On Monday 15 April 2002 14:49, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Look to this page http://www.lyx.org/help/language/hyphen.php
Note at end the section that is called Wrong hyphenation.
I hope this helps,
--
José Abílio
On Monday 15 April 2002 14:49, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Look to this page http://www.lyx.org/help/language/hyphen.php
Note at end the section that is called Wrong hyphenation.
I hope this helps,
--
José Abílio
On Monday 15 April 2002 14:49, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Look to this page http://www.lyx.org/help/language/hyphen.php
Note at end the section that is called "Wrong hyphenation".
I hope this helps,
--
José Abílio
On Monday 08 April 2002 19:07, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Where will I get answers on jadetex ?
There are several places on the net, probably a good place to start is:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/ the docbook faq.
[...]
Two points:
- informaltable also support thead. I
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Not yet :( Please: a CVS update + recompilation is a quite lenghly
process. Dont annouce it before it is OK :(
Ok. :-) I should have said that I have the fix in my tree. I send attached a
patch that fixes it, and it should give you
On Monday 08 April 2002 19:07, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Where will I get answers on jadetex ?
There are several places on the net, probably a good place to start is:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/ the docbook faq.
[...]
Two points:
- informaltable also support thead. I
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Not yet :( Please: a CVS update + recompilation is a quite lenghly
process. Dont annouce it before it is OK :(
Ok. :-) I should have said that I have the fix in my tree. I send attached a
patch that fixes it, and it should give you
On Monday 08 April 2002 19:07, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> Where will I get answers on jadetex ?
There are several places on the net, probably a good place to start is:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/ the docbook faq.
[...]
> Two points:
> - also support . I shouldnt have to
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 09:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not yet :( Please: a CVS update + recompilation is a quite lenghly
> process. Dont annouce it before it is OK :(
Ok. :-) I should have said that I have the fix in my tree. I send attached a
patch that fixes it, and it should give
On Saturday 06 April 2002 16:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Some questions may be too much 'docbook' to be answered here... Does
anybody know a good docbook list ?
DocBook markup - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
docbook applications - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm subscribed to both as is Ben G., and if I know
On Monday 08 April 2002 16:09, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Hum, thanks. I'll see if I have some spare time for this, right now, my
mailbox is a nightmare to manage :(
procmail is a good answer anyway. :-)
Without specifications, I would expect width to addapt to the content
(like html
On Saturday 06 April 2002 16:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Some questions may be too much 'docbook' to be answered here... Does
anybody know a good docbook list ?
DocBook markup - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
docbook applications - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm subscribed to both as is Ben G., and if I know
On Monday 08 April 2002 16:09, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Hum, thanks. I'll see if I have some spare time for this, right now, my
mailbox is a nightmare to manage :(
procmail is a good answer anyway. :-)
Without specifications, I would expect width to addapt to the content
(like html
On Saturday 06 April 2002 16:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some questions may be too much 'docbook' to be answered here... Does
> anybody know a good docbook list ?
DocBook markup -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
docbook applications -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm subscribed to both as is Ben G., and if
On Monday 08 April 2002 16:09, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hum, thanks. I'll see if I have some spare time for this, right now, my
> mailbox is a nightmare to manage :(
procmail is a good answer anyway. :-)
> Without specifications, I would expect width to addapt to the content
> (like
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 22:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your fast reply.
:-)
I think I got something from it. But does it also apply to sect and some
other tags ?
Ok, once more you are right, since they cann't be inside a table, I will
output the correct newline for
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 22:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your fast reply.
:-)
I think I got something from it. But does it also apply to sect and some
other tags ?
Ok, once more you are right, since they cann't be inside a table, I will
output the correct newline for
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 22:02, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your fast reply.
:-)
> I think I got something from it. But does it also apply to and some
> other tags ?
Ok, once more you are right, since they cann't be inside a table, I will
output the correct newline for
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
When I compile doc with anchor, I get an error:
jade:/home/patois/home/patois/work/userdoc/d6.2/d6_2/DataGrid-ConfMngmt-Bui
ldConv.dbook:259:982:E: end tag for element ANCHOR which is not open
I solved the problem with the following
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:17, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Hi Yannick,
(latest CVS devel version)
A few remarks about docbook mode:
- There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it
hard to read when needed (no new line after a /para or even a sectn).
This is
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 18:27, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
- Footnotes are not acknowledged correctly (no 'footnote' in the output
code).
This should be easy to fix. Thanks for the report.
Ok, as I thought, very easy to change. I have the fix in my tree I will
commit
Hi,
I send the fix attached if you want to try it.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/insets/insetfoot.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/insets/insetfoot.C,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -p -r1.45 insetfoot.C
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
When I compile doc with anchor, I get an error:
jade:/home/patois/home/patois/work/userdoc/d6.2/d6_2/DataGrid-ConfMngmt-Bui
ldConv.dbook:259:982:E: end tag for element ANCHOR which is not open
I solved the problem with the following
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:17, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
Hi Yannick,
(latest CVS devel version)
A few remarks about docbook mode:
- There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it
hard to read when needed (no new line after a /para or even a sectn).
This is
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 18:27, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
- Footnotes are not acknowledged correctly (no 'footnote' in the output
code).
This should be easy to fix. Thanks for the report.
Ok, as I thought, very easy to change. I have the fix in my tree I will
commit
Hi,
I send the fix attached if you want to try it.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/insets/insetfoot.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/insets/insetfoot.C,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -p -r1.45 insetfoot.C
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:33, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I compile doc with anchor, I get an error:
> jade:/home/patois/home/patois/work/userdoc/d6.2/d6_2/DataGrid-ConfMngmt-Bui
>ldConv.dbook:259:982:E: end tag for element "ANCHOR" which is not open
>
> I solved the problem with the
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 14:17, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Yannick,
> (latest CVS devel version)
>
> A few remarks about docbook mode:
>
> - There are not enough newline (\n) in the generated sgml, that makes it
> hard to read when needed (no new line after a or even a ).
This is on
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 18:27, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > - Footnotes are not acknowledged correctly (no 'footnote' in the output
> > code).
>
> This should be easy to fix. Thanks for the report.
Ok, as I thought, very easy to change. I have the fix in m
Hi,
I send the fix attached if you want to try it.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/insets/insetfoot.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/insets/insetfoot.C,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -p -r1.45 insetfoot.C
Hi all,
the next LyX meeting will be here in Porto (Portugal), from 13 to 18 of
June. (2002 of course :-)
All LyX users and developers are invited.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
Hi all,
the next LyX meeting will be here in Porto (Portugal), from 13 to 18 of
June. (2002 of course :-)
All LyX users and developers are invited.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
Hi all,
the next LyX meeting will be here in Porto (Portugal), from 13 to 18 of
June. (2002 of course :-)
All LyX users and developers are invited.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 20:59, Robin Turner wrote:
I dream of a super-LyX with it's own TeX-spider which will constantly check
CTAN for packages which it thinks I might find useful and, based on what
I'm trying to do, include whichever one is most important. There again, by
that time, AI
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 20:59, Robin Turner wrote:
I dream of a super-LyX with it's own TeX-spider which will constantly check
CTAN for packages which it thinks I might find useful and, based on what
I'm trying to do, include whichever one is most important. There again, by
that time, AI
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 20:59, Robin Turner wrote:
>
> I dream of a super-LyX with it's own TeX-spider which will constantly check
> CTAN for packages which it thinks I might find useful and, based on what
> I'm trying to do, include whichever one is most important. There again, by
> that time,
On Friday 22 February 2002 09:22, Arnold Christensen wrote:
Yes, I have hacked the linuxdoc function, (see end of mail, it does not
change .ps to .png for HTML though).
That is easy. See the line I modified. You still have to provide the png
figure, but that shouldn't be a problem.
I
On Friday 22 February 2002 09:22, Arnold Christensen wrote:
Yes, I have hacked the linuxdoc function, (see end of mail, it does not
change .ps to .png for HTML though).
That is easy. See the line I modified. You still have to provide the png
figure, but that shouldn't be a problem.
I
On Friday 22 February 2002 09:22, Arnold Christensen wrote:
>
> Yes, I have hacked the linuxdoc function, (see end of mail, it does not
> change .ps to .png for HTML though).
That is easy. See the line I modified. You still have to provide the png
figure, but that shouldn't be a problem.
> I
On Thursday 21 February 2002 12:51, Arnold K. Christensen wrote:
Howdy:
I've recently tried LyX, after using Latex, but I have a some
question's:
I have started to write some documents in LinuxDoc, and by the use of
some sgml woodoo, I am
able to get pictures, images etc. in my documents.
On Thursday 21 February 2002 13:33, Arnold Christensen wrote:
On a line where style is SGML instead of standard, I've wrote the
following, but filename needs to be absolute, or else
Latex can not find it:
figure loc=hereeps file=/path/to/filename/file.ps/figure
somehow caption will not
On Thursday 21 February 2002 12:51, Arnold K. Christensen wrote:
Howdy:
I've recently tried LyX, after using Latex, but I have a some
question's:
I have started to write some documents in LinuxDoc, and by the use of
some sgml woodoo, I am
able to get pictures, images etc. in my documents.
On Thursday 21 February 2002 13:33, Arnold Christensen wrote:
On a line where style is SGML instead of standard, I've wrote the
following, but filename needs to be absolute, or else
Latex can not find it:
figure loc=hereeps file=/path/to/filename/file.ps/figure
somehow caption will not
On Thursday 21 February 2002 12:51, Arnold K. Christensen wrote:
> Howdy:
>
> I've recently tried LyX, after using Latex, but I have a some
> question's:
>
> I have started to write some documents in LinuxDoc, and by the use of
> some sgml woodoo, I am
> able to get pictures, images etc. in my
On Thursday 21 February 2002 13:33, Arnold Christensen wrote:
>
> On a line where "style" is SGML instead of standard, I've wrote the
> following, but filename needs to be absolute, or else
> Latex can not find it:
>
>
>
> somehow caption will not work yet...
Ok, the relevant part in the dtd
On Friday 15 February 2002 12:43, Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to include an image as a footer on all pages?
http://www.lyx.org/help
Search for logo, that applies to both footer and header.
Many thanks
Francesco
--
José Abílio
On Friday 15 February 2002 12:43, Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to include an image as a footer on all pages?
http://www.lyx.org/help
Search for logo, that applies to both footer and header.
Many thanks
Francesco
--
José Abílio
On Friday 15 February 2002 12:43, Francesco Scaglioni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to include an image as a footer on all pages?
http://www.lyx.org/help
Search for logo, that applies to both footer and header.
> Many thanks
>
> Francesco
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:17, Marko Rosic wrote:
On Thursday 14. February 2002. 13:31, Yannick Patois wrote:
I think you problem also occus with a 3 lines document: in this case
you can post it too (if it only occurs in a long one, try to reduce it
to the interesting point if you
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:58, marvin wrote:
marvin writes:
I lost the orginal mail so this is shorter.
Being systematic, I tried ALL the files (15?) in the templates using
open|template.
That probably means that you don't have the support in your computer to
those classes, that
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:40, Jim Osborn wrote:
[...]
I'm currently using LyX 1.1.5fix1.
Can someone give me a hint where to begin?
Try http://www.lyx.org/help/ and there search for logo. There you will find
several tips how to do it.
TIA,
Jim
--
José Abílio
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:07, John O'Gorman wrote:
...
This problem shows up in Lyx v 1.1.5
Could you try with one of the most recent releases?
v 1.1.6fix4
Can anyone suggest a workaround?
As a last resource you could do it using raw latex, but the behaviour that
you described
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:17, Marko Rosic wrote:
On Thursday 14. February 2002. 13:31, Yannick Patois wrote:
I think you problem also occus with a 3 lines document: in this case
you can post it too (if it only occurs in a long one, try to reduce it
to the interesting point if you
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:58, marvin wrote:
marvin writes:
I lost the orginal mail so this is shorter.
Being systematic, I tried ALL the files (15?) in the templates using
open|template.
That probably means that you don't have the support in your computer to
those classes, that
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:40, Jim Osborn wrote:
[...]
I'm currently using LyX 1.1.5fix1.
Can someone give me a hint where to begin?
Try http://www.lyx.org/help/ and there search for logo. There you will find
several tips how to do it.
TIA,
Jim
--
José Abílio
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:07, John O'Gorman wrote:
...
This problem shows up in Lyx v 1.1.5
Could you try with one of the most recent releases?
v 1.1.6fix4
Can anyone suggest a workaround?
As a last resource you could do it using raw latex, but the behaviour that
you described
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:17, Marko Rosic wrote:
> On Thursday 14. February 2002. 13:31, Yannick Patois wrote:
> > I think you problem also occus with a 3 lines document: in this case
> > you can post it too (if it only occurs in a long one, try to reduce it
> > to the interesting point if
On Thursday 14 February 2002 13:58, marvin wrote:
> marvin writes:
> > I lost the orginal mail so this is shorter.
> >
> > Being systematic, I tried ALL the files (15?) in the templates using
> > open|template.
That probably means that you don't have the support in your computer to
those
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:40, Jim Osborn wrote:
[...]
> I'm currently using LyX 1.1.5fix1.
>
> Can someone give me a hint where to begin?
Try http://www.lyx.org/help/ and there search for logo. There you will find
several tips how to do it.
> TIA,
>
> Jim
--
José Abílio
On Friday 15 February 2002 07:07, John O'Gorman wrote:
...
> This problem shows up in Lyx v 1.1.5
Could you try with one of the most recent releases?
v 1.1.6fix4
> Can anyone suggest a workaround?
As a last resource you could do it using raw latex, but the behaviour that
you described
On Thursday 31 January 2002 21:58, Peter Bieringer wrote:
[...]
Current pitfalls:
* left/right quoutes must be converted to normal quotes in SGML (Perl
tool available)
* URL encoding do not handle chars proper, see posting to LyX
maillist yesterday. - has to be fixed manually.
Please
On Thursday 31 January 2002 21:58, Peter Bieringer wrote:
[...]
Current pitfalls:
* left/right quoutes must be converted to normal quotes in SGML (Perl
tool available)
* URL encoding do not handle chars proper, see posting to LyX
maillist yesterday. - has to be fixed manually.
Please
On Thursday 31 January 2002 21:58, Peter Bieringer wrote:
[...]
> Current pitfalls:
>
> * left/right quoutes must be converted to normal quotes in SGML (Perl
> tool available)
>
> * URL encoding do not handle "&" chars proper, see posting to LyX
> maillist yesterday. -> has to be fixed manually.
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff. SGML related.
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
/usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff. SGML related.
On Monday 21 January 2002 21:22, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > On RHL7.2, I assume that this change is to be made to
> > /usr/lib/sgml-tools/linuxdoc-sgml.sty ... ?
Yes it is there where it should be changed, and not on preamble. In the
preamble only goes linuxdoc specific stuff. SGML related.
On Thursday 17 January 2002 17:22, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Holger Warm wrote:
Hi list,
wanted to install lyx1.1.6fix4-1.i386.rpm, but I always get the
following messages;
tetex-xdvi is needed by lyx-1.1.6fix4-1
tetex-latex is needed (...)
Why
On Thursday 17 January 2002 17:22, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Holger Warm wrote:
Hi list,
wanted to install lyx1.1.6fix4-1.i386.rpm, but I always get the
following messages;
tetex-xdvi is needed by lyx-1.1.6fix4-1
tetex-latex is needed (...)
Why
On Thursday 17 January 2002 17:22, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 10:18:30AM +0100, Holger Warm wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > wanted to install lyx1.1.6fix4-1.i386.rpm, but I always get the
> > following messages;
> > tetex-xdvi is needed by lyx-1.1.6fix4-1
> > tetex-latex is needed
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 00:56, Tomer Altman wrote:
[...]
Another issue that frustates me is copy+pasting text into LyX. My
intention was to insert C code in (using LaTeX verbatim command) but
when I tried to simply copy the code from the editor (KDE embedded
editor Advanced Editor), the
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 00:56, Tomer Altman wrote:
[...]
Another issue that frustates me is copy+pasting text into LyX. My
intention was to insert C code in (using LaTeX verbatim command) but
when I tried to simply copy the code from the editor (KDE embedded
editor Advanced Editor), the
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 00:56, Tomer Altman wrote:
[...]
> Another issue that frustates me is copy+pasting text into LyX. My
> intention was to insert C code in (using LaTeX "verbatim" command) but
> when I tried to simply copy the code from the editor (KDE embedded
> editor "Advanced
On Friday 11 January 2002 18:02, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
At 04:22 AM 1/9/2002Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos sez:
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
3) I understand that if the Linuxdoc template would work, (I believe it
did yesterday) then I could create a man
On Monday 14 January 2002 14:51, Remzi Seker wrote:
Trying to install fix 4 from the RPM (Mankrake 8.1), the installation can
not complete because libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed.
How ever... I seem to have libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3, probably more?
$ locate libstdc++-libc6.
On Friday 11 January 2002 18:02, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
At 04:22 AM 1/9/2002Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos sez:
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
3) I understand that if the Linuxdoc template would work, (I believe it
did yesterday) then I could create a man
On Monday 14 January 2002 14:51, Remzi Seker wrote:
Trying to install fix 4 from the RPM (Mankrake 8.1), the installation can
not complete because libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed.
How ever... I seem to have libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3, probably more?
$ locate libstdc++-libc6.
On Friday 11 January 2002 18:02, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
> At 04:22 AM 1/9/2002Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos sez:
> >On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
> > > 3) I understand that if the Linuxdoc template would work, (I believe it
> > > did yesterday) then I could
On Monday 14 January 2002 14:51, Remzi Seker wrote:
> Trying to install fix 4 from the RPM (Mankrake 8.1), the installation can
> not complete because libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 is needed.
> How ever... I seem to have libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3, probably more?
> $ locate libstdc++-libc6.
>
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
I am real new to Lyx. My interest is in its potential for writing Linux
documentation. specifically Howto's and man pages.
I've gotten it installed. Read through the tutorial and spent a bunch of
time using google trying to
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
I am real new to Lyx. My interest is in its potential for writing Linux
documentation. specifically Howto's and man pages.
I've gotten it installed. Read through the tutorial and spent a bunch of
time using google trying to
On Wednesday 09 January 2002 04:22, Paul A. Franz, P.E. wrote:
> I am real new to Lyx. My interest is in its potential for writing Linux
> documentation. specifically Howto's and man pages.
>
> I've gotten it installed. Read through the tutorial and spent a bunch of
> time using google trying to
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:01, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
I got this working by hacking in the Lyx code.
It's true that the current version of Lyx has some bug in this area.
I was told it has been corrected for the next version (maybe already in
CVS ?).
For some months.
I can give
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r on
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:56:50PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
That is correct.
Any chance to fix this for the next 1.1.6fix?
Is 1.1.6fix4 out, I don't remember. Sorry.
If not it should be there.
Andre'
BTW: What
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 14:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What? Where is the fix? You see, I had this secret plan to tag
1.1.6fix4 tomorrow. So if you want a fix in, it has to come pretty quick.
Done.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:01, Yannick Patois wrote:
Hi,
I got this working by hacking in the Lyx code.
It's true that the current version of Lyx has some bug in this area.
I was told it has been corrected for the next version (maybe already in
CVS ?).
For some months.
I can give
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
implemented in Lyx.
For this, you'r on
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:56:50PM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
That is correct.
Any chance to fix this for the next 1.1.6fix?
Is 1.1.6fix4 out, I don't remember. Sorry.
If not it should be there.
Andre'
BTW: What
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 14:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What? Where is the fix? You see, I had this secret plan to tag
1.1.6fix4 tomorrow. So if you want a fix in, it has to come pretty quick.
Done.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:01, Yannick Patois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got this working by hacking in the Lyx code.
> It's true that the current version of Lyx has some bug in this area.
> I was told it has been corrected for the next version (maybe already in
> CVS ?).
For some months.
> I can
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:03, Yannick Patois wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> > The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
> > for that?
>
> I have been told that support for tables in linuxdoc had never been
> implemented in Lyx.
> For this,
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 13:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:56:50PM +0000, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > That is correct.
>
> Any chance to fix this for the next 1.1.6fix?
Is 1.1.6fix4 out, I don't remember. Sorry.
If not it should be
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 14:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What? Where is the fix? You see, I had this secret plan to tag
> 1.1.6fix4 tomorrow. So if you want a fix in, it has to come pretty quick.
Done.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will output a text version of the
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
Mandrake 8mk).
The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will output a text version of the
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:08, Peter J. Braam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a table into a LinuxDoc document (version 1.1.6
> Mandrake 8mk).
> The table doesn't make it into the SGML export. Is there a workaround
> for that?
Not for 1.1.6. For 1.2.0 it will output a text version of
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
appear to work for this
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:31:29PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
I have just started learning about the use of DocBook with LyX (1.1.6fix3
and possibly 1.2 from CVS if I need newer features). One thing I
immediately noticed when composing a DocBook article was the lack of a
bibliography
John, I read the url above. While I don't agree with the premise, perhaps
you could [or someone] explain how to set up mutt to reply to the group.
Usually in mutt one is given the choice.
I've set up mutt to use the group reply and/or reply, however it doesn't
appear to work for this
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 05:31:29PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
I have just started learning about the use of DocBook with LyX (1.1.6fix3
and possibly 1.2 from CVS if I need newer features). One thing I
immediately noticed when composing a DocBook article was the lack of a
bibliography
1 - 100 of 621 matches
Mail list logo
