find the fonts > > I have chosen all default fonts in lyx. > > But if I don't check 'use no-tex fonts', DVI (LuaTeX) works. Except, see > below > >> >> I believe that the error handling in this area has been improved in the >> upcoming LyX 2.2. >> >>> Yes, good EPS were created. Unfortunately, the names of the EPS files >>> were mangled, and I think those names don't match those in the DVI file, >>> so I needed to manually create a bunch of symlinks from the names used >>> in the dvi file to the mangled names, e.g., >>> >>> 0_home_nbecker_scma-unframed_frame_format-cropped.eps -> frame_format- >>> cropped.eps >>> >>> The whole process would've been automated nicely if not for this. >> >> The files are referenced using the mangled names in the DVI (at least on >> my machine). If the DVI does not reference the mangled files then this >> would be a bug => please report at >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome in that case. >> >> If you want a DVI which refernces images without mangled names you need >> to produce it manually: Export to "LaTeX (plain)", which will produce a >> .tex file + all .eps files (unmangled). Then run latex, bibtex and other >> aux programs as needed to produce the DVI. >> >> >> Georg > > Seems pretty messed up. If I don't check 'use non-tex fonts', and export > via DVI (LuaTeX), I get a dvi, but no eps graphics. > > Finally, I tried export LaTeX (dviluatex), and THEN I got eps graphics, > but without mangled names. OK, using DVI export does work, and produce the correctly mangled eps file names. I didn't try this at first, because my .bib file containted unicode characters, and export to dvi didn't work, until I changed document/settings/language input encoding to unicode(utf-8). Then running dvipdfm worked fine.
Breaking the same LaTeX command in several contiguous lines
Dear All, Is it possible to break into different continuous lines a same LaTeX command in ERT? Please, see the attached example, with which I get errors. Thanks in advance, Paul break_command.lyx Description: application/lyx