Re: Numbering by section showed wrong!
OK great. I don't know how to solve your problem, but hopefully someone will come along who can. It seems that you should try to improve your question asking skills (yes, they are skills and require effort and practice). You were given some great advice by Steve Litt: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg89979.html Unfortunately you have either ignored or forgotten that advice. Please study it again. I agree that .rar is not a good format to send in. Please send in tar.gz. You should *always* include your .lyx file (as small as possible but that can still reproduce the "problem") Best of luck with everything! Xu On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: > yes, thankyou! here you have the file attached... > > 2011/11/27 Xu Wang : > > So the numbering is correct in LyX and incorrect in the pdf? Could you > > please send your .lyx file or just a minimum working example (ie a small > > file that shows the problem)? Please send it to the list and not just > me. I > > don't know much about LyX -- I'm just trying to help you ask for help in > the > > best way. > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Kenedy Torcatt > wrote: > >> > >> Hey, Just wrong in pdf, i didn't notice it. That's weird! Wow, how to > fix > >> that? > >> > >> 2011/11/27 Xu Wang : > >> > Does it only show it wrong in LyX? Or does it also show wrong in the > pdf > >> > output? > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Kenedy Torcatt > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hello LyX Users... > >> >> > >> >> I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but > LyX > >> >> is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module > >> >> using: Document→Settings→Modules and add the module "Number equations > >> >> by section" and the same for figures, but when > >> >> I change a section the figures is not showing from 1 like it should, > >> >> For example, ilustrating this: > >> >> > >> >> -Section 1 > >> >> > >> >> Figure 1.1 > >> >> > >> >> -Section 2 > >> >> > >> >> Figure 2.2 ( I need 2.1, then 2.2, .and on) > >> >> > >> >> The same thing occur with equations! > >> >> That's the problem I'm facing it... > >> >> Please help me with this, should I add some code in the preamble? > >> >> > >> >> Thankyou in advance! > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Kenedy Torcatt > >> Personal Fitness Trainer / Geologist Engineer / Guitarist / Webmaster > >> Contact: Gmailfacebook: ktorcatt > >> Yahoo Twitter: kenfitness > >> Hotmail > > > > > > > > -- > Kenedy Torcatt > Personal Fitness Trainer / Geologist Engineer / Guitarist / Webmaster > Contact: Gmailfacebook: ktorcatt > Yahoo Twitter: kenfitness > Hotmail >
Re: Numbering by section showed wrong!
So the numbering is correct in LyX and incorrect in the pdf? Could you please send your .lyx file or just a minimum working example (ie a small file that shows the problem)? Please send it to the list and not just me. I don't know much about LyX -- I'm just trying to help you ask for help in the best way. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: > Hey, Just wrong in pdf, i didn't notice it. That's weird! Wow, how to fix > that? > > 2011/11/27 Xu Wang : > > Does it only show it wrong in LyX? Or does it also show wrong in the pdf > > output? > > > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Kenedy Torcatt > wrote: > >> > >> Hello LyX Users... > >> > >> I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but LyX > >> is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module > >> using: Document→Settings→Modules and add the module "Number equations > >> by section" and the same for figures, but when > >> I change a section the figures is not showing from 1 like it should, > >> For example, ilustrating this: > >> > >> -Section 1 > >> > >> Figure 1.1 > >> > >> -Section 2 > >> > >> Figure 2.2 ( I need 2.1, then 2.2, .and on) > >> > >> The same thing occur with equations! > >> That's the problem I'm facing it... > >> Please help me with this, should I add some code in the preamble? > >> > >> Thankyou in advance! > > > > > > > > -- > Kenedy Torcatt > Personal Fitness Trainer / Geologist Engineer / Guitarist / Webmaster > Contact: Gmailfacebook: ktorcatt > Yahoo Twitter: kenfitness > Hotmail >
Re: Numbering by section showed wrong!
Does it only show it wrong in LyX? Or does it also show wrong in the pdf output? On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Kenedy Torcatt wrote: > Hello LyX Users... > > I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but LyX > is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module > using: Document→Settings→Modules and add the module "Number equations > by section" and the same for figures, but when > I change a section the figures is not showing from 1 like it should, > For example, ilustrating this: > > -Section 1 > > Figure 1.1 > > -Section 2 > > Figure 2.2 ( I need 2.1, then 2.2, .and on) > > The same thing occur with equations! > That's the problem I'm facing it... > Please help me with this, should I add some code in the preamble? > > Thankyou in advance! >
Numbering by section showed wrong!
Hello LyX Users... I need to show in my thesis figures and equations by sections, but LyX is showing them wrong. I mean I activate the module using: Document→Settings→Modules and add the module "Number equations by section" and the same for figures, but when I change a section the figures is not showing from 1 like it should, For example, ilustrating this: -Section 1 Figure 1.1 -Section 2 Figure 2.2 ( I need 2.1, then 2.2, .and on) The same thing occur with equations! That's the problem I'm facing it... Please help me with this, should I add some code in the preamble? Thankyou in advance!
Re: \underset and \overset do not compile
On 11/26/2011 07:51 PM, Màxim Carlavilla Márquez wrote:
> Hi, I'm a new user of LyX. I use Windows XP and LyX version 2.0.0.
>
> When trying to use \underset or \overset (for instance,
> \underset{\lim}{t} both with the command in latex and using the button
> in the frame decorations menu), I get the following error message:
>
> $\underset
>
> {t}{\lim}$
>
> The control sequence at the end of the top line
>
> of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
>
> misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
>
> spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
>
> and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
>
>
> I'm sorry but I don't understand the message. I have also the same
> problem with the \overset, \underrightarrow and the \underleftarrow,
> \underleftrightarrow commands too, but the rest of frame decorations
> seem to work fine.
>
Please check Document>Settings>Math Options, and make sure "Use AMS math
package automatically" is checked.
Richard
\underset and \overset do not compile
Hi, I'm a new user of LyX. I use Windows XP and LyX version 2.0.0.
When trying to use \underset or \overset (for instance, \underset{\lim}{t}
both with the command in latex and using the button in the frame
decorations menu), I get the following error message:
$\underset
{t}{\lim}$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
I'm sorry but I don't understand the message. I have also the same problem
with the \overset, \underrightarrow and the \underleftarrow,
\underleftrightarrow commands too, but the rest of frame decorations seem
to work fine.
Thanks for your time,
Maxim
Re: Display Style
On 11/26/2011 05:40 PM, David L. Johnson wrote: On 11/26/2011 05:22 PM, Charles Reichert wrote: Hello All, Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math > Change Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be directly underneath my summation sign...no problem. How can I get two lower limits directly underneath the summation sign, and the same size? Is that possible? I usually put a 1x2 matrix in the subscript, and it works well enough. Make that 2x1 -- David L. Johnson Some people used to claim that, if enough monkeys sat in front of enough typewriters and typed long enough, eventually one of them would reproduce the collected works of Shakespeare. The internet has proven this not to be the case.
Re: Display Style
On 11/26/2011 05:22 PM, Charles Reichert wrote: Hello All, Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math > Change Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be directly underneath my summation sign...no problem. How can I get two lower limits directly underneath the summation sign, and the same size? Is that possible? I usually put a 1x2 matrix in the subscript, and it works well enough. -- David L. Johnson Some people used to claim that, if enough monkeys sat in front of enough typewriters and typed long enough, eventually one of them would reproduce the collected works of Shakespeare. The internet has proven this not to be the case.
Display Style
Hello All, Come across a problem...When I use display style under Edit > Math > Change Limit Types > Display Style, I can get my lower limit to be directly underneath my summation sign...no problem. How can I get two lower limits directly underneath the summation sign, and the same size? Is that possible? Thanks for the help Charles
Re: Colorful boxes for mathematical formulas
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> > Is there some way of boxing mathematical formulas with a red box? I
>> > have tried with \fbox, but getting only black boxes.
>>
>> Any clue?
>
> Preamble:
> \usepackage{xcolor}
>
> Text:
> ERT: \fcolorbox{black}{red}{
> math inset
> ERT: }
Thanks, Paul. It works when the equation is in inline style, but not
when in display style -- an error is generated while producing the pdf
file. Any ideas?
Paul
Re: Lyx Fußnotenproblem
Die Gesellschaft wrote:
> ich gebe einen Sammelband heraus, das Manuskript ist so gut wie fertig
> in KOMA book gesetzt. Ich arbeite mit LYX 2.0.1. Lyx zeigt mir die
> Fußnoten ausschließlich durchgehend an, was bei einem Sammelband mit
> mehreren autoren natürlich keinen Sinn macht. Ich habe mehrere Stunden
> recherchiert, Faq´s gelesen und so weiter, offensichtlich scheint mein
> Problem etwas ungewöhnlich zu sein denn KOMA book soll eingentlich von
> vorneherein bei jedem Kapitel neu zählen. Zumindest gibt es unzählige
> gegensätzliche Requests, wie man denn eine durchgehende
> Fußnotennummerierung erzeugt. Freue mich über Antwort.
KOMA book resets the footnote counter at each chapter. If you do not use
chapter and/or want to rest the counter manually, you can do so by adding
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
at the beginning of each article of your proceedings.
HTH,
Jürgen
Re: Lyx Fußnotenproblem
Am Freitag, 25. November 2011, 18:52:00 schrieb Die Gesellschaft: > Hallo allerseits, > ich gebe einen Sammelband heraus, das Manuskript ist so gut wie fertig > in KOMA book gesetzt. Ich arbeite mit LYX 2.0.1. Lyx zeigt mir die > Fußnoten ausschließlich durchgehend an, was bei einem Sammelband mit > mehreren autoren natürlich keinen Sinn macht. Ich habe mehrere Stunden > recherchiert, Faq´s gelesen und so weiter, offensichtlich scheint mein > Problem etwas ungewöhnlich zu sein denn KOMA book soll eingentlich von > vorneherein bei jedem Kapitel neu zählen. Zumindest gibt es unzählige > gegensätzliche Requests, wie man denn eine durchgehende > Fußnotennummerierung erzeugt. Freue mich über Antwort. > Michael Michael, Wouldn't it be better to use a chapter environment, since the other authors are probably doing the same, before the book chapters are merged? Or are you collecting the chapters for the book? Wolfgang
