Boylan, Ross wrote:
> It seems the GUI is just incredibly slow, taking maybe 30 to 60 seconds to
> respond to an event. That includes even trivial operations like clicking
> somewhere and having the cursor appear. In the interim I see continuous
> network activity at about 265KiB/s.
I am usin
Le 26/08/2016 à 22:36, Boylan, Ross a écrit :
I'm surprised; I thought the point of X was to avoid pushing bitmaps around.
Yes, it used to be the case. Nowadays it is a bit different, I think.
JMarc
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 26/08/2016 à 00:30, Boylan, Ross a écrit :
> > It seems the GUI is just incredibly slow, taking maybe 30 to 60
> > seconds to respond to an event. That includes even trivial
> > operations like clicking somewhere and having
Le 26/08/2016 à 00:30, Boylan, Ross a écrit :
It seems the GUI is just incredibly slow, taking maybe 30 to 60
seconds to respond to an event. That includes even trivial
operations like clicking somewhere and having the cursor appear. In
the interim I see continuous network activity at about 265
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:30:44 +
"Boylan, Ross" wrote:
> It seems the GUI is just incredibly slow, taking maybe 30 to 60
> seconds to respond to an event. That includes even trivial
> operations like clicking somewhere and having the cursor appear. In
> the interim I see continuous network ac
It seems the GUI is just incredibly slow, taking maybe 30 to 60 seconds to
respond to an event. That includes even trivial operations like clicking
somewhere and having the cursor appear. In the interim I see continuous
network activity at about 265KiB/s.
Perhaps this is some problem with fo
